Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical investigation on thermophoretic deposition of particles in turbulent duct flow with conjugate heat transfer: Analysis of influencing factors

  • Research Article
  • Indoor/Outdoor Airflow and Air Quality
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thermophoretic deposition of particles in turbulent duct flow is of significant relevance in energy and thermal engineering applications. However, conjugate heat transfer (CHT) was commonly not considered in the previous studies, but may have crucial influences on particle deposition behaviors. Therefore, thermophoretic particle deposition in turbulent duct flow with and without CHT was numerically investigated by using \(\overline {v{\prime ^{_2}}} - f\) turbulence model and discrete particle model (DPM) with a modified discrete random walk method. After grid independence study and numerical verification, several important influencing factors on particle deposition velocity were studied, such as flow Reynolds number, temperature difference between inlet hot air and cool wall, thermal conductivity ratio and width ratio of solid and fluid domain. The thermophoresis greatly increases deposition velocity of small particles but has no influence on large particles. The critical particle relaxation time \(\tau _{\rm{p}}^ + \) for thermophoresis effect is 20, which is the same for all the cases in this study. The corresponding particle diameter is 28 µm. The thermophoretic deposition is enhanced when the flow Reynolds number and temperature difference between air and wall increase. This is because the wall-normal temperature variety is higher for large Reynolds number and temperature difference, which can enhance thermophoretic deposition. However, CHT reduces the thermophoretic deposition by decreasing temperature difference in fluid region. Besides, higher thermal conductivity ratio and width ratio of solid and fluid domain will decrease the thermophoretic deposition, as thermal conduction in solid domain becomes more intense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

area of particle deposition

B :

thickness of solid wall

C c :

Cunningham correction factor

C 0 :

mean particle concentration

C D :

drag coefficient of particle

C ps :

specific pressure heat of solid wall

d p :

diameter of dust particle

f :

an elliptic equation for the relaxation function

f c :

fanning friction factor

g :

gravitational acceleration

H :

width of half duct

J :

particle deposition number

k :

turbulent kinetic energy

K c :

Saffman’s lift force coefficient

N d :

number of dust deposited on the walls

N 0 :

total particle number

Re :

Reynolds number

Re p :

particle Reynolds number

s ij :

deformation tensor

S :

ratio of particle-to-fluid density

S 0 :

spectral intensity of a Gaussian white noise random process

S E :

volumetric heat source in solid domain

t d :

time period of dust deposition

T s :

temperature of solid domain

T f :

ttemperature of fluid domain

U mean :

mean velocity of air

U free :

freestream velocity of air

u g :

velocity of fluid

u p :

velocity of particle

u* :

frictional velocity of air

v′:

wall-normal fluctuating velocity of air

\(\overline {v{\prime ^{_2}}}\) :

wall-normal stress of flow

V :

volume of duct flow

V d :

particle deposition velocity

\(V_{\rm{d}}^ + \) :

dimensionless particle deposition velocity

ρ g :

density of fluid

ρ p :

density of particle

ρ s :

density of solid wall

ζ :

normal distributed random number

ν :

kinetic viscosity of air

τ :

particle relaxation time

Δt :

time step

λ s :

thermal conductivity of solid domain

λ f :

thermal conductivity of fluid domain

\(\tau _{\rm{p}}^ + \) :

