Family incivility and cyberbullying in adolescence: A moderated mediation model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106315Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Family incivility (FI) was positively associated with cyberbullying (CB).

  • Hopelessness mediated the relationship between family incivility and cyberbullying.

  • Emotional intelligence moderated the relationship between FI and hopelessness as well as that between FI and CB.

  • Being the first to explore the unique effects of FI on adolescents.

  • Flourishing the frustration-aggression theory by suggesting a strong link of frustration in real life to CB.

Abstract

Extant research has revealed the influence of family incivility on adults in the work context, leaving the reactions of adolescent victims unexplored. According to the frustration-aggression theory, it is possible that individuals become hopeless after experiencing such chronic low-intensity deviant behaviors in the family, thereby engaging in aggression. Considering adolescents' active participation online and their preference for covert ways to vent negative emotions, we focused on their cyberbullying perpetration rather than offline aggression. The participants were 3030 adolescents (57% girls, M age = 16.65 years) of a high school in China. The results examined the mechanism through which family incivility was significantly related to cyberbullying through the mediation of hopelessness, suggesting a strong link of real-life experience to online behavior, while emotional intelligence acted as a buffer against the relationship between family incivility and hopelessness as well as that between family incivility and cyberbullying. The findings revealed the durative underlying detriment of family incivility, and cyberbullying prevention strategies were proposed. Both theoretical and practical implications of these findings were discussed.

Introduction

Family interactions have attracted considerable attention for a long time due to their significant influences on the development of adolescents, who are in a period of heightened risk (Allen et al., 1994, Turpyn and Chaplin, 2016). Recently, family incivility, a new form of family interactions, has been introduced to the literature, referring to low-intensity deviant interpersonal behaviors that undermine mutual respect in the family (e.g., excluding family members from social activities, doubting the judgment of family members)(Lim & Tai, 2014). Being distinguished from family abuse or aggression, family incivility is frequently ignored in our daily life but is more general and has an enormous underlying impact on the victims in reality. Previous studies have examined that for adult victims, family incivility is negatively related to work outcomes (Bai et al., 2016, Lim and Tai, 2014). However, little is known about how adolescents, who are sensitive to subtle relationship problems (Grych, Raynor, & Fosco, 2004), react to family incivility.

According to the frustration-aggression theory, frustration provokes negative affect, which in turn brings about aggression (Berkowitz, 1983, Berkowitz, 1989, Berkowitz, 1990). From this perspective, ongoing exposure to family incivility consistently displeases adolescents and therefore may provoke them into aggressive actions. Nevertheless, as the anticipated punishment for aggression affects the choice of the target (Berkowitz, 1989), facing the authority of parents and siblings, adolescent victims may give up striking back and be prone to some covert forms of aggression, such as cyberbullying. Cyberbullying is an aggressive behavior through modern technological devices (Slonje & Smith, 2008), which peaks in adolescence (Pabian & Vandebosch, 2014). Despite the potential influence of family incivility on adolescent cyberbullying, no prior research has examined the relationship between them. Therefore, we expand the domain of family incivility and speculate that family incivility is positively correlated with cyberbullying perpetration.

The contributions of the present study are threefold. First of all, although family incivility is found to have a marked influence on adult victims (Bai et al., 2016, Lim and Tai, 2014), adolescent reaction to it is still unrevealed. To explore the adverse effects of family incivility on adolescents, we establish a moderated mediation model based on the frustration-aggression formulation, central to which is hopelessness, a type of negative feelings many adolescents have experienced, while emotional intelligence moderates the relationship between family incivility and hopelessness as well as that between family incivility and cyberbullying. Secondly, the findings empirically support the frustration-aggression theory by demonstrating the mechanism through which frustration such as family incivility is associated with aggression such as cyberbullying, and extend the existing theory by observing the interplay between online and offline behaviors. Thirdly, we seek to aid adolescents in mental health practically from a family perspective. We expect the study of daily behavior in the family can assist in improving the quality of family interactions, affecting the way our children deal with their children, and ultimately protecting our descendants from generation to generation.

