Experimental research of flow rate and diffusion behavior of nature gas leakage underwater
Introduction
With rapidly development of explosion and drilling in offshore, submarine pipelines have been widely used in transportation of the offshore oil and gas. However, the increased amount of the under water devices and pipelines also enhanced the potential risks and hazards for safety management and production. Numbers factors of hazard sources include anchoring, falling objects and corrosion in the actual scenario operation of pipelines, which usually lead to potential failure and accidental release (Olsen and Skjetne, 2015; Li et al., 2018). The pipeline gas leakage underwater will pose a serious threat to the integrity of pipeline assets, the life safety of operators and the ecological environment of the seabed. The harsh natural conditions and the marine construction environment put forward more greater requirements for dealing with catastrophic accidents (Van der Geer and AuthorAnonymous, 2010; Yapa et al., 2012; Li et al., 2016).
Numerous researches have investigated on the flow behavior and breakup process near the orifice of a submerged gas jet release. Both methods of the experimental observation on the phenomenon of breakup dynamics and theoretical calculation for mechanism analysis are mainly research measures (Zheng et al., 2003; Premathilake et al., 2016a,b; Solsvik et al., 2016). The theoretical analysis mainly included the integral method, which combines some semi-empirical correlation of experimental data to establish the basic equations of gas-liquid in two-phase flow (Hissong et al., 2014; Olsen et al., 2017). The scale of the current experiments are mainly included: small-scale for laboratory test (water depth < 2 m), medium-scale test (7–50 m offshore) and field trial (>50 m). Koopman and Cederwall. (1982) was conducted an experimental of methane leakage in Burro, and analyzed the effects of different leakage conditions on plume characteristic and flow rate. As early as 2001, a field experiment named “Deepspill” was carried out in Norwegian waters, which provided data support for the initial formulation of prevention strategy information. But limited to the safety issues and high cost, it was difficult to implement another large-scale field experiments (Johansen et al., 2003). J. Rensen and Roig (2001) conducted the dynamics process of the unstable structure in two-dimensional bubble plumes underwater. The results shown the dominant periodic motion was recorded even for both of the different gas flow rates. Martı́nez-Bazán et al. (2002) experimentally studied the dynamic behavior of the bubble size from gas injection to the liquid fluid. Brandvik et al., (2013) established the lab-scale facility (dimension with 6 m in height and 3 m in width) to reveal the relationship between the droplet size versus nozzle diameters under various release conditions. Also the size distribution of the droplets from submerged blowouts in deep water has strong impact on the fate of the leakage fluid. Weiland and Vlachos. (2013) have performed experiments of gas jet release underwater and the length of jet penetration dominated by inertia, but these experiments are based on safety air for substitute and limited in confined scenarios. Premathilake et al., (2016a,b) established a model of prediction the pollutant transport for underwater oil and gas spills based on Lagrange integral method. Lee and Park [2017) presented the evolution process of plume trajectory underwater using high-speed camera technology, and proposed a convective velocity model of bubble wake vortices. Wang et al., (2018) observed and quantified the flow behavior from laminar to turbulent and predict the gas bubble size based on the accidental release of submarine pipelines. The results developed the models of prediction the fate and transport of gas motion and bubble breakup during subsea accidents. From those studies, available experimental data and jet behavior are necessary to assess the effectiveness of risk prediction and verify the previous physics or mathematical based numerical models. Also the methane gas is more compressible in a large pressure drops compared with the safety gas like air and nitrogen. Hence, it is important to observe the behavior of natural gas submerged release and investigate the scale law for prediction the leakage flow rate in engineering significance.
This work experimentally investigated on the flow behavior and breakup process of natural gas submerged release from a wide range of orifice diameter for quiescent conditions in a wind tunnel. The variation parameters of different orifice size and shape, leakage pressure and water depth were carried out to observe the bubble plume rising process and diffusion behavior on water surface, and measure the leakage flow rate for a scale law. The quantification relationship between the plume diameter and leakage flow rate in various factors has also been estimated.
