Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fluidity and elasticity form a concise set of viscoelastic biomarkers for breast cancer diagnosis based on Kelvin–Voigt fractional derivative modeling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cancer progression involves biomechanical changes within transformed cells and the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM). The viscoelastic features of fluidity and elasticity that are based on a novel Kelvin–Voigt fractional derivative (KVFD) model were found capable of discriminating normal, benign and malignant breast biopsy tissues on the cellular scale. The improved specificity of KVFD model parameters derives from greater accuracy of fitting the entire approaching force-indentation measurement curve (\(R^{2}\) > 0.99) compared with traditional elastic models (\(R^{2}\) < 0.86). Moreover, model parameters can be interpreted in terms of histopathological features. First, statistical comparisons reveal there are significant differences (p < 0.001) in elasticity E0, fluidity \(\alpha\), and viscosity \(\tau\) among healthy, benign, and malignant groups. Malignant breast tissues show low-value, broad-distributions in E0 and with high fluidity \(\alpha\) as compared with healthy and benign tissues. Second, histograms of E0 and \(\alpha\) provide distinctive features by fitting to Gaussian mixture (GM) models. The histograms of E0 and \(\alpha\) are best fit by two kernels GM for malignant tissues, indicating that the cells are soft but with high fluidity and the ECM is stiff but with low fluidity. However, the data suggest one-kernel GM model for benign tissue and a patched uniform distribution for healthy tissue. Third, using fluidity \(\alpha\) as the test statistic, the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) is 0.701 ± 0.012 (p < 0.0001) for control versus malignant and 0.706 ± 0.013 (p < 0.0001) for benign versus malignant group. Variations in tissue fluidity and elasticity offer a concise set of viscoelastic biomarkers that correlate well with histopathological features.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H (1992) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL (eds) Breakthroughs in statistics. Springer series in statistics (perspectives in statistics). Springer, New York, pp 610–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Asgeirsson DO, Oertle P, Loparic M, Plodinec M (2016) The nanomechanical signature of tissues in health and disease. In: Daphne OA, Philipp O, Marko L, Marija P (eds) Nanoscience and nanotechnology for human health. Wiley, New York, pp 209–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayad NME, Kaushik S, Weaver VM (2019) Tissue mechanics, an important regulator of development and disease. Philos Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bissell MJ, Radisky DC, Rizki A, Weaver VM, Peterson OW (2002) The organizing principle: microenvironmental influences in the normal and malignant breast. Differentiation 70(9–10):537–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian RA, Appenzeller T, Oertle P, Raez C, Lim RYH, Forte S, Dellas S, Obermann E, Plodinec M (2017) Nanomechanical profiling of human breast tumors as prognostic marker for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 35:11618

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher DT, Alliston T, Weaver VM (2009) A tense situation: forcing tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 9(2):108–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael B, Babahosseini H, Mahmoodi SN, Agah M (2015) The fractional viscoelastic response of human breast tissue cells. Phys Biol 12:046001

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark RA, Lanigan JM, DellaPelle P, Manseau E, Dvorak HF, Colvin RB (1982) Fibronectin and fibrin provide a provisional matrix for epidermal cell migration during wound reepithelialization. J Invest Dermatol 79:264–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Comoglio PM, Trusolino L (2005) Cancer: the matrix is now in control. Nat Med Nat Med 11:1156–1159

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin MF, Bielenberg DR, Lenormand G, Marinkovic M, Waghorne CG, Zetter BR, Fredberg JJ (2013) Cytoskeletal stiffness, friction, and fluidity of cancer cell lines with different metastatic potential. Clin Exp Metastasis 30:237–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Coussot C, Kalyanam S, Yapp R, Insana MF (2009) Fractional derivative models for ultrasonic characterization of polymer and breast tissue viscoelasticity. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferrelectr Freq Control 56:715–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo XY, Keith B, Karin S, Martin G (2014) The effect of neighboring cells on the stiffness of cancerous and non-cancerous human mammary epithelial cells. New J Phys 16:105002