Section snippets

Theory and hypotheses

Family incivility is defined as low-intensity deviant behaviors with ambiguous intent that violate the norms of mutual respect in the family, which consists of three dimensions (Lim & Tai, 2014) ---- discourteous behaviors, ambiguous intent, and violation of the norms of mutual respect. Discourteous behaviors within family, such as putting down and ignoring others, are typically less intense compared with family abuse or aggression. Uncivil family members may act rudely out of their ignorance

Participants and procedures

We collected data from 3030 adolescents of a high school in Hebei Province, China in February of 2019. Participants were composed of 57% females and 43% males. Their mean age was 16.65 years (SD = 1.33). 44.2% of the fathers and 47.1% of the mothers had less than a high school education, which reflected the demographic characteristics of this area. We obtained approval of this study from school administrator and participants in advance, and promised to participants that their participation was

Statistical analyses

Firstly, we calculated descriptive statistics and correlations matrix. In order to facilitate result interpretation and avoid the multicollinearity problem (Aiken & West, 1991), all the data were standardized except for the dependent variable. Secondly, we used PROCESS macro (Model 4) developed by Hayes (2012) to test the mediation effect of hopelessness. Thirdly, we conducted PROCESS macro (Model 59) developed by Hayes (2012) to examine whether emotional intelligence moderated this mediation

Results

As this study aimed at exploring whether hopelessness would mediate the association between family incivility and cyberbullying and whether this mediation effect would be moderated by emotional intelligence, the analysis included the following three steps.

Preliminary analyses

Table 1 outlines the descriptive statistics and the zero-correlation for all variables. The internal consistency alphas were all above 0.80. The results revealed that family incivility was positively linked to hopelessness and cyberbullying, and hopelessness was positively related to cyberbullying. Besides, emotional intelligence was negatively related with family incivility, hopelessness and cyberbullying.

Besides, to investigate the potential impact of sex, we conducted an independent-sample t

Testing for mediation effect

Table 2 displays the results for Hypotheses 1, 2, and 3. The results showed that family incivility was positively related to hopelessness (β = 0.32, p < .001. see Model 1 of Table 2), and hopelessness was positively associated with cyberbullying (β = 0.05, p < .001. see Model 2 of Table 2). Thus, Hypotheses 1 and 2 were supported. Finally, it was found that family incivility had an indirect effect on cyberbullying (β = 0.02). Bootstrapping results confirmed the significance of the indirect

Testing for moderated mediation

The results for Hypotheses 4, 5 and 6 are reported in Table 3. Results demonstrated that the interaction of family incivility with emotional intelligence significantly predicts hopelessness (β = -0.03, p < .05. see Model 1 of Table 3) and cyberbullying (β = -0.03, p < .001. see Model 2 of Table 3), supporting Hypothesis 4 and 6, while the interaction of hopelessness with emotional intelligence was a marginally significant predictor of cyberbullying (β = 0.01, p = .0561. see Model 2 of Table 3).

Discussion

The present study is the first to explore how adolescent victims react to family incivility, which extends prior work on family incivility as well as flourishes the frustration-aggression theory. As previously predicted, the results showed that family incivility was positively related to cyberbullying through the mediator hopelessness. Besides, emotional intelligence mitigated the effect of family incivility on hopelessness and cyberbullying. In addition, sex was significantly related to family

Theoretical implications

Our study has made several considerable contributions to current literature. First of all, although extensive research has focused on the field of family interactions, there is a limited amount of investigation on family incivility. Former studies highlighted the correlation between family incivility and work outcomes for adults (Bai et al., 2016, Lim and Tai, 2014), but their attention has yet to be drawn to adolescent victims. Research demonstrated that aggressive behavior is regarded as a

Practical implications

The findings have remarkable practical implications. Firstly, our research highlights the enormous underlying adverse effects of family incivility on adolescent development. To specify, uncivil family members generally neglect their uncivil behaviors, so that family incivility keeps existing and unravels the psychological well-being of family members (Lim & Tai, 2014). Adolescent victims tend to feel hopeless and carry out some inappropriate behaviors such as cyberbullying, since cyberbullying