Section snippets
Experimental setup
The gas leakage experimental was conducted in a wind tunnel which belongs to Shandong Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation Safety. An overview of the experimental setup for gas release is depicted in Fig. 1. The water tank was made by transparent plexiglass with a dimension of 500 mm × 500 mm × 1000 mm (long × wide × high) and 15 mm in wall thickness. A round of metal frame was employed to reinforce the structure of the water tank. The upper part of the water tank was arranged
Image of methane leakage underwater
Fig. 2 presents the time-resolved plume behavior for a continuous release from a wide-angle lens with various parameters. A cone-shaped structure from the release point to water surface as it ascends through the fluid column. The change of the dominating physics for establish the different zones has been widely discussed (Wu and Tsang, 1991; Olsen and Skjetne, 2015; Li et al., 2019). Three main zones, including gas release zone, plume established zone and surface zone, which are governed by the
Conclusions
In this study, a small-scale system of natural gas accidental release from submerged pipeline has been experimentally investigated in a wind tunnel. The variation factors of orifice sizes, pressure and water depths effect on gas release and dispersion behavior has been analyzed and quantified. Some conclusions are as follows:
- (1)
The cone-shaped structure of dynamics jetting gas from release point to water surface including three zones: plume establishment zone, plume flowing zone and surface
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Yixiang Zhang: Investigation, Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft. Jianlu Zhu: Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Youmei Peng: Data curation, Software. Jun Pan: Formal analysis, Validation. Yuxing Li: Conceptualization, Project administration.
Declaration of competing interest
We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled: ‘Experimental Research of Flow Rate and Diffusion Behavior of Nature Gas Leakage Underwater’.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0805800), the Shandong Provincial Key R&D Program (2017GSF220007), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (19CX02036A) and the Graduate Innovation Project (YCX2018068), which are gratefully acknowledged.
References (22)
- et al.
Droplet breakup in subsurface oil releases – Part 1: experimental study of droplet breakup and effectiveness of dispersant injection
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
(2013) - et al.
A mechanistic model for hydrocarbon plumes rising through water
J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind.
(2014) - et al.
DeepSpill––Field study of a simulated oil and gas blowout in deep water
Spill Sci. Technol. Bull.
(2003) - et al.
Analysis of Burro series 40-m3 lng spill experiments
J. Hazard Mater.
(1982) - et al.
Wake structures behind an oscillating bubble rising close to a vertical wall
Int. J. Multiphas. Flow
(2017) - et al.
Quantitative risk analysis on leakage failure of submarine oil and gas pipelines using Bayesian network
Process Saf. Environ. Protect.
(2016) - et al.
Analysis of underwater gas release and dispersion behavior to assess subsea safety risk
J. Hazard Mater.
(2019) - et al.
Statistical description of the bubble cloud resulting from the injection of air into a turbulent water jet
Int. J. Multiphas. Flow
(2002) Describing the uncertainties in experimental results
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
(1988)- et al.
VLES turbulence model for an Eulerian–Lagrangian modeling concept for bubble plumes
Appl. Math. Model.
(2017)
Impact on water surface due to deepwater gas blowouts
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
Cited by (20)
Leaking flow effect of a simply-supported pipe with a crack undergoing CF VIV
2024, Ocean EngineeringExperimental study on flow characteristics and burning behavior for fire of flammable gases leakage underwater
2024, Process Safety and Environmental ProtectionModeling underwater plumes of gas released from seafloor soil: A comparison of different gases
2024, Process Safety and Environmental ProtectionStudy on numerical simulation of leakage and diffusion law of parallel buried gas pipelines in tunnels
2023, Process Safety and Environmental ProtectionA new methodology to estimate the gas ascending time from underwater gas releases
2023, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process IndustriesModelling underwater dispersion of gas released from seabed soil considering current and wave
2023, Process Safety and Environmental Protection