Skip to main content
Log in

Awake glioma surgery: technical evolution and nuances

  • Topic Review
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Multiple studies have demonstrated that improved extent of resection is associated with longer overall survival for patients with both high and low grade glioma. Awake craniotomy was developed as a technique for maximizing resection whilst preserving neurological function.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive review of the literature describing the history, indications, techniques and outcomes of awake craniotomy for patients with glioma.

Results

The technique of awake craniotomy evolved to become an essential tool for resection of glioma. Many perceived contraindications can now be managed. We describe in detail our preferred technique, the testing paradigms utilized, and critically review the literature regarding functional and oncological outcome.

Conclusions

Awake craniotomy with mapping has become the gold standard for safely maximizing extent of resection for tumor in or near eloquent brain. Cortical and subcortical mapping methods have been refined and the technique is associated with an extremely low rate of complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keles GE, Anderson B, Berger MS (1999) The effect of extent of resection on time to tumor progression and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme of the cerebral hemisphere. Surg Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(99)00103-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Keles GE et al (2006) Volumetric extent of resection and residual contrast enhancement on initial surgery as predictors of outcome in adult patients with hemispheric anaplastic astrocytoma. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2006.105.1.34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McGirt MJ et al (2009) Independent association of extent of resection with survival in patients with malignant brain astrocytoma: clinical article. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2008.4.17536

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lacroix M et al (2001) A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2001.95.2.0190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lamborn KR, Chang SM, Prados MD (2004) Prognostic factors for survival of patients with glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis. Neuro Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1215/s1152851703000620

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeremić B et al (1997) The effect of extent of tumor resection on the outcome of combined therapy in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Srp Arh Celok Lek 125:93–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sanai N, Polley MY, McDermott MW, Parsa AT, Berger MS (2011) An extent of resection threshold for newly diagnosed glioblastomas: clinical article. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.JNS10998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith JS et al (2008) Role of extent of resection in the long-term outcome of low-grade hemispheric gliomas. J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.9337

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Stummer W et al (2008) Extent of resection and survival in glioblastoma multiforme: identification of and adjustment for bias. Neurosurgery 62(3):564–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ushio Y, Kochi M, Hamada JI, Kai Y, Nakamura H (2005) Effect of surgical removal on survival and quality of life in patients with supratentorial glioblastoma. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.45.454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vecht CJ, Avezaat CJJ, Van Putten WLJ, Eijkenbom WMH, Stefanko SZ (1990) The influence of the extent of surgery on the neurological function and survival in malignant glioma. A retrospective analysis in 243 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.53.6.466

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Han SJ et al (2019) Subcortical stimulation mapping of descending motor pathways for perirolandic gliomas: assessment of morbidity and functional outcome in 702 cases. J Neurosurg 131:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Duffau H et al (2003) Usefulness of intraoperative electrical subcortical mapping during surgery for low-grade gliomas located within eloquent brain regions: functional results in a consecutive series of 103 patients. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.98.4.0764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Keles GE et al (2004) Intraoperative subcortical stimulation mapping for hemispherical perirolandic gliomas located within or adjacent to the descending motor pathways: evaluation of morbidity and assessment of functional outcome in 294 patients. J Neurosurg 100:369–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rahman M et al (2017) The effects of new or worsened postoperative neurological deficits on survival of patients with glioblastoma. J Neurosurg 127:123–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bartholow R (1874) Experimental investigations into the functions of the human brain. Am J Med Sci 7:305–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Patra DP, Hess RA, Abi-Aad KR, Muzyka IM, Bendok BR (2019) Roberts Bartholow: the progenitor of human cortical stimulation and his contentious experiment. Neurosurg Focus 47:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Penfield W, Boldrey E (1937) Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/60.4.389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Whitaker HA, Ojemann GA (1977) Graded localisation of naming from electrical stimulation mapping of left cerebral cortex. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/270050a0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Berger MS, Kincaid J, Ojemann GA, Lettich E (1989) Brain mapping techniques to maximize resection, safety, and seizure control in children with brain tumors. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198911000-00015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanai N, Mirzadeh Z, Berger MS (2008) Functional outcome after language mapping for glioma resection. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa067819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hervey-Jumper SL et al (2015) Awake craniotomy to maximize glioma resection: methods and technical nuances over a 27-year period. J Neurosurg 123:325–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Duffau H (2015) Stimulation mapping of white matter tracts to study brain functional connectivity. Nat Rev Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bulsara KR, Johnson J, Villavicencio AT (2005) Improvements in brain tumor surgery: the modern history of awake craniotomies. Neurosurg Focus 18:5–7

