Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

SPINMELT-2.0: Simulation of Spinel–Melt Equilibrium in Basaltic Systems under Pressures up to 15 Kbar: III. The Effects of Major Components in the Melt on the Chrome-Spinel Stability and a Possible Solution of the Problem of Origin of Chromitites

  • Published:
Geochemistry International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

The effect of variations in the fo, fa, en, fs, di, an and ab components in high-Mg basaltic melts on the topology of the spinel liquidus was quantified by conducting simulations with the new SPINMELT-2.0 model for the spinel–melt equilibrium. It has been established that enrichment of the melt in pyroxene components leads to an increase, and conversely, enrichment in plagioclase and olivine components, to a decrease in the solubility of chromite. This effect can be important at the gravitational compaction of cumulates accompanied by the extraction of intercumulus melt and its infiltration upward. In this case, it is reasonable to expect sequential reequilibration of the infiltrating melt with cumulate piles of different composition. This suggests that Cr-spinel can be transferred and concentrated again during the postcumulus solidification stage of layered intrusions. The concentrating process involves Cr-spinel extraction into the melt enriched in pyroxene components and the subsequent redeposition of the mineral during when this melt reacts with the feldspar-rich matrix of proto-anorthosite layers or horizons enriched in olivine. Some of these layers and horizons may be produced by additional injections of more primitive magma. The realism of the proposed mechanism is evident from the well-known spatial relations between the chromite layers with anorthosites and dunite–harzburgites of the Bushveld complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. E. Boudreau “Modeling the Merensky Reef, Bushveld Complex, Republic of South Africa,” Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 156, 431–437 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Boudreau, Hydromagmatic Processes and Platinum-Group Element Deposits in Layered Intrusions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. E. N. Cameron, “Chromite in the central sector of the eastern Bushveld Complex, South Africa,” Am. Mineral. 62, 1082–1096 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. N. Cameron and G. A. Desborough, “Occurrence and characteristics of chromite deposits–eastern Bushveld Complex,” Econ Geol. Monogr. 4, 23–40 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. G. Cawthorn and F. Wairaven, “Emplacement and crystallization time for the Bushveld Complex,” J. Petrol. 39 (9), 1669–1687 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. V. Eales, “Implications of the chromium budget of the Western limb of the Bushveld complex,” South Afric. J. Geol. 103(2), 141–150 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. V. Eales and R. G. Cawthorn “The Bushveld Complex,”, Layered Intrusions, Ed. by Cawthom R.G. (Elsevier Science B.V., 1996), pp. 181–229.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. V. Eales and G. Costin, “Crustally contaminated komatiite: Primary source of the chromitites and Marginal, Lower, and Critical zone magmas in a staging chamber beneath the Bushveld Complex,” Econ. Geol. 107, 645- 665 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Ya. Frenkel, Thermal and Chemical Dynamics of the Differentiation of Basite Magmas (Nauka, Moscow, 1995) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. S. Ghiorso and R. O. Sack, “Chemical mass transfer in magmatic process IV. A revised and internally consistent thermodynamic model for the interpolation and extrapolation of liquid-solid equilibria in magmatic systems at elevated temperatures and pressures,” Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 119, 197-212 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. C. J. Hatton and G. von Gruenewaldt, “The geological setting and petrogenesis of the Busheveld chromitite layers,” Evolution of Chromium Ore Field, Ed. by C. W. Stowe (Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York, 1987), pp. 109–143.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. J. Hulbert and G. von Gruenewaldt, “Textural and compositional features of chromite in the Lower and Critical Zones of the Bushveld Complex South of Potgietersrus,” Econ. Geol. 80, 872–895 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. N. Irvine “Origin of chromitite layers in the Muskox intrusion and other stratiform intrusions: a new interpretation,” Geology 5, 273–277 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. T. N. Irvine, “Infiltration metasomatism accumulate growth and double-diffusive fractional crystallization in the Muskox Intrusion and other layered intrusions,” Physics of Magmatic Processes, Ed. by R. B. Hargraves, (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1980), pp. 325–383.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. S. Korzhinskii, “Acid–Basic interaction of components in silicate melts and direction of cotectic lines,” Dokl. Akad. Nayk SSSR 128 (2), 383–386 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  16. O. B. Kovalev and I. O. Kovaleva, “Modeling of the random packing of a loose layer of polydisperse spherical particles,” J. Appl. Mechanics Tech. Phys. 55(4), 709–717 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. S. Latypov, Chistyakova, R. McIntosh, and A. Scogings, “Geochemical evidence for in situ growth of LG6 chromitite from the compositionally stratified magma in the Bushveld chamber,“ 13th International Platinum Symposium 30 June–6 July 2018 The Ranch Hotel, Polokwane, South Africa, Abstracts, (Polokwane, 2018), pp. 103–104.

  18. J. Leuthold, J. D. Blundy, and R. A. Brooker, “Experimental petrology constraints on the recycling of mafic cumulate: a focus on Cr-spinel from the Rum Eastern Layered Intrusion, Scotland,” Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 170, #12(2015).

