Skip to main content
Log in

Valorization of olive mill wastewater towards the production of L-asparaginases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of several lignocellulosic and other organic wastes has been considered in literature for the production of L-asparaginases (L-ASNase); however, the use of olive mill wastewater (OMWW) has never been contemplated as culture media. OMWW is a widely available waste in the Mediterranean that needs to be treated due to its high pollutant load. In this work, OMWW is used to feed the strain Bacillus aryabhattai Ba03, which reduces the content in phenolic compounds and produces L-ASNase. A water dilution of OMWW to 25% (w/w) supplemented with 10 g/L of yeast extract at pH 8, incubated with the strain at 30 °C, was suitable for the production of 11.6 ± 0.3 U/mL extracellular L-ASNase after 2 days. In addition, the decrease of phenolic compounds together with the production of L-ASNase could be associated with the generation of aspartic acid and the expression of peroxidase activity. At the end of the bioprocess, salicylic acid was identified in the culture supernatant, assuming that chorismate metabolic pathway was followed by B. aryabhattai Ba03.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Foscolou A, Critselis E, Panagiotakos D (2018) Olive oil consumption and human health: a narrative review. Maturitas 118:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. IOI International Olive Council. http://www.internationaloliveoil.org/. Accessed 28 Nov 2019

  3. Arvanitoyannis IS, Kassaveti A, Stefanatos S (2007) Olive oil waste treatment: a comparative and critical presentation of methods, advantages & disadvantages. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 47:187–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390600695300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sousa DA, Costa AI, Alexandre MR, Prata JV (2019) How an environmental issue could turn into useful high-valued products: the olive mill wastewater case. Sci Total Environ 647:1097–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Romero-García JM, Niño L, Martínez-Patiño C, Álvarez C, Castro E, Negro MJ (2014) Biorefinery based on olive biomass. State of the art and future trends. Bioresour Technol 159:421–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Galanakis CM (2017) Olive mill waste: recent advances for sustainable management. Elsevier

  7. Dourou M, Kancelista A, Juszczyk P et al (2016) Bioconversion of olive mill wastewater into high-added value products. J Clean Prod 139:957–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vaidya V, Carota E, Calonzi D, Petruccioli M, D'Annibale A (2019) Production of lignin-modifying enzymes by Trametes ochracea on high-molecular weight fraction of olive mill wastewater, a byproduct of olive oil biorefinery. New Biotechnol 50:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2019.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jallouli R, Bezzine S (2016) Lipase production by a Tunisian Fusarium solani strain cultivated on olive oil wastewater-based media and a biotreatment assay. Desalin Water Treat 57:20327–20331. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1111809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Malvis A, Hodaifa G, Halioui M, Seyedsalehi M, Sánchez S (2019) Integrated process for olive oil mill wastewater treatment and its revalorization through the generation of high added value algal biomass. Water Res 151:332–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.12.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alsafadi D, Al-Mashaqbeh O (2017) A one-stage cultivation process for the production of poly-3-(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) from olive mill wastewater by Haloferax mediterranei. New Biotechnol 34:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2016.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lopes AM, de Oliveira-Nascimento L, Ribeiro A et al (2017) Therapeutic l-asparaginase: upstream, downstream and beyond. Crit Rev Biotechnol 37:82–99. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2015.1120705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu F, Oruna-Concha M-J, Elmore JS (2016) The use of asparaginase to reduce acrylamide levels in cooked food. Food Chem 210:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shakambari G, Ashokkumar B, Varalakshmi P (2019) L-asparaginase – a promising biocatalyst for industrial and clinical applications. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 17:213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.11.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cachumba JJM, Antunes FAF, Peres GFD, Brumano LP, Santos JC, da Silva SS (2016) Current applications and different approaches for microbial L-asparaginase production. Braz J Microbiol 47:77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2016.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Singh Y, Srivastava K (2013) Statistical and evolutionary optimization for enhanced production of an antileukemic enzyme, L-asparaginase, in a protease-deficient Bacillus aryabhattai ITBHU02 isolated from the soil contaminated with hospital waste. Indian J Exp Biol 51:322–335

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–428. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Costa-Trigo I, Otero-Penedo P, Outeiriño D, Paz A, Domínguez JM (2019) Valorization of chestnut (Castanea sativa) residues: characterization of different materials and optimization of the acid-hydrolysis of chestnut burrs for the elaboration of culture broths. Waste Manag 87:472–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tien M, Kirk TK (1988) Lignin peroxidase of Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Methods Enzymol 161:238–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(88)61025-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Black GW, Brown NL, Perry JJB, Randall PD et al (2015) A high-throughput screening method for determining the substrate scope of nitrilases. ChemComm 51:2660. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc06021k

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li X, Zhang X, Xu S, Zhang H, Xu M, Yang T, Wang L, Qian H, Zhang H, Fang H, Osire T, Rao Z, Yang S (2018) Simultaneous cell disruption and semi-quantitative activity assays for high-throughput screening of thermostable L-asparaginases. Sci Rep 8:7915. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26241-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferrara MA, Bonomo Severino NM, Valente RH et al (2010) High-yield extraction of periplasmic asparaginase produced by recombinant Pichia pastoris harbouring the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ASP3 gene. Enzym Microb Technol 47:71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2010.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh Y, Srivastava SK (2014) Performance improvement of Bacillus aryabhattai ITBHU02 for high-throughput production of a tumor-inhibitory L-asparaginase using a kinetic model based approach. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 89:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Paz A, Carballo J, Pérez MJ, Domínguez JM (2016) Bacillus aryabhattai BA03: a novel approach to the production of natural value-added compounds. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 32:. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2113-5

  25. Makky EA, Chun Loh Y, Karim MR (2014) Purification and partial characterization of a low molecular weight L-asparaginase produced from corn cob waste. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 3:265–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2014.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shakambari G, Sameer Kumar R, Ashokkumar B, Varalakshmi P (2017) Agro waste utilization for cost-effective production of L -asparaginase by Pseudomonas plecoglossicida RS1 with anticancer and acrylamide mitigation potential. ACS Omega 2:8108–8117. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Makky EA, Ali MJ (2017) Microbial fermentation biotechnology of cooked chicken bone novel substrate for L-asparaginase production. Karbala Int J Mod Sci 3:202–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kijoms.2017.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Paz A, Costa-Trigo I, Tugores F, Míguez M, Montaña J, Domínguez JM (2019) Biotransformation of phenolic compounds by Bacillus aryabhattai. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 42:1671–1679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-019-02163-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Galanakis CM (2018) Phenols recovered from olive mill wastewater as additives in meat products. Trends Food Sci Technol 79:98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoshida T, Sugano Y (2015) A structural and functional perspective of DyP-type peroxidase family. Arch Biochem Biophys 574:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2015.01.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Noda S, Shirai T, Oyama S, Kondo A (2016) Metabolic design of a platform Escherichia coli strain producing various chorismate derivatives. Metab Eng 33:119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2015.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang J, Shen X, Rey J, Yuan Q, Yan Y (2017) Recent advances in microbial production of aromatic natural products and their derivatives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8599-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee JH, Wendisch VF (2017) Biotechnological production of aromatic compounds of the extended shikimate pathway from renewable biomass. J Biotechnol 257:211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kallscheuer N, Marienhagen J (2018) Corynebacterium glutamicum as platform for the production of hydroxybenzoic acids. Microb Cell Factories 17:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-018-0923-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu L, Li W, Li X, Sun X, Yuan Q (2019) Constructing an efficient salicylate biosynthesis platform by Escherichia coli chromosome integration. J Biotechnol 298:5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shrivastava A, Khan AA, Khurshid M et al (2016) Recent developments in L-asparaginase discovery and its potential as anticancer agent. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 100:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lanvers-Kaminsky C (2017) Asparaginase pharmacology: challenges still to be faced. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 79:439–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3236-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Binod P, Sindhu R, Madhavan A, Abraham A, Mathew AK, Beevi US, Sukumaran RK, Singh SP, Pandey A (2017) Recent developments in L-glutaminase production and applications – an overview. Bioresour Technol 245:1766–1774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Professor George Zervakis for providing the olive mill wastewater, and to the “Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria” of Xunta de Galicia (Spain) for the postdoctoral fellowship of Alicia Pérez Paz (ED481B2018/073). Professor Nikolaos Thomaidis and his research group TrAMS are acknowledged for providing the LC-MS analysis of olive mill wastewater.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evangelos Topakas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paz, A., Nikolaivits, E. & Topakas, E. Valorization of olive mill wastewater towards the production of L-asparaginases. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 11, 539–546 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00725-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00725-x

Keywords

Navigation