Abstract
Objectives
Little is known about cancer survivors’ self-perception of their dietary quality compared with their measured diet quality and how those perceptions may influence their actual diet. This study aimed to fill this gap using national large datasets.
Methods
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2005 to 2014 were used. The healthy eating index (HEI) based on 24-h dietary recall was used to measure diet quality. Logistic regression models were fit to examine the influence of the misperception of eating healthiness on diet quality.
Results
The agreement between self-perceived and actual diet quality was low (Kappa = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.09) among cancer survivors. Over-rating diet quality was associated with a 5.39 lower total HEI score (P < 0.0001), 1.00 lower HEI score for empty calorie intake (P = 0.0028), 0.15 lower score for vegetable intake (P = 0.108), and 0.29 lower score for fruit intake; under-rating one’s diet quality was associated with a 7.12 higher total HEI score (P < 0.0001), 2.57 higher HEI score for empty calorie intake (P < 0.0001), 0.02 higher score for vegetable intake (P = 0.904), and 0.84 higher score for fruit intake (P = 0.001). Our multinomial regression estimates suggested that each 10-year increase in age was associated with an increase in the odds of being an over-rater vs. a correct-rater (OR: 11.4, 95% CI: 10.01, 10.2). Hispanics were more likely than non-Hispanic whites to over-rate their diet quality (OR: 1.792, 95% CI: 1.062, 3.024).
Conclusions
Tailored nutrition interventions and guidance aimed at reducing the divergence between self-assessed and actual diet quality have the potential to improve cancer survivorship and narrow racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Kramer JL, Rowland JH, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA: A Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:271–89.
Davies N, Batehup L, Thomas R. The role of diet and physical activity in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer survivorship: a review of the literature. Br J Cancer. 2011;105:S52.
Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Meyerhardt J, Courneya KS, Schwartz AL, et al. Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:242–74. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21142
Jones LW, Demark-Wahnefried W. Diet, exercise, and complementary therapies after primary treatment for cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:1017–26.
Pekmezi DW, Demark-Wahnefried W. Updated evidence in support of diet and exercise interventions in cancer survivors. Acta Oncologica. 2011;50:167–78.
Rock CL, Demark-Wahnefried W. Nutrition and survival after the diagnosis of breast cancer: a review of the evidence. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3302.
Norman SA, Potashnik SL, Galantino ML, De Michele AM, House L, Localio AR. Modifiable risk factors for breast cancer recurrence: what can we tell survivors? J Women’s Health. 2007;16:177–90.
Meyerhardt JA, Ma J, Courneya KS. Energetics in colorectal and prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4066.
McTiernan A, Irwin M, VonGruenigen V. Weight, physical activity, diet, and prognosis in breast and gynecologic cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4074.
Demark‐Wahnefried W, Peterson B, McBride C, Lipkus I, Clipp E. Current health behaviors and readiness to pursue life‐style changes among men and women diagnosed with early stage prostate and breast carcinomas. Cancer. 2000;88:674–84.
Maskarinec G, Murphy S, Shumay D, Kakai H. Dietary changes among cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer Care. 2001;10:12–20.
Hawkins NA, Smith T, Zhao L, Rodriguez J, Berkowitz Z, Stein KD. Health-related behavior change after cancer: results of the American Cancer Society’s studies of cancer survivors (SCS). J Cancer Survivorship. 2010;4:20–32.
McBride CM, Emmons KM, Lipkus IM. Understanding the potential of teachable moments: the case of smoking cessation. Health Educ Res. 2003;18:156–70.
Cues to action in prostate cancer screening. Oncology Nursing Forum. 1994;21:1171–76.
Humpel N, Magee C, Jones SC. The impact of a cancer diagnosis on the health behaviors of cancer survivors and their family and friends. Supportive Care Cancer. 2007;15:621–30.
Demark-Wahnefried W, Aziz NM, Rowland JH, Pinto BM. Riding the crest of the teachable moment: promoting long-term health after the diagnosis of cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5814–30.
Blanchard CM, Denniston MM, Baker F, Ainsworth SR, Courneya KS, Hann DM, et al. Do adults change their lifestyle behaviors after a cancer diagnosis? Am J Health Behav. 2003;27:246–56.
Zhang FF, Liu S, John EM, Must A, Demark-Wahnefried W. Diet quality of cancer survivors and noncancer individuals: results from a national survey. Cancer. 2015;121:4212–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29488
Zhang FF, Saltzman E, Kelly MJ, Liu S, Must A, Parsons SK, et al. Comparison of childhood cancer survivors’ nutritional intake with US dietary guidelines. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015;62:1461–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.25521
Berdan CA, Tangney CC, Scala C, Stolley M. Childhood cancer survivors and adherence to the American Cancer Society Guidelines on Nutrition and Physical Activity. J Cancer Survivorship. 2014;8:671–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-014-0376-0
Andrykowski MA, Beacham AO, Schmidt JE, Harper FW. Application of the theory of planned behavior to understand intentions to engage in physical and psychosocial health behaviors after cancer diagnosis. Psycho-Oncol. 2006;15:759–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1007
Brug J, Van Assema P, Kok G, Lenderink T, Glanz K. Self-rated dietary fat intake: association with objective assessment of fat, psychosocial factors, and intention to change. J Nutr Educ. 1994;26:218–23.
Jansink R, Braspenning J, Keizer E, Van Der Weijden T, Elwyn G, Grol R. Misperception of patients with type 2 diabetes about diet and physical activity, and its effects on readiness to change. J Diabetes. 2012;4:417–23.
Variyam JN, Shim Y, Blaylock J. Consumer misperceptions of diet quality. J Nutr Educ. 2001;33:314–21.
Guenther PM, Kirkpatrick SI, Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM, Buckman DW, Dodd KW, et al. The Healthy Eating Index-2010 is a valid and reliable measure of diet quality according to the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. J Nutr. 2014;144:399–407. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.113.183079
Hurley KM, Oberlander SE, Merry BC, Wrobleski MM, Klassen AC, Black MM. The healthy eating index and youth healthy eating index are unique, nonredundant measures of diet quality among low-income, African American adolescents. J Nutr. 2009;139:359–64. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.108.097113
Harray AJ, Boushey CJ, Pollard CM, Panizza CE, Delp EJ, Dhaliwal SS, et al. Perception v. actual intakes of junk food and sugar-sweetened beverages in Australian young adults: assessed using the mobile food record. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20:2300–7.
Dunning D, Heath C, Suls JM. Flawed self-assessment: implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Sci Public Interest. 2004;5:69–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x
Crosby RA, Yarber WL. Perceived versus actual knowledge about correct condom use among US adolescents: results from a national study. J Adolesc Health. 2001;28:415–20.
Tracey J, Arroll B, Barham P, Richmond D. The validity of general practitioners’ self assessment of knowledge: cross sectional study. BMJ. 1997;315:1426–8.
Acknowledgements
The study was supported in part by research grants: P30 CA016059 “Massey Cancer Center Core Support” (NIH-NCI) and U54TR001366 “Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer Treatment and Outcomes: A Transdisciplinary Approach” (NCATS/CTSA). The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funder.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xue, H., Liu, J., Cheskin, L.J. et al. Discrepancy between perceived diet quality and actual diet quality among US adult cancer survivors. Eur J Clin Nutr 74, 1457–1464 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-020-0619-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-020-0619-2
This article is cited by
-
Adherence to dietary patterns among cancer survivors in the United States
Journal of Public Health (2022)