Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Synthesis and biological evaluation of 2-(4-methylsulfonyl phenyl) indole derivatives: multi-target compounds with dual antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities

BMC Chemistry volume 14, Article number: 23 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Three series of 2-(4-methylsulfonylphenyl) indole derivatives have been designed and synthesized. The synthesized compounds were assessed for their antimicrobial, COX inhibitory and anti-inflammatory activities. Compound 7g was identified to be the most potent antibacterial candidate against strains of MRSA, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii, respectively, with safe therapeutic dose. Compounds 7a–k, 8a–c, and 9a–c showed good anti-inflammatory activity with excessive selectivity towards COX-2 in comparison with reference drugs indomethacin and celecoxib. Compounds 9a–c were found to release moderate amounts of NO to decrease the side effects associated with selective COX-2 inhibitors. A molecular modeling study for compounds 7b, 7h, and 7i into COX-2 active site was correlated with the results of in vitro COX-2 inhibition assays.

Introduction

Bacterial resistance reached a dangerous level due to the misuse of antibiotics thus searching for new antimicrobial agents is a significant issue [1]. Furthermore, the administration of multiple drugs to relieve inflammation associated with a bacterial infection may have some secondary health problems and may increase adverse effects [2]. Unfortunately, few drugs possessed these two activities in a single compound. Therefore, there are continuous trails to develop a monotherapy against inflammation due to microbial infection (dual antimicrobial/anti-inflammatory agent) with minimal adverse effects and high safety margin [3].

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used as the primary remedy for pain, fever, and inflammation through inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes [4,5,6]. Selective COX-2 inhibitor drugs like valdecoxib I, celecoxib II and rofecoxib III relieve inflammation without any gastric side effects [7] (Fig. 1). Despite less gastric irritation of selective COX-2 inhibitors, they showed a few cardiovascular issues consisting of myocardial infarction and high blood pressure [8, 9], leading to the withdrawal of both rofecoxib and valdecoxib from the market [10]. The cause of cardiovascular issues may be due to inhibition of vasodilatory prostacyclin (PGI2) and an increase in the level of platelet activator thromboxane A2 (TxA2) [11]. Nitric oxide (NO) showed vasodilator activity and inhibition of platelet aggregation [12]. Accordingly, attachment of NO donor moiety to selective COX-2 inhibitors may be beneficial to overcome the cardiovascular side effects [13, 14].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Chemical structures of selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor drugs (I, II, III)

Full size image

A lot of biologically aryl hydrazone derivatives with antimicrobial activity are found in many literatures [15,16,17] which include nitrofurantoin IV [18, 19]. Additionally, indole-based indomethacin V is a potent NSAID used for the treatment of inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis [20]. Still, due to its high selectivity for COX-1 inhibition and its acidic nature, it had an apparent ulcerogenic effect [21].

Herein, we aimed to make molecular hybridization of the indole part of indomethacin with p-methylsulfonyl phenyl part of selective COX-2 inhibitors to match the overall structure of coxibs [presence of a diaryl heterocycle bearing one sulfonamide (SO2NH2) or methylsulfonyl (SO2CH3) group] [22]. Keep in mind the presence of arylhydrazone derivatives at position 3 in indole with the hope to get compounds with dual antimicrobial/anti-inflammatory activity (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Hybridization of chemical structures of indomethacin V, celecoxib II, nitrofurantoin IV to design indole derivatives 7a–k, 8a–c, and 9a–c

Full size image

Results and discussion

Chemistry

The compounds were synthesized through a series of reactions illustrated in Scheme 1, 2. The reaction of p-methylsulfonyl acetophenone (3) with 4-un/substituted phenylhydrazine HCl under Fischer indole synthesis conditions yielded indole derivatives (5a–c) that are converted to indole-3-carbaldehyde derivatives (6a–c) by Vilsmeir Haack’s formylation reaction using POCl3 and DMF (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Reagents and conditions: a acetic anhydride, AlCl3; b Oxone, H2O, reflux, 18 h; c 4-substituted phenylhydrazine HCl, ethanol, reflux, 4 h; d PPA, water bath, 4 h; e POCl3, DMF, RT, overnight

Full size image
Scheme 2
scheme 2

Reagents and conditions: a 4-chloro-o-phenylenediamine, Na2S2O5, DMF, reflux, 6 h; b 4-substituted phenylhydrazine HCl, ethanol, reflux, 4–6 h.; c hydroxylamine, ethanol, few drops of pyridine, reflux, 4–6 h

Full size image

IR spectra for compounds 6a–c showed significant bands at 3205–3320 cm−1 of indole NH, 1657–1670 cm−1 of C=O and 1150, 1300 cm−1 of SO2. 1H NMR spectra showed a signal at δ 10.00–10.04 ppm of an aldehydic proton (H-C=O), 3.17–3.21 ppm of SO2CH3 and 12.92–12.62 ppm of indole NH which is D2O exchangable.

Indole-3-carbaldehyde derivatives (6a–c) were reacted with 4-substituted phenylhydrazine HCl to give hydrazone derivatives (7a–k) in good yield. The structure elucidation of hydrazone derivatives (7a–k) was based on IR, 1H NMR, and 13C NMR spectral data. IR spectra showed bands at 1593-1597 cm−1 for C=N and disappearance of the carbonyl absorption band at 1657–1670 cm−1 which confirm hydrazone formation. 1H NMR spectra showed a signal at δ 8.24–8.36 ppm of hydrazone proton (H-C=N), 10.03–10.73 ppm of hydrazone NH which is D2O exchangeable, 12.00 ppm for NH indole which is D2O exchangeable and disappearance of an aldehydic proton at δ 10.00–10.04 ppm which confirm hydrazone formation. 13C NMR spectra showed a peak at 143–149 ppm of hydrazone carbon (C=N) which confirm hydrazone formation.

On the other hand, benzimidazole derivatives (8a–c) are synthesized from the reaction of Indole-3-carbaldehyde derivatives (6a–c) with 4-chloro-o-phenylenediamine in the presence of sodium metabisulphite. IR spectra showed bands at 3272–3382 cm−1 (indole NH, benzimidazole NH) and disappearance of the carbonyl absorption band at 1657–1670 cm−1. 1H NMR spectra showed the disappearance of an aldehydic proton at δ 10.00–10.04 ppm and the appearance of a signal at δ (12.37–12.45) ppm of benzimidazole NH (D2O exchangeable) in addition to a signal at δ 12.04–12.18 ppm of indole NH (D2O exchangeable).

Oxime derivatives (9a–c) resulted from the reflux of the reaction of Indole-3-carbaldehyde derivatives (6a–c) with hydroxylamine HCl. IR spectra lacked the carbonyl absorption band at 1657–1670 cm−1 and showed absorption bands at 3272–3382 cm−1 (NH, OH) and 1597 cm−1 (C=N). 1H NMR spectra showed a singlet signal at δ 8.32 ppm of azomethine proton H-C=N, 10.89 ppm of OH (D2O exchangeable) in besides to signal at δ 11.79–12.04 ppm of indole NH (D2O exchangeable) and disappearance of an aldehydic proton at δ 10.00–10.04 ppm which confirm oxime formation.

Biological evaluation

Antimicrobial screening

The antimicrobial study was performed by CO-ADD (The Community for Antimicrobial Drug Discovery), funded by the Wellcome Trust (UK) and The University of Queensland (Australia). Evaluation of all synthesized compounds for their antimicrobial activities was done against five pathogenic bacteria, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 43300) as Gram-positive bacteria, Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Klebsiella pneumonia (ATCC 700603), Acinetobacter baumannii (ATCC 19606) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) as Gram-negative bacteria and antifungal activity against two pathogenic fungal strains Candida albicans (ATCC 90028) and Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii (H99; ATCC 208821) (Table 1).

Table 1 The antibacterial and antifungal activities (growth inhibition %) for compounds 7a–k, 8a–c and 9a–c at 32 µg/mL concentration
Full size table

Results revealed that hydrazone derivatives 7c, 7e, 7f, 7 h, and 7j have moderate antibacterial activity against Gram-negative A. baumannii with growth inhibition 43.29, 43.64, 66.69, 51.82 and 46.23%, respectively. While the hydrazone derivatives 7a, 7g, and 7i have high antibacterial activity against MRSA bacteria and E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii with growth inhibition ranged from 85.76 to 97.76%.

Additionally, the oxime derivatives 9a showed moderate antibacterial activity against Gram-negative A. baumannii with growth inhibition 42.1%, while benzimidazole derivatives (8a–c) showed weak antibacterial activity.

On the other hand, all compounds have weak antifungal activity against C. albicans and C. neoformans var. grubii.

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC µg/mL) measurements were performed for compounds with significant microbial growth inhibition (7a, 7g, and 7i) using ceftriaxone and amphotericin B as a reference drug for antibacterial and antifungal activity, respectively.

As shown in Table 2, compounds 7a, 7g and 7i have the best antibacterial activity comparable to that of ceftriaxone against MRSA, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii, respectively.

