Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:01:40.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The amphibamiform Nanobamus macrorhinus from the early Permian of Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2019

Bryan M. Gee
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Robert R. Reisz
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada International Centre of Future Science, Dinosaur Evolution Research Center, Jilin University, Changchun, China

Abstract

Nanobamus macrorhinus Schoch and Milner, 2014 is a small amphibamiform temnospondyl from the early Permian Arroyo Formation of Texas. It is most readily characterized by an elongate and partially subdivided naris. This condition is superficially reminiscent of that seen in the coeval trematopids, the group to which N. macrorhinus was originally referred to under an interpretation of the holotype as a larval form. This was discounted by later workers, but the amphibamiform affinities of the specimen were not formalized until recently. The specimen has never been described in the context of its amphibamiform affinities and remains poorly characterized, never having been sampled in a phylogenetic analysis. Here we present a complete, updated osteological description of N. macrorhinus, including an improved characterization of its unique mosaic of plesiomorphic and apomorphic features and clarification of the taxon's autapomorphies. Our analysis of the taxon's phylogenetic position within Amphibamiformes shows that N. macrorhinus was recovered as diverging after basal amphibamiforms, e.g., the micropholids, and before derived amphibamiforms, e.g., the amphibamids. This is supported by the unique mixture of retained plesiomorphies, e.g., nonforeshortened postparietals and an oval choana, and apomorphies, e.g., a narrow interorbital region and slender palatal rami of the pterygoid. These results reflect the complexity of terrestrial amphibamiform diversity and provide further insight into the evolutionary history of the lissamphibian stem in terrestrial environments.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2019, The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J.S., and Bolt, J.R., 2013, New information on amphibamids (Tetrapoda, Temnospondyli) from Richards Spur (Fort Sill), Oklahoma: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 33, p. 553567, doi:10.1080/02724634.2013.726676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J.S., Henrici, A.C., Sumida, S.S., Martens, T., and Berman, D.S., 2008a, Georgenthalia clavinasica, a new genus and species of dissorophoid temnospondyl from the early Permian of Germany, and the relationships of the family Amphibamidae: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 28, p. 6175, doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2008)28[61:GCANGA]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J.S., Reisz, R.R., Scott, D., Fröbisch, N.B. and Sumida, S.S., 2008b, A stem batrachian from the early Permian of Texas and the origin of frogs and salamanders: Nature, v. 453, p. 515518, doi:10.1038/nature06865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolt, J.R., 1969, Lissamphibian origins: Possible protolissamphibian from the lower Permian of Oklahoma: Science, v. 166, p. 888891, doi:10.1126/science.166.3907.888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolt, J.R., 1977, Dissorophoid relationships and ontogeny, and the origin of the Lissamphibia. Journal of Paleontology, v. 51, p. 235249.Google Scholar
Bolt, J.R., 1979, Amphibamus grandiceps as a juvenile dissorophoid: Evidence and implications, in Nitecki, M.H., ed., Mazon Creek Fossils: New York, Academic Press, p. 529563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourget, H., and Anderson, J.S., 2011, A new amphibamid (Temnospondyli: Dissorophoidea) from the early Permian of Texas: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 31, p. 3249, doi:10.1080/02724634.2011.539652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boy, J.A., 1985, Über Micropholis, den letzten Überlebenden der Dissorophoidea (Amphibia, Temnospondyli; Unter-Trias): Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, v. 1985, p. 2945.Google Scholar
Boy, J.A., 1986, Studien über die Branchiosauridae (Amphibia: Temnospondyli) 1: Neue und wenig bekannte Arten aus dem mitteleuropäischen Rotligenden (?oberstes Karbon bis unteres Perm): Palaeontologische Zeitschrift, v. 60., p. 131166, doi:10.1007/BF02989427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boy, J.A., and Sues, H.-D., 2000, Branchiosaurs: Larvae, metamorphosis and heterochrony in temnospondyls and seymouriamorphs, in Heatwole, H., and Carroll, R.L., eds., Amphibian Biology, Volume 4, Palaeontology: Chipping Norton, Surrey Beatty and Sons, p. 11501197.Google Scholar
Case, E.C., 1910, New or little known reptiles and amphibians from the Permian (?) of Texas: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 28, p. 163181.Google Scholar
Clack, J.A., and Milner, A.R., 2010 (for year 2009), Morphology and systematics of the Pennsylvanian amphibian Platyrhinops lyelli (Amphibia: Temnospondyli): Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, v. 100, p. 275295, doi:10.1017/S1755691010009023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausing, A., and Boy, J.A., 2000, Lamination and primary production in fossil lakes: Relationship to palaeoclimate in the Carboniferous-Permian transition: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, v. 181, p. 516, doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.181.01.02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1865, On Amphibamus grandiceps, a new Batrachian from the Coal Measures: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 17, p. 134137.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D., 1882, Third contribution to the history of the Vertebrata of the Permian formation of Texas: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, v. 20, p. 447461.Google Scholar
Daly, E., 1994, The Amphibamidae (Amphibia: Temnospondyli), with a description of a new genus from the Upper Pennsylvanian of Kansas: The University of Kansas, Miscellaneous Publications, v. 85, p. 159.Google Scholar
Dilkes, D.W., 1990, A new trematopsid amphibian (Temnospondyli: Dissorophoidea) from the lower Permian of Texas: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 10, p. 222243, doi:10.1080/02724634.1990.10011809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilkes, D.W., 1991, Reinterpretation of a larval dissorophoid amphibian from the lower Permian of Texas: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 28, p. 14881492, doi:10.1139/e91-130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilkes, D.W., 1993, Biology and evolution of the nasal region in trematopid amphibians: Palaeontology, v. 36, p. 839839.Google Scholar
Fröbisch, N.B., and Reisz, R.R., 2008, A new lower Permian amphibamid (Dissorophoidea, Temnospondyli) from the fissure fill deposits near Richards Spur, Oklahoma: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 28, p. 10151030, doi:10.1671/0272-4634-28.4.1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fröbisch, N.B., and Schoch, R.R., 2009a, Testing the impact of miniaturization on phylogeny: Paleozoic dissorophoid amphibians: Systematic Biology, v. 58, p. 312327, doi:10.1093/sysbio/syp029.Google ScholarPubMed
Fröbisch, N.B., and Schoch, R.R., 2009b, The largest specimen of Apateon and the life history pathway of neoteny in the Paleozoic temnospondyl family Branchiosauridae: Fossil Record, v. 12, p. 8390, doi:10.1002/mmng.200800012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, B.M., Bevitt, J.J., and Reisz, R.R., 2019, A juvenile specimen of the trematopid Acheloma from Richards Spur, Oklahoma and challenges of trematopid ontogeny: Frontiers in Earth Science, v. 7, p. 38, doi:10.3389/feart.2019.00038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, A.P., Lucas, S.G., and Berman, D.S., 1996, A new amphibamid (Amphibia: Temnospondyli) from the Late Pennsylvanian (middle Stephanian) of central New Mexico, USA: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 70, p. 555565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocker, A.K., Pardo, J.D., and Small, B.J., 2007, Plemmyradytes shintoni, gen. et sp. nov., an early Permian amphibamid (Temnospondyli: Dissorophoidea) from the Eskridge Formation, Nebraska: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 27, p. 316328, doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2007)27[316:PSGESN]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, T.H., 1859, On some amphibian and reptilian remains from South Africa and Australia: Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, v. 15, p. 642649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddin, H.C., Fröbisch, N.B., Evans, D.C., and Milner, A.R., 2013, Reappraisal of the early Permian amphibamid Tersomius texensis and some referred material: Comptes Rendus Palevol, v. 12, p. 447461, doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2013.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, H. von., 1844, Briefliche Mittheilung an Prof. Bronn: Neues Jahrbuch für Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefaktenkunde, v. 1844, p. 329340.Google Scholar
Milner, A.R., 2018, Two primitive trematopid amphibians (Temnospondyli, Dissorophoidea) from the upper Carboniferous of the Czech Republic: Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, v. 109, p. 201223, doi:10.1017/S1755691018000725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moodie, R.L., 1909, A contribution to a monograph of the extinct Amphibia of North America: New forms from the Carboniferous: Journal of Geology, v. 17, p. 3882, doi:10.1086/621585.Google Scholar
Olson, E.C., 1941, The family Trematopsidae: The Journal of Geology, v. 49, p. 149176, doi:10.1086/624952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, E.C., 1970, New and little known genera and species of vertebrates from the lower Permian of Oklahoma: Fieldiana: Geology, v. 18, p. 359434.Google Scholar
Olson, E.C., 1985, A larval specimen of a trematopsid (Amphibia: Temnospondyli): Journal of Paleontology, v. 59, p. 11731180.Google Scholar
