Skip to main content
Log in

Physiological and genetic characterization of indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae for potential use in productions of fermented maize-based-beverages

  • Food Microbiology - Research Paper
  • Published:
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been used for many years in the elaboration of food and beverage products, mainly associated with fermentation processes. The objective of this study was to characterize different indigenous S. cerevisiae strains and guide the notable strains for potential use in productions of fermented maize-based beverages. Initially, 81 strains isolated from different spontaneous food fermentations were evaluated. About 31% of strains showed phytase activity, an important characteristic for their application in cereals beverages production. All strains were able to grow in pH values 2.0, 3.0, and 5.0 and the presence of 5, 15, and 30% of glucose, but none could grow at 42 °C. Only 29.6% of the evaluated strains were able to efficiently grow in up to 1.0 mol L−1 of NaCl. The Rep-PCR and RAPD-PCR tools showed that the strains were differently grouped by the two techniques, and the grouping was not completely correlated with isolation source. A total of 65 volatile compounds were identified from the maize beverage produced. The profiles of volatile compounds produced by the strains were strain specific. S. cerevisiae strains isolated from the same source showed different chemical and genetic profiles, emphasize the importance to characterize the performance of each strain when searching for starter culture to develop or improve fermented beverages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mussatto SI, Dragone G, Guimarães PMR, Silva JPA, Cameiro LM, Roberto IC, Vicente A, Domingues L, Teixeira JA (2010) Technological trends, global market and challenges of bio-ethanol production. Biotecnol Adv 28:817–830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beato FB, Bergdahl B, Rosa CA, Foster J, Gombert AK (2016) Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from Brazilian biomes: new insights into biodiversity and industrial applications. FEMS Yeast Res:16

  3. Aidoo KE, Nout MJ, Sarkar PK (2006) Occurrence and function of yeast in Asian indigenous fermented foods. FEMS Yeast Res 6:30–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nout MJR (2009) Rich nutrition from the poorest-cereal fermentations in Africa and Asia. Food Microbiol 26:685–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Poutanen K (2012) Past and future of cereal grains as food for health. Trends Food Sci Technol 25:58–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2017) World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates—WASDE-569 (September 2017)

  7. Chaves-López C, Serio A, Grande-Tovar C, Cuervo-Mullet R, Delgado-Ospina J, Paparella A (2014) Traditional fermented foods and beverages from a microbiological and nutritional perspective: the Colombian heritage. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 13:1031–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwan RF, Ramos CL (2019) Functional beverages from cereals. In: Grumezescu A, Holban A-M (eds) Functional and Medicinal Beverages. 1aed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 351–379

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Ejigui J, Savoie L, Marin J, Desrosiers T (2005) Beneficial changes and drawbacks of a traditional fermentation process on chemical composition and antinutritional factors of yellow maize (Zea mays). J Biol Sci 5:590–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh AK, Rejal J, Kaur A, Jyot G (2015) Enhancement of attributes of cereals by germination and fermentation: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 55:1575–1589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Griffiths DW, Birch ANE, Hillman JR (1998) Antinutritional compounds in the Brassicaceae: analysis, biosynthesis, chemistry and dietary effects. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 73:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tofalo R, Fusco V, Böhnlein C, Kabisch J, Logrieco AF, Habermann D, Cho G-S, Benomar N, Abriouel H, Schmidt-Heydt M, Neve H, Bockelmann W, Franz CMAP (2019) The life and times of yeasts in traditional food fermentations. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 26:1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1677553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Raghavendra P, Halami PM (2009) Screening, selection and characterization of phytic acid degrading lactic acid bacteria from chicken intestine. Int J Food Microbiol 133:129–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ries EF, Macedo GA (2009) Progressive screening of thermostable yeasts for phytase production. Food Sci Biotechnol 18:665–660

