Abstract
The relationship between religions and science can be considered historically controversial in nature. In constantly evolving global societies, it is important to provide a new perspective on the past and present relationship between religions and technological developments in the different societies. In this regard, this paper will provide insights into the different ways in which ancient societies and their religious traditions helped in the development of technological progress. At one end, it will highlight some of the positive contributions of different religions towards technological progress in the past. At the other end, this discussion will aid in dispelling the viewpoint that perceived the ancient cultures and societies as bereft of technological knowledge and innovation. This paper will provide a historical perspective on the development of relationship between religion and robotics in the past. A brief look at the existing scenario within the contemporary societies will also be examined, along with discussion of socio-cultural norms and values related to perception of robots in different Eastern and Western cultures. The discussion will conclude with some predictions regarding the future, along with the different ways in which the relationship of co-existence and co-dependence is expected to evolve between religion and robotics in the future, which goes beyond the predictions of mass annihilation and mass enslavement by sentient AI-based robots.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shelley MW (1984) Frankenstein. Penguin Random House, New York
Asimov I (1950) I, Robot. Penguin Random House, New York, NY
Raynor WJ (1999) The international dictionary of artificial intelligence. Glenlake Publishing Company Ltd., London
Nilsson NJ (2009) The quest of artificial intelligence: a history of ideas and achievement. Cambridge University Press, London
Loffler D et al (2019) Blessing robot blessU2: a discursive design study to understand the implications of social robots in religious contexts. IJSR Spec Issue Relig Robot 20:1–18
Weng YH et al (2019) The religious impacts of taoism on ethically aligned design in HRI. IJSR Spec Issue Relig Robot 16:1–18
Trovato G et al (2019) Religion and robots: towards the synthesis of two extremes. IJSR Spec Issue Relig Robot 22:1–18
Cuomo S (2007) Technology and culture in Greek and Roman antiquity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Greene K (2008) Historiography and theoretical approaches. In: Oleson JP (ed) Oxford handbook of engineering and technology in the classical world. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Price DJS (1964) Automata and the origins of mechanism and mechanistic philosophy. Technol Cult 5:9–23
De Groot J (2008) Dynamics and the science of mechanics: aristotle on animal motion. J Hist Philos 46(1):43–68
Berryman S (2009) The mechanical hypothesis in ancient Greek natural philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Francis JA (2009) Metal maidens, achilles’ shield, and pandora: the beginnings of ‘ekphrasis’. Am J Philol 130:1–23
Bosak-Schroeder C (2016) The religious life of greek automata. Archiv Fur Religionsgeschichte 17(1):123–136
Murray AT (1919) Homer’s the Odyssey. Heinemann, London
Tybjerg K (2005) Hero of Alexandria’s mechanical treatises: between theory and practice. Steiner, Stuttgart
Wikander O (2008) Gadgets and scientific instruments. In: Olesen JP (ed) Oxford handbook of engineering and technology in the classical world. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Boas M (1949) Hero’s pneumatica: a study of its transmission and influence. Isis 40:38–48
Anderson WS (1972) Ovid’s metamorphoses: books 6–10, Norman. University of Oklahoma Press, OK
Greene K (1990) Perspectives on Roman technology. Oxf J Archaeol 9:209–219
Cambiano G (1994) Automaton. Studi Storici 35(3):613–633
Humphrey JW, Oleson J, Sherwood A (1998) Greek and Roman technology: a sourcebook. Routledge, New York
Lively G (2006) Science fictions and cyber myths: or, do cyborgs dream of dolly the sheep? In: Zajko V, Leonard M (eds) Laughing with the medusa: classical myth and feminist thought. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Rosheim ME (2006) Leonardo’s lost robots. Springer, Berlin
