Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Feasibility study of red mud for geopolymer preparation: effect of particle size fraction

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The storage of red mud has seriously damaged the ecological environment, and its utilization is urgent. The roles of particle size fraction of red mud on the geopolymer properties was investigated, to provide guidance for the preparation of red mud-based geopolymer. The composition variation, workability, mechanical strength, and microstructure of each red mud fraction were analyzed, and the results show that the chemical composition changed with the classification. The fluidity decreased first and then increased with the decrement of particle fraction, and all the specimens showed the rheological characteristics of Herschel–Buckley model. The specimens with coarser and finer particles both had excellent mechanical strength and lower porosity. The microstructure of red mud-based geopolymer with different red mud particle fractions was analyzed by FTIR, XRD and SEM–EDS. The results showed that the main hydration products were geopolymer gel (N-A-C-S-H). And the particle fraction has a little effect on the kinds of hydration products. Finally, the particle fraction of red mud was classified according to the properties of red mud-based geopolymer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davidovits J (1989) Geopolymers and geopolymeric new materials. J Therm Anal Calorm 35:429–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang P, Zheng Y, Wang K, Zhang J (2018) A review on properties of fresh and hardened geopolymer mortar. Compos Part B: Eng 152:79–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma C-K, Awang AZ, Omar W (2018) Structural and material performance of geopolymer concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater 186:90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rożek P, Król M, Mozgawa W (2019) Geopolymer-zeolite composites: a review. J Clean Prod 230:557–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hassan A, Arif M, Shariq M (2019) Use of geopolymer concrete for a cleaner and sustainable environment—a review of mechanical properties and microstructure. J Clean Prod 223:704–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Asim N, Alghoul M, Mohammad M, Amin MH, Akhtaruzzaman M, Amin N, Sopian K (2019) Emerging sustainable solutions for depollution: geopolymers. Constr Build Mater 199:540–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zongjin Li and Sifeng Liu (2007) Influence of slag as additive on compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer. J Mater Civ Eng 19:470–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kinnunen P, Yliniemi J, Talling B, Illikainen M (2017) Rockwool waste in fly ash geopolymer composites. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19:1220–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khairul MA, Zanganeh J, Moghtaderi B (2019) The composition, recycling and utilisation of Bayer red mud. Resour Conserv Recycl 141:483–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Emile M, Zhang LingLing, Liu X, Zhang Na (2019) Utilization of red mud in road base and subgrade materials: a review. Resour Conserv Recycl 141:187–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang W, Jiang J, Xuelong Wu, Liang S (2000) The current situation of solid waste generation and its environmental contamination in China. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 2:65–69

    Google Scholar 

  12. Verma AS, Verma AS, Kant S (2017) Applications of bauxite residue: a mini-review. Waste Manag Res 35(10):999–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ihsan Cakici A, Yanik J, Uçar S, Karayildirim T, Anil H (2004) Utilization of red mud as catalyst in conversion of waste oil and waste plastics to fuel. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 2004(6):20–26

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nie Q, Wei H, Tao A et al (2016) Strength properties of geopolymers derived from original and desulfurized red mud cured at ambient temperature. Constr Build Mater 125:905–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaya K, Soyer-Uzun S (2016) Evolution of structural characteristics and compressive strength in red mud-metakaolin based geopolymer systems. Ceram Int 42:7406–7413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Smita Singh M, Aswath U, Ranganath RV (2018) Effect of mechanical activation of red mud on the strength of geopolymer binder. Constr Build Mater 177:91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaituo W, Lemougna PN, Qing T et al (2017) Low temperature depolymerization and polycondensation of a slag-based inorganic polymer. Ceram Int 43:9067–9076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ye J, Zhang W, Shi Di (2017) Properties of an aged geopolymer synthesized from calcined ore-dressing tailing of bauxite and slag. Cem Concr Res 100:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. NanYe YeChen, Yang J, Liang S, Yong Hu, Jingping Hu, Zhu S, Fan W, Xiao Bo (2017) Transformations of Na, Al, Si and Fe species in red mud during synthesis of one-part geopolymers. Cem Concr Res 101:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. NanYe JY, Liang S, Yong Hu, Jingping Hu, Xiao Bo, Huang Q (2016) Synthesis and strength optimization of one-part geopolymer based on red mud. Constr Build Mater 111:317–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ye N, Chen Ye, Yang J, Liang S, Hu Y, Xiao B, Huang Q, Shi Y, Hua J, Wua X (2016) Co-disposal of MSWI fly ash and Bayer red mud using an one-part geopolymeric system. J Hazard Mater 318:70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ye N, Yang J, Liang S, Yong Hu, Jingping Hu, Xiao Bo, Huang Q (2016) Synthesis and strength optimization of one-part geopolymer based on red mud. Constr Build Mater 111:317–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ye N, Yang J, Ke X, Zhu J, Li Y, Xiang C, Wang H, Li L, Xiao Bo (2014) Synthesis and characterization of geopolymer from Bayer red mud with thermal pretreatment. J Am Ceram Soc 97(5):1652–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu W, Zhang X, Jiang W, Xinfeng Z, Jiakuan Y (2011) Study on particle-size separation pretreatment of Bayer red mud. Chin J Environ Eng 5(4):521–524

