Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling time-dependent aggregate traffic in 5G networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Future wireless networks like 5G will carry an increasingly wide variety of data traffic, with different QoS requirements. In addition to conventional data traffic generated from HTTP, FTP and video streaming applications by mobile broadband users [human-type communication (HTC)], traffic from machine-to-machine (M2M) and Internet-of-Things (IoT) applications [machine-type communication (MTC)] has to be supported by 5G networks. Time-of-day variation in arrival rate of connection-level requests and randomness in length of data sessions in HTC result in randomness in aggregate traffic. In MTC, randomness in traffic arises from random number of devices trying to connect to the base station at any given time. Traffic generated by MTC devices may be either periodic or event-triggered. Nevertheless, it is difficult to model aggregate traffic due to non-stationary nature of traffic generated by each type of service. In this paper, special correlation functions of stochastic point processes called Product Densities (PDs) are used for estimating aggregate traffic under non-stationary arrival rates. For HTC, PDs are defined for estimating time-dependent offered load of connection-level service requests and expected number of ON periods in an interval of time \((0,T)\). The aggregate traffic is evaluated for light-tail (exponential) and heavy-tail (hyper exponential) servicing times. For MTC, PDs are defined for estimating the random number of devices connected to the base station at any time. Another QoS parameter of interest in high speed networks is the expected number of service requests/devices delayed beyond a critical value of delay. Bi-variate PD is defined to estimate the number of service requests/devices delayed beyond a given critical threshold. The results from PD model show close agreement with simulation results. The proposed PD technique proves effective in performance analysis under time-dependent traffic conditions, and is versatile for application to several studies in wireless networks including power consumption, interference and handover performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elayoubi, S.-E., Fallgren, M., Spapis, P., Zimmermann, G., Martin-Sacristán, D., Yang, C., et al. (2016). 5G service requirements and operational use cases: Analysis and METIS II vision. In European conference on networks and communications (EuCNC). https://doi.org/10.1109/EuCNC.2016.7561024.

  2. 3GPP TR-37.868 V0.6.2. (2014). Study on RAN improvements for machine-type communications.

  3. UMTS Forum. (2003). 3G offered traffic characteristics report.

  4. Cox, D. R. (1955). Some statistical methods connected with series of events. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 17, 129–164.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fischer, W., & Meier-Hellstern, K. (1993). The Markov-modulated Poisson process (MMPP) cookbook. Performance Evaluation, 18(2), 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eick, S. G., Massey, W. A., & Whitt, W. (1993). \(M_t/G/\infty \) queues with sinusoidal arrival rates. Management Science, 39(2), 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eick, S. G., Massey, W. A., & Whitt, W. (1993). The physics of the \(M_t/G/\infty \) queue. Operations Research, 41(4), 731–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Massey, W. A. (2002). The analysis of queues with time-varying rates for telecommunication models. Telecommunication Systems, 21(2–4), 173–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duffield, N. G., Massey, W. A., & Whitt, W. (2001). A nonstationary offered load model for packet networks. Telecommunication Systems, 13(3/4), 271–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Whitt, W. (2013). Offered load analysis for staffing. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 15(2), 166–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuraya, K., Masuyama, H., Kasahara, S., & Takahashi, Y. (2009). Decentralized user information management systems for peer-to-peer communication networks: An approach by nonstationary peer-population process. Ubiquitous Computing and Communication Journal, CSNDSP2008, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuraya, K., Masuyama, H., & Kasahara, S. (2011). Load distribution performance of super-node based peer-to-peer communication networks: A nonstationary Markov chain approach. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 1(4), 593–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hampshire, R. C., & Massey, W. A. (2010). Dynamic optimization with applications to dynamic rate queues. In Tutorials in operations research INFORMS (pp. 208–247).

  14. Ellis, P. M. (2010). The Time-dependent mean and variance of the non-stationary Markovian infinite server system. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 6(1), 68–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xie, Yi, Yu, Shun-zheng, Tang, Shensheng, & Huang, Xiangnong. (2011). A two-layer hidden markov model for the arrival process of web traffic. In Proceedings of IEEE 19th annual international symposium on modeling, analysis, and simulation of computer and telecommunication systems (pp. 469–471).