Pedretti C (1973) Leonardo: a study in chronology and style. University of California Press, Berkeley
Reti L (1974) The madrid codices of Leonardo Da Vinci. McGraw-Hill, New York
Burke J (2006) Meaning and crisis in the early sixteenth century: interpreting Leonardo’s lion. Oxf Art J 29:77–91
Hatchard J (1819) Observations on the automaton chess player. S. Gosnell, London
Weibel P (2007) Preface. In: von Kempelen W (ed) Mensch in der mashine. Matthes & Seitz, Berlin
Evans HR (1905) The romance of automata. Open Court 3:131–140
Kang H (2011) Sublime dreams of living machines. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Reilly K (2011) Automata and mimesis on the stage of theatre history. Palgrave-Macmillan, Chippenham
Walbank FW (1945) Men and donkeys. Class Q 39:122
Rice EE (1983) The grand procession of ptolemy phidelphus. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Dueck D et al (2005) Strabo’s cultural geography: the making of a kolossourgia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Drachman AG (1948) Ktesibios, Philon and Heron: a study in ancient pneumatics, vol 4. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp 52–77
Swift C (2015) Robot Saints. Preternature Crit Hist Stud Preternatural 4(1):52–77
RIskin J (2010) Machines in the garden. Repub Lett J Study Knowl Politics Arts 1(2):16–43
Noble F (1997) The religion of technology: the divinity of man and the spirit of invention. Knopf Books, New York
Rowland ID (2003) Vitruvius: ten books on architecture, the Corsini Incunabulum with the annotations and drawings of Giovanni Battista da Sangallo. Edizioni dell’Elafante, Rome
Gorman MJ (2001) Between the demonic and the miraculous: athanasius kircher and the baroque culture of machines. In: Stolzenberg D (ed) The great art of knowing: the baroque encyclopedia of Athanasius Kircher. Stanford University Libraries, Stanford
King E (2002) Clockwork prayer: a sixteenth-century mechanical monk. Blackbird Online J Lit Arts 1(1):1–29
Reich-Steibert N, Eyssel F (2015) Learning with educational companion robots? Toward attitudes on education robots, predictors of attitudes, and application potential for education robots. IJSR 7:875–888
Kwak SS et al (2017) The effects of organism- versus object-based robot design approaches on the consumer acceptance of domestic robots. IJSR 9:359–377
Pino M et al (2015) Are we ready for robots that care for us? Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Front Aging Neurosci 7(141):1–15
De Graaf MMA et al (2015) Sharing a life with harvey: exploring the acceptance of and relationship-building with a social robot. Comput Hum Behav 43:1–14
Leite I et al (2013) Social robots for long-term interactions: a survey. IJSR 5(2):291–308
Shiomi M, Hagita N (2017) Social acceptance toward a childcare support robot system: web-based cultural differences investigation and a field study in Japan. Adv Robot 31(14):727–738
Geraci RM (2008) Apocalyptic AI: religion and the promise of artificial intelligence. J Am Acad Relig 76(1):138–166
Baisch S et al (2017) Acceptance of social robots by elder people: does psychosocial functioning matter? IJSR 9:293–307
Unhlekar VV et al (2018) Human-aware robotic assistant for collaborative assembly: integrating human motion prediction with planning in time. IEEE-RAL 3(3):2394–2401
Nomura T et al (2008) What people assume about humanoid and animal-type robots: Cross-cultural analysis between Japan, Korea and the United States. IJHR 5(1):25–46
Nomura T et al (2009) Age difference and images of robots. Social survey in Japan. Inter Stud 10(3):374–391
Nomura T et al (2015) Differences on social acceptance of humanoid robots between Japan and the UK. In: Proceedings of 4th international symposium on new frontiers in human–robot interaction, pp 1–6
Hebesberger D et al (2017) A long-term autonomous robot at a care hospital: a mixed methods study on social acceptance and experiences of staff and older adults. IJSR 9:417–429
Sim DYY, Loo CK (2015) Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modeling human–robot interaction—a review. Inf Sci 301:305–344
Broadbent E (2017) Interactions with robots: the truths we reveal about ourselves. Ann Rev Psychol 68:627–652
Sung JY et al (2009) Robots in the wild: understanding long-term use. HRI 15:45–52