Table 2 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC µg/mL) of most active compounds 7a, 7g, 7i and reference drugs, ceftriaxone and amphotericin B
Full size table

The safety margin for the active compounds to human cells was determined through cytotoxicity against human embryonic kidney cell line and hemolysis of human red blood cells. The tested compounds 7a, 7g, and 7i were tolerated and non-toxic to human cells as the cytotoxic and hemolytic dose was higher than the therapeutic dose (Table 2).

Compound 7a lacked general nonspecific toxicity, as the largest therapeutic dose (16 µg/mL against A. baumannii) was lower than the cytotoxic and hemolytic concentration (> 32, > 32 µg/mL respectively). Also, compound 7g showed safe therapeutic concentration against all tested microbes except for A. baumannii (4 µg/mL) which is near to cytotoxic concentration (4.2 µg/mL). Otherwise, the therapeutic concentration of compound 7i against all tested microbes was safe except for A. baumannii (4 µg/mL), which is higher than the cytotoxic concentration (2.987 µg/mL).

In vitro cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition assay

The in vitro assay evaluated the ability of compounds 7a–k, 8a–c, and 9a–c to inhibit Ovine COX-1 and human recombinant COX-2. All tested compounds have weak COX-1 inhibition activity (IC50 = 9.14–13.2 µM) in comparison with indomethacin (IC50 = 0.039 µM). They also exerted potent COX-2 inhibitory activity (IC50 = 0.1–0.31 µM) with high COX-2 selectivity (SI = 132–31.29) in comparison with reference drugs, indomethacin and celecoxib.

Hydrazone derivatives 7a–k showed potent COX-2 inhibitory activity (IC50 = 0.10–0.31 µM) with high selectivity (SI = 132–31.29) more than other compounds. Likewise, benzimidazole 8a–c and oxime derivatives 9a–c showed good COX-2 inhibitory activity (IC50 = 0.13–0.35 µM) in comparison with reference drugs.

Generally, all tested compounds were more selective toward the COX-2 enzyme (SI = 31.29–132) than indomethacin (SI = 0.079) (Table 3) because the size of synthesized compounds was too large to fit into the small COX-1 active site in addition to the presence of diaryl structure bearing SO2CH3 or SO2NH2 group.

Table 3 In vitro COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition for compounds 7a–k, 8a–c, 9a–c and reference drugs
Full size table

In vivo anti-inflammatory activity

The results listed in (Table 4) showed that compounds 7a–k, 8a–c, and 9a–c offered good anti-inflammatory activity (56.4–93.5% reduction of inflammation) after 6 h in comparison with celecoxib and indomethacin (94.7, 96.6% reduction of inflammation, respectively) after 6 h.

Table 4 Anti-inflammatory activities for compounds 7a–k, 8a–c, 9a–c and reference drug in carrageen-induced rat paw edema test
Full size table

Hydrazone derivatives (7a–k) showed good anti-inflammatory activity (66.3–93.5% reduction of inflammation) after 6 h, Compounds that contained two SO2CH3 groups or one SO2CH3 and one SO2NH2 group (7b, 7c, 7d, 7e, 7h, and 7i) showed a reduction of inflammation by 93.5, 82.5, 78.6, 79.9, 92.7 and 90.1% after 6 h, respectively, more than other derivatives.

Also, benzimidazole and oxime derivatives (8a–c, 9a–c) showed good inhibition of inflammation ranged from 56.4 to 76.2% after 6 h.

Compounds 7b, 7c, 7h and 7i that showed the highest COX-2 inhibitory activity (IC50 = 0.1, 0.11, 0.11 and 0.1 respectively) with high selectivity (S.I. = 124.2, 103.7, 112.7 and 132 respectively) were found to have excellent anti-inflammatory activity (edema inhibition = 93.5, 82.5, 92.7 and 90.1%, respectively) after 6 h.

In vitro nitric oxide release

The NO-releasing properties of compounds 9a–c were assessed in phosphate buffer of pH 7.4 with Griess reagent [23]. As shown in Table 5, compounds 9a–c were found to release moderate amounts of NO compared to the sodium nitrite standard solution, which may explain that the desired action of NO is mediated systemically in the biological system [24]. Therefore, the insertion of nitric oxide releasing group (oxime) can offer a method to decrease the cardiovascular side effects of selective COX-2 inhibitors.

Table 5 The amount of NO released from tested compounds 9a–c in phosphate buffer pH = 7.4 (% mol/mol)
Full size table

Structure–activity relationship

Presence of arylhydrazone moiety 7a–k at position 3 of indole can possess antimicrobial activity against strains of Gram-positive MRSA bacteria and Gram-negative E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii beside their COX-2 inhibitory activity.

