Skip to main content
Log in

Socially Acceptable Navigation of People with Multi-robot Teams

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Socially acceptable navigation is a subject that involves developments regarding Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) and autonomous mobile robot navigation. In this context, there is little research considering people interacting with a robot team, and even fewer considering multi-robot teams with people. In this paper, a study on socially acceptable navigation involving a human and a robot team is presented. Four navigation strategies that consider social aspects are presented and compared in simulated environment by terms as the average number of robots invading the personal space and the number of robots to the person’s side, with two of them using Asymmetric Gaussian Functions (AGFs) as the person’s social zone model; a navigation perception comparison is made involving people to investigate their view on navigating with three robots in contrast to a single robot. Simulated and real-world experiments were performed showing that the proposed methods have advantages over each other on different aspects. The follow-up techniques for interaction between humans and a team of robots suggest that people’s perception may not be affected significantly when interacting with more than one robot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arai, M., Sato, Y., Suzuki, R., Kobayashi, Y., Kuno, Y., Miyazawa, S., Fukushima, M., Yamazaki, K., Yamazaki, A.: Robotic wheelchair moving with multiple companions. In: IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp. 513–518 (2014)

  2. Batista, M. R., Macharet, D. G., Romero, R. A.: A study on the effect of human proxemics rules in human following by a robot team. In: Latin American robotics symposium (LARS) and Brazilian symposium on robotics (SBR), pp. 1–6 (2017)

  3. Chang, W. L., White, J. P., Park, J., Holm, A., Šabanović, S.: The effect of group size on people’s attitudes and cooperative behaviors toward robots in interactive gameplay. In: IEEE RO-MAN, pp. 845–850 (2012)

  4. Cosgun, A., Florencio, D. A., Christensen, H. I.: Autonomous person following for telepresence robots. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp. 4335–4342. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2013.6631191 (2013)

  5. Ferryman, J., Hogg, D., Sochman, J., Behera, A., Rodriguez-Serrano, J. A., Worgan, S., Li, L., Leung, V., Evans, M., Cornic, P., et al.: Robust abandoned object detection integrating wide area visual surveillance and social context. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 34(7), 789–798 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fraune, M. R., Kawakami, S., Sabanovic, S., De Silva, P. R. S., Okada, M.: Three’s company, or a crowd?: The effects of robot number and behavior on hri in Japan and the usa. In: Robotics: Science and systems (2015)

  7. Garrell, A., Sanfeliu, A.: Cooperative social robots to accompany groups of people. Int. J. Robot. Res. 31 (13), 1675–1701 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldhoorn, A., Garrell, A., Alquézar, R., Sanfeliu, A.: Searching and tracking people with cooperative mobile robots. Autonomous Robots pp. 1–21 (2017)

  9. Hall, E. T.: The hidden dimension: Man’s use of space in public and private. The Bodley Head Ltd (1966)

  10. He, L., Pan, J., Wang, W., Manocha, D.: Proxemic group behaviors using reciprocal multi-agent navigation. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp. 292–297. IEEE (2016)

  11. Hu, J.-S., Wang, J.-J., Ho, D.M.: Design of sensing system and anticipative behavior for human following of mobile robots. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 61(4), 1916–1927 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. van Houwelingen-Snippe, J., Vroon, J., Englebienne, G., Haselager, P.: Blame my telepresence robot: joint effect of proxemics and attribution on interpersonal attraction. In: 2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), pp. 162–168 (2017)

  13. Kendon, A.: Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters, vol. 7. CUP Archive (1990)

  14. Kendon, A.: Spacing and orientation in co-present interaction. In: Development of multimodal interfaces: Active listening and synchrony, pp. 1–15. Springer (2010)

  15. Kirby, R.: Social robot navigation. Ph.D. thesis, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA (2010)

  16. Laga, H., Amaoka, T.: Modeling the spatial behavior of virtual agents in groups for non-verbal communication in virtual worlds. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Universal Communication Symposium, IUCS’09. https://doi.org/10.1145/1667780.1667811, pp 154–159. ACM, New York (2009)

  17. Marquardt, N., Hinckley, K., Greenberg, S.: Cross-device interaction via micro-mobility and f-formations. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pp. 13–22 (2012)

  18. Mead, R., Matarić, M.J.: Robots have needs too: How and why people adapt their proxemic behavior to improve robot social signal understanding. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 5(2), 48–68 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.5.2.Mead

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mead, R., Matarić, M. J.: Autonomous human–robot proxemics: socially aware navigation based on interaction potential. Auton. Robot. 41(5), 1189–1201 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mizumaru, K., Satake, S., Kanda, T., Ono, T.: Stop doing it! approaching strategy for a robot to admonish pedestrians. In: 2019 14th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), pp. 449–457 (2019)

  21. Morales, Y., Kanda, T., Hagita, N.: Walking together: Side by side walking model for an interacting robot. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3(2), 51–73 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moussaïd, M., Perozo, N., Garnier, S., Helbing, D., Theraulaz, G.: The walking behaviour of pedestrian social groups and its impact on crowd dynamics. PloS One 5(4), e10047 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Okal, B., Arras, K.O.: Learning socially normative robot navigation behaviors with bayesian inverse reinforcement learning. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp 2889–2895 (2016)

  24. Penders, J., Alboul, L., Witkowski, U., Naghsh, A., Saez-Pons, J., Herbrechtsmeier, S., El-Habbal, M.: A robot swarm assisting a human fire-fighter. Adv. Robot. 25(1-2), 93–117 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pérez-Higueras, N., Caballero, F., Merino, L.: Teaching robot navigation behaviors to optimal rrt planners. Journal of Social Robotics pp. 1–15 (2017)

  26. Reynolds, C. W.: Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. ACM SIGGRAPH computer graphics 21(4), 25–34 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rios-Martinez, J., Spalanzani, A., Laugier, C.: Understanding human interaction for probabilistic autonomous navigation using risk-rrt approach. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp. 2014–2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2011.6094496 (2011)

  28. Rios-Martinez, J., Spalanzani, A., Laugier, C.: From proxemics theory to socially-aware navigation: A survey. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7(2), 137–153 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0251-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Satake, S., Kanda, T., Glas, D. F., Imai, M., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: How to approach humans?-strategies for social robots to initiate interaction. In: Proceedings of 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), pp. 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1145/1514095.1514117 (2009)

  30. Sato, Y., Suzuki, R., Arai, M., Kobayashi, Y., Kuno, Y., Fukushima, M., Yamazaki, K., Yamazaki, A.: Multiple robotic wheelchair system able to move with a companion using map information. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp. 286–287. ACM (2014)

  31. Suzuki, R., Yamada, T., Arai, M., Sato, Y., Kobayashi, Y., Kuno, Y.: Multiple robotic wheelchair system considering group communication. In: International symposium on visual computing, pp. 805–814 (2014)

  32. Vasquez, D., Stein, P., Rios-Martinez, J., Escobedo, A., Spalanzani, A., Laugier, C.: Human aware navigation for assistive robotics, pp 449–462. Springer International Publishing, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00065-7_31

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yeh, A., Ratsamee, P., Kiyokawa, K., Uranishi, Y., Mashita, T., Takemura, H., Fjeld, M., Obaid, M.: Exploring proxemics for human-drone interaction. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on human agent interaction, pp. 81–88 (2017)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murillo Rehder Batista.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Batista, M.R., Macharet, D.G. & Romero, R.A.F. Socially Acceptable Navigation of People with Multi-robot Teams. J Intell Robot Syst 98, 481–510 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-019-01080-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-019-01080-4

Keywords

Navigation