Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of Galileo precise time and frequency transfer models using quad-frequency carrier phase observations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

GNSSs, such as Galileo and modernized GPS, BeiDou and GLONASS systems, offer new potential and challenges in precise time and frequency transfer using multi-frequency observations. We focus on the performance of Galileo time and frequency transfer using the E1, E5a, E5b and E5 observations. Dual-frequency, triple-frequency and quad-frequency models for precise time and frequency transfer with different Galileo observations are proposed. Four time and transfer links between international time laboratories are used to assess the performances of different models in terms of time link noise level and frequency stability indicators. The average RMS values of the smoothed residuals of the clock difference series are 0.033 ns, 0.033 ns and 0.034 ns for the dual-frequency, triple-frequency and quad-frequency models with four time links, respectively. With respect to frequency stability, the average stability values at 15,360 s are 9.51 × 10−15, 9.46 × 10−15 and 9.37 × 10−15 for the dual-frequency, triple-frequency and quad-frequency models with four time links, respectively. Moreover, although biases among different models and receiver the inter-frequency exist, their characteristics are relatively stable. Generally, the dual-/triple-/quad-frequency models show similar performance for those time links, and the quad-frequency models can provide significant potential for switching among and unifying the three multi-frequency solutions, as well as further enhancing the redundancy and reliability compared to the current dual-frequency time transfer method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan DW, Weiss MA (1980) Accurate time and frequency transfer during common-view of a GPS satellite. In: Proceedings of 34th annual frequency control symposium, USAERADCOM, Ft. Monmouth, WJ, May. pp 334–346

  • Dai Z, Knedlik S, Loffeld O (2009) Instantaneous triple-frequency GPS cycle-slip detection and repair. Int J Navig Obs. Article ID 407231. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/407231

  • Defraigne P, Baire Q (2011) Combining GPS and GLONASS for time and frequency transfer. Adv Space Res 47(2):265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defraigne P, Bruyninx C (2007) On the link between GPS pseudorange noise and day-boundary discontinuities in geodetic time transfer solutions. GPS Solut 11(4):239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defraigne P, Petit G (2003) Time transfer to TAI using geodetic receivers. Metrologia 40(4):184–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deo M, El-Mowafy A (2016) Triple-frequency GNSS models for PPP with float ambiguity estimation: performance comparison using GPS. Surv Rev 50(360):249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsobeiey M (2015) Precise point positioning using triple-frequency GPS measurements. J Navig 68(3):480–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guang W, Dong S, Wu W, Zhang J, Yuan Y, Zhang S (2018) Progress of BeiDou time transfer at NTSC. Metrologia 55(2):175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo F, Zhang X, Wang J, Ren X (2016) Modeling and assessment of triple-frequency BDS precise point positioning. J Geod 90(11):1223–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmegnies A, Defraigne P, Petit G (2013) Combining GPS and GLONASS in all-in-view for time transfer. Metrologia 50(3):277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang W, Defraigne P (2016) BeiDou time transfer with the standard CGGTTS. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 63(7):1005–1012. https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2016.2517818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z, Lewandowski W (2012a) Use of GLONASS for UTC time transfer. Metrologia 49(1):57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z, Lewandowski W (2012b) Use of GLONASS for UTC time transfer. Metrologia 49:57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leick A, Rapoport L, Tatarnikov D (2015) GPS satellite surveying, 4th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Ge M, Dai X, Ren X, Fritsche M, Wickert J, Schuh H (2015) Accuracy and reliability of multi-GNSS real-time precise positioning: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo. J Geod 89(6):607–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Zhang X, Li X, Liu J, Li X (2017) Characteristics of inter-frequency clock bias for Block IIF satellites and its effect on triple-frequency GPS precise point positioning. GPS Solut 21(2):811–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Li X, Liu G, Feng G, Yuan Y, Zhang K, Ren X (2019) Triple-frequency PPP ambiguity resolution with multi-constellation GNSS: BDS and Galileo. J Geod 93(8):1105–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang K, Arias F, Petit G, Jiang Z, Tisserand L, Wang Y, Yang Z, Zhang A (2018) Evaluation of BeiDou time transfer over multiple inter-continental baselines towards UTC contribution. Metrologia 55(4):513–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Belda MC, Defraigne P, Baire Q, Aerts W (2011) Single-frequency time and frequency transfer with Galileo E5. In: Joint conference of the IEEE international frequency control and the european frequency and time forum (FCS) proceedings, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2011, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/FCS.2011.5977741

  • Martínez-Belda MC, Defraigne P, Bruyninx C (2013) On the potential of Galileo E5 for time transfer. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 60(1):121–131. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit G, Defraigne P (2016) The performance of GPS time and frequency transfer: comment on ‘A detailed comparison of two continuous GPS carrier-phase time transfer techniques’. Metrologia 53(3):1003–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit G, Jiang Z (2008) GPS All in view time transfer for TAI computation. Metrologia 45(1):35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray J, Senior K (2005) Geodetic techniques for time and frequency comparisons using GPS phase and code measurements. Metrologia 42(4):215–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizos C, Montenbruck O, Weber R, Neilan R, Hugentobler U (2013) The IGS MGEX Experiment as a milestone for a comprehensive multi-GNSS service. In: Proceedings of pacific PNT meeting 2013, Honolulu, USA, April 22–25, pp 1–7

  • Rovera GD, Torre JM, Sherwood R, Abgrall M, Courde C, Laas-Bourez M, Uhrich P (2014a) Link calibration against receiver calibration: an assessment of GPS time transfer uncertainties. Metrologia 51(5):476–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovera GD, Torre JM, Sherwood R, Abgrall M, Courde C, Laas-Bourez M, Uhrich P (2014b) Link calibration against receiver calibration: an assessment of GPS time transfer uncertainties. Metrologia 51:476–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simsky A (2006) Three’s the charm: triple-frequency combinations in future GNSS. Inside GNSS 1(5):38–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Su K, Jin S (2019) Triple-frequency carrier phase precise time and frequency transfer models for BDS-3. GPS Solut 23:86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-019-0879-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tegedor J, Øvstedal O (2014) Triple carrier precise point positioning (PPP) using GPS L5. Surv Rev 46(337):288–297. https://doi.org/10.1179/1752270613Y.0000000076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJG, Joosten P, Tiberius C (2002) A comparison of TCAR, CIR and LAMBDA GNSS ambiguity resolution. In: Proceedings of ION GPS, Portland, Oregon, September 24–27, pp 2799–2808

  • Tu R, Zhang P, Zhang R, Liu J, Lu X (2018a) Modeling and performance analysis of precise time transfer based on BDS triple-frequency un-combined observations. J Geod 93(6):837–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu R, Zhang P, Zhang R, Liu J, Lu X (2018b) Modeling and assessment of precise time transfer by using beidou navigation satellite system triple-frequency signals. Sensors 18(4):1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss MA, Petit G, Jiang Z. (2005) A comparison of GPS common-view time transfer to all-in-view. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international frequency control symposium and exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 29–31 August

  • Wu J, Wu S, Hajj G, Bertiger W, Lichten S (1993) Effects of antenna orientation on GPS carrier phase. Manuscr Geod 18:91–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Li P (2016) Benefits of the third frequency signal on cycle slip correction. GPS Solut 20(3):451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Tu R, Zhang R, Gao Y, Cai H (2018) Combining GPS, BeiDou, and Galileo satellite systems for time and frequency transfer based on carrier phase observations. Remote Sens 10(2):324. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10020324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Tu R, Gao Y, Liu N, Zhang R (2019) Improving Galileo’s carrier-phase time transfer based on prior constraint information. J Navig 72(1):121–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11903040, 41974032, 41674034) and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) programs of “Pioneer Hundred Talents” (Grant No. Y620YC1701) and “Light of the West” (Grant No. Y712YR4701), National Time Service Centre (NTSC) programs “Young Creative Talents” (Grant No. Y824SC1S06).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Tu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, P., Tu, R., Gao, Y. et al. Performance of Galileo precise time and frequency transfer models using quad-frequency carrier phase observations. GPS Solut 24, 40 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-0955-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-0955-7

Keywords

Navigation