Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of coding and robotic education on pre-school children’s skills of scientific process

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was carried out with the aim of determining the effect of robotic coding education on pre-school children’s skills of scientific process. Study group consisted of 30 children aged five who studied in an independent kindergarten connected to Ministry of National Education in Refahiye district of Erzincan province in the first semester of 2017–2018 academic year and 15 of them were in the experiment group and other 15 of them were included in the control group. In the study, experimental design with pre-test, post-test and control groups was used. “Scale for Preschool Students’ Basic Skills” developed by Aydogdu and Karakus (Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 10 (1), 49-72, 2017) was applied to both experiment and control group before and after the education. After applying the pre-test to the students in the experiment group, “Coding and Robotic Education Program”, which consisted of 16 sessions, was also applied to them during eight weeks, two days a week and an hour a day. No programs were applied to the control group and they continued their education in their own programs. No programs were applied to the control group and they continued their education in their own programs. As a result of the study it was found that the post-test scores of the children in the experiment group were significantly higher than their pre-test scores. It was determined that there was no significant difference between the posttest scores and the pre-test scores of the control group. To sum up, it can be claimed that the robotic coding education, which was applied to preschool children, developed the children’s skills of scientific process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aydogdu, B., & Karakus, F. (2017). Okulöncesi öğrencilerinin temel becerileri: bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 10(1), 49–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bers, M. (2008). Blocks to robots :Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

  • Bozkurt, O. (2012). Fen eğitiminde araştırmaya dayalı öğrenme yaklaşımının öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına ve bilimsel süreç becerilerine etkisi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(18), 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buyukozturk, Ş., Cakmak, E. K., Akgun, O. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 1–360.

  • Chesloff, J. D. (2013). Stem education must start in early childhood. Education Week, 32(23), 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebelt, K. R. (2012). The effects of a robotics program on students skills in STEM, problem solving and teamwork. Bozeman: Professional paper Montana State University.

  • Elkin, M., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2016). Programming with the KIBO robotics kit in preschool classrooms. Journal Computers in the Schools: Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 33(3), 170–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers & Education, 63, 87–97.

  • García-Peñalvo, F. J., Reimann, D., Tuul, M., Rees, A., & Jormanainen, I. (2016). An overview of the most relevant literature on coding and computational thinking with emphasis on the relevant issues for teachers. Belgium: TACCLE3 Consortium.

  • Geist, E. (2016). Robots, programming and coding, oh my! Childhood Education, 92(4), 298–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goncu, A., Cetin, İ., & Top, E. (2018). Öğretmen adaylarının kodlama eğitimine yönelik görüşleri: Bir durum çalışması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 48, 85–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2008). Using spss for windows and macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S., Pea, R., & Cooper, S. (2015). Designing for deeper learning in a blended computer science course for middle school students. Computer Science Education, 25(2), 199–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, P. H., Friedman, B., Perez-Granados, D. R., & Freier, N. G. (2006). Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 405–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalelioglu, F., & Gulbahar, Y. (2014). The effects of teaching programming via scratch on problem solving skills: A discussion from learners’ perspective. Informatics in Education, 13(1), 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanaki, K., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2018). Introducing fundamental object-oriented programming concepts in preschool education within the context of physical science courses. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2673–2698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplancali, U. T., & Demirkol, Z. (2017). Teaching coding to children: A methodology for kids 5+. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(4), 32–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazakoff, E., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Licciardello, O., Mauceri, M., & Marco, G. (2016). Use of information and communication technologies improves healthy and unhealthy elderly people’s quality of life – the key role of the training setting. World Journal on Educational Technology, 8(1), 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, C. G., Bridgers, S., Griffiths, T. L., & Gopnik, A. (2014). When children are better (or at least more open-minded) learners than adults: Developmental differences in learning the forms of causal relationships. Cognition, 131(2), 284–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moomaw, S., & Davis, J. A. (2010). STEM comes to preschool. YC Young Children, 65(5), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odacı, M. M., & Uzun, E. (2017). Okul Öncesinde Kodlama Eğitimi ve Kullanılabilecek Araçlar Hakkında Bilişim Teknolojileri Öğretmenlerinin Görüşleri: Bir Durum Çalışması. 1. Uluslararası Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Sempozyumu, İnönü Üniversitesi, 718-725.

  • Oluk, A., Korkmaz, O., & Oluk, H. (2018). Scratch’ın 5. Sınıf öğrencilerinin algoritma geliştirme ve bilgi-işlemsel düşünme becerilerine etkisi. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 9(1), 54–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozbey, T. (2018). Okul Öncesi Dönemde Kodlama Eğitimi Ve Kodlama Araçları. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Dış Ticaret Ensitüsü: Tartışma Metinleri.

  • Peel, S., & Prinsloo, F. (2001). Neuro- integration movements workshop: Module 1. South Africa: Brain Gym Edu-K (Educational Kinesiology).

  • Riskowski, J. L., Todd, C. D., Wee, B., Dark, M., & Harbor, J. (2009). Exploring the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary water resources engineering module in an eighth grade science course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayın, Z., & Seferoglu, S. S. (2016). Yeni bir 21. yüzyıl becerisi olarak kodlama eğitimi ve kodlamanın eğitim politikalarına etkisi. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı, 3-5 Şubat 2016.

  • Siahaan, P., Suryani, A., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., & Samsudin, A. (2017). Improving students’ science process skills through simple computer simulations on linear motion conceptions. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 812, No. 1, p. 012017). IOP Publishing.

  • Stoeckelmayr, K., Tesar, M., & Hofmann, A. (2011, September). Kindergarten children programming robots: A first attempt. In Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Robotics in Education (RIE).

  • Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2016). Robotics in the early childhood classroom: Learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A., Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The wheels on the bot go round and round: Robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 12, 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagci, C. (2019). Kodlama Eğitiminin İlkokul Öğrencileri Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Afyon.

  • Tunc, Y. & Yavas Kıncal, R. (2018). Okul Öncesİnde Kodlamanın Önemİ ve Kodlama Eğİtİmlerİnde Kullanılan Araç ve Uygulamaların İncelenmesİ (s.97-98). II. Uluslararası Multidispliner Çalışmaları Kongresi, 4th −5 th May 2018, Adana-Turkey.

  • Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. W. G., Ching, C. C., Mark, K. P., Tang, J. K., Lei, C. U., Cheung, H. Y., & Chui, H. L. (2015). Impact of computational thinking through coding in K-12 education: A pilot study in Hong Kong. General Studies, 85(88.01), 2–08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyeth, P. (2008). How young children learn to program with sensor, action, and logic blocks. International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(4), 517–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yolcu, V., & Demirer, V. (2017). A review on the studies about the use of robotic technologies in education. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 4(2), 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was presented as an oral presentation at the International Science and Education Congress on March 23–25, 2018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Refahiye Vocational School, Electronics and Automation Department, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey

    Sedat Turan

  2. Health Services Vocational School, Child Development Department, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey

    Fatih Aydoğdu

Authors
  1. Sedat Turan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fatih Aydoğdu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatih Aydoğdu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turan, S., Aydoğdu, F. Effect of coding and robotic education on pre-school children’s skills of scientific process. Educ Inf Technol 25, 4353–4363 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10178-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10178-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation