Skip to main content
Log in

Synthetic Jet Control on the Propulsion Behavior of a Foil in Plunge-pitch Motion

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Synthetic Jet (SJ) control on the propulsion behavior of a foil in plunge-pitch motion is examined in this work by numerical simulations. An elliptic foil with ratio of 8 performs the plunge and pitch motions synchronously. A pair of SJs with the same frequency and strength is integrated into the upper and lower surfaces of the foil. As a result, the local flow field around the foil could be obviously modified by the SJs. At the Reynolds number of 200, the effects of the inclined angle between the jet direction and the chord line, the phase angle between the SJs and the flapping motion as well as the location of SJ on the propulsion performance are systematically investigated. Compared with the pure plunging and pitching foil, it is indicated that the enhancement of mean thrust and propulsive efficiency can be obtained by the SJs with suitable working parameters. Based on the numerical analysis, it is found that the jet flow on the foil surfaces, which changes the local pressure distribution to increase the pressure difference between upper and lower surfaces, can benefit the propulsion behavior of the flapping foil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lighthill M J. Hydromechanics of aquatic animal propulsion. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1969, 1, 413–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maxworthy T. The fluid dynamics of insect flight. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1981, 13, 329–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang Z J. Dissecting insect flight. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2005, 37, 183–210.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Platzer M F, Jones K D, Young J, Lai J C S. Flapping wing aerodynamics: Progress and challenges. AIAA Journal, 2008, 46, 2136–2149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu T Y. Fish swimming and bird/insect flight. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 43, 25–58.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellington C P, van den Berg C, Willmott A P, Thomas A L R. Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature, 1996, 384, 626–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson J M, Streitlien K, Barret K S, Triantafyllou M S. Oscillating foils of high propulsive efficiency. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 360, 41–72.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dickinson M H, Lehmann F O, Sane S P. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science, 1999, 284, 1954–1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun M, Tang J. Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lehmann F O, Pick S. The aerodynamic benefit of wing-wing interaction depends on stroke trajectory in flapping insect wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2007, 210, 1362–1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baik Y S, Bernal L P, Granlund K, Ol M V. Unsteady force generation and vortex dynamics of pitching and plunging aerofoils. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 709, 37–68.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Au L T K, Phan V H, Park H C. Longitudinal flight dynamic analysis on vertical takeoff of a tailless flapping-wing micro air vehicle. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2018, 15, 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Das A, Shukla R K, Govardhan R N. Existence of a sharp transition in the peak propulsive efficiency of a low-Re pitching foil. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 800, 307–326.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Fernandez-Feria R. Linearized propulsion theory of flapping airfoils revisited. Physical Review Fluids, 2016, 1, 084502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fernandez-Feria R. Note on optimum propulsion of heaving and pitching airfoils from linear potential theory. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 826, 781–796.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Heathcote S, Gursul I. Flexible flapping airfoil propulsion at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA Journal, 2007, 45, 1066–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kang C-K, Aono H, Cesnik C E S, Shyy W. Effects of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 689, 32–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Quinn D B, Lauder G V, Smits A J. Maximizing the efficiency of a flexible propulsor using experimental optimization. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 767, 430–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. David M J, Govardhan R N, Arakeri J H. Thrust generation from pitching foils with flexible trailing edge flaps. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 828, 70–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Molina J, Zhang X. Aerodynamics of a heaving airfoil in ground effect. AIAA Journal, 2011, 49, 1168–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Quinn D B, Moored K W, Dewey P A, Smits A J. Unsteady propulsion near a solid boundary. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2014, 742, 152–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mivehchi A, Dahl J, Licht S. Heaving and pitching oscillating foil propulsion in ground effect. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2016, 63, 174–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Licht S C, Wibawa M S, Hover F S, Triantafyllou M S. In-line motion causes high thrust and efficiency in flapping foils that use power downstroke. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2010, 213, 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Esfahani J A, Barati E, Karbasian H R. Fluid structures of flapping airfoil with elliptical motion trajectory. Computers & Fluids, 2015, 108, 142–155.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang S C, Liu C, Wu J. Effect of motion trajectory on the aerodynamic performance of a flapping airfoil. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2017, 75, 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith B L, Glezer A. The formation and evolution of synthetic jets. Physics of Fluids, 1998, 10, 2281–2297.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Cattafesta L N, Sheplak M. Actuators for active flow control. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2011, 43, 247–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Amitay M, Smith D R, Kibens V, Parekh D E, Glezer A. Aerodynamic flow control over an unconventional airfoil using synthetic jet actuators. AIAA Journal, 2001, 39, 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim S H, Kim C. Separation control on NACA23012 using synthetic jet. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2009, 13, 172–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Monir H E, Tadjfar M, Bakhtian A. Tangential synthetic jets for separation control. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2014, 45, 50–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zong H H, van Pelt T, Kotsonis M. Airfoil flow separation control with plasma synthetic jets at moderate Reynolds number. Experiments in Fluids, 2018, 59, 169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rehman A, Kontis K. Synthetic jet control effectiveness on stationary and pitching airfoils. Journal of Aircraft, 2006, 43, 1782–1789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yen J, Ahmed N A. Parametric study of dynamic stall flow field with synthetic jet actuation. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2012, 134, 071106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Taylor K, Amitay M. Dynamic stall process on a finite span model and its control via synthetic jet actuators. Physics of Fluids, 2015, 27, 077104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tadjfar M, Asgari E. The role of frequency and phase difference between the flow and the actuation signal of a tangential synthetic jet on dynamic stall flow control. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2018, 140, 111203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang C L, Tang H. Enhancement of aerodynamic performance of a heaving airfoil using synthetic-jet based active flow control. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2018, 13, 046005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wu J, Shu C. Implicit velocity correction-based immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method and its applications. Journal of Computational Physics, 2009, 228, 1963–1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin X J, Guo S H, Wu J, Nan J W. Aerodynamic performance of a flapping foil with asymmetric heaving motion near a wall. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2018, 15, 636–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lin X J, Wu J, Zhang T W. Performance investigation of a self-propelled foil with combined oscillating motion in stationary fluid. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 175, 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11622219) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20191271). This work is also supported by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Zhou, G. & Wu, J. Synthetic Jet Control on the Propulsion Behavior of a Foil in Plunge-pitch Motion. J Bionic Eng 17, 303–314 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-020-0024-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-020-0024-5

Keywords

Navigation