Concerning the anti-inflammatory activity, replacement of methyl group in position 2 in indomethacin by p-methylsulfonyl phenyl moiety increased COX-2 selectivity through increasing the interaction with a hydrophobic residue of COX-2 active site [25]. In addition, the presence of two SO2CH3 groups or one SO2CH3 and one SO2NH2 group (7b, 7c, 7d, 7e, 7h, and 7i) has COX-2 selectivity more than other derivatives.

Replacement of acidic center (CH2COOH) moiety in position 3 in indomethacin by benzimidazole moiety 8a–c, as a rigid isostere of p-chlorobenzoyl moiety of indomethacin, enhances the anti-inflammatory activity and COX-2 selectivity.

Molecular modeling

To understand the nature of the interaction of the most active synthesized compounds and COX-2 active site, a molecular docking study was performed using crystal structure data for COX-2 (PDB: ID 3LN1) active site obtained from protein data bank [26]. Molecular modeling of compounds 7h, 7i, 7b, and co-crystallized ligand, celecoxib was performed using MOE 2018.0101 modeling software.

The docking results of compounds 7h, 7i, 7b, and celecoxib were presented in (Table 6). Hydrazone derivatives 7b, 7h, and 7i have been fully fitted within COX-2 active site with high affinity (− 17.19, − 16.71 and − 16.42 kcal/mol, respectively) in assessment with celecoxib (− 14.12 kcal/mol). Compounds 7b, 7h, and 7i contained one SO2CH3 and one SO2NH2 group or two SO2CH3 groups that formed hydrogen bonds with different amino acids (Leu338, Arg499, Ser339, Val335, Arg106, and His75). Besides, the indole ring of compound 7h and 7i offered hydrophobic interaction with Val509 (Fig. 3, 4). Thus, the molecular docking results ensure that compounds 7b, 7h and 7i bind to COX-2 active site with the same manner of celecoxib.

Table 6 Molecular docking data for compounds 7b, 7h, 7i and celecoxib in COX-2 active site (PDB ID: 3LN1)
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Binding of celecoxib inside COX-2 active site. a 2D interaction, the most important amino acids are shown together with their respective numbers. b The 3D proposed binding mode inside the active site of COX-2 resulted from docking

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Binding of compound 7b inside COX-2 active site. a 2D interaction, the most important amino acids are shown together with their respective numbers. b The 3D proposed binding mode inside the active site of COX-2 resulted from docking

Full size image

Conclusion

Three series of 2-(4-methylsulfonylphenyl) indole derivatives 7a–k, 8a–c, and 9a–c were evaluated for their antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities.

The results showed that arylhydrazone derivatives 7a–k exhibited moderate to good levels of antimicrobial activity. In particular, compounds 7a, 7g, and 7i showed the highest antimicrobial activity against strains of MRSA bacteria and many species of Gram-negative with growth inhibition ranged from 85.76 to 97.76%.

Regarding anti-inflammatory activity, all synthesized compounds 7a–k, 8a–c and 9a–c showed potent anti-inflammatory (56.4–93.5% reduction of inflammation after 6 h.) and selective COX-2 inhibitory activity (IC50 = 0.1–0.31 µM, SI = 132–31.29) more than indomethacin. Besides, oxime derivatives 9a–c showed good selective COX-2 inhibitory activity with moderate in vitro nitric oxide release, which can offer valuable drug design to decrease the cardiovascular problems.

The molecular modeling study ensured in vitro COX-2 inhibition assay results. Compounds 7b, 7h, and 7i fitted to a COX-2 enzyme similar to celecoxib.

These results suggested that the presence of methylsulfonyl moiety in the indole ring offered an increase in COX-2 selectivity more than the reference drug indomethacin. Also, hybridization of methylsulfonyl and arylhydrazone moiety with an indole ring, providing valuable design for the development of compounds with dual antimicrobial/anti-inflammatory activity. Many investigations are currently undergoing to determine the mechanism of action of these compounds.

Experimental

Chemistry

A Thomas-Hoover capillary apparatus used to determine melting points. Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded as films on KBr plates using the FT-IR spectrometer.

Thin-layer chromatography (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used for monitoring the reaction mixture, purity, and homogeneity of the synthesized compounds. UV was used as the visualizing agent.

1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker Avance III 400 MHz for 1H NMR and 100 MHz for 13C NMR (Bruker AG, Switzerland) with BBFO Smart Probe and Bruker 400 AEON Nitrogen-Free Magnet, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Egypt in DMSO-d6 with TMS as the internal standard, where J (coupling constant) values are estimated in Hertz (Hz) and chemical shifts were recorded in ppm on δ scale.

Microanalyses for C, H, and N were carried out on Perkin-Elmer 2400 analyzer (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA) at the Microanalytical unit of Al Azhar University, Egypt and all compounds were within ± 0.4% of the theoretical values.

p-Methylthioacetophenone (2) and p-methylsulfonyl acetophenone (3) and 5-Un/substituted-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl) phenyl)-1H-indole (5a-c) were prepared according to a previous procedure [13]. The compounds were confirmed by matching their physical properties with the reported ones.

General procedure for synthesis of 5-substituted-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde 6a-c

A mixture of phosphorous oxychloride POCl3 (1.53 g, 10 mmol) and DMF (0.73 g, 10 mmol) was stirred for 30 min at room temperature, the solution of respective indole (1 mmol) in DMF (5 mL) was added slowly to the mixture which allowed to stir overnight. The reaction mixture was poured into ice-cold water and neutralized with 40% NaOH. The separated solid was filtered, dried and recrystallized from ethyl alcohol (yield: 70–80%).

2-(4-(Methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde (6a)

Yellow solid; Yield 70%; mp 232–235 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3205 (NH), 3065–3042 (CH aromatic), 2929–2871 (CH aliphatic), 1657 (C=O), 1305, 1150 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 3.21 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.27–7.36 (m, 2H, indole H-5, H-6), 7.57 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-7), 8.08 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 8.15 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 8.26 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz, indole H-4), 10.04 (s, 1H, aldehydic H), 12.64 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable). Anal. Calced for C16H13NO3S: C, 64.20; H, 4.38; N, 4.68. Found: C, 64.48; H, 4.40; N, 4.84.

5-Methyl-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde (6b)

Brown solid; Yield 80%; mp 244–246 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3279 (NH), 3059–3029 (CH aromatic), 2927–2856 (CH aliphatic), 1670 (C=O), 1301, 1148 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 2.45 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.17 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.17 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-6), 7.46 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-7), 8.06–8.14 (m, 5H, indole H-4, phenyl H-2, H-3, H-5, H-6), 10.00 (s, 1H, aldehydic H), 12.62 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable). Anal. Calced for C17H15NO3S: C, 65.16; H, 4.82; N, 4.47. Found: C, 65.27; H, 4.68; N, 4.52.

5-Fluoro-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde (6c)

Yellow solid; Yield 72%; mp 195–197 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3320 (NH), 3064–3027 (CH aromatic), 2928–2853 (CH aliphatic), 1661 (C=O), 1302, 1146 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 3.18 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.2 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-6), 7.58 (s, 1H, indole H-4), 7.91 (d, 1H, J = 9.6 Hz, indole H-7), 8.09 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 8.14 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 10.00 (s, 1H, aldehydic H), 12.92 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable). Anal. Calced for C16H12FNO3S: C, 60.56; H, 3.81; N, 4.41. Found: C, 60.73; H, 3.72; N, 4.62.

General procedure for synthesis of 5-substituted-3-((2-(4-substituted- phenyl)hydrazono) methyl)-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indole 7a-k

A mixture of an ethanolic solution of respective indole-3-carbaldehyde derivative (6a–c) (1 mmol) and 4-substituted phenylhydrazine HCl (1 mmol) was heated under reflux for 4–6 h in the presence of a few drops of glacial acetic acid. After cooling, the reaction mixture was poured into ice-cold water and the separated solid was filtered, dried and recrystallized from methanol (yield: 73–92%).

3-((2-(4-Fluorophenyl)hydrazono)methyl)-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indole (7a)

Brown solid; Yield 73%; mp 204–206 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3282–3317 (indole NH, hydrazone NH), 3063 (CH aromatic), 2927–2843 (CH aliphatic), 1597 (C=N), 1302, 1148 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 3.26 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.04–7.18 (m, 4H, phenyl hydrazone H-3, H-5, indole H-5, H-6), 7.44 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-4), 7.59 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, phenyl hydrazone H-2, H-6), 7.99 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 8.12 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 8.27 (s, 1H, CH), 8.4 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-7), 10.01 (s, 1H, hydrazone NH, D2O exchangeable), 11.79 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 43.0 (SO2CH3), 110.4, 111.9, 112.7, 115.2, 120.3, 125.6, 126.2, 128.0, 129.7, 132.1, 135.7, 136.4, 137.3, 140.2, 143.6 (CH=N), 154.7, 157.1. Anal. Calced for C22H18FN3O2S: C, 64.85; H, 4.45; N, 10.31. Found: C, 65.08; H, 4.33; N, 9.95.

