Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance-based damage evaluation of hybrid joints

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Design objectives should be determined based on damage quantification in performance-based seismic design. To do this, the damage development and the damage model suitable for hybrid joints, which are critical substructures in self-centering frames, are studied. The damage intervals and quantified performance indexes are then suggested. Based on the existing tests, 29 hybrid joints with various structural features are modeled and loaded with cyclic loadings. The damage model, which is composed of the maximum deformation, the residual deformation and the cumulative energy, is adopted to investigate the damage development in hybrid joints. It has been demonstrated that the initial prestressing force in post-tensioned tendons has little influence on damage states of hybrid joints. The stirrup reinforcement ratio, the self-centering parameter and the concrete strength can dramatically diminish the damage developed in hybrid joints under large deformations. Linear trends are incarnated in their relations with the non-negative parameter in the damage model. The damage intervals and quantified performance indexes applied to hybrid joints are suggested. Performance indexes are enhanced compared with traditional concrete members. This study demonstrates the performance promotion and the preponderance of damage control in self-centering frame structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACI Innovation Task Group 1 (2003) Special hybrid moment frames composed of discretely jointed precast and post-tensioned concrete members: ACI T1.2-03. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hill

  • ATC-40 (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete building. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City

    Google Scholar 

  • Belleri A, Moaveni B, Restrepo JI (2013) Damage assessment through structural identification of a three-story large-scale precast concrete structure. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(1):61–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen LZ, Jiang HJ, Lu XL (2010) Modified Park–Ang damage model for reinforced concrete structures. J Tongji Univ (Nat Sci) 38(8):1103–1107

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheok G, Lew HS (1991) Performance of 1/3-scale model precast concrete beam–column connections subjected to cyclic inelastic loads—report no. 2. NISTIR 4589, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, Gaithersburg

  • Cheok G, Stone W (1994) Performance of 1/3-scale model precast concrete beam–column connections subjected to cyclic inelastic loads—report no. 4. NISTIR 5436, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, Gaithersburg

  • Cheok G, Stone W, Lew HS (1993) Performance of 1/3-scale model precast concrete beam–column connections subjected to cyclic inelastic loads—report no. 3. NISTIR 5246, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, Gaithersburg

  • Christopoulos C, Pampanin S (2004) Towards performance-based seismic design of MDOF structures with explicit consideration of residual deformations. ISET J Earthq Technol Spec Issue Perform Based Seismic Des (Guest Editor Priestley MJN) 41(1):53–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopoulos C, Pampanin S, Priestley MJN (2003) Performance-based seismic response of frame structures including residual deformations. Part I: single-degree-of-freedom systems. J Earthq Eng 7(1):97–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Code for Seismic Design of Buildings [GB 50011-2010 (2016 Edition)] (2016) Ministry of housing and urban–rural construction of the People’s Republic of China

  • Dong BQ, Lu C, Pan JL, Shan QF, Yin WY (2018) Mechanical behavior of a novel precast beam-to-column connection with U-shaped bars and engineered cementitious composites. Adv Struct Eng 21(13):1963–1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sheikh M, Sause R, Pessiki S, Lu LW (1999) Seismic behavior and design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete frames. PCI J 44(3):54–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sheikh M, Pessiki S, Sause R, Lu LW (2000) Moment rotation behavior of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete beam–column connections. ACI Struct J 1:122–132

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 356 (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao W, Ying Z, Liu W (2019) Collapse fragility analysis of self-centering precast concrete walls with different post-tensioning and energy dissipation designs. Bull Earthq Eng 17(6):3593–3613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindi RA, Sexsmith RG (2001) A proposed damage model for RC bridge columns under cyclic loading. Earthq Spectra 17(2):261–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkmaz HH, Tankut T (2005) Performance of a precast concrete beam-to-beam connection subject to reversed cyclic loading. Eng Struct 27(9):1392–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzig WB, Meskouris M (1989) Damage evaluation in reinforced concrete members under cyclic loading. In: Proceedings of 5th international concrete on structural safety and reliability, San Francisco, pp 795–802

  • Kunnath SK, Reinhorn AM, Abel JF (1991) A computational tool for evaluation of seismic performance of reinforced concrete building. Comput Struct 41(1):157–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurama YC (2000) Seismic design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls with supplemental viscous damping. ACI Struct J 97(4):648–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurama YC, Sause R, Pessiki S, Lu L (1999) Lateral load behavior and seismic design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls. ACI Struct J 96(4):622–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZF, Wang YK, Cao ZX, Chen YP, Hu Y (2018) Seismic energy dissipation under variable amplitude loading for rectangular RC members in flexure. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 47:831–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng 114(8):1804–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander JB, Butta A, Kim JH (1998) Fatigue analysis of unconfined concrete columns. MCEER report 98-0009, State University of New York at Buffalo

  • Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL (2016) Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees) command language manual. University of California, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu DT, Ren LJ (1996) A modified seismic damage model with double variables for reinforced concrete structures. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 16(4):44–54

    Google Scholar 

  • NZS3101:2006 (2006a) Concrete structures standard: part I—the design of concrete structures. Standards New Zealand, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • NZS3101:2006 (2006b) Appendix B: special provisions for the seismic design of ductile jointed precast concrete structural systems. Standards New Zealand, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Pampanin S, Christopoulos C (2010) Development of probabilistic framework for performance-based seismic assessment of structures considering residual deformations. J Earthq Eng 14:1092–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pampanin S, Christopoulos C, Priestley MJN (2002) Residual deformations in the performance based seismic assessment of frame structures. Research report ROSE-2002/02, European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk, University of Pavia, Pavia

  • Pampanin S, Christopoulos C, Priestley MJN (2003) Performance-based seismic response of frame structures including residual deformations. Part II: multi-degree-of-freedom systems. J Earthq Eng 7(1):119–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Pampanin S, Marriott D, Palermo A (2010) PRESSS design handbook. New Zealand Concrete Society Industry, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Parastesh H, Hajirasouliha I, Ramezani R (2014) A new ductile moment-resisting connection for precast concrete frames in seismic regions: an experimental investigation. Eng Struct 70(9):144–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park YJ, Ang HS (1985) Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. J Struct Eng 111(4):722–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PEER (2000) Open system of earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees). University of California, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN (1991) Overview of PRESSS research program. PCI J 36(4):50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN (2001) Direct displacement-based design of precast/prestressed concrete buildings. PCI J 74(6):67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, Tao J (1993a) Seismic response of precast prestressed concrete frames with partially debonded tendons. PCI J 38(1):58–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, Tao J (1993b) Seismic response of precast prestressed concrete frames with partially debonded tendons. PCI J 39(1):58–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MA, Sritharan S (2006) An evaluation of force-based design vs. direct displacement-based design of jointed precast post-tensioned wall systems. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 5(2):285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Restrepo JI, Rahman A (2007) Seismic performance of self-centering structural walls incorporating energy dissipaters. J Struct Eng 133(11):1560–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roh H (2007) Seismic behavior of structures using rocking columns and viscous dampers. Dissertation, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

  • SEAOC Vision 2000 Committee (1995) Performance based seismic engineering. Structural Engineering Association of California, Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson M, Panian L, Korolyk M et al (2008) Post-tensioned concrete walls and frames for seismic-resistance—a case study of the David Brower Center. In: Proceedings the SEAOC annual convention, Hawaii

  • Wada A, Qu Z, Ito H et al (2009) Seismic retrofit using rocking walls and steel dampers. In: Proceedings ATC/SEI conference on improving the seismic performance of existing buildings and other structures, San Francisco

  • Wang DS, Feng QM, Wang GX (2004) A modified Park–Ang seismic damage model considering low-cycle fatigue life. China Civ Eng J 37(11):41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JL, Robinson AJ, Balendra T (2008) Performance of precast concrete load-bearing panel structures in regions of low to moderate seismicity. Eng Struct 30(7):1831–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu DY, Lu XL (2017) Probabilistic performance assessment of self-centering dual systems. J Build Struct 38(8):14–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Guo T, Chai S, Li A (2019) Cyclic tests on beam–column joints of SCOPE system with different key slot lengths and corrosion levels. Eng Struct 201(12):109406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Song G, Huang SM, Wu H (2019a) Input energy spectra for self-centering SDOF systems. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 121:293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Song G, Tan P (2019b) Hysteretic energy demand for self-centering SDOF systems. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 125:105703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoubek B, Isakovic T, Fahjan Y, Fischiger M (2013) Cyclic failure analysis of the beam-to-column dowel connections in precast industrial buildings. Eng Struct 52:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support received from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0701101), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51678449) and Key Innovation Team Program of Innovation Talents Promotion Plan by MOST of China (No. 2016RA4059).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China

    Ying Zhou & Ge Song

  2. Xian University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, 710055, Shaanxi Province, China

    Wei Huang

Authors
  1. Ying Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ge Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wei Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Zhou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Song, G. & Huang, W. Performance-based damage evaluation of hybrid joints. Bull Earthquake Eng 18, 3781–3816 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00838-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00838-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation