Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Governance of the water-energy-food nexus: insights from four infrastructure projects in the Lower Mekong Basin

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The social relations and biophysical flows that link water, food, and energy systems are said to form a ‘nexus’. Efforts to steer or otherwise exert influence on decisions that impact upon these nexus links, including to ignore them, take place at multiple levels, vary in complexity, and have implications for who benefits and who is burdened by those relations and flows. This paper examines how nexus links have been governed, using four medium- to large-scale water infrastructure projects in Laos and Thailand as probes into problematic issues of coordination, anticipation, inclusion, and attribution. Project documents, media reports, and published analyses were coded to extract information about nexus links, narratives, and decisions. Nexus interactions were summarized using a novel symbolic notation and then classified along a scale of increasing structural complexity as pairs, chains, and loops. The key finding from the analysis of the four projects was that nexus governance was fragmented, reactive, exclusive, and opaque. Coordination among ministries was limited with inter-ministerial bodies, and integrated development plans ineffective at guiding project design or operation decisions in the presence of bureaucratic competition. Anticipation of cross-sectoral concerns was rare, despite scope to identify them early in feasibility studies, and assessment activities; instead they were only acknowledged after public pressure. Inclusion of the needs of vulnerable and affected groups was limited, although poverty alleviation, and other social benefits were a significant element in project justification narratives. Attribution of responsibility was difficult as many key decisions took place behind closed doors, while project information was withheld, raising further governance issues of transparency and accountability. Structural complexity in the nexus links made addressing governance problems even more challenging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allouche J, Middleton C, Gyawali D (2015) Technical Veil, Hidden Politics: interrogating the power linkages behind the nexus. Water Altern 8:610–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird IG, Manorom K, Phenow A, Gaja-Svasti S (2019) What about the tributaries of the tributaries? Fish migrations, fisheries, dams and fishers’ knowledge in North-Eastern Thailand. Int J Water Res Dev 1–30.

  • Bangkok Post (2004) Irrigation head airs doubts on proposed national grid (3 May 2004). Bangkok Post, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangkok Post (2010) Water grid scheme lashed (2 January 2010). Bangkok Post, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangkok Post (2011) Water management plan may be expanded in Isan (3 May 2011). Bangkok Post, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangkok Post (2013) DWR unveils strategy to ease droughts in Northeast (30 April 2013). Bangkok Post, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangkok Post (2014) Dam activists slam charges (18 February 2014). Bangkok Post, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Baran E, Myschowoda C (2009) Dams and fisheries in the Mekong Basin. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manage 12:227–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello W, Cunningham S, Poh LK (1998) A siamese tragedy: development and disintegration in modern Thailand. White Lotus, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake D (2014) Halt to water megaprojects offers hope. Bangkok Post, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Bréthaut C, Gallagher L, Dalton J, Allouche J (2019) Power dynamics and integration in the water-energy-food nexus: learning lessons for transdisciplinary research in Cambodia. Environ Sci Policy 94:153–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnag A (1990) Energy shortages spark additional threat to livelihoods in Northeast (29 January 1990). Bangkok Post, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns R, Krzywoszynska A (2016) Anatomy of a buzzword: the emergence of ‘the water-energy-food nexus’ in UK natural resource debates. Environ Sci Policy 64:164–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinvarakorn V (1999) Pak Mun Dam: still waters run deep (2 June 1999). Bangkok Post, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Colloff MJ, Doody TM, Overton IC, Dalton J, Welling R (2019) Re-framing the decision context over trade-offs among ecosystem services and wellbeing in a major river basin where water resources are highly contested. Sustain Sci 14:713–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Covarrubias M (2019) The nexus between water, energy and food in cities: towards conceptualizing socio-material interconnections. Sustain Sci 14:277–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Dombrowsky I, Hensengerth O (2018) Governing the water-energy-food nexus related to hydropower on shared rivers-the role of regional organizations. Front Environ Sci 6:153

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore J, Lebel L, Molle F (2012) A framework for analysing transboundary water governance complexes, illustrated in the Mekong Region. J Hydrol 466:23–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Elinoff E (2007) Years of cruel treatment may have pushed Pak Mun villagers to the brink (21 July 2007). The Nation, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Foran T (2015) Node and regime: interdisciplinary analysis of water-energy-food nexus in the Mekong region. Water Altern 8.