2-(4-(Methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-3-((2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)hydrazono)methyl)-1H-indole (7b)

Yellow solid; Yield 85%; mp 228–230 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3262–3309 (indole NH, hydrazone NH), 3017 (CH aromatic), 2934–2863 (CH aliphatic), 1593 (C=N), 1299, 1150 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 3.11 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 3.33 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.17 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl hydrazone H-3, H-5), 7.24–7.33 (m, 2H, indole H-5, H-6), 7.51 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-4), 7.75 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl hydrazone H-2, H-6), 7.95 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 8.13 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 8.3 (s, 1H, CH), 8.4 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-7), 10.72 (s, 1H, hydrazone NH, D2O exchangeable), 11.98 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 43.9 (SO2CH3), 44.8 (SO2CH3), 110.5, 111.2, 112.2, 121.5, 122.7, 124.1, 125.7, 127.9, 128.7, 129.5, 130.2, 136.8, 137.3, 137.6, 137.8, 140.6, 149.8 (CH = N). Anal. Calced for C23H21N3O4S2: C, 59.08; H, 4.53; N, 8.99. Found: C, 59.27; H, 4.68; N, 9.12.

4-(2-((2-(4-(Methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)hydrazinyl)benzene sulfonamide (7c)

Yellow solid; Yield 83%; mp 203–204 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3298–3325 (NH2, indole NH, hydrazone NH), 3014 (CH aromatic), 2924–2853 (CH aliphatic), 1593 (C=N), 1276, 1089 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 3.11 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.17 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl hydrazone H-3, H-5), 7.24–7.33 (m, 2H, indole H-5, H-6), 7.5 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-4), 7.75 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl hydrazone H-2, H-6), 7.95 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 8.13 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 8.36 (s, 1H, CH), 8.39 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-7), 10.71 (s, 1H, hydrazone NH, D2O exchangeable), 11.97 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable), NH2 not distinguished; 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 43.9 (SO2CH3), 110.5, 111.2, 112.2, 121.5, 122.7, 124.1, 125.7, 127.9, 128.7, 129.5, 130.2, 136.8, 137.3, 137.6, 137.8, 140.6, 149.8 (CH=N). Anal. Calced for C22H20N4O4S2: C, 56.39; H, 4.30; N, 11.96. Found: C, 56.45; H, 4.17; N, 12.28.

5-Methyl-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-3-((2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl) hydraz-ono) methyl)-1H-indole (7d)

Brown solid; Yield 85%; mp 262–264 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3319–3340 (indole NH, hydrazone NH), 3023 (CH aromatic), 2932–2856 (CH aliphatic), 1595 (C=N), 1300, 1140 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 2.55 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.11 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 3.31 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.12–7.18 (m, 3H, indole H-6, phenyl hydrazone H-3, H-5), 7.4 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, indole H-7), 7.76 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, phenyl hydrazone H-2, H-6), 7.92 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 8.11 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 8.35 (s, 1H, CH), 8.18 (s, 1H, indole H-4), 10.71 (s, 1H, hydrazone NH, D2O exchangeable), 11.88 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 22.0 (CH3), 44.0 (SO2CH3), 44.8 (SO2CH3), 110.1, 111.2, 111.9, 122.2, 125.6, 126.0, 126.8, 127.8, 128.7, 129.5, 129.8, 130.1, 135.7, 136.9, 137.8, 140.6, 149.8 (CH=N). Anal. Calced for C24H23N3O4S2: C, 59.86; H, 4.81; N, 8.73. Found: C, 59.67; H, 4.82; N, 8.97.

4-(2-((5-Methyl-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene) hydrazine-yl) benzenesulfonamide (7e)

Yellow solid; Yield 87%; mp 186–188 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3300–3341 (NH2, indole NH, hydrazone NH), 3023 (CH aromatic), 2927–2854 (CH aliphatic), 1595 (C=N), 1300, 1130 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 3.1 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.33 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.12–7.18 (m, 4H, phenyl hydrazone H-3, H-5, indole H-4, H-6), 7.39 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-7), 7.76 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl hydrazone H-2, H-6), 7.93 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 8.12 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 8.18 (s, 2H, NH2, D2O exchangeable), 8.35 (s, 1H, CH), 10.7 (s, 1H, hydrazone NH, D2O exchangeable), 11.88 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 22.0 (CH3), 43.9 (SO2CH3), 110.1, 111.2, 111.9, 122.3, 125.6, 125.9, 127.9, 128.6, 129.5, 129.8, 130.1, 135.7, 136.9, 137.8, 137.8, 140.5, 149.8 (CH=N). Anal. Calced for C23H22N4O4S2: C, 57.24; H, 4.60; N, 11.61. Found: C, 57.56; H, 4.53; N, 11.89.

