Elsevier

Food Quality and Preference

Volume 84, September 2020, 103958
Food Quality and Preference

The impact of innovation-related perception on consumer acceptance of food innovations – Development of an integrated framework of the consumer acceptance process

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103958Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Development of a new conception of consumer acceptance of food innovations.

  • Several antecedent factors of innovation-related perception were identified.

  • PSL-SEM was used for the empirical tests of the developed model.

  • Relative advantage, naturalness, and trust affect innovation-related perception.

  • Value, risk, & innovation-related perception are drivers of consumer acceptance.

Abstract

Innovations are an important part of the further advancement of societies in general as well as of companies in particular. Individuals can benefit from the advantages of innovations, while companies can maintain or increase their market share and profitability. However, especially in the food sector, scientific or technological innovations often encounter mistrust and rejecting reactions from consumers, resulting in decreasing acceptance of those innovations. Therefore, this paper aims to gain a deeper comprehension of consumer acceptance of innovative food products as well as to identify antecedent factors of innovation-related perception. For the empirical investigation of our conceptualized model, an online survey was conducted in Germany (n = 617) and the collected data were analyzed through structural equation modeling. The results confirmed a high predictive power of the multi-dimensional model of consumer acceptance. Our first major finding indicates that relative advantage, naturalness, novelty, and discomfort are the most important driving factors of the innovation-related perception of food products. Further important findings show that innovation-related perception has a strong positive and highly significant impact on customer perceived value, respectively a strong negative and highly significant impact on the customer perceived risk. In summary, innovation-related perception, customer perceived value, as well as customer perceived risk, are all important variables related to the acceptance of an innovative food product. The food sector can benefit from the insights provided by this study to communicate and market their products accordingly to the results to reduce mistrust and increase acceptance of food innovations on the consumer side.

Introduction

Across sectors, it is essential for future-oriented companies to successfully develop and introduce new products to the market (Kühne, Vanhonacker, Gellynck, & Verbeke, 2010). In order to develop new products, companies can fall back on scientific and technological innovations of various domains (Ronteltap, Van Trijp, Renes, & Frewer, 2007). Consumers have adopted many of these technology-based innovations easily whereas other innovations have met with substantial resistance (Ronteltap et al., 2007). Within the food area a similar picture emerges, with some recent technology-based innovations receiving high levels of consumer acceptance (e.g. nutraceuticals or fortified, enriched or enhanced functional foods), and others essentially being rejected by consumers (e.g., genetically modified foods in Europe) (Cardello, 2003, Gaskell et al., 2010, Vanhonacker et al., 2013). Especially, when an innovative food product has been produced by a more or less unfamiliar technology, consumers are often highly skeptical about that product and perceive great consumption risks (Chaudhry et al., 2010). Even though the production of food has never been safer in the Western world and developed countries, consumers of those societies are increasingly uncertain about the safety and quality of food (Bánáti, 2011). This increasing mistrust of consumers toward the food chain led to a decreasing acceptance and boycott of regular and newly developed products (e.g., Shepherd, 2008). From an expert point of view, these behavior patterns appear irrational and inconsistent with expert opinions and scientific knowledge (Verbeke, Frewer, Scholderer, & De Brabander, 2007). Experts are usually more open to innovative food technologies, as they appreciate the many benefits of using the innovation, such as improved food quality or simplified food production processes, more than the small uncertainties related to potentially detrimental effects of the technology (Bearth & Siegrist, 2016). Among other reasons, the disparity between experts’ and laypeople’s perception is the result of different appraisal strategies (e.g., heuristics, mental shortcuts) and the different resources available to them (Hansen et al., 2003, Kahneman and Tversky, 1979, Krystallis et al., 2007, Tversky and Kahneman, 1992). Therefore, it is necessary for the successful and sustainable introduction of innovative food products to have a good understanding of consumers’ perceptions and expectations towards innovations in food products (Grunert et al., 2011, Linnemann et al., 2006).

