Skip to main content
Log in

Classification of ischemic and non-ischemic cardiac events in Holter recordings based on the continuous wavelet transform

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Holter recordings are widely used to detect cardiac events that occur transiently, such as ischemic events. Much effort has been made to detect early ischemia, thus preventing myocardial infarction. However, after detection, classification of ischemia has still not been fully solved. The main difficulty relies on the false positives produced because of non-ischemic events, such as changes in the heart rate, the intraventricular conduction or the cardiac electrical axis. In this work, the classification of ischemic and non-ischemic events from the long-term ST database has been improved, using novel spectral parameters based on the continuous wavelet transform (CWT) together with temporal parameters (such as ST level and slope, T wave width and peak, R wave peak, QRS complex width). This was achieved by using a nearest neighbour classifier of six neighbours. Results indicated a sensitivity and specificity of 84.1% and 92.9% between ischemic and non-ischemic events, respectively, resulting a 10% increase of the sensitivity found in the literature. Extracted features based on the CWT applied on the ECG in the frequency band 0.5–4 Hz provided a substantial improvement in classifying ischemic and non-ischemic events, when comparing with the same classifier using only temporal parameters.

In this work it is improved the classification of ischemic and non-ischemic events. The main difficulty of ischemic detectors relies on the false positives produced because of non-ischemic events. After a preprocessing stage, temporal and spectral parameters are extracted from events of the Long Term ST Database. The novel parameters proposed in this work are extracted from the Continuous Wavelet Transform. A nearest Neighbor Classifier is used, obtaining a sensitivity and specificity of 84.1% and 92.9%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ASE :

Axis shift event

CCE :

Conduction change event

CP :

Control period

CWT :

Continuous wavelet transform

ECG :

Electrocardiogram

HRE :

Heart rate event

ISE :

Ischemic event

LTST DB :

Long-term ST database

NISE :

Non-ischemic event

SSE :

Sudden step event

STE :

ST event

TE :

Transient event

References

  1. Addison P (2017) Complex wavelets: the Morlet wavelet. In: The illustrated wavelet transform handbook: introductory theory and applications in science, engineering, medicine and finance, pp 35–45. CRC Press

  2. Amon M, Jager F (2016) Electrocardiogram ST-segment morphology delineation method using orthogonal transformations. PLoS ONE 11(2):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ansari S, Farzaneh N, Duda M, Horan K, Andersson HB, Goldberger ZD, Nallamothu BK, Najarian K (2017) A review of automated methods for detection of myocardial ischemia and infarction using electrocardiogram and electronic health records. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 10:264–298. https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2017.2757953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Badilini F, Moss AJ, Titlebaum EL (1991) Cubic spline baseline estimation in ambulatory ECG recordings for the measurement of ST segment displacements. In: Annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), vol 13, pp 584–585. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.1991.684093

  5. Banerjee S, Mitra M (2012) Cross wavelet transform based analysis of electrocardiogram signals. Int J Elect Electron Comput Eng 1(2):88–92

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cover TM, Hart PE (1967) Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans Inform Theory IT-13(1):21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Demski AJ, Soria ML (2016) ecg-kit a matlab toolbox for cardiovascular signal processing. J Open Res Softw 4:2–5. https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gamero LG, Vila J, Palacios F (2002) Wavelet transform analysis of heart rate variability during myocardial ischaemia. Med Biol Eng Comput 40(1):72–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. García J, Sörnmo L, Olmos S, Laguna P (2000) Automatic detection of ST-T complex changes on the ECG using filtered RMS difference series: application to ambulatory ischemia monitoring. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 47(9):1195–1201. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.867943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberger A, Amaral L, Glass L, Hausdorff J, Ivanov P, Mark R, Mietus J, Moody G, Penk C, Stanley H (2000) PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation 23:e215–e220

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gramatikov B, Brinker J, Yi-chun S, Thakor NV (2000) Wavelet analysis and time-frequency distributions of the body surface ECG before and after angioplasty. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 62:87–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jager F, Moody G, Mark R (1998) Detection of transient ST segment episodes during ambulatory ECG monitoring. Comput Bio Res Int J 31(5):305–22. https://doi.org/10.1006/cbmr.1998.1483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jager F, Taddei A, Moody GB, Emdin M, Antolič G, Dorn R, Smrdel A, Marchesi C, Mark R (2003) Long-term ST database: a reference for the development and evaluation of automated ischaemia detectors and for the study of the dynamics of myocardial ischaemia. Med Biol Eng Comput 41(2):172–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Langley P, Bowers E, Wild J, Drinan M, Allen J, Sims A, Brown N, Murray A (2003) An algorithm to distinguish ischaemic and non-ischaemic ST changes in the holter ECG. Comput Cardiol 30:239–242

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lemire D, Pharand C, Rajaonah JC, Dubé B, Robert Leblanc A (2000) Wavelet time entropy, T wave morphology and myocardial ischemia. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 47(7):967–970. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.846692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Manocha AK, Singh M (2011) An overview of ischemia detection techniques. Int J Sci Eng Res 2(11):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meyer CR, Keiser HN (1977) Electrocardiogram baseline noise estimation and removal using cubic splines and state-space computation techniques. Comput Biomed Res 10(5):459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4809(77)90021-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mincholé A, Jager F, Laguna P (2010) Discrimination between ischemic and artifactual ST segment events in Holter recordings. Biomed Signal Process Control 5(1):21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2009.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moody G, Jager F (2003) Distinguishing ischemic from non-ischemic ST changes: the Physionet/Computers in Cardiology Challenge 2003. Comput Cardiol 2003:235–237. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2003.1291134

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pencina MJ, D’ Agostino RB Sr, D’ Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS (2008) Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond, pp 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim

  21. Smrdel A, Jager F (2004) Automated detection of transient ST-segment episodes in 24 h electrocardiograms. Med Bio Eng Comput 42(3):303–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Taddei A, Distante G, Emdin M, Pisani P, Moody G, Zeelenberg C, Marchesi C (1992) The European ST-T database standard for evaluating systems for the analysis of ST-T changes in ambulatory electrocardiography. Eur Heart J 13:1164–1172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jafe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD (2012) The third universal definition of myocardial infarction - moving forward. Am Heart Assoc 126:2020–2035. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2012.196832

    Google Scholar 

  24. Torrence C, Compo GP (1998) A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79(1):61–78. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0061:APGTWA>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBACyT 20020130100485BA), by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (MINCyT PICT 2145 2016) and by Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (PIP 2014-2016 112-20130100552CO), Argentina.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolina Fernández Biscay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernández Biscay, C., Arini, P.D., Rincón Soler, A.I. et al. Classification of ischemic and non-ischemic cardiac events in Holter recordings based on the continuous wavelet transform. Med Biol Eng Comput 58, 1069–1078 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02134-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02134-8

Keywords

Navigation