Skip to main content
Log in

Classifying changes in LN-18 glial cell morphology: a supervised machine learning approach to analyzing cell microscopy data via FIJI and WEKA

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In cell-based research, the process of visually monitoring cells generates large image datasets that need to be evaluated for quantifiable information in order to track the effectiveness of treatments in vitro. With the traditional, end-point assay-based approach being error-prone, and existing computational approaches being complex, we tested existing machine learning frameworks to find methods that are relatively simple, yet powerful enough to accomplish the goal of analyzing cell microscopy data. This paper details the machine learning pipeline for pixel-based classification and object-based classification. Furthermore, it compares the performances of three classifiers. The classifiers evaluated were the fast-random forest (RF), the sequential minimal optimization (SMO), and the Bayesian network (BN). Images were first preprocessed using smoothing and contrast methods found in FIJI. For pixel-based classification, the preprocessed images were fed into the Trainable Waikato Segmentation (TWS). For object-based classification, training and classification were conducted within the Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA) interface. All classifiers’ performance was evaluated using the WEKA experimental explorer. In terms of performance, the BN had the lowest classification accuracy for both the pixel-based and object-based model. The object-based SMO classifier had the best performance with the lowest mean absolute error of 0.05. The TWS and WEKA interface allows users to easily create and train classifiers for image analysis. However, for analyzing large image datasets, they are not ideal.

Grapical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sommer C, Gerlich DW (2013) Machine learning in cell biology – teaching computers to recognize phenotypes. J Cell Sci 126. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.123604

  2. Baatz M, Arini N, Schäpe A, Binnig G, Linssen B (2006) Object-oriented image analysis for high content screening: detailed quantification of cells and sub cellular structures with the cellenger software. Cytometry Part A:69. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20289

  3. Tarca AL, Carey VJ, Chen X, Romero R, Drăghici S (2007) Machine learning and its applications to biology. PLoS Comput Biol 3. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030116

  4. Arganda-Carreras I, Kaynig V, Rueden C, Eliceiri KW, Schindelin J, Cardona A, Sebastian Seung H (2017) Trainable Weka segmentation: a machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 33. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx180

  5. Sonka M, Hlavac V, Boyle R (1993) Image pre-processing. In: Image Processing, Analysis and Machine Vision. Springer US, Boston

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Chitradevi B, Srimanthi P (2014) An overview on image processing techniques. ISRN Signal Process 2. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/496701

  7. Maini R, Aggarwal H (2009) Study and Comparison of Various Image Edge Detection Techniques. In: International Journal of Image Processing (IJIP)

  8. Pérez-Benito C, Morillas S, Jordán C, Conejero JA (2017) Smoothing vs. sharpening of color images - together or separated. Appl Math Nonlinear Sci. https://doi.org/10.21042/AMNS.2017.1.00025

  9. Singh A, Yadav S, Singh N (2016) Contrast enhancement and brightness preservation using global-local image enhancement techniques. In: 2016 4th International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing, PDGC 2016

  10. Blaschke T, Burnett C, Pekkarinen A (2004) Image segmentation methods for object-based analysis and classification. In: Jong SMD, Meer FDV (eds) Remote Sensing Image Analysis: Including the Spatial Domain, pp.211-236. Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2560-0_12

  11. Yuheng S, Hao Y Image segmentation algorithms overview

  12. Anjna E, Rajandeep Kaur E (2017) Review of image segmsentation technique

  13. Shariff A, Kangas J, Coelho LP, Quinn S, Murphy RF (2010) Automated image analysis for high-content screening and analysis. J Biomol Screen 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057110370894

  14. Kotsiantis SB (2007) Supervised machine learning: a review of classification techniques

  15. Mayo M (2007) Effective classifiers for detecting objects. CIRAS

  16. Bin Othman MF, Yau TMS (2007) Comparison of Different Classification Techniques Using WEKA for Breast Cancer. In: Ibrahim F, Osman NAA, Usman J, Kadri NA (eds) 3rd Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering 2006. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 15. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68017-8_131

  17. Kelner R, Lerner B (2012) Learning Bayesian network classifiers by risk minimization. In: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning

  18. Frank E, Hall M, Holmes G, Kirkby R, Pfahringer B, Witten IH, Trigg L Chapter 1 WEKA a machine learning workbench for data mining

  19. Soille P, Vincent LM (1990) Determining watersheds in digital pictures via flooding simulations. In: Visual Communications and Image Processing '90. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.24211

  20. Paynter G, Trigg L, Kirkby R (2008) Attribute-relation file format (ARFF). In: The University of Waikato. Accessed 4 Nov 2018

  21. Li W, Mao KZ, Zhang H, Chai T (2010) Selection of gabor filters for improved texture feature extraction. In: Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP

  22. Krishan A (2012) Evaluation of Gabor filter parameters for image enhancement and segmentation. In: International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology (IJARCET), Volume 1, Issue 7. ISSN: 2278 – 1323

  23. Bai Y, Guo L, Jin L, Huang Q (2009) A novel feature extraction method using pyramid histogram of orientation gradients for smile recognition. In: Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP

  24. Bouckaert RR, Frank E, Hall M, Kirkby R, Reutemann P, Seewald A, Scuse D (2013) WEKA Manual for Version 3-7-8

  25. Frank E, Hall MA, Witten IH (2016) The WEKA Workbench. Online Appendix for “Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques". Morgan Kaufmann, Fourth Edition

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Timothy Samec for cultivating and imaging the LN-18 cells.

Funding

This research was funded by the Transformative Initiative for Generating Extramural Research (TIGER) grant at Clemson University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Mbiki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mbiki, S., McClendon, J., Alexander-Bryant, A. et al. Classifying changes in LN-18 glial cell morphology: a supervised machine learning approach to analyzing cell microscopy data via FIJI and WEKA. Med Biol Eng Comput 58, 1419–1430 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02177-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02177-x

Keywords

Navigation