A recent trial of distributed peer review for telescope time allocation at the European Southern Observatory echoes the findings of a similar scheme in place at Gemini Observatory since 2015, with both procedures reducing the time invested, financial costs and reviewer burden.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Mervis, J. Science 345, 248–249 (2014).
Merrifield, M. R. & Saari, D. G. Astron. Geophys. 50, 16–20 (2009).
Kerzendorf, W. E., Patat, F., Bordelon, D., van de Ven, G. & Pritchard, T. A. Nat. Astron. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-1038-y (2020).
Mervis, J. Science 344, 1328 (2014).
Mason, R. E. et al. Proc. SPIE 9149, 914910 (2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andersen, M. Easing the burden of peer review. Nat Astron 4, 646–647 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-1101-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-1101-8