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu F, Xue SG, William H, Huang L, Wu C, Li XF (2016) Novel predictors of soil genesis following natural weathering processes of bauxite residues. Environ Sci Pollut R 23:2856–2863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Assi LN, Deaver EE, Ziehl P (2018) Effect of source and particle size distribution on the mechanical and microstructural properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 167:372–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang D, Wang D, Liu Ze, Xie F (2018) Rheology, agglomerate structure, and particle shape of fresh geopolymer pastes with different NaOH activators content. Constr Build Mater 187:674–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Özer Sevim and İlhami Demir (2019) Optimization of fly ash particle size distribution for cementitious systems with high compactness. Constr Build Mater 195:104–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Frigioine G, Marra S (1976) Relationship between particle size distribution and compressive strength in Portland cement. Cem Concr Res 6:113–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang YM, Napier-Munn TJ (1995) Effects of particle size distribution, surface area and chemical composition on Portland cement strength. Powder Technol 83:245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bentz DP, Conway JT (2001) Computer modeling of the replacement of ‘‘coarse’’ cement particles by inert fillers in low w/c ratio concretes: hydration and strength. Cem Concr Res 31:503–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang T, Qijun Yu, Wei J, Zhang P (2011) Effects of size fraction on composition and fundamental properties of Portland cement. Constr Build Mater 25:3038–3043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Furlani E, Maschio S, Magnan M et al (2018) Synthesis and characterization of geopolymers containing blends of unprocessed steel slag and metakaolin: the role of slag particle size. Ceram Int 44:5226–5232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wallevik OH, Feys D, Wallevik JE, Khayat KH (2015) Avoiding inaccurate interpretations of rheological measurements for cement-based materials. Cem Concr Res 78:100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Daddy Kabagire K, Diederich P, Yahia A, Chekired M (2017) Experimental assessment of the effect of particle characteristics on rheological properties of model mortar. Constr Build Mater 151:615–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. HaoLiang W, Jing Y, Duo Z et al (2019) Effect of morphological parameters of natural sand on mechanical properties of engineered cementitious composites. Cem Concr Comp 100:108–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wan Q, Rao F, Song S et al (2017) Geopolymerization reaction, microstructure and simulation of metakaolin-based geopolymers at extended Si/Al ratios. Cem Concr Comp 79:45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hua W, Nie Q, Huang B, Shu X, He Q (2018) Mechanical and microstructural characterization of geopolymers derived from red mud and fly ashes. J Clean Prod 186:799–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. El-Naggar MR, El-Dessouky MI (2017) Re-use of waste glass in improving properties of metakaolin-basedgeopolymers: mechanical and microstructure examinations. Constr Build Mater 132:543–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang Z, Li L, Ma X, Wang H (2016) Compositional, microstructural and mechanical properties of ambient condition cured alkali-activated cement. Constr Build Mater 113:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Young Scientists Funds of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants nos. 51709158), the Major Project of Chinese National Programs for Fundamental Research and Development (Project no. 2017YFC0703100), the Major Basic Project of Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Project no. ZR2017ZC0734), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (no. 2018M632676).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, 250061, Shandong, China

    Jian Zhang, Shucai Li, Zhaofeng Li, Chao Liu & Yifan Gao

Authors
  1. Jian Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shucai Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhaofeng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yifan Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaofeng Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Li, S., Li, Z. et al. Feasibility study of red mud for geopolymer preparation: effect of particle size fraction. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22, 1328–1338 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01023-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01023-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation