“In the future, there will be no female leaders. There will just be leaders.” — Sheryl Sandberg [1]
This month’s commentary by Dr. Pfeifer and colleagues [2] addresses the issue of gender representation in pediatric radiology, specifically examining gender-related trends in pediatric radiology leadership and in Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) annual meeting participation. The authors point out that pediatric radiology is poised to achieve the gender balance that eludes most other radiology subspecialties, and they define strategies to develop female leaders in pediatric radiology.
Gender balance in pediatric radiology and pediatric radiology leadership is about more than just equity and doing the right thing (though that is also important) — it is about doing the smart thing, something that will enable individual pediatric radiology practices and the specialty itself to thrive.
Our diversity, gender and otherwise, makes us smarter and more capable. Researchers in organizational behavior and theory have studied how groups of people perform on a variety of tasks and found that it is possible to measure the collective intelligence factor of a group [3]. In one study, groups were tested on tasks that are highly reminiscent of challenges that we as pediatric radiologists encounter on a regular basis:
solving visual puzzles (e.g., complicated MRI),
brainstorming (e.g., research ideas),
making collective moral judgments (e.g., ethical practice questions) and
negotiating over limited resources (e.g., anesthesia availability for sedated imaging).
These researchers found that a group’s collective intelligence factor predicts the group’s performance on these tasks to a greater degree than the group members’ average or maximum individual intelligence [3]. More interesting, in this study, the collective intelligence factor was positively and strongly correlated with the proportion of women in the group, with subsequent work by these same researchers showing an enhanced collective intelligence factor in diverse groups, independent of the individual group members’ intelligence quotients (IQs) [4]. Maybe this explains why mixed-gender authorship teams have more citations than single-gender teams in both radiology and other disciplines [5].
The benefits of maintaining gender balance extend to our patients, too. Analysis of nearly 2,000 original research articles published in three major U.S. radiology journals over a 5-year period shows that researchers publish more often on topics related to their own gender [6], highlighting the need for our specialty to diversify and reflect our patient population. Gender reporting in radiology human subjects research is frequently ignored, with one study showing that nearly 10% of articles published in seven major radiology journals did not specify the gender distribution of subjects and that only one-quarter of those that included subjects of both genders reported gender-based results [7]. Female researchers are more likely to include gender analysis in their research, uncovering differences in disease behavior and treatment response between males and females [8].
The implications of gender on the delivery of radiology clinical services have been largely unexplored. Literature on the role of gender in patient–provider relationships shows differences in the way male and female physicians communicate as well as differences in the expectations and needs of male versus female patients [9]. It stands to reason that patients might feel more comfortable being examined by, sharing problems with, and asking questions of physicians with whom they identify by gender. This is yet another reason to maintain diversity in our group that mirrors the children we serve.
Pfeifer et al. [2] make the important observation that although there has been recent progress toward gender equity in pediatric radiology leadership, there is room for improvement. The challenge of balancing career and home responsibilities has been invoked as a major obstacle in the development of female leaders [10]. Although Generation Xers are regarded as having a strong sense of shared responsibility for parenting and domestic obligations, according to surveys of early career physicians published within the last 6 years, married women with children spend substantially more time on domestic and parenting responsibilities than their male peers and have primary responsibility for a greater number of household tasks than their male colleagues [11, 12]. Institutional investments to improve work–life integration can provide all young physicians, particularly women, with the potential to find career success and allow them to pursue leadership roles. Hospitals should offer on-site child care, provide lactation facilities for nursing mothers, and finance infrastructure such as home picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) and dictation systems. Of course, cultural shifts, such as allowing flexibility to work from home when needed (e.g., when a child is ill) and avoiding scheduling meetings at times that conflict with family responsibilities, are also required. Some professional societies have begun offering child care arrangements and lactation facilities at national conferences to afford parents the opportunity to participate [13].
Women must also realize that even if they elect not to pursue leadership roles during their early careers because of family obligations or personal choice, there is nothing to prevent them from doing so in mid- or late-career years. As Dr. Ella Kazerooni explained, women “do not have to do everything at the same time.... By the time women are able to take on responsibility, they often believe that time has passed them by.... It is important for women to know that they do not have to do things on the same time track or the same trajectory as their male counterparts…. Time has not really passed them by” [14].
Pfeifer et al. [2] note that coaches, mentors, sponsors and role models are imperative in nurturing future leaders. Increasing the number of visible female mentors and role models, such as full professors, division chiefs, department chairs, professional society leaders, and journal editors, is likely to encourage women to choose careers in pediatric radiology, which will, in turn, keep an open pipeline from which to cultivate future female leaders. However, because time spent on mentorship translates to less time on the traditionally rewarded activities of teaching, research and administration, departments need to encourage mentorship efforts by providing time, recognition and training to those involved [14].
Developing female leaders requires hard work from men and women and cultural changes on the individual, institutional and societal levels. But increasing the number of female leaders in pediatric radiology doesn’t just benefit women — it benefits everyone.
References
Sandberg S (2013) Lean in: women, work, and the will to lead. Alfred A. Knopf, New York
Pfeifer CW, Gokli A, Reid JR (2020) Gender representation in pediatric radiology. Pediatr Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04645-w
Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A et al (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330:686–688
Woolley AW, Aggarwal I, Malone TW (2015) Collective intelligence and group performance. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 24:420–424
O'Connor EE, Chen P, Weston B et al (2018) Gender trends in academic radiology publication in the United States revisited. Acad Radiol 25:1062–1069
Campbell JC, Yoon SC, Grimm LJ (2019) Authorship and impact of gender-specific research in major radiology journals. J Am Coll Radiol 16:240–243
Balthazar P, Moreno CC, Jalilvand A et al (2018) Gender reporting in radiology human subjects research. J Am Coll Radiol 15:1341–1345
Nielsen MW, Andersen JP, Schiebinger L, Schneider JW (2017) One and a half million medical papers reveal a link between author gender and attention to gender and sex analysis. Nat Hum Behav 1:791–796
Bertakis KD (2009) The influence of gender on the doctor-patient interaction. Patient Educ Couns 76:356–360
Surawicz CM (2016) Women in leadership: why so few and what to do about it. J Am Coll Radiol 13:1433–1437
Jolly S, Griffith KA, DeCastro R et al (2014) Gender differences in time spent on parenting and domestic responsibilities by high-achieving young physician-researchers. Ann Intern Med 160:344–353
Starmer AJ, Frintner MP, Matos K et al (2019) Gender discrepancies related to pediatrician work–life balance and household responsibilities. Pediatrics 144:e2018292612
Cook T (2018) RADxx moms. https://radxx.ambrahealth.com/2018/05/30/273/. Accessed 31 Jan 2020
Forman HP, Larson DB, Kaye AD et al (2012) Masters of radiology panel discussion: women in radiology — how can we encourage more women to join the field and become leaders? AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:145–149
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to thank Dr. David Bloom, Dr. Sowmya Balasubramanian and Dr. Prachi Agarwal for reviewing the manuscript, and the University of Michigan Women in Radiology group for providing inspiration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joshi, A. Gender balance in pediatric radiology: it benefits everyone. Pediatr Radiol 50, 634–635 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04652-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04652-x