    Google Scholar 

  15. Breisha GZ (2010) Production of 16% ethanol from 35% sucrose. Biomass Bioenergy 34:1243–1249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramos CL, Thorsen L, Schwan RF, Jespersen L (2013) Strain-specific probiotics properties of Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus brevis isolates from Brazilian food products. Food Microbiol 36:22–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pereira GVDM, Miguel MGDCP, Ramos CL, Schwan RF (2012) Microbiological and physicochemical characterization of small-scale cocoa fermentations and screening of yeast and bacterial strains to develop a defined starter culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:5395–5405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Versalovic J, Schneider M, de Bruijn F, Lupski JR (1994) Genomic fingerprint of bacteria using repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction. Methods Mol Cell Biol 5:25–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Silva WPK, Multani DS, Deverall BJ, Lyon BR (1995) RFLP and RAPD analyses in the identification and differentiation of isolates of the leaf spot fungus Corynespora cassiicola. Aust J Bot 43:609–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Miguel MGDCP, Santos MRRM, Duarte WF, de Almeida EG, Schwan EF (2012) Physico-chemical and microbiological characterization of corn and rice ‘calugi’ produced by Brazilian Amerindian people. Food Res Int 49:524–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Duarte WF, Dias DR, Oliveira JM, Teixeira JA, Silva JBDA, Schwan RF (2010) Characterization of different fruit wines made from cacao, cupuassu, gabiroba, jaboticaba and umbu. LWT Food Sci Technol 43:1564–1572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ogunremi OR, Banwo K, Sanni AI (2017) Starter-culture to improve the quality of cereal-based fermented foods: trends in selection and application. Curr Opin Food Sci 13:38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hellström AM, Vazques-Juárez R, Svanberg U, Andlid TA (2010) Biodiversity and phytase capacity of yeasts isolated from Tanzanian togwa. Int J Food Microbiol 136:352–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Attfield PV (1997) Stress tolerance: the key to effective strains of industrial baker’s yeast. Nat Biotechnol 15:1351–1357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rep M, Krantz M, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S (2000) The transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to osmotic shock. J Biol Chem 275:8290–8300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fleet GH (2008) Wine yeasts for the future. FEMS Yeast Res 8:979–995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Crauwels S, Zhu B, Steensels J, Busschaert P, Samblanx GD, Marchal K, Willems KA, Verstrepen KJ, Lievens B (2014) Assessing genetic diversity among Brettanomyces yeasts by DNA fingerprinting and whole-genome sequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:4398–4413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nielsen DS, Teniola OD, Ban-Koffi L, Owusu M, Andersson TS, Holzapfel WH (2007) The microbiology of Ghanaian cocoa fermentations analysed using culture dependent and culture independent methods. Int J Food Microbiol 114:168–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Visintin S, Alessandria V, Valente A, Dolci P, Cocolin L (2016) Molecular identification and physiological characterization of yeasts, lactic acid bacteria and acetic acid bacteria isolated from heap and box cocoa bean fermentations in West Africa. Int J Food Microbiol 4:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Santos CCAA, Almeida EG, Melo GVP, Schwan RF (2012) Microbiological and physicochemical characterisation of caxiri, an alcoholic beverage produced by the indigenous Juruna people of Brazil. Int J Food Microbiol 156:112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Brasil. (2009) DECRETO N° 6.871, DE 4 DE JUNHO DE 2009. Regulamenta a Lei no 8.918, de 14 de julho de 1994, que dispõe sobre a padronização, a classificação, o registro, a inspeção, a produção e a fiscalização de bebidas. Legislação Bebidas. Presidência da República. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato20072010/2009/Decreto/D6871.htm2010/2009/Decreto/D6871.htm./ (web archive link, 20 February 2018). (Accessed 20.02.2018)

  32. Walker GM, Stewart GG (2016) Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the production of fermented beverages. Beverages 2:30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Blandino A, Al-Aseeri M, Pandiella S, Cantero D, Webb C (2003) Cereal-based fermented foods and beverages. Food Res Int 36:527–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Roger T, Léopold TN, Funtong MM (2015) Nutritional properties and antinutritional factors of corn paste (Kutukutu) fermented by different strains of lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Sci 2015:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Freire AL, Ramos CL, Schwan RF (2017) Effect of symbiotic interaction between a fructooligosaccharide and probiotic on the kinetic fermentation and chemical profile of maize blended rice beverages. Food Res Int 100:698–707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Longo MA, Sanromán MA (2006) Production of food aroma compounds. Food Technol Biotechnol 44:335–353

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Frauendorfer F, Schieberle P (2008) Changes in key aroma compounds of Criollo cocoa beans during roasting. J Agric Food Chem 56:10244–10251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Luna F, Crouzillat D, Cirou L, Bucheli P (2002) Chemical composition and flavor of Ecuadorian cocoa liquor. J Agric Food Chem 50:3527–3532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hagedorn S, Kaphammer B (1994) Microbial biocatalysis in the generation of flavor and fragrance chemicals. Annu Rev Microbiol 48:773–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Funding

The authors received financial support from the Brazilian agencies Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Brasil (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JV analyzed and interpreted the data and writing of the manuscript. LV, CR, and RS contributed to the orientation and writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosane Freitas Schwan.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Gisele Monteiro.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 44 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Almeida Silva Vilela, J., de Figueiredo Vilela, L., Ramos, C.L. et al. Physiological and genetic characterization of indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae for potential use in productions of fermented maize-based-beverages. Braz J Microbiol 51, 1297–1307 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-020-00271-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-020-00271-8

Keywords

Navigation