Pardo, J.D., Small, B.J., and Huttenlocker, A.K., 2017, Stem caecilian from the Triassic of Colorado sheds light on the origins of Lissamphibia: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 114, p. E5389E5395, doi:10.1073/pnas.1706752114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pardo, J.D., Small, B.J., Milner, A.R., and Huttenlocker, A.K., 2019. Carboniferous–Permian climate change constrained early land vertebrate radiations: Nature Ecology & Evolution, v. 3, p. 200206, doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0776-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchez, S., Steyer, J.S., Schoch, R.R., and De Ricqlès, A., 2010, Palaeoecological and palaeoenvironmental influences revealed by long-bone palaeohistology: The example of the Permian branchiosaurid Apateon: Geological Society London, Special Publications, v. 339, p. 139149, doi:10.1144/SP339.12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoch, R.R., 2002, The evolution of metamorphosis in temnospondyls: Lethaia, v. 35, p. 309327, doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.2002.tb00091.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoch, R.R., 2014, First evidence of the branchiosaurid temnospondyl Leptorophus in the early Permian of the Saar-Nahe Basin (SW Germany): Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie-Abhandlungen, v. 272, p. 225236, doi:10.1127/0077-7749/2014/0401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoch, R.R., 2019, Data from: The putative lissamphibian stem-group: Phylogeny and evolution of the dissorophoid temnospondyls [Journal of Paleontology, v. 93, p. 137156, doi:10.1017/jpa.2018.67]: Dryad Digital Repository, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1n1p0b5.2.Google Scholar
Schoch, R.R., and Fröbisch, N., 2006, Metamorphosis and neoteny: Alternative pathways in an extinct amphibian clade: Evolution, v. 60, p. 14671475, doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01225.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoch, R.R., and Milner, A.R., 2008, The intrarelationships and evolutionary history of the temnospondyl family Branchiosauridae: Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 6, p. 409431, doi:10.1017/S1477201908002460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoch, R.R., and Milner, A.R., 2014. Handbook of Paleoherpetology, Part 3A2, Temnospondyli I: Munich, Germany, Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, 150 p.Google Scholar
Schoch, R.R., and Rubidge, B.S., 2005, The amphibamid Micropholis from the Lystrosaurus assemblage zone of South Africa: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 25, p. 502522, doi:10.1671/0727-4634(2005)025[0502:TAMFTL]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönfeld, G., 1911, Branchiosaurus tener Schönfeld: Ein neuer Stegocephale aus dem Rotliegenden des nordwestlichen Sachsen: Stizungs-Berichte und Abhandlugnen der Naturwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft Isis, Dresden, v. 1911, p. 1943.Google Scholar
Sigurdsen, T., and Bolt, J.R., 2010, The lower Permian amphibamid Doleserpeton (Temnospondyli: Dissorophoidea), the interrelationships of amphibamids, and the origin of modern amphibians: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 30, p. 13601377, doi:10.1080/02724634.2010.501445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simões, T.R., Caldwell, M.W., Palci, A., and Nydam, R.L., 2017, Giant taxon-character matrices: Quality of character constructions remains critical regardless of size: Cladistics, v. 33, p. 198219, doi:10.1111/cla.12163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, M.C., 1934, The amphibian fauna from the South Joggins, Nova Scotia: Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, v. 1934, p. 465504, doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1934.tb01644.x.Google Scholar
Steen, M.C., 1938, On the fossil Amphibia from the Gas Coal of Nyrany and other deposits of Czechoslovakia: Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, v. 108, p. 205283, doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1938.tb00027.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swofford, D.L., 2002, PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods) ver. 4.0.B5: University of Florida, http://paup.phylosolutions.com/.Google Scholar
Vaughn, P.P., 1969, Further evidence of a close relationship of the trematopsid and dissorophid labyrinthodont amphibians with a description of a new genus and a new species: Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, v. 68, p. 121130.Google Scholar
Werneburg, R., 2012, Dissorophoide Amphibien aus dem Westphalian D (Ober-Karbon) von Nýřany in Böhmen (Tschechische Republik)—der Schlüssel zum Verständnis der frühen ‘Branchiosaurier’: Semana, v. 27, p. 350.Google Scholar
Wyman, J., 1858, On some remains of batrachian reptiles discovered in the coal formation of Ohio, by Dr. J.S. Newberry and C.M. Wheatley: American Journal of Science, v. 25, p. 158163.Google Scholar