Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Echinoderm functional diversity does not correlate with the protection level of marine protected areas in the Mexican Pacific

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The functional diversity of echinoderms has been understudied, even though these organisms are critical components of various ecosystems, including coral reefs and hard-bottom benthic communities. Additionally, there are only a few papers relating the protection level of marine protected areas (MPAs) with functional diversity. In this study, we calculate the functional diversity of echinoids and asteroids in 11 coral and rocky reefs with different protection levels across the Mexican Pacific. We recorded the abundance of 15 echinoderm species comprising seven echinoid and eight asteroid species. More than 30 morphological and ecological traits of the censused species were evaluated to calculate two functional diversity indices: Rao’s quadratic entropy index (FDQ) and functional richness (FRic). Latitudinal patterns of functional diversity differed between groups. Asteroids showed the highest FDQ and FRic values in the Gulf of California. Echinoids showed FDQ peaks at the highest (Bahía de los Ángeles; 28° 56′, − 113° 30′), and the lowest latitude (Bahías de Huatulco; 15° 43′, − 98° 08′) sites. The Ixtapa-Zihuatanejo site (17° 39′, − 101° 36′) had the highest FRic values. Generalized linear mixed models showed that protection level did not have any significant effect on FDQ or FRic. Latitude, on the other hand, did have a significant effect on asteroid functional diversity, although no significant effects were found for echinoids. The lack of an effect of protection level, and the support of a latitudinal gradient in terms of both taxonomic and functional diversity, has important implications for conservation efforts, supporting the idea of a protected area network to maintain adequate regional biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funds for this study were provided by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología of Mexico (CONACYT Projects183534 and 236654), Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO; JF030, MM003), Programa de Conservación de Especies en Riesgo- Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (PROCER-CONANP; 11/2014), and Programa de Monitoreo Biológico en Áreas Naturales Protegidas- Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (PROMOBI-CONANP; 03/2014). BRM received a scholarship from CONACYT (534217) for her Master of Science degree, and GRO for her Doctorate degree (CONACYT 266599). Comments from Cesar Cordeiro, Omri Bronstein and three anonymous reviewers substantially improved previous versions of this work. We thank everyone who participated in field surveys as well as Alexandra Álvarez and Mariana Walther Mendoza (Sociedad de Historia Natural Niparajá, A. C.) for providing data and L. Ladah for proofreading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. E. Calderon-Aguilera.

Additional information

Communicated by David Hawksworth.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Coastal and marine biodiversity.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1445 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rojas-Montiel, B., Reyes-Bonilla, H., Calderon-Aguilera, L.E. et al. Echinoderm functional diversity does not correlate with the protection level of marine protected areas in the Mexican Pacific. Biodivers Conserv 29, 1871–1896 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-01952-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-01952-4

Keywords

Navigation