Dynamic compressive behavior of a novel ultra-lightweight cement composite incorporated with rubber powder
Introduction
Concrete using lightweight aggregates, such as expanded clay/shale [1], fly ash aggregates [2], fly ash cenospheres [3], [4], perlite [5], pumice [6], are classified as Lightweight aggregate concrete (LWAC). As summarized in Huang et al [4], LWAC has an apparent density of less than, e.g., 2000 kg/m3 with a compressive strength of 8–80 MPa, 1950 kg/m3 with a compressive strength of 10–38.5 MPa and 1850 kg/m3 with a compressive strength of 17–35 MPa, respectively, as specified in JGJ 51-2002 [7], CEB-FIP 2010 and BS EN 13055-2016 [8], [9], ACI 213R-14 and ASTM C330 [10], [11]. Lightweight aggregates mainly reduce self-weight and improve thermal performance of concrete [12], [13]. LWAC can be used in industrial and building structures to reduce structural weight and the materials used in construction. LWAC also reduces the transportation and hoisting cost during construction, the gravity load on the foundation, thus the reinforcement and labor cost [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [12], [13], [14], [15]. Due to the superior performance of LWAC, it has been used in, e.g., bridges [16], prefabricated construction [17] and offshore structures [18]. To further reduce the self-weight of offshore structures, Huang et al. [3], [4], Chia et al. [19] and Wu et al. [20] developed a novel ultra-lightweight cement composite (ULCC) using fly ash cenospheres. The apparent density of the ULCC is only 1450 kg/m3 with a 28-day compressive strength of 60 MPa. To further downsize the design, they developed a novel steel-ULCC-steel sandwich composite [21], and studied the bending, shearing, compression and dynamic impact resistance of beams, plates, shells and walls made of the sandwich composite experimentally and theoretically [15], [18], [21], [22], [23], [24]. A set of design methods were also proposed. The above studies have demonstrated that the ULCC has obvious advantages, though the brittleness of the ULCC has limited its wider applications.
With the rapid development of the global economy and the automobile industry, the annual increase of waste tires over the world is currently about 8% to 10%. It is estimated that by 2020, the output of waste tires in China will reach 20 million tons, which has become an emerging issue of environmental concerns. Traditional landfill and incineration not only cause huge environmental pollution, but also are energy inefficient. In 1996, Fedroff et al. [25] pioneered in producing rubberized concrete by mixing rubber powder made from grinding waste tires, which offered a new approach to recycle waste tires and started a new research topic on rubberized concrete. Many studies have since shown that, compared with the ordinary concrete, rubberized concrete has good resistance to crack and abrasion and energy dissipation capacity [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. As an elastomer, rubber aggregates in concrete can restrain the generation and development of cracks, thus improve the energy dissipation capacities of concrete [25], [26]. However, adding rubber may reduce compressive strength, flexural strength and workability of concrete. To achieve improved energy dissipation, while still maintain sufficient material strength, adding additional mineral admixture such as silica fume and steel or polypropylene fibers are considered as commonly used and effective methods [27], [29], [37]. Nili et al. [28] conducted drop hammer impact tests on hooked steel fiber reinforced concrete with or without silica fume using the test method specified in ACI 544 [35]. The impact resistance of the concrete with 1% steel fiber and silica fume was twenty times higher than that of the plain concrete and 2.4 times higher than that of the concrete with silica fume only. Fiber-bridging plays a significant role in preventing crack and energy dissipating in the damage process. Similar findings were also concluded by Ali et al. [27] and Gupta et al. [29]. Guo et al. [37] reported that steel slag increased the stiffness and brittleness of the concrete in the static and SHPB impact tests. Yoo and Banthia [36] also studied the impact resistance of fiber reinforced concrete. Strain-rate sensitivities of fiber reinforced concretes depend on the types of loading and the strength of matrix. Tensile impacts are more sensitive to strain rate than compressive and flexural impacts are. Higher strength concrete is less sensitive compared to lower strength concrete. Liu et al. [30] evaluated the impact behavior of rubberized concrete of different rubber particle size and content through Splitting Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) tests. The results showed that with a fixed content of rubber, the dynamic compressive strength increased as the increase of the rubber particles size. However, when the rubber content exceeded 10% of the fine aggregate by weight, the energy dissipation capacity of the concrete started to decline.
The observations and conclusions made from the previous research have suggested that rubberized concrete is particularly beneficial to structures that require high impact resistance, such as high-rise buildings, long-span bridges, offshore platforms and other mega constructions. Moreover, these structures are normally very heavy due to their large cross sections that require more reinforcement. Thus, lightweight high strength concrete is a compromising alterative due to its unique advantages, such as low density, good thermal insulation and durability [13], [14]. Unfortunately, most of the existing lightweight concrete has low strength and is brittle, which has limited their applications. Hence, demands for new lightweight cement-based materials that have high ductility and good energy consumption are increasing. Naturally, using rubber aggregates to replace fine or coarse aggregates can reduce the weight and increase impact resistance, thus have the potential to meet the demand and recycle waste tires at the same time. To the authors’ best knowledge, the research on the dynamic responses of rubberized LWAC is rare. The failure mechanism and strain rate sensitivity of the promising material also remain unclear.
This paper reports an experimental study on the development of an ultra-lightweight, high ductility cement composite with rubber powder and PE fibers. The mechanical properties of the new material, such as compressive strength, elastic modulus and damage modes under different strain rates are evaluated through static and SHPB impact tests. Furthermore, this paper proposes and validates a modified equation to predict the Dynamic Increasing Factor (DIF) of the new material.
Section snippets
Materials and mix proportion design
To make the novel rubberized ultra-lightweight cement composite (RULCC) mixes, raw materials including cement, fly ash cenospheres (FAC), silica fume, rubber powder aggregate and PE fiber were used. The RULCC was designed to have a target 28-day compressive strength of around 35 MPa with low density of around 1450 kg/m3. Fig. 1 shows the fine aggregates and their particle size distribution. The fine aggregate was FAC with a specific gravity of 870 kg/m3, a fineness modulus of 0.902g/cm3 and an
Static compressive test
The compressive strength of the RULCC decreases with the increase of rubber powder content. The compressive strength decreases by 29.5%, 47.7%, 54.8% and 60.3%, respectively, when 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% of the fine aggregates in the composites were replaced by rubber powder without fiber, as shown in Fig. 6. As an organic polymer material, rubber powder has weak adhesion with cement based inorganic materials, resulting in a reduction of strength in the interfacial transition zone (ITZ). Each
Modified equation for DIF
DIF is an indicator of strength improvement that is defined as the ratio of dynamic compressive strength to static compressive strength [26], [29], [30], [31]. CEB-FIP [8] proposed a formula to calculate the DIF of normal concrete with respect to the strain rate. Chen [26] also proposed a formula to calculate the DIF for the conventional rubberized concrete while Ngo et al. [42] proposed a formula to predict the DIF for the high strength concrete. The abovementioned formulas are summarized in
Conclusions
This paper develops a novel ultra-lightweight high ductility cement composite (RULCC) with added low content of PE fibers (0.7%) and different amount of rubber powder. The paper investigates the dynamic behavior of the RULCC based on the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar tests and proposes modified equations to predict the Dynamic Increasing Factor (DIF) of the material. The following conclusions have been made on the basis of this study.
- (1)
The novel rubberized ultra-lightweight cement composite
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Zhenyu Huang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Supervision. Lili Sui: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision. Fang Wang: Investigation, Validation. Shilin Du: Investigation, Formal analysis. Yingwu Zhou: Supervision, Methodology. Jianqiao Ye: Methodology, Writing - review & editing.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the research grant received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, China (NSFC, No. 51708360, 51978407), Innovative Project Funded by Ministry of Guangdong Province Education Office (No. 2017KTSCX164), Shenzhen Basic Research Project (No. JCYJ20180305124106675). The authors also would like to acknowledge Professor Liu Laibao from Xinan University of Technology for providing the rubber powder materials and Professor Dong Zhijun for providing
References (42)
- et al.
Axial compressive behavior of FRP-confined lightweight aggregate concrete: an experimental study and stress-strain relation model
Constr Build Mater
(2016) - et al.
Manufacturing of sintered lightweight aggregate using high-carbon fly ash and its effect on the mechanical properties and microstructure of concrete
J Cleaner Prod
(2016) - et al.
Mechanical properties and microstructure of ultra-lightweight cement composites with fly ash cenospheres after exposure to high temperatures
Constr Build Mater
(2018) - et al.
Impact response of lightweight mortars containing expanded perlite
Cem. Concr. Compos.
(2013) - et al.
The effects of different cement dosages, slumps and pumice aggregate ratios on the compressive strength and densities of concrete
Cem. Concr. Res.
(2003) - et al.
Analytical model for compressive strength, elastic modulus and peak strain of structural lightweight aggregate concrete
Constr. Build. Mater.
(2012) - et al.
Evaluation of compressive behavior of ultra-lightweight cement composite after elevated temperature exposure
Constr. Build. Mater.
(2017) - et al.
Nonlinear finite element modelling and parametric study of curved steel–concrete–steel double skin composite panels infilled with ultra-lightweight cement composite
Constr. Build. Mater.
(2015) - et al.
Development of lightweight engineered cementitious composite for durability enhancement of tall concrete wind towers
Cem Concr Compos
(2019) - et al.
Lightweight steel-concrete-steel sandwich shell subject to punching shear
Ocean Eng.
(2015)
Development of ultralightweight cement composites with low thermal conductivity and high specific strength for energy efficient buildings
Constr. Build. Mater.
Compression resistance of steel-concrete-steel composite wall with J-hook connectors
J. Constr. Steel Res.
Lightweight steel-concrete-steel sandwich shell subject to punching shear
Ocean Eng
Structural behaviour of steel-concrete-steel sandwich composite wall subjected to compression and end moment
Thin Wall Struct
Behavior of steel–concrete–steel sandwich slabs subject to impact load
J Constr Steel Res
Hybrid-fiber reinforced engineered cementitious composite under tensile and impact loading
Mater Des
Combined effect of silica fume and steel fibers on the impact resistance and mechanical properties of concrete
Int J Impact Eng
Impact resistance of concrete containing waste rubber fiber and silica fume
Int J Impact Eng
Study of impact performance of rubber reinforced concrete
Constr Build Mater
Experimental study on the effect of strain rates on the dynamic flexural properties of rubber concrete
Constr Build Mater
Testing and comparison of concrete barriers containing shredded waste tire chips
Mater Lett
Cited by (64)
Investigation of dynamic compression properties of lightweight engineered geopolymer composites containing different ceramsites (LW-EGC)
2024, Construction and Building MaterialsLightweight ambient-cured geopolymer composite with expanded clay: quasi-static and dynamic properties
2024, Construction and Building MaterialsDynamic compressive properties of rubberized mortar reinforced with straw-fiber additive
2023, Construction and Building MaterialsUltra-low carbon lightweight engineered cementitious composite: Design and material characterization
2023, Case Studies in Construction MaterialsUltra-lightweight low-carbon LC<sup>3</sup> cement composites: Uniaxial mechanical behaviour and constitutive models
2023, Construction and Building MaterialsInfluence of interface inclination angle and load impact velocity on dynamic splitting tensile behavior and dissipated energy of geopolymer-concrete composites
2023, Construction and Building Materials