Screen-printed carbon based biosensors and their applications in agri-food safety

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2020.115898Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Design and fabrication of screen printed carbon biosensors are discussed.

  • Immobilisation of biorecognition elements and chemical modification of biosensors are described.

  • The performance characteristics of the biosensors for selected analytes are summarised.

  • This review highlights the application of biosensors to agri-food safety.

Abstract

This review focuses on the ways in which screen-printed carbon electrodes have been tailored with different biorecognition elements, including enzymes, antibodies, and aptamers, often with other modifiers, such as mediators and nanoparticles, to produce electrochemical biosensors for a variety of analytes of importance in agri-food safety. Emphasis is placed on the strategies of biosensor fabrication and the performance characteristics of the devices. As well as biosensors for a range of analytes in different agri-food matrices, we have also included reports on novel devices that have potential in agri-food safety but as yet have not been applied in this area.

Introduction

This review explores the fabrication and application of screen-printed biosensors for the analysis of selected species implicated in food safety in the agri-food sector. Screen-printing technology offers a number of advantages for the fabrication of electrochemical biosensors, including fabrication in a wide range of geometries, mass production at low cost, disposability and portability. These attributes are an important consideration in commercialising biosensors and the authors believe that the examples described in this review may be of particular interest to organisations wishing to market devices for agri-food safety.

A comprehensive review by Hughes et al. (2016) highlights the advantages of screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) biosensors for various applications including the agri-food area [1]. The advantages of carbon as an electrode material over other materials such as gold include affordability and versatility of fabrication and customizability with nanomaterials and biological elements due to its high surface area. Carbon is also non-toxic. Jewell et al. (2016) highlights important aspects of scaling up the production of SPCEs such as choice of solvent [2]. A review by Wang et al. (1998) outlines differences in electrochemical properties of four commercially available carbon inks from different vendors. The author concludes that choice of ink should depend on the analyte and electrochemical technique used for measurement [3]. Trojanowicz (2016) also outlines the advantages of SPCE biosensors for a range of applications and reviews a large number of designs; the author states the biggest progression in this technology over the last decade is the inclusion of various nanomaterials [4], a statement which is supported by Yamanaka et al. (2016) [5]. Cinti et al. (2017) outlines the advantages of graphene as a nanomaterial, which are mostly in common with the advantages of carbon as an electrode material [6].

Bio-recognition elements are readily immobilised onto the surface of carbon electrodes using strategies including adsorption, entrapment, cross-linking and covalent bonding. The bio-recognition element is chosen depending on the target analyte which results in highly selective measurements. Simple analytical methods are used in conjunction with the biosensors; typical measurement techniques include amperometry in stirred solution, chronoamperometry and pulse voltammetry. This is an attractive feature for end users of this technology for application in agri-food safety.

This review is broadly divided into 4 sections based on the classes of analyte determined, these are: (i) toxins, antibiotics and microorganisms, (ii) naturally occurring compounds, (iii) pesticides and (iv) metals.

Section snippets

Toxins, antibiotics and microorganisms

A good insight into some of the most important factors and useful generic approaches to utilising antibodies in various sensor formats involving screen-printed carbon surfaces can be found in a recent article by Sharafeldin et al. [7]. The authors compared various immobilisation strategies for antibodies onto screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) arrays, for the resulting antibody coverage, and also antibody activity in capturing the enzyme horseradish peroxidase (HRP). Passive adsorption led

Glucose

In this section, the fabrication methods are discussed in relation to the method of enzyme immobilization. This is summarised in Table 1.

The series of reactions leading to the generation of an amperometric response in the presence of glucose oxidase and a mediator, can generally be described by the following reactions.Glucose + GODOX → Gluconolactone + GODREDGODRED + MediatorOX → GODOX + MediatorREDMediatorRED → MediatorOX + ne

The method in which the enzyme, such as glucose oxidase, is bound

Pesticides

The use of plain SPCEs in relation to the direct determination of organophosphate pesticides (OPs) has largely disappeared from publication [78], which has been dominated by the development of a variety of bio-recognition strategies. An exception to this has been described by Li et al. [79], who discussed the development of a photo-electrochemical assay using SPCEs with nano-sized titania surface modification with ultraviolet photocatalysis. By using differential pulse voltammetry, these

