Abstract
Since molecules are inaccessible to immediate observation, our conception of the molecule is brought about by transdiction which entails invention of various transcendental ideas. In organic chemistry we think that molecules consist of atoms, bonds, functional groups, etc. This is, however, not the unique description of the molecule as is shown by quantum mechanical calculations, for example. Then, what description represents the real molecule? Before asking this question, we have to consider what the real molecule is in the first place. Constructive realism distinguishes our cognitive world and the world just given, and claims that we should accept the former as reality. Understanding our cognitive world is possible only through construction of micro-worlds. Atoms (in molecules), bonds, functional groups, etc., are micro-worlds which make sense in a theoretical framework of organic chemistry. In this study we translate a micro-world to an affordance and paraphrase it as a context-relative dispositional attribute of an {agent-world} complex. Then, we can understand that it is what we take as molecular structure, not what might be out there to be found, that we should accept as reality. Excluding metaphysical fictions from scientific arguments, constructive realism makes science a meaningful activity. Constructive realism claims that, for getting knowledge of the world, we have to integrate information into our own linguistic frame, i.e., to translate it. Strangification is a technique of intentionally taking an accepted proposition out of one scientific system and putting it into a completely different context. As is the case with translation, strangification brings about deeper understanding of philosophical as well as scientific grounds on which the proposition system holds. We apply this method to molecular structure and reveal that it is an ingenious model to describe molecular behavior in multi-molecular systems with strong interactions between molecules. Information provided by strangification is essential to claim the legitimacy of a proposition system. As far as strangification is properly applied, relativism is irrelevant to constructive realism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bader, R.F.W.: Atoms in Molecules. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2003)
Dewar, M.J.S.: The molecular Orbital Theory of Organic Chemistry. McGraw-Hill, New York (1969)
Harré, R., Llored, J.-P.: Procedures, products and pictures. Philosophy 93, 167–186 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819117000535
Ingold, C.K.: Structure and Mechanism in Organic Chemistry. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1953)
Kant, I: The Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2018) The critique of Pure Reason is, as usual, cited by the pagination of the first (A) and/or second (B) editions. (Guyer, P. and Wood, A.W. trans., ed.)
Mandelbaum, M.: Philosophy, Science, and Sense Perception. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1966)
Ochiai, H.: Does a molecule have structure?. Found. Chem. 19(3), 197–207 (2017)
Ochiai, H.: Overcoming skepticism about molecular structure by developing the concept of affordance. Found. Chem. 22(1), 77–86 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-019-09349-0
Parr, P.G., Yang, W.: Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1994)
Ramberg, P.J.: Chemical Structure. Spatial Arrangement. Ashgate, Burlington (2003)
Rocke, A.J.: The Quite Revolution; Hermann Kolbe and the Science of Organic Chemistry. University of California Press, Berkley and Los Angeles (1993)
Rohlf, M.: The Ideas of Pure Reason, in The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. (Guyer, P. ed.). Cambridge University Press, New York (2010)
Russell, C.A.: The History of Valence. Humanities Press, New York (1971)
Wallner, F.: Constructive Realism; Philosophy, Science, and Medicine. Wallner, F. and Klünger, G. (eds.). Verlag Traugott Bautz GmbH, Nordhausen (2016)
Woolley, R.G.: Must a molecule have a shape? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100, 1073–1078 (1978)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ochiai, H. Understanding molecular structure requires constructive realism. Found Chem 22, 457–465 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-020-09362-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-020-09362-8