Fink J et al (2013) Living with a vacuum cleaning robot: a 6-month ethnographic study. IJSR 5(3):389–408
Strassberg AA (2005) Fortieth anniversary symposium: science, religion, and secularity in a technological society: magic, religion, science, technology, and ethics in a postmodern world. Zygon 40(2):308–322
Bauman Z (2011) Culture in a liquid modern world. Polity Press, Cambridge
Sabanovic S (2014) Inventing Japan’s ‘robotics culture’: the repeated assembly of science, technology and culture in social robotics. Soc Stud Sci 44(3):342–367
Mavridis N et al (2012) Opinions and attitudes toward humanoid robots in the Middle East. AI Soc 27:517–534
McBride J (2015) The advent of postmodern robotic techno-religiosity. J Evol Technol 25(2):25–38
Conti D et al (2015) A cross-cultural study of acceptance and use of robotics by future psychology practitioners. Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 555–560
Mori M (1999) The buddha in the robot: a robot engineer’s thoughts on science and religion. Kosei Publishing, Tokyo
Kasulis TP (1993) The body-Japanese style. In: Kasulis TP, Ames RT, Dissanayake W (eds) Self as body in asian theory and practice. University of New York, Albany
Geraci RM (2006) Spiritual robots: religion and our scientific view of the natural world. Theol Sci 4(13):1–16
Robertson J (2010) Gendering humanoid robots: robo-sexism in Japan. Body Soc 16(2):1–36
Hashimoto T et al (2011) Development of educational system with the android robot SAYA and evaluation. Int J Adv Robot Syst 8(3):51–61
Tanaka F, Matsuzoe S (2012) Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning: field experiments in a classroom for vocabulary learning. J Hum Robot Interact 1(1):78–95
Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press, New York
De Graaf MMA et al (2019) Why would i use this in my home? A model of domestic social robot acceptance. Hum Comput Interact 34:115–173
MacDorman KF et al (2009) Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitude by implicit and explicit measures. AI Soc 23(4):485–510
Wagner C et al (2009) The Japanese way of robotics: interacting ‘naturally’ with robots as a national character? In: RO-MAN’ 09, pp 510–515
Guizzo E (2010) Hiroshi Ishiguro: the man who made a copy of himself,”. IEEE Spectr 47:44–56
Ackerman E (2011) Honda robotics unveils next-generation ASIMO robot. IEEE Spectr 10:8
Kawamura K et al (2016) Can we talk through a robot as if face-to-face? Long-term fieldwork using tele-operated robot for seniors with alzheimer’s disease. Front Psychol 7(1066):1–13
Han J et al (2005) The educational use of home robots for children. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2005), pp 378–383
Shin N, Kim S (2007) Learning about, from, and with robots: students’ perspectives. In: 16th IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication, pp 1040–1045
Choi J et al (2008) Comparison of cultural acceptability for educational robots between Europe and Korea. J Inf Process Syst 4:97–102
Park S et al (2011) Teaching assistant robot, ROBOSEM, in English class and practical issues for its diffusion. In: Proceedings of Workshop on ARSO, pp 1–6
Park I-W, Han J (2016) Teachers’ views on the use of robots and cloud services in education for sustainable development. Clust Comput 19:987–999
Yueh HP, Lin W (2013) The interaction between human and the home service robot on a daily life cycle. In: Proceedings of international conference on cross-cultural design, pp 175–181
Xu Q et al (2017) Needs and attitudes of Singaporeans towards home service robots: a multi-generational perspective. Univers Access Inf Soc 14:477–486
Keren G et al (2012) Kindergarten assistive robotics (KAR) as a tool for spatial cognition development in pre-school education. In: Proceedings of IROS, pp 1084–1090
Keren G, Fridin M (2014) Kindergarten Social Assistive Robot (KindSAR) for children’s geometric thinking and metacognitive development in preschool education: a pilot study. Comput Hum Behav 35:400–412
Riek L et al (2010) Ibn Sina steps out: exploring Arabic attitudes towards humanoid robots. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on new frontiers in human–robot interaction, pp 1–7
Shaw-Garlock G (2009) Looking forward to sociable robots. IJSR 1:249–260
