Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Numerical and experimental investigation of an efficient convergent–divergent micromixer

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experimental and numerical investigations on the mixing quality of a novel micromixer are conducted. A micromixer made by PDMS is fabricated to evaluate the mixing process in comparison with the numerical simulations. The main purpose of the present paper is to propose an efficient divergence–convergence based macromixer for low-Reynolds-number flows. The effect of inlet velocity (Reynolds number), number of mixing cycles and blockage ratio on the mixing performance of the micromixer is investigated. The results reveal that the mixing efficiency (ME) increases with injection velocity, number of cycles and blockage ratio. For the range of Reynolds number from 9 to 75, the Dean vortices are not formed, however, generation of expansion vortices is the main factor of mixing for Re > 19. It is demonstrated that the value of ME/ΔP (Pa−1) for the micromixer with three, four, five and six mixing cycles is 6.36, 2.23, 0.74, and 0.5, respectively. In addition, the micromixer with the blockage ratio of 0.25 reaches the mixing efficiency of 100%. Relatively high values of ME/ΔP makes the proposed micromixer suitable for practical applications in which the Reynolds number is less than 75.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nguyen N-T, Wu Z (2005) Micromixers—a review. J Micromech Microeng 15:R1–R16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Afzal A, Kim K-Y (2014) Three-objective optimization of a staggered herringbone micromixer. Sens Actuat B Chem 192:350–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chung CK, Shih TR (2007) A rhombic micromixer with asymmetrical flow for enhancing mixing. J Micromech Microeng 17(12):2495–2504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tan H (2019) Numerical study of a bubble driven micromixer based on thermal inkjet technology. Phys Fluid 31:062006

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin Y, Gao C, Gao Y, Wu M, Ahmadian Yazdi A, Xu J (2019) Acoustofluidic micromixer on lab-on-a-foil devices. Sens Actuat B Chem 287:312–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Usefian A, Bayareh M, Shateri A, Taheri N (2019) Numerical study of electro-osmotic micro-mixing of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 41(5):238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Usefian A, Bayareh M (2019) Numerical and experimental study on mixing performance of a novel electro-osmotic micro-mixer. Meccanica 54(8):1149–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Niu X, Lee Y-K (2003) Efficient spatial-temporal chaotic mixing in microchannels. J Micromech Microeng 13:454–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Usefian A, Bayareh M, Ahmadi Nadooshan A (2019) Rapid mixing of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids in a three-dimensional micro-mixer using non-uniform magnetic field. J Heat Mass Transf Res 6(1):55–61

    Google Scholar 

  10. Afzal A, Kim K-Y (2014) Performance evaluation of three types of passive micromixer with convergent–divergent sinusoidal walls. J Mar Sci Technol 22(6):680–686

    Google Scholar 

  11. Izadpanah E, Hekmat MH, Azimi H, Hoseini H, Rabiee MB (2018) Numerical simulation of mixing process in T-shaped and DT-shaped micromixers. Chem Eng Commun 205(3):363–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheri MS, Latifi H, Moghaddam MS, Shahraki H (2013) Simulation and experimental investigation of planar micromixers with short-mixing-length. Chem Eng J 234:247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hessel V, Lowe H, Schonfeld F (2005) Micromixers—a review on passive and active mixing principles. Chem Eng Sci 60:2479–2501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bessoth FG, de Meelo AJ, Manz A (1999) Microstructure for efficient continues flow mixing. Anal Commun 36:213–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Löb P, Drese KS, Hessel V, Hardt S, Hofmann C, Löwe H, Werner B (2004) Steering of liquid mixing speed in interdigital micro mixers–from very fast to deliberately slow mixing. Chem Eng Technol 27(3):340–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hessel V, Hardt S, Löwe H, Schönfeld F (2003) Laminar mixing in different interdigital micromixers: I. Experimental characterization. AIChE J 49(3):566–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hardt S, Schönfeld F (2003) Laminar mixing in different interdigital micromixers: II. Numerical simulations. AIChE J 49(3):578–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hardt S, Dietrich T, Freitag A, Hessel V, Löwe H, Hoffman C, Oroskar A, Schönfeld F, VandenBussche K (2002) In: Rinard I, Hoch B (eds) Sixth international conference on microreaction technology, IMRET 6, vol 164. AIChE Publications, New Orleans, pp 329–344

  19. Hong CC, Choi JW, Ahn CH (2004) A novel in-plane microfluidic mixer with modified tesla structures. Lab Chip 4:109–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu RH, Stremler MA, Sharp KV, Olsen MG, Santiago JG, Adrian RJ, Aref H, Beebe DJ (2000) Passive mixing in a three-dimensional serpentine microchannel. J Microelectromech Syst 9(2):190–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alam A, Afzal A, Kim K-Y (2014) Mixing performance of a planar micromixer with circular obstructions in a curved microchannel. Chem Eng Res Des 92(3):423–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen X, Zhang S, Wu Z, Zheng Y (2019) A novel Koch fractal micromixer with rounding corners structure. Microsyst Technol 25(7):2751–2758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hama B, Mahajan G, Fodor PS, Kaufman M, Kothapalli CR (2018) Evolution of mixing in a microfluidic reverse-staggered herringbone micromixer. Microfluid Nanofluid 22(5):22–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khosravi Parsa M, Hormozi F (2014) Experimental and CFD modeling of fluid mixing in sinusoidal microchannels with different phase shift between side walls. J Micromech Microeng 24(6):065018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mondal B, Mehta SK, Patowari PK, Pati S (2018) Numerical study of mixing in wavy micromixers: comparison between raccoon and serpentine mixer. Chem Eng Process—Process Intensif 136:44–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bayareh M, Nazemi Ashani M, Usefian A (2020) Active and passive micromixers: a comprehensive review. Chem Eng Process-Process Intensif. 147:107771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2019.107771

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

    Azam Usefian & Morteza Bayareh

Authors
  1. Azam Usefian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Morteza Bayareh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morteza Bayareh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Usefian, A., Bayareh, M. Numerical and experimental investigation of an efficient convergent–divergent micromixer. Meccanica 55, 1025–1035 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-020-01142-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-020-01142-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation