Abstract
Building energy performance assessment technique has become a new paradigm that plays a significant part in reducing world energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions. However, there exists a global proliferation of diverse models for assessing and benchmarking buildings. This paper proposes a single building energy performance assessment model that considered several factors that affect office building energy efficiency performances in two different countries. It aimed to develop a model that could identify building energy performance critical factors as a new technique for aggregating energy efficiency metrics for commercial buildings. It examined the relationship and interdependency between the variables as it affects buildings’ performance as a basis for developing its theoretical model. Survey questions were derived from variables obtained from the existing literature using this theoretical paper proposition. A self-administered questionnaire was used to gather data from occupants of office buildings in Nigeria and the UK. Exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modelling via confirmatory factor analysis were used to analyse the explanatory power of the measured variables and their constructs. The results identified management, strategic and operational issues as critical factors that affect building energy performance in both countries. It confirmed the relationships and interdependency of the study factors and developed a new strategy that gives them proper considerations in the operations and management of building energy. Data collected support the theoretical model, and the measurement model fits into the conceptual model. The model gives a quantitative approach that identified critical factors for improving energy management and auditing efficiency of buildings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdel-Azim AI, Ibrahim A, Aboul-Zahab EM (2017) Development of an energy efficiency rating system for existing buildings using analytic hierarchy process: the case of Egypt. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 71:414–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.071
Amasyali K, El-Gohary NM (2018) A review of data-driven building energy consumption prediction studies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:1192–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.095
Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res 14(3):396. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150783
Bernardo H, Gaspar A, Henggeler AC (2018) A combined value focused thinking-soft systems methodology approach to structure decision support for energy performance assessment of school buildings. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072295
Braekman E, Drieskens S, Charafeddine R, Demarest S, Berete F, Gisle L, Tafforeau J, Van der Heyden J, Van Hal G (2019) Mixing mixed-mode designs in a national health interview survey: a pilot study to assess the impact on the self-administered questionnaire non-response. BMC Med Res Methodol 19(1):212. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0860-3
Byrne BM (2010) Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Struct Equ Model. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600219
Chan APC, Lam PTI, Chan DWM, Cheung EK, Yongjian K (2010) Critical success factors for PPPs in infrastructure developments: chinese perspective. J Constr Eng Manag 136(5):484–494. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000152
Choi BCK, Pak AWP (2005) A catalogue of biases in questionnaires. Preven Chronic Dis 2(1):A13
Chou J, Kim S, Ung C, Yutami TK, Lin IGAN, Son GT (2015) Cross-country review of smart grid adoption in residential buildings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 48:192–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.055
Dávi GA, Asiain GLD, Solano J, Caamaño-Martín E, Bedoya C (2017) Energy refurbishment of an office building with a hybrid photovoltaic system and demand-side management. Energies 10(8):1117–1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10081117
Gliedt T, Hoicka CE (2015) Energy upgrades as a financial or strategic investment? Energy Star property owners and managers are improving building energy performance. Appl Energy 147:430–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.028
Gram-Hanssen K, Georg S (2018) Energy performance gaps: promises, people, practices. Build Res Inf 46(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1356127
Hanif I (2018) Impact of economic growth, nonrenewable and renewable energy consumption, and urbanization on carbon emissions in Sub-Saharan Africa. Environ Sci and Pollut Res 25(15):15057–15067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1753-4
Hartwell ML, Khojasteh J, Wetherill MS, Croff JM, Wheeler D (2019) Using structural equation modeling to examine the influence of social, behavioral, and nutritional variables on health outcomes based on NHANES data: addressing complex design, nonnormally distributed variables, and missing information. Curr Dev Nutr 3(5):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzz010
Iman Mohd W, Royapoor W, Wang M, Roskilly Y, Paul A (2017) Office building cooling load reduction using thermal analysis method: a case study. Appl Energy 185:157–1584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.12.053
International Energy Agency (2014) Africa energy outlook- a focus on energy prospects in Sub-Saharan Africa. World energy outlook series. OECD/IEA, Paris
Jones K, Sharp M (2007) A new performance-based process model for built asset maintenance. Facilities 25(13–14):525–535. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770710822616
Kanneganti GH, Crowe B, Al-shebeeb E, Yelamanchi O, Nimbarte A, Currie A, Abolhassani K, Amir A (2017) Specification of energy assessment methodologies to satisfy ISO 50001 energy management standard. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 23:121–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2017.09.003
Kasperavičiūtė-Černiauskienė R, Serafinas D (2018) The adoption of ISO 9001 standards within higher education institutions in Lithuania: Innovation diffusion approach. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 29(1–2):74–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1164012
Kim T, Ko W, Kim J (2019) Analysis and impact evaluation of missing data imputation in day-ahead PV generation forecasting. Appl Sci (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010204
Kotireddy R, Hoes PJ, Hensen JLM (2018) A methodology for performance robustness assessment of low-energy buildings using scenario analysis. Appl Energy 212:428–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.066