Metals

There is a pressing need for convenient, rapid, cost-effective analytical methods for the measurement of metals in the agri-food sector. This section will describe a selection of novel screen-printed carbon biosensors, demonstrating their advantages in challenging matrices. Table 8 summarizes the performance characteristics of screen-printed carbon biosensors for some important metal ion contaminants. Ingestion of metal ions can be toxic, whilst the literature does not always directly describe

Conclusion

This review has focused on the ways in which SPCEs have been biologically modified with enzymes, antibodies, aptamers and bacteria together with chemical modifications such as organic and organometallic mediators (electrocatalysts), nanoparticles and membranes to further enhance the performance of the biosensors for potential application to agri-food safety.

In this review, we have also described a wide variety of applications in which prototype biosensors, based on SPCEs, were successfully

Funding

AS is a recipient of an AHDB PhD studentship (AHDB reference numbers 61100031 and 51510045).

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom, for supporting our research; we would also like to thank all the researchers whose work has been described in this review. Particular thanks go to Kelly Westmacott and Kevin Honeychurch for their interest.

References (112)

  • A. Rhouati et al.

    Development of an automated flow-based electrochemical aptasensor for on-line detection of ochratoxin A

    Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.

    (2013)
  • R.K. Mishra et al.

    A label-free aptasensor for Ochratoxin AQ detection in cocoa beans: an application to the chocolate industries

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2015)
  • R.K. Mishra et al.

    Sensitive quantitation of Ochratoxin A in cocoa beans using differential pulse voltammetry based aptasensor

    Food Chem.

    (2016)
  • G. Catanante et al.

    Sensitive biosensor based on recombinanat PP1a for microcystin detection

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2015)
  • A.Y. El-Moghazy et al.

    Ultrasensitive label-free electrochemical immunosensor based on PVA-co-PE nanofibrous membrane for the detection of chloramphenicol residues in milk

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2018)
  • F. Conzuelo et al.

    Disposable amperometric magneto-immunosensor for direct detection of tetracyclines antibiotics residues in milk

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2012)
  • F. Conzuelo et al.

    Rapid screening of multiple antibiotic residues in milk using disposable amperometric magnetosensors

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2014)
  • N. Bhardwaj et al.

    Bacteriophage immobilized graphene electrodes for impedimetric sensing of bacteria (Staphylococcus Arletta)

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2016)
  • S.A. Bhakta et al.

    Protein adsorption onto nanomaterials for the development of biosensors and analytical devices: a review

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2015)
  • S. Piermarini et al.

    Real time monitoring of alcoholic fermentation with low-cost amperometric biosensors

    Food Chem.

    (2011)
  • L. Jiang et al.

    A sensitive biosensor based on Os-complex mediator and glucose oxidase for low concentration glucose determination

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (2008)
  • K. Tian et al.

    Amperometric detection of glucose based on immobilizing glucose oxidase on g-C3N4 nanosheets

    Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.

    (2019)
  • Q. Gao et al.

    An amperometric glucose biosensor based on layer-by-layer GOx-SWCNT conjugate/redox polymer multilayer on a screen-printed carbon electrode

    Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.

    (2011)
  • Q. Gao et al.

    A biosensor prepared by co-entrapment of a glucose oxidase and a carbon nanotube within an electrochemically deposited redox polymer multilayer

    Bioelectrochemistry

    (2011)
  • J.S.Y. Chia et al.

    A bio-electrochemical sensing platform for glucose based on irreversible, non-covalent pi-pi functionalization of graphene produced via a novel, green synthesis method

    Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.

    (2015)
  • P. Barathi et al.

    A simple and flexible enzymatic glucose biosensor using chitosan entrapped mesoporous carbon nanocomposite

    Microchem. J.

    (2019)
  • H. Zheng et al.

    Highly selective and stable glucose biosensor based on incorporation of platinum nanoparticles into polyaniline-montmorillonite hybrid composites

    Microchem. J.

    (2020)
  • R.M. Pemberton et al.

    Fabrication of microband glucose biosensors using a screen-printing water-based carbon ink and their application in serum analysis

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2009)
  • R.M. Pemberton et al.

