Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating YouTube videos for young children

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

YouTube has become a popular digital media platform used by young children. However, concerns have been raised around inappropriate video content and limited quality. A lack of research and theoretical discussion exists on how best to evaluate the quality of YouTube videos made for children. In this study, we reviewed research and developed a set of design principles that informed the production of a YouTube video rubric used to evaluate the quality of YouTube videos targeted at young children 0 to 8 years old. From this, four key criteria were used to evaluate each video: Age appropriateness, Content quality, Design features and Learning objectives. These criteria demonstrated substantial inter-rater reliability between scorers. This evaluation tool has the potential to be used by educators to assess the quality of videos for early learning and guide YouTube creators in their production of educational videos for young children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessandri, S. M. (1992). Effects of maternal work status in single-parent families on children's perception of self and family and school achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54(3), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(92)90028-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. R., & Pempek, T. A. (2005). Television and very young children. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(5), 505–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204271506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. R., Lorch, E. P., Field, D. E., & Sanders, J. (1981). The effects of TV program comprehensibility on preschool children's visual attention to television. Child Development, 52(1), 151–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, R. (2010). Transfer of learning between 2D and 3D sources during infancy: Informing theory and practice. Developmental Review, 30, 128–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baydar, N., Kağitçibaşi, Ç., Küntay, A. C., & Gökşen, F. (2008). Effects of an educational television program on preschoolers: Variability in benefits. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(5), 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B. J., & Huesmann, L. R. (2006). Short-term and long-term effects of violent media on aggression in children and adults. Archives Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 160(4), 348–352. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.160.4.348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, C. (2010). YouTube as a participatory culture. New Directions for Youth Development, 128, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, A. M., Anderson, D. R., Wilder, A., Williams, M., & Santomero, A. (1999). Effects of repeated exposures to a single episode of the television program Blue's clues on the viewing behaviors and comprehension of preschool children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 630–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, C., Given, L. M., Danby, S., & Thorpe, K. (2014). Talk about a YouTube video in preschool: The mutual production of shared understanding for learning with digital technology. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(3), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911403900310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., Signorielli, N., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 43–67). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herodotou, C. (2017a). Young children and tablets: A systematic review of effects on learning and development. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(1), 1–9.

  • Herodotou, C. (2017b). Mobile games and science learning: A comparative study of 4 and 5 years old playing the game angry birds. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12546.

  • Hillman, M., & Marshall, J. (2009). Evaluation of digital media for emergent literacy. Computers in the Schools, 26, 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560903360186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston, A. C., Wright, J. C., Rice, M. L., Kerkman, D., & St Peters, M. (1990). Development of television viewing patterns in early childhood: A longitudinal investigation. Developmental Psychology, 26(3), 409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izci, B; Jones, I; Ozdemir, T; Alktebi, L & Bakır, E. (2019). Youtube and young children: Research, concerns, and new directions. In Edited book: Children, families and technology in today's society: What challenges? Which paths? Chapter 7 81–92. Publisher: Lisbon School of Education.

  • Jones, T., & Cuthrell, K. (2011). YouTube: Educational potentials and pitfalls. Computers in the Schools, 28, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2011.553149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. L. (2017). Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on youtube? Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostyrka-Allchorne, K., Cooper, N. R., & Simpson, A. (2017). The relationship between television exposure and children’s cognition and behaviour: A systematic review. Developmental Review, 44, 19–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, A. S., Li, H., & Boguszewski, K. (2015). Television and children's executive function. Advances in Child Development and Behaviour, 48, 219–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linebarger, D. L., & Walker, D. (2005). Infants’ and toddlers’ television viewing and language outcomes. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(5), 624–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J. (2016). ‘Unboxing’ videos: Co-construction of the child as cyberflâneur. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37, 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1041457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J., Law, L., Lahmar, J., Yamada-Rice, D., Parry, B., Scott, F., Robinson, P., Nutbrown, B., Scholey, E., Baldi, P., McKeown, K., Swanson, A., & Bardill, R. (2019). Social media, television and children. Sheffield: University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. The American Psychologist, 63(8), 760–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. L., & Kocurek, C. A. (2017). Principles for educational game development for young children. Journal of Children and Media, 11(3), 314–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2017.1308398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • More, C. M., & Travers, J. C. (2013). What's app with that? Selecting educational apps for young children with disabilities. Young Exceptional Children, 16, 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250612464763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moussiades, L., Kazanidis, I., & Iliopoulou, A. (2019). A framework for the development of educational video: An empirical approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56, 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1399809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naigles, L., & Mayeux, L. (2001). Television as incidental language teacher. In D. Singer & J. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 135–152). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, M. M. (2015). Young children and screen time: Creating a mindful approach to digital technology. Australian Educational Computing, 30(2). Retrieved from http://journal.acce.edu.au/index.php/AEC/article/view/67.

  • Neumann, M. M. (2017). Parent scaffolding of young children’s use of touch screen tablets. Early Child Development and Care, 188(12), 1654–1664. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1278215.

  • Neumann, M. M., Wang, Y., Xi, G., & Neumann, D. L. (2019). An evaluation of mandarin learning apps designed for English speaking pre-schoolers. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 30(2), 167–193.

  • Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2006). Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: A comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, Media and Technology, 31, 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadamou, K., Papasavva, A., Zannettou, S., Blackburn, J., Kourtellis, N., Leontiadis, I., Stringhini, G., & Sirivianos, M. (2019). Disturbed YouTube for kids: Characterizing and detecting inappropriate videos targeting young children. Computer Science: Social and Information Networks. Retrieved online from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.07046.pdf

  • Pempek, T. A., Demers, L. B., Hanson, K. G., Kirkorian, H. L., & Anderson, D. R. (2011). The impact of infant-directed videos on parent–child interaction. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plowman, L., McPake, J., & Stephen, C. (2010). The technologisation of childhood? Young children and technology in the home. Children and Society, 24(1), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rideout, V. (2017). The common sense census: Media use by kids age zero to eight. San Francisco: Common Sense Media https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rideout, V., & Robb, M. B. (2019). The Common Sense census: Media use by tweens and teens, 2019. San Francisco: Common Sense Media https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/uploads/research/2019-census-8-to-18-key-findings-updated.pdf.

  • Shoufan, A. (2019). Estimating the cognitive value of YouTube's educational videos: A learning analytics approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 450–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strasburger, V. C., Wilson, B. J., & Jordan, A. B. (2009). Children, adolescents, and the media (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Hove, P., & van der Meij, H. (2015). Like it or not. What characterizes YouTube's more popular instructional videos? Technical Communication, 62(1), 48–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. M. (2005). Comparing theories of child development (6th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M. (2001). Television and the child’s developing imagination. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 121–134). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, K. K., Kruse, N. B., Messenger, S. J., & Letain, M. (2018). Children’s clapping games on the virtual playground. International Journal of Music Education, 36(4), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761418772865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. C., St Peters, M., & Huston, A. C. (1990). Family television use and its relation to children’s cognitive skills and social behaviour. In J. Bryant (Ed.), Television and the American family (pp. 227–251). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, F. J., & Christakis, D. A. (2007). Associations between content types of early media exposure and subsequent attentional problems. Pediatrics, 120(5), 986–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle M. Neumann.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neumann, M.M., Herodotou, C. Evaluating YouTube videos for young children. Educ Inf Technol 25, 4459–4475 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10183-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10183-7

Keywords

Navigation