Halpern D, Katz JE (2012) Unveiling robotphobia and cyber-dystopianism: the role of gender, technology and religion on attitudes towards robots. In: HRI, pp 139–140
Gerhart M, Russell AM (1998) Cog is to US as we are to god: a response to anne foerst. Zygon J Relig Sci 33:263–269
Foerst A (2004) God in the machine: what robots teach us about humanity and god. Dutton, New York
Belpaeme T et al (2018) Guidelines for designing social robots as second language tutors. IJSR 10(3):325–341
Fridin M, Belokopytov M (2014) Acceptance of socially assistive humanoid robot by preschool and elementary school teachers. Comput Hum Behav 33:23–31
Conti D et al (2017) Robots in education and care of children with developmental disabilities: a study on acceptance by experienced and future professionals. IJSR 9(1):1–62
Ben Massoud C et al (2011) Facilitators and barriers to adopting robotic-assisted surgery: contextualizing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. PLoS ONE 6(1):62
Beuscher LM et al (2017) Socially assistive robots: measuring older adults’ perceptions. J Gerontol Nurs 43(12):35–43
Rantanen T et al (2018) Attitudes towards care robots among Finnish home care personnel—a comparison of two approaches. Scand J Caring Sci 32:772–782
Meyer S (2011) My friend the robot, service robotics for elderly—an answer to the demographic change?. VDE, Berlin
Mitnik R et al (2008) An autonomous educational mobile robot mediator. Auton Robots 25(4):367–382
Fernandez-Llamas C et al (2017) Analysing the computational competences acquired by K-12 students when lectured by robotic and human teachers. IJSR 23:1–11
Brown LN, Howard AM (2014) The positive effects of verbal encouragement in mathematics education using a social robot. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE integrated STEM education conference, pp 1–5
Walker E (2016) The effects of physical form and embodied action in a teachable robot for geometry learning. In: Proceedings of the 16th ICALT, pp 381–385
Pinto AMH et al (2015) A question game for children aiming the geometrical figures learning by using a humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of 12th Latin American robotics symposium, pp 228–234
Serholt S, Barendregt W (2014) Students’ attitudes towards the possible future of social robots in education. In: Proceedings of RO-MAN workshop, pp 1-6
Serholt S et al (2017) The case of classroom robots: teachers’ deliberations on ethical tensions. AI Soc 32:613–631
Serholt S et al (2014) Teachers’ view on the use of empathic robotic tutors in the classroom. In: 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 955–960
Sung JY et al (2010) Domestic robot ecology: an initial framework to unpack long-term acceptance of robots at home. IJSR 2(4):417–429
Alaiad A, Zhou L (2014) The determinants of home healthcare robots adoption: an empirical investigation. Int J Med Inform 83:825–840
De Graaf MMA et al (2016) Long-term evaluation of a social robot in real homes. Interact Stud 17(3):1–25
Li H et al (2019) Perceptions of domestic robots’ normative behavior across cultures. In: Proceedings of AAAI/ACM conference on AI, ethics and society, pp 345–351
Pope LC, Meltzer T (2008) Has a robotic dog the buddha-nature? In: AAAI, pp 23–26
Evers V et al (2009) Relational vs. group self-construal: untangling the role of national culture in HRI’. In: HRI, pp 255–262
Li D et al (2010) A cross-cultural study: effect of robot appearance and task. IJSR 2:175–186
Boradbent E et al (2009) Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: review and future directions. IJSR 1:319–330
Syrdal DS et al (2013) The Frankenstein Syndrome Questionnaire—Results from a quantitative cross-cultural survey. In: Proceedings of ICSR, pp 270–279
Kennedy J et al (2016) The cautious attitude of teachers towards social robots in schools. In: Robots 4 learning workshop at IEEE RO-MAN 2016, pp 1–6
Bakar O (2016) Science and technology for mankind’s benefit: islamic theories and practices—past, present and future. In: Kamali MH, Bakar O, Batchelor DA-F, Hashim R (eds) Islamic Perspectives on Science and Technology, Springer, Singapore
Report EC (2012) Special Eurobarometer 382: public attitudes towards robots. European Commission, London
Hanson R (2008) Economics of the singularity. IEEE Spectr 45(6):45–60