  19. B. R. Lipin, “Pressure increases in the formation of chromite seams and the development of the ultramafic series in the Stillwater complex, Montana,” J. Petrol. 34, 955–976 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. W. Maier and S.-J. Barnes, “Platinum-group elements in the UG1 and UG2 chromitites, and the Bastard reef, at Impala platinum mine, western Bushveld Complex, South Africa: Evidence for late magmatic cumulate instability and reef constitution,” South. Afr. J. Geol. 111, 159–176 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. E. A. Mathez and R. J. Kinzler, “Metasomatic chromitite seams in the Bushveld and Rum layered intrusions,” Elements 13 (6), 397–402 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2138/gselements.13.6.397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. A. McDonald, “Liquid immiscibility as one factor in chromitite seam formation in the Bushveld Igneous Complex,” Econ. Geol. Bull. Soc. 60, 1674–1685 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. A. McIntosh, Dissertation of Master of Science (Geology). (University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg School of Geosciences, 2017) (http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/ handle/10539/24026).

  24. S. K. Mondal and E. A. Mathez, “Origin of the UG2 chromitite layer, Bushveld complex,” J. Petrol. 48 (3), 495–510 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. A. J. Naldrett, A. Wilson, J. Kinnaird, M. Yudovskaya, and G. Chunnett, “The origin of chromitites and related PGE mineralization in the Bushveld Complex: new mineralogical and petrological constraints,” Mineral. Deposita 47, 209–232 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. D. M. Nicholson and E. A. Mathez, “Petrogenesis of the Merensky Reef in the rustenburg section of the Bushveld Complex,” Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 107, 293–309 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. R. L. Nielsen and M. A. Dungan, “Low-pressure mineral-melt equilibria in natural anhydrous mafic system,” Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 84, 310–326 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. G. S. Nikolaev, A. A. Ariskin, and G. S. Barmina, “SPI-NMELT-2.0: simulation of spinel–melt equilibrium in basaltic systems under pressures up to 15 kbar: I. Model formulation, calibration, and tests,” Geochem. Int. 56(1), 24–45 (2018a).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. G. S. Nikolaev, A. A. Ariskin, and G. S. Barmina, “SPI-NMELT-2.0: simulation of spinel–melt equilibrium in basaltic systems under pressures up to 15 kbar: II. Description of the program package, the topology of the Cr-spinel–melt model system, and petrological implications,” Geochem. Int. 56(2), 125-135 (2018b).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. G. S. Nikolaev, A. A. Ariskin, and G. S. Barmina, “Influence of petrogenic components on the Cr-spinel liquidus topology (modem SPINMELT-2.0) and some considerations concerning the chromitite genesis,” Problems of Magmatic and Metamorphic Petrology, Geodynamics, and Diamond Origin. Proc. International Conference Dedicated to the 110th Anniversary of Academician V. S. Sobolev, Novosbirsk, Russia,2018(SO RAN, Novosibirsk, 2018c), p. 42 [in Russian].

  31. G. S. Nikolaev, A. A. Ariskin, and G. S. Barmina, “Some considerations concerning the chromitite genesis based on analysis of the inflkuence of petrogenic components of melts on the Cr-spinel liquidus topology (model SPINMELT-2.0),” 19th International Conference “Physicochemical and Petrophysical Studies in the Earth’s Science, Borok, Russia, 2018 (IGEM RAN, Moscow, 2018), pp. 246–249 (2018d) [in Russian].

  32. G. S. Nikolaev, A. A. Ariskin, and G. S. Barmina, “Numerical modeling of the effects of major elements on the solubility of chrome–spinel and a likely solution of the problem of the origin of chromitite,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 487 (1), 791–794 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. B. O’Driscoll, C. H. Emeleus, C. H. Donaldson, and J. S. Daly, “Cr-spinel seam petrogenesis in the Rum layered suite, NW Scotland: cumulate assimilation and in situ crystallization in a deforming crystal mush,” J. Petrol. 51 (6), 1171–1201 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egq013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. R. O. Sack, “Spinels as petrogenetic indicators: activity-composition relations at low pressure, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 79, 169–186 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. G. C. Ulmer, “Experimental investigations of chromite spinels,” Econ Geol Monogr. 4, 114–131 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. H. Wilson, “A chill sequence to the Bushveld complex: Insight into the first stage of emplacement and implications for the parental magmas,” J. Petrol. 53 (6), 1123–1168 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank O.I. Yakovlev (Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences) for consultations on the thermodynamic aspects of the problems. We thank the reviewer O.A. Lukanin (same institute) for detailed editorial comments that led us to improve the text of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partially supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant 16-17-10129).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry (GEOKhI), Russian Academy of Sciences, , 119991, Moscow, Russia

    G. S. Nikolaev, A. A. Ariskin & G. S. Barmina

  2. Geological Faculty, Moscow State University, 119234, Moscow, Russia

    A. A. Ariskin

Authors
  1. G. S. Nikolaev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. A. Ariskin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. S. Barmina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to G. S. Nikolaev or A. A. Ariskin.

Additional information

Translated by E. Kurdyukov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikolaev, G.S., Ariskin, A.A. & Barmina, G.S. SPINMELT-2.0: Simulation of Spinel–Melt Equilibrium in Basaltic Systems under Pressures up to 15 Kbar: III. The Effects of Major Components in the Melt on the Chrome-Spinel Stability and a Possible Solution of the Problem of Origin of Chromitites. Geochem. Int. 58, 1–10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016702920010115

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016702920010115

Keywords:

Search

Navigation