  16. Xie, Y., Hu, J., Xiang, Y., Yu, S., Tang, S., & Wang, Y. (2013). Modeling oscillation behavior of network traffic by nested hidden Markov model with variable state-duration. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 24(9), 1807–1817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwarz, J. A., Selinka, G., & Stolletz, R. (2016). Performance analysis of time-dependent queuing systems: Survey and classification. Omega, 63, 170–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.10.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Newell, G. F. (1971). Applications of queueing theory. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mandelbaum, A., Massey, W. A., Reiman, M. I., Stolyar, A., & Rider, B. (2002). Queue lengths and waiting times for multiserver queues with abandonment and retrials. Telecommunication Systems, 21(2–4), 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Carofiglio, G., Cagetto, M., Leonardi, E., Tarello, A., & Ajmone Marsan, M. (2007). Beyond fluid models: Modelling TCP mice in IP networks under non-stationary random traffic. Computer Networks, 51(1), 114–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, K., Tipper, D., Qian, Y., Krishnamurthy, P., & Tipmongkonsilp, S. (2014). Time-varying performance analysis of multihop wireless networks with CBR traffic. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 63(7), 3397–3409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Whitt, W. (2006). Staffing a call center with uncertain arrival rate and absenteeism. Production and Operations Management, 15(1), 88–102.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, Y., & Whitt, W. (2012). The \( G_t/GI/s_t+ GI\) many-server fluid queue. Queueing Systems, 71, 405–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Whitt, W. (2016). Heavy-traffic fluid limits for periodic infinite-server queues. Queueing Systems, 84, 111–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shafiq, M. Z., Ji, L., Liu, A. X., Pang, J., & Wang, J. (2012). A first look at cellular machine-to-machine traffic—Large scale measurement and characterization. In Proceedings of ACM sigmetrics (pp. 65–76).

  26. de Andrade, T. P. C., Astudillo, C. A., & da Fonseca, N. L. S. (2015). Impact of M2M traffic on Human-type communication users on the LTE uplink channel. In Proceedings of 7th IEEE Latin-American conference on communications (pp. 1–6).

  27. Li, R., Zhao, Z., Zhou, X., Palicot, J., & Zhang, H. (2014). The prediction analysis of cellular radio access network traffic: From entropy theory to networking practice. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52, 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Naboulsi, D., Fiore, M., Ribot, S., & Stanica, R. (2016). Large-scale mobile traffic analysis: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 18(1), 124–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, S., Yin, D., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, W. (2015). Computing on base station behavior using erlang measurement and call detail record. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 3(3), 444–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mobile Data Forecasting Tools and Methodology to Improve Accuracy and Optimize Profit. (2011). Alcatel Lucent Strategic White Paper. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a6bf/c95e8cb991e1186e22aed0e1fedf1770201f.pdf. Retrieved October 12 2018.

  31. Shi, H., & Li, Y. (2018). Discovering periodic patterns for large scale mobile traffic data: Method and applications. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 17(10), 2266–2278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chiaraviglio, L., Amorosi, L., Blefari-Melazzi, N., Dell’Olmo, P., Shojafar, M., & Salsano, S. (2019). Optimal management of reusable functional blocks in 5G superfluid networks. International Journal of Network Management, 29, e2045. https://doi.org/10.1002/nem.2045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Srinivasan, S. K., & Iyer, K. S. S. (1966). Random processes associated with random points on a line. Zastosowania Matematicae (Applications Mathematicae), VIII, 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ramakrishnan, A. (1950). Stochastic processes relating to particles distributed in a continuous infinity of states. Proceedings of Cambridge Philosophical Society, 46, 595–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bartlett, M. S. (1966). An introduction to stochastic processes with special reference to methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Iyer, K. S. S., & Saksena, V. N. (1970). A stochastic model on the growth of cells in cancer. Biometrics, 26(3), 401–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Agrawal, H., Ruchi, D., Iyer, K. S. S., & Chetlapalli, V. (2019). An improved energy efficient system for IoT enabled precision agriculture. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01359-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Srinivasan, S. K., & Vijayakumar, A. (2003). Point processes and product densities. Chennai: Narosa Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Iversen, V. B. (2006). Teletraffic engineering handbook. ITU-D SG 2/16 & ITC.

  40. ITU-R M.2083-0 (2015). IMT vision—Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2020 and Beyond. ITU, February 2015.

  41. Schulz, P., Matthe, M., Klessig, H., Simsek, M., Fettweis, G., Ansari, J., et al. (2017). Latency critical IoT applications in 5G: Perspective on the design of radio interface and network architecture. IEEE Communications Magazine, 5(2), 70–78. February 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. ITU-R M.2410-0. (2017). Minimum requirements related to technical performance for IMT-2020 radio interface(s). ITU, November 2017.

  43. IEEE 802.16m Evaluation Methodology Document (EMD), 2008.

  44. ITU-R M.2370-0. (2015). IMT traffic estimates for the years 2020 to 2030. ITU, July 2015.

  45. De Pessemier, T., Stevens, I., De Marez, L., Martens, L., & Joseph, W. (2016). Quality assessment and usage behavior of a mobile voice-over-IP service. Telecommunication Systems, 61(3), 417–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vijayalakshmi Chetlapalli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chetlapalli, V., Iyer, K.S.S. & Agrawal, H. Modelling time-dependent aggregate traffic in 5G networks. Telecommun Syst 73, 557–575 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-019-00629-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-019-00629-w

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation