Characterizing flood risk perception in urban communities of Pakistan
Introduction
Risk perception has become an important research agenda in disaster risk science. It predicts the willingness of exposed communities to undertake precautionary measures against external threats [[1], [2], [3]]. It is also seen as a factor predicting protective actions against natural hazards [4]. With higher risk perception, it is expected that the communities will also increase their capacities by undertaking climate change adaptation and disaster preparedness initiatives. Risk perception shows acceptability of risk and to some extent, predicts the community responses which subsequently helps designing appropriate public education programs and risk communication strategies [5]. Risk perception is also considered as an important component of social vulnerability assessment and community resilience [1]. Consequently, risk perception has become an important constituent of disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation.
Flood is the most common and deadliest natural hazard in the world [6,7]. The frequency and intensity of flood events, especially in the Global South, have increased over the last few decades. There were an estimated 539,811 deaths, 361,974 injuries and 2.8 billion people affected by floods during 1980 and 2009 [6]. Between 1980 and 2016, total direct damages exceeded 1.6 trillion USD [8]. Asia is the worst affected region in the world, accounting for more than 50% of fatalities [6]. It is projected that climate change, extreme rainfall events and sea level rise would increase the flood risk [9,10]. Another reason, and arguably the bigger driver for the rise in flood-related damages, is the increase in population and infrastructure development in floodplains – urban areas are becoming hotspots of disaster risks [11,12]. Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) and UN-HABITAT's New Urban Agenda calls for making cities safe, resilient and inclusive [13,14]. Both the “inclusive” and “resilient” aspects can be achieved by understanding the risk perception (and its determinants) of urban inhabitants.
Pakistan is a developing country in South Asia with a population of almost 207 million [78]. The average GDP growth of the country is 5.5% and ranked 147 on the Human Development Index (HDI) [15]. Its socioeconomic and physical development are focused on large urban areas resulting in disparity in small cities and rural areas [16]. With several basic issues such as health, education, poverty, housing, population growth and economic instability at the centre stage of government priorities, there is little room for disaster management. As a result, disaster management is carried out on an ad-hoc basis, with a top-down and reactive approach [17].
It is believed that climate change could possibly increase the frequency and severity of floods and therefore, it has become essential to assess how communities respond to these events [10,18]. Risk perception may vary spatially depending on exposure, socioeconomic conditions, cultural and religious backgrounds. Literature calls for more empirical testing in various settings for potential new insights and establishment of “well-grounded” theory [19]. In developing countries, especially Pakistan, limited studies have been conducted to examine risk perception and its determinants. Hence, it is imperative to study risk perception and its determinants that can influence communities. The objectives of this study are to: (1) examine the levels of risk perception; (2) determine the socioeconomic factors influencing risk perception; and (3) understand the spatial variability of risk perception in three flood-prone communities (Dhok Ratta, Rawalpindi; Hajipura, Sialkot; and Khangarh, Muzaffargarh) in the province of Punjab, Pakistan. The next section of the paper presents an extended review of literature on risk perception, followed by the description of data and methods employed in this study. The findings on flood hazard exposure and risk perception in the selected communities are discussed in the results section, whereas important implications for policy makers and other stakeholders are presented at the end of this paper.
Section snippets
Revisiting risk perception
The term risk has become an important parameter in disaster risk and climate change science. Actual risk is measured by experts based on hazard, exposure, sensitivities and capacities of communities [10,12]. On the contrary, the perceived risk is based on exposure, past experiences, community/individual understanding and cognitive thinking (the way a potential victim understands the risk) or socio-political factors [20]. Actual risk is often based on statistical probability of hazard
Materials and methods
Three urban areas of varying population sizes, based on their high flood risk classification by the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), Pakistan, were chosen for this study. A questionnaire was developed and household survey was conducted to collect the data for assessing the flood risk perception through an index-based approach. Thereafter, regression analyses were performed to identify the socioeconomic determinants of risk perception in the selected flood prone communities.
Flood hazard exposure in selected communities
Communities in the selected urban areas experienced varying flood hazard and exposure as the main source of flooding was different in each region. Nullah2 Lai passing through the city centre was seen as the flood hazard source in Rawalpindi. Similarly, in Sialkot, Nullah Degh and Nullah Aik were considered flood hazard source in the past. Muzaffargarh and its rural extent have regularly seen riverine flooding, as it lies between Chenab and Indus rivers.
Conclusion
A good understanding of flood risk would influence community's willingness to adopt precautionary measures. Therefore, it is critical that the public must understand flood risk to accept and support DRR and climate change policies. Due to the multidimensional impacts of flood risk, a multi-disciplinary approach must be used to integrate all components of risks, vulnerability and behavioural assessments. Understanding the dynamics of flood risk perception can also help in priority one of Sendai
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References (78)
- et al.
Rethinking the relationship between flood risk perception and flood management
Sci. Total Environ.
(2014) - et al.
People's risk perception in earthquake prone Quetta city of Baluchistan
Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
(2014) - et al.
Risk perception in a multi-hazard environment
World Dev.
(2017) - et al.
Public perception of flood risk in flash flood prone areas of Eastern Mediterranean: the case of Attica Region in Greece
Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
(2018) - et al.
The spatial and temporal dynamics of infrastructure development disparity – from assessment to analyses
Cities
(2017) - et al.
Actual vis-à-vis perceived risk of flood prone urban communities in Pakistan
Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
(2016) - et al.
Hurricane risk perceptions among Florida's single family homeowners
Landsc. Urban Plann.
(2005) - et al.
What influences disaster risk perception? Intervention measures, flood and landslide risk perception of the population living in flood risk areas in Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil
Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
(2017) - et al.
Adolescents' perceived risk and personal experience with natural disasters: an evaluation of cognitive heuristics
Acta Psychol. (Amst).
(1996) The role of social norms in climate adaptation: mediating risk perception and flood insurance purchase
Global Environ. Change
(2013)