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100:57–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Jena MK, Janjanam J (2018) Role of extracellular matrix in breast cancer development: a brief update. F1000Research 7:274

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalluri R, Weinberg RA (2009) The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest 119:1420–1428

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessenbrock K, Plaks V, Werb Z (2010) Matrix metalloproteinases: regulators of the tumor microenvironment. Cell 141:52–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Lekka M, Gil D, Pogoda K, Dulińska-Litewka J, Jach R, Gostek J, Klymenko O, Prauzner-Bechcicki S, Stachura Z, Wiltowska-Zuber J, Okoń K, Laidlerb P (2012) Cancer cell detection in tissue sections using AFM. Arch Biochem Biophys 518:151–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelievre SA, Weaver VM, Nickerson JA, Larabell CA, Bhaumik A, Petersen OW, Bissell MJ (1998) Tissue phenotype depends on reciprocal interactions between the extracellular matrix and the structural organization of the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95(25):14711–14716

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Li K, Xu L, Wu DC (2014) Bilayered near-infrared fluorescent nanoparticles based on low molecular weight PEI for tumor-targeted in vivo imaging. J Nanopart Res 16(12):2784

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez JI, Kang I, You WK, McDonald DM, Weaver VM (2011) In situ force mapping of mammary gland transformation. Integr Biol-UK 3:910–921

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran S, Sequist LV, Nagrath S, Ulkus L, Brannigan B, Collura CV, Inserra E, Diederichs S, Iafrate AJ, Bell DW, Digumarthy S, Muzikansky A, Irimia D, Settleman J, Tompkins RG, Lynch TJ, Toner M, Haber DA (2008) Detection of mutations in EGFR in circulating lung-cancer cells. N Engl J Med 359(4):366–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainardi F, Spada G (2011) Creep, relaxation and viscosity properties for basic fractional models in rheology. Eur Phys J Spec Top 193:133–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattice JM, Lau AG, Oyen ML, Kent RW (2006) Spherical indentation load-relaxation of soft biological tissues. J Mater Res 21:2003–2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Mclachlan G, Peel D (2000) Finite mixture models. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson M, Gabriel S, Getz G (2010) Advances in understanding cancer genomes through second-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 11(10):685–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcott JM, Dean IS, Mouw JK, Weaver VM (2018) Feeling stress: the mechanics of cancer progression and aggression. Front Cell Dev Biol 6:17

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyen ML (2015) Nanoindentation of hydrated materials and tissues. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 19:317–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Plodinec M, Loparic M, Monnier CA, Obermann EC, Zanetti-Dallenbach R, Oertle P, Hyotyla JT, Aebi U, Bentires-Alj M, Lim RYH, Schoenenberger CA (2012) Schoenenberger. The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. Nat Nanotechnol 7:757

    Google Scholar 

  • Podlubny I (1998) Mathematics in science and engineering. Elsevier, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramiao NG, Martins PS, Rynkevic R, Fernandes AA, Barroso M, Santos DC (2016) Biomechanical properties of breast tissue, a state-of-the-art review. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 15(5):1307–1323

    Google Scholar 

  • Riethdorf S, Fritsche H, Müller V, Rau T, Schindlbeck C, Rack B, Janni W, Coith C, Beck K, Jänicke F, Jackson S, Gornet T, Cristofanilli M, Pantel K (2007) Detection of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood of patients with metastatic breast cancer: a validation study of the cell search system. Clin Cancer Res 13(3):920–928

    Google Scholar 

  • Rother J, Nöding H, Mey I, Janshoff A (2014) Atomic force microscopy-based microrheology reveals significant differences in the viscoelastic response between malign and benign cell lines. Open Biol 4:140046

    Google Scholar 

  • Soreide K (2009) Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarker research. J Clin Pathol 62:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Stylianou A, Lekka M, Stylianopoulos T (2018) AFM assessing of nanomechanical fingerprints for cancer early diagnosis and classification: from single cell to tissue level. Nanoscale 10:20930–20945