Limitations and future research

We should acknowledge several limitations of the current study. Firstly, we tested this moderated mediation model in adolescent participants and whether the results apply to adults remain unclear. Herein, we deduced the impact of family incivility from the perspective of adolescents. As the prevalence of hopelessness and cyberbullying among adolescents kept increasing (Gillham and Reivich, 2004, Von Marées and Petermann, 2012), we hypothesized that adolescent victims of family incivility might

Conclusions

In summary, our study enriches the frustration-aggression theory by investigating the relationships between family incivility, hopelessness and cyberbullying among adolescents. Specifically, hopelessness mediates the relationship between family incivility and cyberbullying. This study also identifies the individual differences by exploring how emotional intelligence moderates this mediation model. We hope that our efforts can set a platform for future research to study the influence of family

Credit author statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

Acknowledgment

The project was funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation.

References (72)

  • J. Johnson et al.

    Resilience to suicidal ideation in psychosis: Positive self-appraisals buffer the impact of hopelessness

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (2010)
  • T.R. Kratochwill et al.

    Families and schools together: An experimental study of multi-family support groups for children at risk

    Journal of School Psychology

    (2009)
  • T. Roberton et al.

    Emotion regulation and aggression

    Aggression and Violent Behavior

    (2012)
  • C. Rodríguez-Naranjo et al.

    Daily stress and coping styles in adolescent hopelessness depression: Moderating effects of gender

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2016)
  • D. Ruiz-Aranda et al.

    Short- and midterm effects of emotional intelligence training on adolescent mental health

    Journal of Adolescent Health

    (2012)
  • N.S. Schutte et al.

    A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between emotional intelligence and health

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2007)
  • R. Slonje et al.

    The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2013)
  • L.A. Stockdale et al.

    Parent and child technoference and socioemotional behavioral outcomes: A nationally representative study of 10- to 20-year-Old adolescents

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2018)
  • C.S. Wong et al.

    The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude:An exploratory study

    The Leadership Quarterly

    (2002)
  • L.Y. Abramson et al.

    Hopelessness depression:A theory-based subtype of depression

    Psychological Review

    (1989)
  • L.S. Aiken et al.

    Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions

    (1991)
  • J.P. Allen et al.

    Longitudinal assessment of autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-family interactions as predictors of adolescent ego development and self-esteem

    (1994)
  • B.N. Allison

    Parent-adolescent conflict in early adolescence: Research and implications for middle school programs

    Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences Education

    (2000)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Hopelessness and suicidal behavior: An overview

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1975)
  • L. Berkowitz

    Aversively stimulated aggression: Some parallels and differences in research with animals and humans

    American Psychologist

    (1983)
  • L. Berkowitz

    Frustration-aggression hypothesis; examination and reformulation

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1989)
  • L. Berkowitz

    On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression: A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis

    American Psychologist

    (1990)
  • U. Beyazit et al.

    An examination of the predictive factors of cyberbullying in adolescents

    Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal

    (2017)
  • N. Bodner et al.

    Affective family interactions and their associations with adolescent depression: A dynamic network approach

    Development and Psychopathology

    (2018)
  • J.M. Bolland et al.

    Hopelessness and violence among inner-city youths

    Maternal and Child Health Journal

    (2001)
  • L.M. Cortina et al.

    Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact

    Journal of Occupational Health Psychology

    (2001)
  • K. Cripps et al.

    Adolescents' psychological well-being and perceived parental involvement: Implications for parental involvement in middle schools

    RMLE Online

    (2015)
  • B. Dilmaç

    The relationship between adolescents' levels of hopelessness and cyberbullying: The role of values

    Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice

    (2017)
  • J. Dollard et al.

    Frustration and aggression

    (1939)
  • E. Dowdy et al.

    Enhancing school-based mental health services with a preventive and promotive approach to universal screening for complete mental health

    Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation

    (2014)
  • E.F. Dubow et al.

    Long-term effects of parents' education on children's educational and occupational success: Mediation by family interactions, child aggression, and teenage aspirations

    Merrill-Palmer Quarterly

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Qiyu Bai and Shiguo Bai made equal contributions: co-first authorship.

    View full text