Physics of Electrostatic Projection Revealed by High-Speed Video Imaging

Arash Sayyah, Mohammad Mirzadeh, Yi Jiang, Warren V. Gleason, William C. Rice, and Martin Z. Bazant
Phys. Rev. Applied 13, 034071 – Published 30 March 2020

Abstract

Processes based on electrostatic projection are used extensively in industry, e.g., for mineral separations, electrophotography, or manufacturing of coated abrasives, such as sandpaper. Despite decades of engineering practice, there are still unanswered questions. In this paper, we present a comprehensive experimental study of the projection process of more than 1500 individual spherical alumina particles with a nominal size of 500μm, captured by high-speed video imaging and digital image analysis. Based on flight trajectories of approximately 1100 projected particles, we determine the acquired charge and dynamics as a function of the relative humidity (RH) and the electric field intensity and compare the results with classical theories. For RH levels of 50% and above, more than 85% of distributed particles are projected, even when the electric field intensity is at its minimum level. This suggests that, beyond a critical value of the electric field intensity, the RH plays a more critical role in the projection process. We also observe that the charging time is reduced dramatically for RH levels of 50% and above, possibly due to the buildup of thin water films around the distributed particles, which can facilitate charge transfer. In contrast, projected particles at the 30% RH level exhibit excessive amounts of electric charge, between 2 and 4 times than that of the saturation value, which might be attributed to triboelectric charging effects. Finally, the physics of electrostatic projection is compared and contrasted with those of induced-charge electrokinetic phenomena, which share similar field-square scaling, as the applied electric field acts on its own induced charge to cause particle motion.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
5 More
  • Received 20 November 2019
  • Revised 8 March 2020
  • Accepted 10 March 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.034071

© 2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Polymers & Soft MatterFluid Dynamics

Authors & Affiliations

Arash Sayyah1, Mohammad Mirzadeh1, Yi Jiang2, Warren V. Gleason2, William C. Rice2, and Martin Z. Bazant1,3,*

  • 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
  • 2Saint-Gobain Research North America, Northborough, Massachusetts 01532, USA
  • 3Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

  • *bazant@mit.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 13, Iss. 3 — March 2020

Subject Areas
Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Applied

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×