dimensionless particle relaxation time

References

  • Bakanov SP (1991). Thermophoresis in gases at small Knudsen numbers. Aerosol Science and Technology, 15: 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Gong W, Yan YY (2018). Conjugate natural convection heat transfer in an open-ended square cavity partially filled with porous media. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 124: 368–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng YS (1997). Wall deposition of radon progeny and particles in a spherical chamber. Aerosol Science and Technology, 27: 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YH, Chen LF (2011). The effect of stable stratification and thermophoresis on fine particle deposition in a bounded turbulent flow. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 54: 1168–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durbin PA (1995). Separated flow computations with the k-epsilon-v-squared model. AIAA Journal, 33: 659–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Shobokshy MS (1983). Experimental measurements of aerosol deposition to smooth and rough surfaces. Atmospheric Environment (1967), 17: 639–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FLUENT (2009). FLUENT 12.0 User’s Guide. Lebanon, NH, USA: FLUENT Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander SK, Johnstone HF (1957). Deposition of suspended particles from turbulent gas streams. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 49: 1151–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao N, Niu J, He Q, Zhu T, Wu J (2012). Using RANS turbulence models and Lagrangian approach to predict particle deposition in turbulent channel flows. Building and Environment, 48: 206–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He C, Ahmadi G (1998). Particle deposition with thermophoresis in laminar and turbulent duct flows. Aerosol Science and Technology, 29: 525–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai ACK (2002). Particle deposition indoors: A review. Indoor Air, 12: 211–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KW, Gieseke JA (1994). Deposition of particles in turbulent pipe flows. Journal of Aerosol Science, 25: 699–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee BU, Sub Byun D, Bae GN, Lee JH (2006). Thermophoretic deposition of ultrafine particles in a turbulent pipe flow: Simulation of ultrafine particle behaviour in an automobile exhaust pipe. Journal of Aerosol Science, 37: 1788–1796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu BYH, Agarwal JK (1974). Experimental observation of aerosol deposition in turbulent flow. Journal of Aerosol Science, 5: 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R, You C, Yang R, Wang J (2010). Direct numerical simulation of kinematics and thermophoretic deposition of inhalable particles in turbulent duct flows. Aerosol Science and Technology, 44: 1146–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H, Lu L (2015a). A numerical study of particle deposition in ribbed duct flow with different rib shapes. Building and Environment, 94: 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H, Lu L (2015b). Effects of rib spacing and height on particle deposition in ribbed duct air flows. Building and Environment, 92: 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H, Lu L (2016). CFD investigation on particle deposition in aligned and staggered ribbed duct air flows. Applied Thermal Engineering, 93: 697–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H, Lu L, Jiang Y (2017). Numerical study of monodispersed particle deposition rates in variable-section ducts with different expanding or contracting ratios. Applied Thermal Engineering, 110: 150–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majlesara M, Salmanzadeh M, Ahmadi G (2013). A model for particles deposition in turbulent inclined channels. Journal of Aerosol Science, 64: 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olufade AO, Simonson CJ (2018). Application of indirect non-invasive methods to detect the onset of crystallization fouling in a liquid-to-air membrane energy exchanger. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 127: 663–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partankar SV (1980). Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postma AK, Schwendiman LC (1960). Studies in micrometrics: I. Particle deposition in conduits as a source of error in aerosol sampling. Report HW-65308. Richland, WA, USA: Hanford Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romay FJ, Takagaki SS, Pui DYH, Liu BYH (1998). Thermophoretic deposition of aerosol particles in turbulent pipe flow. Journal of Aerosol Science, 29: 943–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimada M, Okuyama K, Asai M (1993). Depostition of submicron aerosol particles in turbulent and transitional flow. AIChE Journal, 39: 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sippola MR, Nazaroff WW (2004). Experiments measuring particle deposition from fully developed turbulent flow in ventilation ducts. Aerosol Science and Technology, 38: 914–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakurta DG, Chen M, McLaughlin JB, Kontomaris K (1998). Thermophoretic deposition of small particles in a direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 41: 4167–4182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian L, Ahmadi G (2007). Particle deposition in turbulent duct flows—Comparisons of different model predictions. Journal of Aerosol Science, 38: 377–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, You C, Liu R, Yang R (2011). Particle deposition on the wall driven by turbulence, thermophoresis and particle agglomeration in channel flow. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 33: 2821–2828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells C, Chamberlain C (1967). Transport of small particles to vertical surfaces. British Journal of Applied Physics, 18: 1793–1799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LZ (2015). Transient and conjugate heat and mass transfer in hexagonal ducts with adsorbent walls. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 84: 271–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Chen Q (2009). Prediction of particle deposition onto indoor surfaces by CFD with a modified Lagrangian method. Atmospheric Environment, 43: 319–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao B, Zhang Y, Li X, Yang X, Huang D (2004). Comparison of indoor aerosol particle concentration and deposition in different ventilated rooms by numerical method. Building and Environment, 39: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao B, Wu J (2006). Modeling particle deposition from fully developed turbulent flow in ventilation duct. Atmospheric Environment, 40: 457–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao B, Yang C, Yang X, Liu S (2008). Particle dispersion and deposition in ventilated rooms: Testing and evaluation of different Eulerian and Lagrangian models. Building and Environment, 43: 388–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the financial supports provided by the National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2017YFE0116100), the “Xinghua Scholar Talents Plan” of South China University of Technology (D6191420) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (D2191930). It is also supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 51425601) and the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province: Guangdong-Hong Kong Technology Cooperation Funding Scheme (TCFS), No. 2017B050506005.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-zhi Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, H., Zhang, Lz. & Cai, Rr. Numerical investigation on thermophoretic deposition of particles in turbulent duct flow with conjugate heat transfer: Analysis of influencing factors. Build. Simul. 13, 387–399 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-019-0582-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-019-0582-9

Keywords

Navigation