Elsevier

Annals of Physics

Volume 418, July 2020, 168168
Annals of Physics

Thermodynamics of antiferromagnetic solids in magnetic fields

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2020.168168Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Systematic thermodynamic analysis of antiferromagnetic solids in mutually perpendicular magnetic and staggered fields.

  • Analysis of the impact of the spin–wave interaction in thermodynamic quantities of antiferromagnetic solids.

  • Two-point function and partition function of antiferromagnetic solids.

Abstract

We analyze the thermodynamic properties of antiferromagnetic solids subjected to a combination of mutually orthogonal uniform magnetic and staggered fields. Low-temperature series for the pressure, order parameter and magnetization up to two-loop order in the effective expansion are established. We evaluate the self-energy and the dispersion relation of the dressed magnons in order to discuss the impact of spin–wave interactions on thermodynamic observables.

Section snippets

Motivation

The literature on the thermodynamic properties of antiferromagnets in three spatial dimensions is considerable. Low-temperature representations for the free energy density, staggered magnetization, and other observables describing quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnets have been derived, e.g., in Refs. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Various authors have furthermore discussed how an external magnetic field influences the low-temperature physics of antiferromagnets (see Refs. [11]

Free energy density: Two-loop representation

The paradigmatic microscopic description of antiferromagnets is based on the Heisenberg model, whose Hamiltonian in the simplest situation, where only the nearest neighbor spin interactions are taken into account, takes the form H=Jn.n.SmSnnSnHn(1)nSnHs,J=const.,where the summation in the first term extends over nearest neighbor spin pairs on a bipartite three-dimensional lattice. The exchange constant J<0 defines the fundamental energy scale of the system. The first term is

Dressed magnons and interaction free energy density

Naively, one might expect that the first line of our result (2.8) for the free energy density, that is its one-loop part, corresponds to a gas of free magnons, while all the rest captures magnon–magnon interactions. That would, however, be premature: the magnons get dressed by self-energy corrections even at T=0. Part of the thermal two-loop free energy density can then be accounted for as the free energy density of such dressed, yet noninteracting, magnons. Whatever is left can be considered

Low-temperature series

The effective field theory expansion of the free energy density, Eq. (2.8), is valid at low temperatures and in weak external fields. More precisely, the quantities T,H,Hs have to be small compared to a characteristic scale inherent in the underlying microscopic system. In the present case of the Heisenberg antiferromagnet, the thermal scale is given by the Néel temperature TN. The actual definition of low temperature and weak field is somewhat arbitrary. To be concrete, here we choose T,H,MII(

Conclusions

Antiferromagnets subjected to magnetic and staggered fields can be addressed straightforwardly with the systematic effective Lagrangian method. Starting from the two-loop representation of the partition function, we have discussed the low-temperature behavior of d=3+1 antiferromagnets in a configuration of mutually orthogonal external magnetic and staggered fields.

To have a clear picture of what “interaction” means in the free energy density – and any other thermodynamic quantity derived from

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

Tomas Brauner acknowledges financial support from the ToppForsk-UiS program of the University of Stavanger and the University Fund, Grant No. PR-10614.

References (45)

  • LiuB.-G.

    Phys. Lett. A

    (1999)
  • FilhoE.B. et al.

    Phys. Lett. A

    (2004)
  • NetoM.A. et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (2012)
  • GasserJ. et al.

    Ann. Phys., NY

    (1984)
  • GasserJ. et al.

    Nuclear Phys. B

    (1985)
  • HasenfratzP. et al.

    Nuclear Phys. B

    (1990)
  • RománJ.M. et al.

    Ann. Phys.

    (1999)
  • HofmannC.P.

    Nuclear Phys. B

    (2017)
  • BraunerT. et al.

    Ann. Phys.

    (2017)
  • HofmannC.P.

    Phys. B

    (2017)
  • OguchiT.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1960)
  • KefferF. et al.

    J. Appl. Phys. (Suppl.)

    (1961)
  • OguchiT. et al.

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (1963)
  • HarrisA.B.

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (1964)
  • LeeK.H. et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1967)
  • NagaiO.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1969)
  • CottamM.G. et al.

    J. Phys. C

    (1970)
  • HarrisA.B. et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1971)
  • HasselmannN. et al.

    Europhys. Lett.

    (2006)
  • KaganovM.I. et al.

    Sov. Phys.—JETP

    (1958)
  • AkhiezerA.I. et al.

    Sov. Phys. Usp.

    (1961)
  • FalkH.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1964)
  • Cited by (5)

    View full text