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempany CMC, Mcneil BJ (2001) Advances in biomedical imaging. J Am Med Assoc 285(5):562–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian M, Li Y, Liu W, Jin L, Jiang X, Wang X, Ding Z, Peng Y, Zhou J, Fan J, Cao Y, Wang W, Shi Y (2015) The nanomechanical signature of liver cancer tissues and its molecular origin. Nanoscale 7(30):12998–13010

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung JC, Barnes JM, Desai SR, Sistrunk C, Conklin MW, Schedin P, Eliceiri KW, Keely PJ, Seewaldt VL, Weaver VM (2015) Tumor mechanics and metabolic dysfunction. Free Radic Biol Med 79:269–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolynetz (1979) Algorithm AS139: maximum likelihood estimation in a linear model from confined and censored normal data. J R Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat) 28(2):195–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346749

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu R, Boudreau A, Bissell MJ (2009) Tissue architecture and function: dynamic reciprocity via extra-and intra-cellular matrices. Cancer Metastasis Rev 28:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamauchi M, Barker TH, Gibbons DL, Kurie JM (2018) The fibrotic tumor stroma. J Clin Invest 128:16–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Y, Zhang S, Jia M, Liu Y, Shang J, Guo Y, Xu J, Wu D (2013) Hypoxia-sensitive bis(2-(2′-benzothienyl)pyridinato-N, C(3′))iridium[poly(n-butyl cyanoacrylate]/chitosan nanoparticles and their phosphorescence tumor imaging in vitro and in vivo. Nanoscale 5(24):12633–12644

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HM, Wang Y, Insana MF (2016) Ramp-hold relaxation solutions for the KVFD model applied to soft viscoelastic media. Meas Sci Technol 27:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HM, Zhang Q, Ruan L, Duan J, Wan M, Insana MF (2018) Modeling ramp-hold indentation measurements based on Kelvin–Voigt fractional derivative model. Meas Sci Technol 29:035701

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Xiong G, Trinkle C, Xu R (2014) Integrated extracellular matrix signaling in mammary gland development and breast cancer progression. Histol Histopathol 29:1083

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu HR, Qin D, Wu YS, Jing BW, Liu JJ, Hazlewood D, Zhang HM, Feng Y, Yang XM, Wan MX, Wu DC (2018) Laser-activated bioprobes with high photothermal conversion efficiency for sensitive photoacoustic/ultrasound imaging and photothermal sensing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(35):29251–29259

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Prof. Xin Lv, Dr. Meili Gao and Pathologist Zunzhen Nie for their kind assistance on this work.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Science Fund of China (61871316, 81771854), national key scientific instruments and equipment development project (81827801), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (zdyf2017011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The KVFD method was developed in Department of Bioengineering, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana IL, 61801, USA. The experiment was done in The Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, PR China. The development of the KVFD method and design of the experiment was participated by HZ, MFI and MW. The overall structure of the article was designed by HZ and MFI. The construction of KVFD model, the fitting algorithm of KVFD model and the program implementation of the algorithm are completed by HZ. The collection and preparation of experimental samples were completed by LR. The design and execution of mechanical test experiments, the fitting of experimental data with KVFD model and the statistical analysis of samples were completed by YZ. The pathological diagnosis and grading of the samples and the measurement of the epithelial percentage of the samples were completed by KW. Biological explanations of experimental data and statistical results were completed by HZ, HZ, YW and pathological explanations by YG. The first draft of the manuscript was written by HZ and MFI. All authors commented on the previous version of the manuscript, and MFI reviewed and revised it substantially. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mingxi Wan or Michael F. Insana.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee of the first affiliated hospital of Xi’an JiaoTong University (XJTU1AF2017LSK-46).

Informed consent

An informed consent was given by all patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 22 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 148 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Guo, Y., Zhou, Y. et al. Fluidity and elasticity form a concise set of viscoelastic biomarkers for breast cancer diagnosis based on Kelvin–Voigt fractional derivative modeling. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19, 2163–2177 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01330-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01330-7

Keywords

Navigation