    Application of screen-printed microband biosensors to end-point measurements of glucose and cell numbers in HepG2 cell culture

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2009)
  • R.M. Pemberton et al.

    A screen-printed microband glucose biosensor system for real-time monitoring of toxicity in cell culture

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2011)
  • R.M. Pemberton et al.

    Microfabricated glucose biosensor for culture well operation, Biosens

    Bioelectron

    (2013)
  • J.Y. Chiu et al.

    Glucose sensing electrodes based on a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/Prussian blue bilayer and multi-walled carbon nanotubes

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2009)
  • P. Kanyong et al.

    Development of a sandwich format, amperometric screen-printed uric acid biosensor for urine analysis

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2012)
  • A.C. Pereira et al.

    Amperometric biosensor for lactate based on lactate dehydrogenase and Meldola Blue coimmobilized on multi-wall carbon-nanotube

    Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.

    (2007)
  • T. Alizadeh et al.

    A high performance potentiometric sensor for lactic acid determination based on molecularly imprinted polymer/MWCNTs/PVC nanocomposite film covered carbon rod electrode

    Talanta

    (2019)
  • O.A. Loaiza et al.

    Graphitized carbon nanofiber-Pt nanoparticle hybrids as sensitive tool for preparation of screen printing biosensors. Detection of lactate in wines and ciders

    Bioelectrochemistry

    (2015)
  • R. Antiochia et al.

    A new osmium-polymer modified screen-printed graphene electrode for fructose detection

    Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.

    (2014)
  • P. Nicholas et al.

    Development of a simple, low cost chronoamperometric assay for fructose based on a commercial graphite-nanoparticle modified screen-printed carbon electrode

    Food Chem.

    (2018)
  • U.B. Trivedi et al.

    Amperometric fructose biosensor based on fructose dehydrogenase enzyme

    Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.

    (2009)
  • J.A.A. Ho et al.

    Ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of biotin using electrically addressable site-oriented antibody immobilization approach via aminophenyl boronic acid

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2010)
  • O.D. Renedo et al.

    Recent developments in the field of screen-printed electrodes and their related applications

    Talanta

    (2007)
  • J. Mehta et al.

    Graphene quantum dot modified screen printed immunosensor for the determination of parathion

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2017)
  • E.A. Songa et al.

    Recent approaches to improving selectivity and sensitivity of enzyme-based biosensors for organophosphorus pesticides: a review

    Talanta

    (2016)
  • C.S. Pundir et al.

    Acetylcholinesterase inhibition-based biosensors for pesticide determination: a review

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2012)
  • D. Chen et al.

    Acetylcholinesterase biosensor for chlorpyrifos detection based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes-SnO2-chitosan nanocomposite modified screen-printed electrode

    Int J Electrochem Sci

    (2015)
  • G. Istamboulie et al.

    Screen-printed poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT): a new electrochemical mediator for acetylcholinesterase-based biosensors

    Talanta

    (2010)
  • N. Ben Oujji et al.

    Sol-gel immobilization of acetylcholinesterase for the determination of organophosphate pesticides in olive oil with biosensors

    Food Contr.

    (2013)
  • R.K. Mishra et al.

    Automated flow based biosensor for quantification of binary organophosphates mixture in milk using artificial neural network

    Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.

    (2015)
  • A. Crew et al.

    A screen-printed, amperometric biosensor array incorporated into a novel automated system for the simultaneous determination of organophosphate pesticides

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2011)
  • F. Arduini et al.

    Origami multiple paper-based electrochemical biosensors for pesticide detection

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2019)
  • Cited by (65)

    • Evaluating the status quo of deep eutectic solvent in food chemistry. Potentials and limitations

      2023, Food Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      The importance of biosensing is rising across all industries, including those concerned with medicine, the environment, and food. Biosensors can be viewed as very potent and versatile tools owing to their low cost, integration with compact and portable instrumentation, and ease of use (Smart et al., 2020; Svigelj et al., 2021). Recent DESs application in developing biosensors and their combo with various materials to improve the detecting capabilities of bio-based sensing tools highlight the benefits that DES provides to creating attenuated and environmentally friendly biosensors.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text