Chalmer D (2010) The singularity: a philosophical analysis. J Conscious Stud 17:7–65
Kaczynski T (1996) Industrial society and its future. The New York Times, New York
Merritt J (2017) Is AI a threat to Christianity? The Atlantic
Dowd M (2017) Elon Musk’s billion-dollar crusade to stop the AI apocalypse. Vanity Fair
Cho A (2007) Making machines that make others of their kind. Sci New Ser 318(5853):1084–1085
Collin M (2010) Terminate the terminators. Sci Am 303(1):30–31
Meyer CD (2011) GI, robot: the ethics of using robots in combat. Public Aff Q 25(1):21–36
Sauer F (2016) Stopping ‘killer robots’: why now is the time to ban autonomous weapons systems. Arms Control Today 46(8):8–13
Ma V (2016) The ethics and implications of modern warfare: robotic systems and human optimization. Harv Int Rev 37(4):43–45
Gates B (2007) A robot in every home. Sci Am 296(1):58–65
Butler D (2016) A world where everyone has a robot: why 2040 could blow your mind. Nature 530(7951):398
Gibb S, La HM, Le T, Nguyen L, Schmid R, Pham N (2018) Non-destructive evaluation sensor fusion with autonomous robotic system for civil infrastructure inspection. J Field Robot 35(6):988–1004
La HM, Gucunski N, Dana K, Kee SH (2017) Development of an autonomous bridge deck inspection robotic system. J Field Robot 34(8):1489–1504
Gucunski N, Kee SH, La HM, Basily B, Maher A (2015) Delamination and concrete quality assessment of concrete bridge decks using a fully autonomous RABIT platform. Inte J Struct Monit Maint 2(1):19–34
Lim RS, La HM, Sheng W (2014) A robotic crack inspection and mapping system for bridge deck maintenance. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 11(1):367–378
La HM, Lim RS, Basily B, Gucunski N, Yi J, Maher A, Romero FA, Parvardeh H (2013) Mechatronic and control systems design for an autonomous robotic system for high-efficiency bridge deck inspection and evaluation. IEEE Trans Mechatron 18(6):1655–1664
Smith A, Anderson J (2014) AI, robotics and the future of jobs. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC
McCrum K (2016) Samsung and Apple iPhone factory replaces 60,000 workers with robots in cost-cutting move: the workforce previously numbered 110,000 humans, but some big changes are afoot for Foxconn. The Daily Mirror
McBride J (2017) Robotic bodies and the Kairos of humanoid theologies,”. Sophia 58:1–14
Ackerman E (2017) Pepper now available at funerals as a more affordable alternative to human priests. IEEE Spectrum
Chronicles D (2018) Techno Artistic Ganesha: Watch Lord Ganes levitate, robot conduct Aarti. https://www.deccanchronicle.com/technology/in-other-news/140918/techno-artistic-ganesha-watch-lord-ganesha-levitate-robot-conduct-aa.html. Accessed 1 Feb 2020
Sherwood H (2016) Robot monk to spread Buddhist wisdom to the digital generation. The Guardian
Ackerman E (2018) Can a robot be divine? Researchers explore whether robots can become useful sacred objects in a religious context. IEEE Spectrum
Trovato G, Kishi T, Kawai M, Zhong T, Lin JY, Gu Z, Takanishi A (2019) The creation of DarumaTO: a social companion robot for Buddhist/Shinto elderlies. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics (AIM), pp 1–6
Trovato G et al (2016) Introducing ‘theomorphic robots’. In: Humanoids, pp 1245–1250
Sharkey N et al (2017) Our sexual future with robots: a foundation for responsible robotics consultation report. The Hague Global Institute for Justice, The Hague
Vallor S (2015) Moral deskilling and upskilling in a new machine age: reflections on the ambiguous future of character. Philos Technol 28:107–124
Kaye L (2016) Challenging sex robots and the brutal dehumanisation of women. https://campaignagainstsexrobots.org/2016/02/10/challenging-sex-robots-andthe-brutal-dehumanisation-of-women/. Accessed 26 Dec 2019
Richardson K (2016) Sex robot matters: slavery, the prostituted and the rights of machines. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 35(2):46–53
Barber T (2017) For the love of artifice 2: attached. In: Cheok A, Devlin K, Levy D (eds) LNCS. Springer, Berlin
Rosano MJ (2001) Artificial intelligence, religion, and community concern. Zygon 36(1):57–75
Kewenig V et al (2018) Commentary: robot as intentional agents: using neuroscientific methods to make robots appear more social. Front Psychol 9:1131