Lallmahamood M (2007) An examination of individual’s perceived security and privacy of the internet in Malaysia and the influence of this on their intention to use E-commerce: using an extension of the technology acceptance model. J Internet Bank Commer 12(3):1–26
Li K (2019) MOOC learners’ demographics, self-regulated learning strategy, perceived learning and satisfaction: a structural equation modelling approach. Comput Educ 132:16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.003
Lowry P, Gaskin J, Moody G (2015) Proposing the multimotive information systems continuance model (MISC) to better explain end-user system evaluations and continuance intentions. J Assoc Inf Syst 16(7):515–579. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00403
Mafimisebi BI (2017) A model for reducing energy consumption in existing office buildings: a case for Nigeria and the United Kingdom building owners & facilities managers. Doctoral Thesis. Anglia Ruskin University. https://arro.anglia.ac.uk/702574/1/Mafimisebi_2017.pdf. Accessed 07 Jan 2018
Mafimisebi IB, Jones K, Sennaroglu B, Nwaubani S (2018) A validated low-carbon office building intervention model based on structural equation modelling. J Clean Prod 200:478–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.249
Mattoni B, Guattari C, Evangelisti L, Bisegna F, Goti P, Asdrubali F (2018) Critical review and methodological approach to evaluate the differences between international green building rating tools. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82(February):950–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.105
McGrath J, Bates B (2013) The little book of big management theories and how to use them, 1st edn. Pearson Education Ltd, Harlow. ISBN: 9780273785262
McKanea A, Therkelsena P, Scodela A, Raoa P, Aghajanzadeha A, Hirzelb S, Zhangc R, Premd R, Fossae A, Lazarevskaf AM, Matteinig M, Schreckg B, Allardh F, Alcántari NV, Steynj K, Hürdoğank E, Björkmanl T, O’Sullivanm J (2017) Predicting the quantifiable impacts of ISO 50001 on climate change mitigation. Energy Policy 107:278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.049
Meng X, Tan X, Wang Y, Wen Z, Tao Y, Qian Y (2019) Investigation on decision-making mechanism of residents’ household solid waste classification and recycling behaviours. Resour Conserv Recycl 140:224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.021
Min Z, Morgenstern P, Marjanovic-halburd L (2016) Facilities management added value in closing the energy performance gap. Int J Sustain Built Environ 5(2):197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.06.004
Moshagen M, Auerswald M (2018) On congruence and incongruence of measures of fit in structural equation modelling. Psychol Methods 23(2):318–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000122
O’Brien W, Gaetani I, Carlucci S, Hoes PJ, Hensen JLM (2017) On occupant-centric building performance metrics. Build Environ 122:373–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.06.028
Patterson MG (1996) What is energy efficiency? Concepts, indicators and methodological issues. Energy Policy 24(5):377–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(96)00017-1
Sen P, Roy M, Pal P (2015) Exploring the role of environmental proactivity in the financial performance of manufacturing enterprises: a structural modelling approach. J Clean Prod 108:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.076
Shaikha PH, Norb NBM, Sahitoa AA, Nallagowndenb P, Elamvazuthib I, Shaikhc MS (2017) Building energy for sustainable development in Malaysia: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:1392–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.128
Shi S, Chong HY, Liu L, Ye X (2016) Examining the interrelationship among critical success factors of public-private partnership infrastructure projects. Sustainability 8(12):1313. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121313
Strachan ME, Banfill PF (2017) Energy-led refurbishment of non-domestic buildings: ranking measures by attributes. Facilities 35(5/6):286–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-04-2016-0036
Tarka P (2018) An overview of structural equation modelling: its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciences. Qual Quant 52(1):313–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0469-8
The Institute of Energy Economics, Japan (2017) IEEJ energy outlook 2018—prospects and challenges until 2050. In: The 427th forum on research work. https://eneken.ieej.or.jp/data/7570.pdf. Accessed 25 April 2019
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2017) International energy outlook 2017. September 14, 2017. www.eia.gov/ieo. Accessed 30 Jan 2020
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2019) International energy outlook 2019. September 24, 2019. www.eia.gov/ieo. Accessed 30 Jan 2020
Wang S, Yan C, Xiao F (2012) Quantitative energy performance assessment methods for existing buildings. Energy Build 55:873–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.037
Wang T, Li X, Liao PC, Fang D (2016) Building energy efficiency for public hospitals and healthcare facilities in China: barriers and drivers. Energy 103:588–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.039
Wang E, Alp N, Shi J, Wang C, Zhang X, Chen H (2017) Multi-criteria building energy performance benchmarking through variable clustering-based compromise TOPSIS with objective entropy weighting. Energy 125:197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.131
Wilson C, Pettifor H, Chryssochoidis G (2018) Quantitative modelling of why and how homeowners decide to renovate energy efficiently. Appl Energy 212:1333–1344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.099
Yin RK (2014) Case study research: design and methods, 5th edn. SAGE Publications Ltd, London
Zhao X, Pan W, Chen L (2018) Disentangling the relationships between business model innovation for low or zero carbon buildings and its influencing factors using structural equation modelling. J Clean Prod 178:154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.010
Acknowledgements
This study recognises the contributions of Ove-Arup & Partner Nigeria, Cerntu-Serve Nigeria, Cornice Consult Nigeria, Silvianazer International Nigeria, Miviti Communication Nigeria, and Estates & Facilities Management Department, Anglia Ruskin University, the UK, for approving the participation of their staff and usage of case-study buildings. Also, this paper is part of a self-sponsor PhD research project without financial support or grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: M. Abbaspour.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mafimisebi, B.I., Jones, K., Nwaubani, S. et al. Procedural tool for analysing building energy performance: structural equation modelling protocol. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 17, 2875–2888 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02708-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02708-x