    Google Scholar 

  25. Archer DP, McKenna JMA, Morin L, Ravussin P (1988) Conscious-sedation analgesia during craniotomy for intractable epilepsy: a review of 354 consecutive cases. Can J Anaesth. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03010852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Silbergeld DL, Mueller WM, Colley PS, Ojemann GA, Lettich E (1992) Use of propofol (Diprivan) for awake craniotomies: technical note. Surg Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(92)90038-O

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Serletis D, Bernstein M (2007) Prospective study of awake craniotomy used routinely and nonselectively for supratentorial tumors. J Neurosurg 107:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tarapore PE et al (2012) Preoperative multimodal motor mapping: a comparison of magnetoencephalography imaging, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation, and direct cortical stimulation: clinical article. J Neurosurg 117:354–362

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu JS et al (2007) Clinical evaluation and follow-up outcome of diffusion tensor imaging-based functional neuronavigation: a prospective, controlled study in patients with gliomas involving pyramidal tracts. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000303189.80049.ab

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nimsky C et al (2005) Intraoperative diffusion-tensor MR imaging: shifting of white matter tracts during neurosurgical procedures—initial experience. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2341031984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tarapore PE, Chang EF, Gabriel R, Berger MS, Nagarajan SS (2014) Magnetoencephalographic imaging for neurosurgery. Funct Brain Tumor Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5858-7_7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Spena G et al (2010) Preoperative and intraoperative brain mapping for the resection of eloquent-area tumors: a prospective analysis of methodology, correlation, and usefulness based on clinical outcomes. Acta Neurochir (Wien). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0764-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Roux F et al (2019) Intraoperative electrostimulation for awake brain mapping: how many positive interference responses are required for reliability? J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.6.JNS19925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Southwell DG, Hervey-Jumper SL, Perry DW, Berger MS (2016) Intraoperative mapping during repeat awake craniotomy reveals the functional plasticity of adult cortex. J Neurosurg 124:1460–1469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Molina ES et al (2018) Conscious sedation with dexmedetomidine compared with asleep-awake-asleep craniotomies in glioma surgery: An analysis of 180 patients. J Neurosurg 129(5):1223–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Goettel N et al (2016) Dexmedetomidine vs propofol-remifentanil conscious sedation for awake craniotomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 116(6):811–821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Aabedi AA et al (2019) Assessment of wakefulness during awake craniotomy to predict intraoperative language performance. J Neurosurg 31:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.2.jns183486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Roux FE, Durand JB, Djidjeli I, Moyse E, Giussani C (2017) Variability of intraoperative electrostimulation parameters in conscious individuals: Language cortex. J Neurosurg 126:1641–1652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sartorius CJ, Berger MS (1998) Rapid termination of intraoperative stimulation-evoked seizures with application of cold Ringer’s lactate to the cortex. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.2.0349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Verst SM et al (2019) Monopolar 250–500 Hz language mapping: Results of 41 patients. Clin Neurophysiol Pract 4:1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Danks RA, Rogers M, Aglio LS, Gugino LD, Black PM (1998) Patient tolerance of craniotomy performed with the patient under local anesthesia and monitored conscious sedation. Neurosurgery 42:26–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ojemann G, Ojemann J, Lettich E, Berger M (1989) Cortical language localization in left, dominant hemisphere: an electrical stimulation mapping investigation in 117 patients. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1989.71.3.0316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. De Benedictis A, Moritz-Gasser S, Duffau H (2010) Awake mapping optimizes the extent of resection for low-grade gliomas in eloquent areas. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000369514.74284.78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Swift JR et al (2018) Passive functional mapping of receptive language areas using electrocorticographic signals. Clin Neurophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2018.09.007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Ritaccio AL, Brunner P, Schalk G (2018) Electrical stimulation mapping of the brain: basic principles and emerging alternatives. J Clin Neurophysiol 35:86–97

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Chang EF, Raygor KP, Berger MS (2015) Contemporary model of language organization: an overview for neurosurgeons. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.JNS132647

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ries SK et al (2019) Roles of ventral versus dorsal pathways in language production: an awake language mapping study. Brain Lang 191:17–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Papagno C et al (2011) What is the role of the uncinate fasciculus? Surgical removal and proper name retrieval. Brain 134:405–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Duffau H, Gatignol P, Moritz-Gasser S, Mandonnet E (2009) Is the left uncinate fasciculus essential for language? J Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-009-0053-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. De Witt Hamer PC, Robles SG, Zwinderman AH, Duffau H (2012) Berger MS Impact of intraoperative stimulation brain mapping on glioma surgery outcome: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 30:2559–2565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Blanshard HJ, Chung F, Manninen PH, Taylor MD, Bernstein M (2001) Awake craniotomy for removal of intracranial tumor: considerations for early discharge. Anesth Analg 92:89–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Nossek E et al (2013) Failed awake craniotomy: a retrospective analysis in 424 patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor. J Neurosurg 118:243–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Peruzzi P et al (2011) A retrospective cohort-matched comparison of conscious sedation versus general anesthesia for supratentorial glioma resection. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 114:633–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Taylor MD, Bernstein M (1999) Awake craniotomy with brain mapping as the routine surgical approach to treating patients with supratentorial intraaxial tumors: a prospective trial of 200 cases. J Neurosurg 90:35–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Shinoura N et al (2013) Awake craniotomy for brain lesions within and near the primary motor area: a retrospective analysis of factors associated with worsened paresis in 102 consecutive patients. Surg Neurol Int 4:149

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Trinh VT et al (2013) Subcortical injury is an independent predictor of worsening neurological deficits following awake craniotomy procedures. Neurosurgery 72:160–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Southwell DG et al (2018) Resection of gliomas deemed inoperable by neurosurgeons based on preoperative imaging studies. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.5.JNS17166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Magill ST, Han SJ, Li J, Berger MS (2018) Resection of primary motor cortex tumors: feasibility and surgical outcomes. J Neurosurg 129:961–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Saito T et al (2019) Awake craniotomy with transcortical motor evoked potential monitoring for resection of gliomas in the precentral gyrus: utility for predicting motor function. J Neurosurg 15:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zelitzki R et al (2019) Comparison of motor outcome in patients undergoing awake vs general anesthesia surgery for brain tumors located within or adjacent to the motor pathways. Neurosurgery 85:E470–E476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Eseonu CI et al (2017) Awake craniotomy vs craniotomy under general anesthesia for perirolandic gliomas: evaluating perioperative complications and extent of resection. Neurosurgery 81:481–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Tuominen J, Yrjänä S, Ukkonen A, Koivukangas J (2013) Awake craniotomy may further improve neurological outcome of intraoperative MRI-guided brain tumor surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 155:1805–1812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Pereira LCM et al (2009) Outcome of fully awake craniotomy for lesions near the eloquent cortex: analysis of a prospective surgical series of 79 supratentorial primary brain tumors with long follow-up. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151:1215–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Bello L et al (2007) Intraoperative subcortical language tract mapping guides surgical removal of gliomas involving speech areas. Neurosurgery 60:67–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Gupta DK et al (2007) Awake craniotomy versus surgery under general anesthesia for resection of intrinsic lesions of eloquent cortex–a prospective randomised study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 109:335–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Khan F, Amatya B, Drummond K, Galea M (2014) Effectiveness of integrated multidisciplinary rehabilitation in primary brain cancer survivors in an Australian community cohort: a controlled clinic al trial. J Rehabil Med. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Khan F, Amatya B, Ng L, Drummond K, Galea M (2015) Multidisciplinary rehabilitation after primary brain tumour treatment. Coch Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009509.pub3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Ali MZ, Fadel NA, Abouldahab HA (2009) Awake craniotomy versus general anesthesia for managing eloquent cortex low-grade gliomas. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 14:263–272

    Google Scholar 

  69. Gravesteijn BY et al (2018) Awake craniotomy versus craniotomy under general anesthesia for the surgical treatment of insular glioma: choices and outcomes. Neurol Res 40:87–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Martino J, Gomez E, Bilbao JL, Dueñas JC, Vázquez-Barquero A (2013) Cost-utility of maximal safe resection of WHO grade II gliomas within eloquent areas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 155:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Pinsker MO, Nabavi A, Mehdorn HM (2007) Neuronavigation and resection of lesions located in eloquent brain areas under local anesthesia and neuropsychological-neurophysiological monitoring. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 50:281–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Gerritsen JKW et al (2019) Awake craniotomy versus craniotomy under general anesthesia without surgery adjuncts for supratentorial glioblastoma in eloquent areas: a retrospective matched case-control study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 161:307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Lu VM, Phan K, Rovin RA (2018) Comparison of operative outcomes of eloquent glioma resection performed under awake versus general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 169:121–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Taylor MD, Bernstein M (1999) Awake craniotomy with brain mapping as the routine surgical approach to treating patients with supratentorial intraaxial tumors: a prospective trial of 200 cases. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1999.90.1.0035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Noel Sirivansanti and Ken Probst for their illustrations in Figures 1 and 2 respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Gogos.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gogos, A.J., Young, J.S., Morshed, R.A. et al. Awake glioma surgery: technical evolution and nuances. J Neurooncol 147, 515–524 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03482-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03482-z

Keywords

Navigation