Quasi-static experiments on steel plate shear walls reinforced with X-shaped restrainers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101451Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A novel buckling restrained steel plate shear wall with X-shaped restrainers (XSPSW) is proposed.

  • The quasi-static experiment on unstiffened steel plate shear wall (USPSWs) and XSPSWs were conducted.

  • The mechanical properties and energy dissipation capacity of the XSPSW were obtained.

  • The failure mechanism of the XSPSW under a cyclic load was revealed, and the rationality of the XSPSW was verified.

  • The SPSWs with small height-to-thickness ratio of the infill steel plate exhibited relatively stable hysteretic behavior.

Abstract

Steel plate shear walls in this paper consist of X-shaped restrainers, embedded steel plates and boundary restrainers (simply referred to as XSPSW). The XSPSW was constrained by sliding X-shaped restrainers. The embedded steel plate was divided into diagonally arranged square sub-plates with small height-to-thickness ratio by X-shaped restrainers set on two sides of the embedded steel plate. Shear buckling of the plate can effectively be constrained, and the seismic energy dissipation capacity of the SPSW can be increased. Moreover, because the external X-shaped restrainers have characteristics of rapid assembly and high stiffness, they can be reused after a rare earthquake. Four groups of quasi-static experiments on unreinforced steel plate shear walls (USPSWs) and XSPSWs were conducted to obtain their mechanical properties and energy dissipation capacity. The failure mechanism of the XSPSW under cyclic load was revealed, and the rationality of the XSPSW was verified. Experimental results showed that the initial stiffness, load-carrying capacity, and energy dissipation capacity of the XSPSWs were at least 21%, 11%, and 27%, respectively, higher than those of the USPSW. For USPSWs, the embedded steel plate with a small height-to-thickness ratio exhibited relatively stable hysteretic performance. The height-to-thickness ratio of the subplate is the main factor affecting the hysteretic performance of the XSPSW. Meanwhile, the X-shaped restrainers were not damaged during the experiment and could be reused.

Introduction

The steel plate shear wall is an effective lateral-force resisting structural component that was developed in the 1970s. It consist of a embedded steel plate, horizontal and vertical boundary restrainer. SPSWs resist wind, earthquakes, and other lateral loads by forming an inclined tensile field after the shear buckling of the embedded steel plate [[1], [2], [3]]. Berman, through cyclic loading experiments, found that SPSWs exhibited good ductility and seismic behavior [4,5].

In early applications, thicker or welded reinforced steel plates were used to prevent out-of-plane buckling of the embedded steel plate before the shear yield [6]. Since the early 1980s, the ultimate state of the SPSW in the norms of the United States, Canada, and other countries has been the yield of the diagonal tension band formed after the buckling of the embedded steel plate [7,8]. Therefore, a thinner embedded steel plate could be selected to meet the requirements of structural stiffness and load-carrying capacity. Under relatively small shear loads, a embedded steel plate of thin, unreinforced SPSW will produce significant out-of-plane plastic deformation and buckling noise.

To improve the energy dissipation capacity of the SPSWs and the performance of the structure, an approach of setting a stiffener or concrete panel was put forward to restrain the shear buckling of the thin SPSW or to reduce its out-of-plane buckling deformation [[9], [10], [11], [12]]. However, stiffeners welded to steel plates do not provide continuous, stable out-of-plane constraints for the embedded steel plate, and result in additional costs. Moreover, too many stiffeners will affect the deformation performance of the SPSW [9,13]. Placing concrete plates on two sides of an embedded steel plate can effectively restrain buckling and help the steel plate resist horizontal loads through in-plane shear [14], but this approach will significantly increase the weight and construction period of the structure and reduce the load-carrying capacity of the structure suddenly [15].

In order to effectively constraint the shear buckling of the embedded steel plate and improve the energy dissipation capacity and service performance of the SPSWs, the advantages of the rapid industrial production and assembly construction of an all-steel structure should be completely utilise. Thus, a new SPSW reinforced with the X-shaped restrainer and its design method were proposed in the literature [16]. The restrainers improve the seismic performance of the SPSWs effectively by divid the plate into squre sub-plates which have well buckling behavior. The embedded steel plate connect with X-shaped restrainers by the pull bolt, and the underboardings are used to install bolts (Fig. 1(a)).

The X-shaped restrainers consist of steel tubes and connection boxes (Fig. 1(b)), and the diameters of the expanded bolt holes are larger than those of the bolts, to ensure that the bolt rod does not contact with the hole wall during the large earthquake. The restrainers is sliding within a certain range relative to the embedded steel plate. The size of the clearance is the ultimate storey drift angle (1/50) of the height of embedded steel plate under rare earthquakes [17]. Moreover, the external X-shaped restrainers have the characteristics of rapid assembly and high stiffness, so they can be reused after the strong motion.

In this study, a quasi-static method was used to carry out a low-cycle cyclic load experiment on USPSW and XSPSW scale-model specimens. The hysteretic performance and failure modes of the two types of SPSWs were compared, and the working mechanisms and energy dissipation capacities were revealed. The initial stiffness and variation rules of the peak loads of the SPSWs were obtained, and the rationality of the buckling restraint effect of the X-shaped restrainers was verified.

Section snippets

Specimen design and fabrication

Four single-layer and single-span hinged frame specimens were designed. The specimens were squre with a dimension of 1500 mm. To study the hysteretic performance of specimens with different height-to-thickness ratios of the embedded steel plate, two groups of embedded steel plates with thicknesses of 4 mm and 2 mm were selected, and the corresponding height-to-thickness ratios were 375 and 750. The specimen parameters are listed in Table 1.

Note: λ and λsub are the height-to-thickness ratios of

Phenomenon of USPSWs

Fig. 7 and Fig. 8 show the out-of-plane displacement curves and entire failure modes of the USPSWs respectively. The specimen of USPSW1 yielded when the load was ±328 kN, the steel plate evidently buckled and the displacement was 13.7 mm. Before the yield point, the specimens were basically in the elastic stage and the trends of out-of-plane displacement for each measured point were similar, indicating that the specimen occurred low-order single-wave buckling. In the displacement loading stage,

Strain response

The strain development process of the embedded steel plate was measured during the experiment. The strain–load curves, with obvious changes in the embedded steel plate, are shown in Fig. 11 (USPSW) and Fig. 12 (XSPSW). Before USPSW1 yielded, the strains of most measured points were small. In the displacement loading stage, the strains (5, 10, 15, 20, 25) in the principle diagonal region of the loading direction increased rapidly and exceeded the yield strain of the steel, indicating that the

Numerical analysis

The numerical analysis method established in Ref. [19] was used to model the USPSW and XSPSW specimens in the test and applied the same loading protocol, the results are shown in Fig. 21. Due to the relative slip between the specimen and loading frame in the experiment, the hysteretic curves obtained by the numerical analysis are slightly fuller. However, the differentials of their peak load are all smaller than 5%.

When the height-to-thickness ratio of the embedded steel plate (λ) is 200 and

Conclusion

This experimental study examined SPSW specimens under a low-cycle cyclic load. Some of the conclusions drawn are as follows.

  • (1)

    The USPSW was easy to buckle, and was accompanied by significant noise. The elastic-plastic out-of-plane buckling of the embedded steel plate was obvious, and the hysteresis curve was seriously pinched. Moreover, the out-of-plane buckling of the embedded steel plate resulted in a significant reduction in the energy dissipation capacity of the shear walls.

  • (2)

    X-shaped

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Zhenggang Cao: Writing - review & editing. Zhicheng Wang: Writing - original draft. Peng Du: Data curation. Han Liu: Visualization. Feng Fan: Funding acquisition.

Declaration of competing interest

There are no conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. “Quasi-static experiments on steel plate shear walls reinforced with X-shaped restrainers”.

Acknowledgements

This work was conducted with financial support from the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (Project designation: 51878218).

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (11)

  • Numerical investigation of transverse steel damper (TSD) seismic system for suspension bridges considering pounding between girder and towers

    2022, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    Fig. 1 shows a girder-support connection system in which the TSD system controls the transverse horizontal behavior while the sliding bearings support the vertical loads of the suspended superstructure. The developments of TSD in bridges were pursued to a simple and reliable transverse seismic-control system that exhibits superior seismic behavior comparable to mature damper systems employed in buildings [34–36]. The detailed configuration of the TSD is illustrated in Fig. 2.

  • Development of a volumetric compression restrainer for structures subjected to vibration

    2022, Journal of Building Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    As a sample of such works, Dehghani and Tremblay [22] worked to obtain a proper design for the restraining mechanism. Steel plate shear walls consist of X-shaped restrainers have been analyzed through Quasi-static experiments to evaluate their mechanical properties and energy dissipation capacity [23]. The results of the analysis showed that the height-to-thickness ratio is a main factor to affect the performance and a small height-to-thickness ratio exhibited relatively stable hysteretic performance.

  • Mechanical performance of coupled buckling-restrained steel plate shear walls

    2021, Journal of Building Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    Different from conventional composite SPSW [14,15], SPSWs with buckling-restraining concrete panel use concrete panel only to realize buckling restraint, reserved holes on the concrete panel and gaps between the concrete panel and boundary frame elements make the concrete panel relieve from in-plane shear transferring and prevent the crack or failure of the concrete panel. Based on the design criterion of concrete panel buckling-restrained steel plate shear wall, other non-welded and shear-free restrainers made of other materials, such as steel, were all proved to be effective shear wall structures [16–19]. Among these schemes for performance improving of traditional thin steel plate shear wall, buckling-restrained steel plate shear wall, using reinforced concrete panels to restrain the out-of-plane deformation of infill thin steel plate, is one of the most effect structural forms and proved to have higher bearing capacity, larger lateral stiffness, higher energy consuming capacity.

  • A study on mid-panel of steel shear-walls with dual openings

    2021, Journal of Constructional Steel Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    They found that a rigid beam-column connection can improve the performance and the capacity of the walls from 5% to 35%. Cao et al. [7] conducted a set of experiments under quasi static loading on steel shear-walls with X-shaped restraints. They showed that the initial stiffness, capacity, and energy dissipation of reinforced walls are higher respectively by about 21%, 11%, and 27% than unreinforced shear-walls.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text