A number of studies demonstrated that perceived risks and perceived benefits are major determinants of consumer acceptance of new food technologies (e.g., Gupta et al., 2012, Bredahl, 2001, Ronteltap et al., 2007). The trade-off between individual costs and benefits of an innovation is a crucial element in attitudinal models of innovation acceptance, as it contributes to the relevant attitudes, which determine consumer acceptance or rejection (Frewer, 2003). Nevertheless, the determining factors of consumer acceptance of innovative food products cannot be reduced to these two factors (Siegrist, 2008). According to Siegrist (2008), one key driver for a high consumer acceptance of food innovations is the consumer perception of the properties of those food innovations, which significantly influences the perceived risk as well as perceived benefit of innovative food products. Besides intrinsic sensory properties of the product, consumer’s perception of food depends also largely on a variety of factors that are extrinsic to the product (Cardello, 2003). Over the past several years, numerous studies have identified several extrinsic factors that affect the perception of innovative food products (e.g., Amin et al., 2011, Connor and Siegrist, 2010, Siegrist, 2008, Stampfli et al., 2010, Verbeke, 2005). These factors can be distinguished between features of the innovation to be adopted (e.g., innovativeness or naturalness), of the prospective consumer potentially adopting it (e.g., knowledge or moral concerns), and the social system in which the innovation is introduced (e.g., social trust) (Ronteltap et al., 2007). However, most previous studies have only considered certain factors that affect the perception and acceptance of (innovative) food products (e.g., knowledge and health expectations (Connor and Siegrist, 2010, Verbeke, 2005), or trust in science and regulation (Bearth et al., 2014, Zhang et al., 2018)). In order to understand the acceptance of and the intention to buy food products that are new on the market to its full extent, it is necessary to consider the perception of the innovative product with all its extrinsic determinants, as the consumer decision is also made based on these determinants (Grunert et al., 2011).

Against that background, the objectives of the present study were to identify extrinsic determinants of the consumer perception of innovative food products in a first step and, subsequently, to understand the consumer acceptance toward a technology-based food innovation in all its stages.

Therefore, a new multifaceted model of innovation-related perception regarding food products combined with a process of consumer acceptance is developed and empirically tested. We used an innovative taste enhancer, which strengthens the taste of salt, in combination with cheese as a case for our exploratory study that was conducted in Germany. To determine the derivated dependencies of the different dimensions of the consumer acceptance process (i.e. innovation-related perception, customer perceived value and risk, attitude components, implementation, and confirmation), we used structural equation modeling. Knowing about the factors that have an impact on consumer acceptance as well as the dynamic process that leads to acceptance of food-related innovations enables marketing managers to develop marketing concepts and communication material that decrease consumers’ uncertainty and skepticism and increase their acceptance of innovative food technologies and product innovations.

Section snippets

Dimensions of innovation-related perception

When it comes to the success of innovative products, one always faces the problem that people are confronted with something more or less completely new, meaning that consumers can’t rely on their personal knowledge or experiences when they have to evaluate the product (Garcia and Calantone, 2002, Siegrist, 2000). However, the first perception of product properties has an impact on the consumer assessment of new products (Siegrist, 2008). Moreover, in Rogers (2003) theory about the diffusion of

Questionnaire

To measure the constructs as conceptualized in our model we used already existing and tested reflective measures for the constructs affective, cognitive, and conative attitude component, as well as for implementation and confirmation (e.g., Wiedmann, Hennigs, Schmidt, & Wuestefeld, 2011, Wiedmann, Hennigs, Schmidt, & Wüstefeld, 2012; cf. Table 4). For the constructs innovation-related perception, customer perceived value, and customer perceived risk we generated measurement instruments based on

Evaluation of the formative measurement model

Referring to the evaluation of our formative measurement models, Table 1 presents the manifest variables defined as formative indicators for the constructs of innovation-related perception, customer perceived value, and customer perceived risk.

Following Hair et al. (2017), formative measurement models are evaluated based on convergent validity, indicator collinearity, and statistical significance and relevance of the indicators weights. Saying this, during the process of index construction, we

Discussion

In this study, we aimed to better understand the perception and acceptance of innovative food. As a result, we developed a framework, including innovation-related perception and an acceptance process, which consists of five phases representing different sequential levels of acceptance: assessment acceptance, attitude acceptance, action acceptance, use acceptance, and performance acceptance.

Our study revealed five main factors that are important predicting people’s innovation-related perception.