Zhou Y, Fischer MH (2019) Intimate relationships with humanoid robots: exploring human sexuality in the twenty-first century. In: Zhou Y, Fischer MH (eds) AI Love You. Springer, Switzerland
Sharkey N (2008) The ethical frontiers of robotics. Science 322(5909):1800–1801
Wallach W, Allen C (2009) Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press, New York
Lichocki P et al (2011) A survey of robotics ethical landscape. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 18(1):39–50
Bostrom N, Yulsowsky E et al (2014) The ethics of artificial intelligence. In: Ramsey W, Frankish K (eds) The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Torresen J (2018) A review of future and ethical perspectives of robotics and AI. Front Robot AI 4(75):1–10
Lin P (2015) Why ethics matters for autonomous cars. Springer, Heidelberg
Deng B (2015) Machine ethics: the robots dilemma. Nature 523(7558):435
Vanderelst D, Winfield AFT (2018) The dark side of ethical robots. In: AAAI/ACM conference on AI, ethics and society. Vols, New Orleans, 1–3 February 2018
Veruggio G (2006) Roboethics: social and ethical implications. Humanoids, pp 612–617
Asaro PM (2007) Robots and responsibility from a legal perspective. Proc IEEE 25:20–24
Asaro PM (2016) The liability problem for autonomous artificial agents. In: AAAI Spring Symposium, pp 189–194
Yang G-Z et al (2018) The grand challenges of Science Robotics. Sci Robot 3:1–14
Cerrudo C, Apa L (2017) Hacking robots before skynet. IOActive Inc., Seattle
Opitz P (2019) Civil liability and autonomous robotic machines: approaches in the EU and US. Transatlantic Technology Law Forum, Vienna
Schaerer E et al (2009) Robots as animals: a framework for liability and responsibility in human–robot interactions. In: RO-MAN 2009, pp 72–77
Report E (2019) Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission, Brussels
Bisol B et al (2013) RoboLaw deliverable D5.5. European Union, Brussels
Richards NM, Smart WD (2013) How should the law think about robots? https://ssrn.com/abstract=2263363. Accessed 10 Nov 2019
Leenes R et al (2017) Regulatory challenges of robotics: some guidelines for addressing legal and ethical issues. Law, Innov Technol 9(1):1–44
Brougher C (2011) Application of religious law in US courts: selected legal issues. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC
Grotius H (2005) The rights of war and peace. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis
Maoz A (2004) Can judaism serve as a source of human rights? Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 64:677–721
De Blois M (2010) Religious law versus secular law. The example of the get refusal in Dutch, English and Israeli law. Utrecht Law Rev 6(2):93–115
Ferrari S (2012) Law and religion in a secular world: a European perspective. Eccles Law J 14:355–370
Brownsword R, Goodwin M (2012) Law and the technologies of the twenty-first century: texts and materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lessig L (1999) The law of the horse: what cyberlaw might teach. Harv Law Rev 23:501–546
Trovato G, Lucho C, Ramon A, Ramirez R, Rodriquez L, Cuellar F (2018) The creation of SanTO: a robot with “divine” features. In: Proceedings of 15th international conference on ubiquitous robots (UR), pp 437–442
Trovato G, Paraisca F, Ramirez R, Cerna J, Reutskiy L, Rodriguez L, Cuellar F (2019) Communicating with SanTO- the first Catholic robot. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2019), pp 1–6
Holley P (2019) Meet ‘Mindar,’ the robotic Buddhist priest: the $1 million robot preaches in a Japanese template. Will one day learn to think on its own? The Washington Post
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Grant No. NNX15AI02H under the sub-award No. 18-54, issued through the Nevada NASA Space Grant Consortium for Curriculum Development: Robotics and Big Data Curriculum for Undergraduate and Graduate Students of UNR College of Engineering.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmed, H., La, H.M. Evaluating the Co-dependence and Co-existence between Religion and Robots: Past, Present and Insights on the Future. Int J of Soc Robotics 13, 219–235 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00636-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00636-x