  • Foran T, Manorom K (2009) Pak Mun Dam: perpetually contested? In: Molle F, Foran T, Käkönen M (eds) Contested waterscapes in the mekong region: hydropower, livelihoods and governance. Earthscan, London, pp 55–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlak AK, Haefner A (2017) Riparianization of the mekong river commission. Water Int 42:893–902

    Google Scholar 

  • Givens JE, Padowski J, Guzman CD, Malek K, Witinok-Huber R, Cosens B, Briscoe M, Boll J, Adam J (2018) Incorporating social system dynamics in the Columbia River Basin: food-energy-water resilience and sustainability modeling in the Yakima River Basin. Front Environ Sci 6:104

    Google Scholar 

  • Grachangnetara S, Bumrungtham P (2003) Pak Mun Dam revisited. TDRI Quart Rev 18:5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas PM (1992) Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Organ 46(1):1–3546

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefner A (2016) Negotiating for water resources: bridging troubled waters. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Handley P, Awanahora S (1991) Power struggles: Thai dam scheme causes split between rich and poor countries. Far East Econ Rev 154:98–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoolohan C, Larkin A, McLachlan C, Falconer R, Soutar I, Suckling J, Varga L, Haltas I, Druckman A, Lumbroso D, Scott M, Gilmour D, Ledbetter R, McGrane S, Mitchell C, Yu D (2018) Engaging stakeholders in research to address water–energy–food (WEF) nexus challenges. Sustain Sci 13:1415–1426

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huckleberry JK, Potts MD (2019) Constraints to implementing the food-energy-water nexus concept: Governance in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Environ Sci Policy 92:289–298

    Google Scholar 

  • International Rivers (2011) The Xayaburi Dam: a looming threat to the Mekong River. International Rivers, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Jutagate T, Krudpan C, Ngamsnae P, Lamkom T, Payooha K (2005) Changes in the fish catches during a trial opening of sluice gates on a run-of-the river reservoir in Thailand. Fish Manage Ecol 12:57–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Keskinen M, Guillaume JHA, Kattelus M, Porkka M, Räsänen TA, Varis O (2016) The water-energy-food nexus and the transboundary context: insights from large Asian rivers. Water (Switzerland) 8:193

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchherr J (2018) Strategies of successful anti-dam movements: evidence from Myanmar and Thailand. Soc Nat Res 31:166–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenzer C, Campbell I, Roch M, Leinenkugel P, Tuan VQ, Dech S (2013) Understanding the impact of hydropower developments in the context of upstream-downstream relations in the Mekong river basin. Sustain Sci 8:565–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Samabuddhi K (2004) Proposed projects earn Somkid's praise. Bangkok Post, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Larcom S, van Gevelt T (2017) Regulating the water-energy-food nexus: interdependencies, transaction costs and procedural justice. Environ Sci Policy 72:55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebel L, Grothmann T, Siebenhuner B (2010) The role of social learning in adaptiveness: insights from water management. Int Environ Agreem 10:333–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebel L, Lebel B (2018) Nexus narratives and resource insecurities in the Mekong Region. Environ Sci Policy 90:164–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Leck H, Conway D, Bradshaw M, Rees J (2015) Tracing the water–energy–food nexus: description, theory and practice. Geogr Compass 9:445–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Leese M, Meisch S (2015) Securitising sustainability? Questioning the 'water, energy and food-security nexus'. Water Altern 8.

  • Leong C, Mukherjee M (2015) Managing the socio-ecology of very large rivers: collective choice rules in IWRM narratives. Global Environ Change 34:172–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin S (1999) Fragile dominion: complexity and the commons. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Märker C, Venghaus S, Hake JF (2018) Integrated governance for the food–energy–water nexus—the scope of action for institutional change. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 97:290–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Watch M (2004) A river, its fish and its people: Local local knowledge of the natural environment at the mouth of the Mun river. Mekong Watchc, Myanmar

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton C, Allouche J, Gyawali D, Allen S (2015) The rise and implications of the water-energy-food nexus in Southeast Asia through an environmental justice lens. Water Altern 81:627–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Missingham B (2002) The village of the poor confronts the state: a geography of protest in the assembly of the poor. Urban Studies 39:1647–1663

    Google Scholar 

  • Missingham BD (2003) The assembly of the poor in Thailand: from local struggles to national protest movement. Silkworm Books, Chiang Mai

    Google Scholar 

  • MOE (2015a) Thailand energy outlook 2015 [in Thai]. Ministry of Energy, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • MOE (2015b) Thailand power development plan 2015–2036. Ministry of Energy, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Molle F (2005) Irrigation and water policies in the Mekong region: current discourses and practices. International Water Management Institute, Colombo

    Google Scholar 

  • Molle F, Floch P (2008) Megaprojects and social and environmental changes: the case of the Thai "water grid". Ambio 37:199–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Molle F, Floch P, Promphaking B, Blake DJH (2009a) "Greening Isaan": politics, ideology, and irrigation development in northeast Thailand. In: Molle F, Foran T, Käkönen M (eds) Contested waterscapes in the mekong region: hydropower, livelihoods and governance. Earthscan, London, pp 253–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Molle F, Foran T, Kakonen M (2009) Contested waterscapes in the Mekong Region: hydropower, livelihoods and governance. Earthscan, London, p 426

