Skip to main content
Log in

Is a One Prognostic Block Sufficient to Proceed with Radiofrequency Ablation? A Single Center Experience

  • Neuropathic Pain (A Abd-Elsayed, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Pain and Headache Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

We performed this study and associated review to examine whether a one prognostic block is sufficient to proceed with radiofrequency ablation.

Recent Findings

To perform one or two prognostic blocks before performing radiofrequency ablation is a very controversial issue. The practice is inconsistent and insurance companies even do not follow same regulations.

Summary

We found in our research that majority of patients who receive a successful first prognostic block also receive a successful second prognostic block. We think one prognostic block can be sufficient to move forward with radiofrequency ablation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Institute of Medicine Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care, and Education. Relieving pain in America, a blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education and research. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dieleman JL, Squires E, Bui AL, Campbell M, Chapin A, Hamavid H, et al. Factors associated with increases in US health care spending, 1996-2013. JAMA. 2017;318:1668–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Manchikanti L, Hirsch JA, Falco FJ, Boswell MV. Management of lumbar zygapophysial (facet) joint pain. World J Orthop. 2016;7:315–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. • Gaskin DJ, Richard P. The economic costs of pain in the United States. J Pain. 2012;13:715–24 A very important study as it discusses the economic burden of pain management.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dawson J, Linsell L, Zondervan K, Rose P, Randall T, Carr A, et al. Epidemiology of hip and knee pain and its impact on overall health status in older adults. Rheumatology. 2004;43:497–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh086.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. • Choi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, Leem JG, Kang YU, Park PH, et al. Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2011;152:481–4877 An important study as it was one of the first to describe one of the most widespread performed RFA procedures.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Iannaccone F, Dixon S, Kaufman A. A review of long-term pain relief after genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation in chronic knee osteoarthritis. Pain Physician. 2017;20:E437–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R, Fortin J, Kine G, Bogduk N. The false-positive rate of uncontrolled diagnostic blocks of the lumbar zygapophysial joints. Pain. 1994;58:195–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Waldman S, Rosenthal R. Pain management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leggett LE, Soril LJ, Lorenzetti DL, Noseworthy T, Steadman R, Tiwana S, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for chronic low back pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Pain Res Manag. 2014;19:e146–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cosman ER Jr, Cosman ER Sr. Electric and thermal field effects in tissue around radiofrequency electrodes. Pain Med. 2005;6:405–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bogduk N. Pulsed radiofrequency. Pain Med. 2006;7:396–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eerd M, Kleef M, Zundert J. Practical management of pain. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Derby R, Melnik I, Lee JE, Lee SH. Cost comparisons of various diagnostic medial branch block protocols and medial branch neurotomy in a private practice setting. Pain Med. 2013;14:378–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Pampati V, Smith HS, Hirsch JA. Analysis of growth of interventional techniques in managing chronic pain in the Medicare population: a 10-year evaluation from 1997 to 2006. Pain Physician. 2009;12:9–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Manchikanti L. The growth of interventional pain management in the new millennium: a critical analysis of utilization in the Medicare population. Pain Physician. 2004;7:465–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R, Fortin J, Kine G, Bogduk N. Clinical features of patients with pain stemming from the lumbar zygapophysial joints. Is the lumbar facet syndrome a clinical entity? Spine. 1994;19:1132–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bogduk N. International Spinal Injection Society guidelines for the performance of spinal injection procedures. Part 1: zygapophysial joint blocks. Clin J Pain. 1997;13:285–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bogduk N. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with facet injections and radiofrequency neurotomy. Spine J. 2008;8:56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. • Cohen SP, Williams KA, Kurihara C, Nguyen C, Shields C, Kim P, et al. Multicenter, randomized, comparative cost-effectiveness study comparing 0, 1, and 2 diagnostic medial branch (facet joint nerve) block treatment paradigms before lumbar facet radiofrequency denervation. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:395–405 An important study as it provides a prospective on performing 2 blocks.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bogduk N, Holmes S. Controlled zygapophysial joint blocks: the travesty of cost-effectiveness. Pain Med. 2000;1:24–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Fee schedule. 2018. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/. Accessed September 10, 2018.

  23. McCormick ZL, Reddy R, Korn M, Dayanim D, Syed RH, Bhave M, et al. A prospective randomized trial of prognostic genicular nerve blocks to determine the predictive value for the outcome of cooled radiofrequency ablation for chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis. Pain Med. 2018;19:1628–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Reddy RD, McCormick ZL, Marshall B, Mattie R, Walega DR. Cooled radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves for knee osteoarthritis pain: a protocol for patient selection and case series. Anesth Pain Med. 2016;6(6):e39696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kornick C, Kramarich SS, Lamer TJ, et al. Complications of lumbar facet radiofrequency denervation. Spine. 2004;29:1352–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alaa Abd-Elsayed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Emily Narel and Michael Loebertman declare no conflict of interest. Dr. Abd-Elsayed is a consultant for Medtronic, Avanos, StimWave, Sollis.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neuropathic Pain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abd-Elsayed, A., Narel, E. & Loebertman, M. Is a One Prognostic Block Sufficient to Proceed with Radiofrequency Ablation? A Single Center Experience. Curr Pain Headache Rep 24, 23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-020-00858-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-020-00858-8

Keywords

Navigation