Conclusion

This study offers insights into consumer acceptance of innovative food products. We introduced a new extensive model of consumer acceptance including food innovation-related perception, customer perceived value and risk, and other dimensions which reflect our understanding of the process of consumer acceptance. In summary, the findings of our empirical study suggest that relative advantage, naturalness, novelty, trust in regulations, and discomfort are driving factors of the perception of

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Levke Albertsen: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Project administration. Klaus-Peter Wiedmann: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Steffen Schmidt: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - review & editing.

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Culture, Lower Saxony, Germany.

References (90)

  • J. Hansen et al.

    Beyond the knowledge deficit: Recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks

    Appetite

    (2003)
  • S. Henson

    Demand-side constraints on the introduction of new food technologies – The case of food irradiation

    Food Policy

    (1995)
  • A. Huotilainen et al.

    Social representation of new foods has a stable structure based on suspicion and trust

    Food Quality and Preference

    (2005)
  • B. Kühne et al.

    Innovation in traditional food products in Europe: Do sector innovation activities match consumers’ acceptance?

    Food Quality and Preference

    (2010)
  • A.R. Linnemann et al.

    Consumer driven food product development

    Trends in Food Science & Technology

    (2006)
  • M.K. Magnusson et al.

    Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods

    Appetite

    (2002)
  • K.A. McComas et al.

    Factors influencing US consumer support for genetic modification to prevent crop disease

    Appetite

    (2014)
  • A. Ronteltap et al.

    Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: Lessons for the future of nutrigenomics

    Appetite

    (2007)
  • P. Rozin et al.

    Preference for natural: Instrumental and ideational/moral motivations, and the contrast between foods and medicines

    Appetite

    (2004)
  • M. Sarstedt et al.

    Selecting single items to measure doubly concrete constructs: A cautionary tale

    Journal of Business Research

    (2016)
  • R. Shepherd

    Involving the public and stakeholders in the evaluation of food risks

    Trends in Food Science & Technology

    (2008)
  • G. Shmueli et al.

    The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models

    Journal of Business Research

    (2016)
  • M. Siegrist

    Factors influencing public acceptance of innovative food technologies and products

    Trends in Food Science & Technology

    (2008)
  • M. Siegrist et al.

    Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust

    Appetite

    (2007)
  • F. Vanhonacker et al.

    Innovations in traditional foods: Impact on perceived traditional character and consumer acceptance

    Food Research International

    (2013)
  • W. Verbeke

    Consumer acceptance of functional foods: Socio-demographic, cognitive and attitudinal determinants

    Food Quality and Preference

    (2005)
  • W. Verbeke et al.

    Why consumers behave as they do with respect to food safety and risk information

    Analytica Chimica Acta

    (2007)
  • B. Wansink et al.

    Ingredient-based food fears and avoidance: Antecedents and antidotes

    Food Quality and Preference

    (2014)
  • J.H. Wu et al.

    What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model

    Information & Management

    (2005)
  • Y. Zhang et al.

    Application of an integrated framework to examine Chinese consumers’ purchase intention toward genetically modified food

    Food Quality and Preference

    (2018)
  • F. Ali et al.

    An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research

    International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management

    (2018)
  • L. Amin et al.

    Factors influencing Malaysian public attitudes to agro-biotechnology

    Public Understanding of Science

    (2011)
  • R.P. Bagozzi et al.

    On the evaluation of structural equation models

    Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

    (1988)
  • B. Blake et al.

    Dogmatism and acceptance of new products

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (1970)
  • L. Bredahl

    Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified food–results of a cross-national survey

    Journal of Consumer Policy

    (2001)
  • R.T. Cenfetelli et al.

    Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research

    MIS Quarterly

    (2009)
  • Q. Chaudhry et al.

    Nanotechnologies in the food arena: New opportunities, new questions, new concerns

  • W.W. Chin

    The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling

  • J. Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1988)
  • M. Connor et al.

    Factors influencing people’s acceptance of gene technology: The role of knowledge, health expectations, naturalness, and social trust

    Science Communication

    (2010)
  • R.F. DeVellis

    Scale Development: Theory and Applications

    (1991)
  • A. Diamantopoulos et al.

    Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective

    Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

    (2012)
  • A. Diamantopoulos et al.

    Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration

    British Journal of Management

    (2006)
  • A. Diamantopoulos et al.

    Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (2001)
  • C. Fornell et al.

    Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (1981)
  • Cited by (51)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text