    Google Scholar 

  • MRC (2003) Procedures for notification, prior consultation and agreement. Mekong River Commission, Phnom Penh

    Google Scholar 

  • NESDB (2012) 11th National economic and social development plan 2012–2016 [in Thai]. National Economic and Social Development Board, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg J, Cumming GS (2008) Complexity theory for a sustainable future. Columbia University Press, New York, p 315

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2019) Governance of the water-energy-food security nexus: a multi-level coordination challenge. Environ Sci Policy 92:356–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Phongpaichit P, Baker C (1998) Thailand’s boom and bust. Chiang Mai, Silkworm

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkaew T (2004) Completion of water grid not likely in five years (16 October 2004). Bangkok Post, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieu-Clarke A (2014) Notification and consultation procedures under the mekong agreement: insights from the Xayaburi Controversy. Asian J Int Law 5:143–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts T (1993) Just another dammed river? Negative impacts of Pak Mun Dam on the fishes of the Mekong basin. Nat Hist Bull Siam Soc 41:105–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Saengpassa C (2011) Death of a river (18 August 2011). Bangkok Post, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer J, Pham HT, Hoang H (2014) Broadening stakeholder participation to improve outcomes for dam-forced resettlement in Vietnam. Water Res Rural Dev 4:85–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Smajgl A, Ward J, Pluschke L (2016) The water-food-energy Nexus—realising a new paradigm. J Hydrol 533:533–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Stackhouse J (1991) Thousands of northern Thailand villagers who fear losing their homes and farms are protesting a controversial hydroelectric project at stake is a $54million World Bank loan (19 October 1991). Globe and Mail, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein C, Pahl-Wostl C, Barron J (2018) Towards a relational understanding of the water-energy-food nexus: an analysis of embeddedness and governance in the Upper Blue Nile region of Ethiopia. Environ Sci Policy 90:173–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Strait Times (2003) Thaksin vows to tackle Thailand's water problems (26 July 2003). Strait Times, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhardiman D, Giordano M, Molle F (2015) Between interests and worldviews: the narrow path of the Mekong River Commission. Environ Plan C 33:199–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhardiman D, Wichelns D, Lebel L, Sellamuttu SS (2014) Benefit sharing in Mekong Region hydropower: Whose benefits count? Water Res Rural Dev 4:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • TDRI (2000) Pak Mun Dam case study. Prepared for the world commission on dams. Thailand Development Researh Institute, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nation (1999) Not a picnic for Pak Mool refugee (2 April 1999). The Nation, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nation (2005) Fight drought by conserving water (17 May 2005). The Nation, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nation (2005b) Group calls for halt to projects (5 July 2005). The Nation, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nation (2007a) Govt damned over Pak Mun (19 July 2007). The Nation, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nation (2007b) Thailand's water management in a haze (19 March 2007). The Nation, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nation (2010) Suwit seeks Bt50bn for irrigation project (18 February 2010). The Nation, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Tongcumpou C, Harvey N (1994) Implications of recent EIA changes in Thailand. Environ Impact Assess Rev 14:271–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Villamayor-Tomas S, Grundmann P, Epstein G, Evans T, Kimmich C (2015) The water-energy-food security nexus through the lenses of the value chain and the institutional analysis and development frameworks. Water Altern 8:735–755

    Google Scholar 

  • WCD (2000) Dams and development: a new framework for decision making. World Commission on Dams, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitz N, Strambo C, Kemp-Benedict E, Nilsson M (2017) Closing the governance gaps in the water-energy-food nexus: Insights insights from integrative governance. Global Environ Change 45:165–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Wichelns D (2017) The water-energy-food nexus: Is is the increasing attention warranted, from either a research or policy perspective? Environ Sci Policy 69:113–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Wipatayotin A (2011) B850m grid study budget under fire (8 March 2011). Bangkok Post, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Wongruang P (2005) Grid system given thumbs down (7 July 2005). Bangkok Post, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2011) Integrated water resources management: a a way forward, Thailand Environment Monitor. World Bank, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • Young O (2017) Governing complex systems: social capital for the anthropocene. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2010) Institutional dynamics: Resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in environmental and resource regimes. Global Environ Change 20:378–385

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Future Water for support to LL and AH to develop the case studies, and to Christian Kneiper and Boripat Lebel for inputs on earlier drafts of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis Lebel.

Additional information

Handled by Fabrice Renaud, University of Glasgow, Germany.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 203 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lebel, L., Haefner, A., Pahl-Wostl, C. et al. Governance of the water-energy-food nexus: insights from four infrastructure projects in the Lower Mekong Basin. Sustain Sci 15, 885–900 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00779-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00779-5

Keywords

Navigation