3-((2-(4-Fluorophenyl)hydrazono)methyl)-5-methyl-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indole (7f)

Yellow solid; Yield 80%; mp 159–161 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3250–3307 (indole NH, hydrazone NH), 3065 (CH aromatic), 2928–2859 (CH aliphatic), 1597 (C=N), 1300, 1146 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 2.49 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.4 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.02 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, phenyl hydrazone H-3, H-5), 7.04–7.1 (m, 3H, phenyl hydrazone H-2, H-6, indole H-7), 7.37 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-6), 7.92 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 8.1 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 8.18 (s, 1H, indole H-4),8.25 (s, 1H, CH), 10.03 (s, 1H, hydrazone NH, D2O exchangeable), 11.75 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 22.6 (CH3), 43.6 (SO2CH3), 110.4, 111.5, 112.1, 116.2, 122.3, 125.4, 126.1, 127.8, 129.8, 134.6, 135.7, 136.4, 137.2, 140.2, 143.1 (CH=N), 154.7, 157.0. Anal. Calced for C23H20FN3O2S: C, 65.54; H, 4.78; N, 9.97. Found: C, 65.6; H, 4.6; N, 9.94.

5-Methyl-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-3-((2-(p-tolyl)hydrazono)methyl)-1H-indole (7 g)

Brown solid; Yield 84%; mp 166-168 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3214–3306 (indole NH, hydrazone NH), 3023 (CH aromatic), 2926–28,658 (CH aliphatic), 1598 (C=N), 1302, 1149 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 2.32 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.48 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.25 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 6.95–7.07 (m, 3H, indole H-6, phenyl hydrazone H-3, H-5), 7.39 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, indole H-7), 7.62 (s, 2H, NH2, D2O exchangeable), 7.80 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, phenyl hydrazone H-2, H-6), 7.92 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 8.10 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 8.2 (s, 1H, CH), 8.25 (s, 1H, indole H-4), 9.91 (s, 1H, hydrazone NH, D2O exchangeable), 11.71 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 20.5 (CH3), 22.1 (CH3), 44.0 (SO2CH3), 111.0, 111.9, 120.5, 122.5, 125.6, 126.1, 126.8, 127.2, 127.8, 128.1, 129.6, 130.0, 135.2, 136.1, 137.7, 140.7, 144.1 (CH=N). Anal. Calced for C24H23N3O2S: C, 69.04; H, 5.55; N, 10.06. Found: C, 68.82; H, 5.68; N, 10.32.

5-Fluoro-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-3-((2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl) hydraz-ono)methyl)-1H-indole (7h)

Bale yellow solid; Yield 92%; mp 187–188 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3265–3337 (indole NH, hydrazone NH),3025 (CH aromatic), 2925–2854 (CH aliphatic), 1593 (C=N), 1321, 1140 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 3.12 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 3.34 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.15–7.20 (m, 3H, phenyl hydrazone H-3, H-5, indole H-6), 7.51 (s, 1H, indole H-4), 7.77 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl hydrazone H-2, H-6), 7.95 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 8.04 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-7), 8.14 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 8.34 (s, 1H, CH), 10.73 (s, 1H, hydrazone NH, D2O exchangeable), 12.11 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 44.0 (SO2CH3), 44.8 (SO2CH3), 107.0, 111.3, 112.1, 113.4, 125.9, 127.9, 129.0, 129.5, 130.2, 134.0, 136.5, 137.4, 139.4, 140.9, 149.7 (CH=N), 157.2, 159.5. Anal. Calced for C23H20FN3O4S2: C, 56.89; H, 4.15; N, 8.65. Found: C, 57.17; H, 4.23; N, 8.58.

4-(2-((5-Fluoro-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indol-3yl)methylene)hydrazinyl) benzene sulfonamide (7i)

Yellow solid; Yield 82%; mp 212–214 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3260–3315 (NH2, indole NH, hydrazone NH), 3026 (CH aromatic), 2927 (CH aliphatic), 1594 (C=N), 1295, 1140 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 3.24 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.14 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl hydrazone H-3, H-5), 7.51 (s, 1H, indole H-4), 7.67 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-6), 7.76 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl hydrazone H-2, H-6), 7.91 (s, 2H, NH2, D2O exchangeable), 7.95 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 8.03 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-7), 8.13 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 8.34 (s, 1H, CH), 10.62 (s, 1H, hydrazone NH, D2O exchangeable), 11.99 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 44.0 (SO2CH3), 107.0, 110.6, 112.4, 113.5, 125.9, 127.5, 129.0, 129.2, 130.2, 134.0, 135.5, 136.4, 139.4, 140.8, 141.0, 149.7 (CH=N), 157.2. Anal. Calced for C22H19FN4O4S2: C, 54.31; H, 3.94; N, 11.52. Found: C, 54.67; H, 3.82; N, 11.73.

5-Fluoro-3-((2-(4-fluorophenyl)hydrazono)methyl)-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indole (7j)

Yellow solid; Yield 82%; mp 200–202 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3217–3250 (indole NH, hydrazone NH), 3065 (CH aromatic), 2928–2863 (CH aliphatic), 1597 (C=N), 1302, 1145 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 3.33 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.01 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl hydrazone H-3, H-5), 7.09–7.17 (m, 3H, phenylhydrazone H-2, H-6, indole H-6), 7.5 (s, 1H, indole H-4), 7.94 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 8.03 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-7), 8.12 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 8.25 (s, 1H, CH), 10.09 (s, 1H, hydrazone NH, D2O exchangeable), 11.99 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 44.0 (SO2CH3), 107.3, 111.1, 112.0, 112.7, 113.0, 116.3, 125.9, 127.9, 130.1, 134.0, 136.7, 137.9, 140.6, 142.9 (CH=N), 154.7, 157.0, 159.3. Anal. Calced for C22H17F2N3O2S: C, 62.11; H, 4.03; N, 9.88. Found: C, 62.32; H, 4.11; N, 10.16.

5-Fluoro-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-3-((2-(p-tolyl)hydrazono)methyl)-1H-indole (7k)

Brown solid; Yield 75%; mp 151–153 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3220–3270 (indole NH, hydrazone NH),3034 (CH aromatic), 2927, 2860 (CH aliphatic), 1597 (C=N), 1303, 1146 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 2.23 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.33 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 6.94 (d, 2H, J = 12 Hz, phenyl hydrazone H-3, H-5), 7.07 (d, 2H, J = 12 Hz, phenyl hydrazone H-2, H-6),7.15 (d,1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-6), 7.48 (s, 1H, indole H-4), 7.94 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 8.05 (d, 1H, J = 12 Hz, indole H-7), 8.12 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 8.24 (s, 1H, CH), 10.01 (s, 1H, hydrazone NH, D2O exchangable), 11.96 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangable; 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 20.7 (CH3), 43.9 (SO2CH3), 105.3, 111.4, 112.2, 113.3, 125.9, 126.9, 127.3, 128.2, 129.9, 134.0, 134.8, 137.7, 137.9, 140.5, 144.0 (CH = N), 157.0, 159.3. Anal. Calced for C23H20FN3O2S: C, 65.54; H, 4.78; N, 9.97 Found: C, 65.70; H, 5.03; N, 10.14.

General procedure for synthesis of 2-(5-substituted-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)-6-chloro-1H-benzo[d]imidazole 8a-c

A mixture of 4-chloro phenylene diamine (0.142 g, 1 mmol), sodium metabisulfite (0.19 g, 1 mmol) and respective indole-3-carbaldehyde derivative (6a–c) (1 mmol) in DMF was heated under reflux for 6 h. After cooling, the reaction mixture was poured into ice cold water and the separated solid was filtered, dried and recrystallized from ethanol (yield: 60–70%).

5-Chloro-2-(2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (8a)

Yellow solid; Yield 60%; mp 210–212 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3285–3382 (indole NH, benzimidazole NH), 3065–3021 (CH aromatic), 2926–2853 (CH aliphatic), 1660 (benzimidazole C=N), 1301, 1149 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 3.27 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.19–7.22 (m, 2H, indole H-5, benzimidazole H-6), 7.3 (t, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz, indole H-6), 7.47 (s, 1H, benzimidazole H-4), 7.55 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, benzimidazole H-7), 7.69 (s, 1H, indole H-7), 7.89–7.92 (m, 3H, phenyl H-2, H-6, indole H-4), 7.99 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 12.18 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable), 12.45 (s, 1H, benzimidazole NH, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 43.8 (SO2CH3), 105.1, 112.4, 116.4, 116.8, 117.5, 120.7, 121.2, 122.5, 123.8, 127.7, 128.0, 129.5, 131.5, 135.3, 136.2, 136.8, 136.9, 140.5, 145.8. Anal. Calced for C22H16ClN3O2S: C, 62.63; H, 3.82; N, 9.96. Found: C, 62.89; H, 3.68; N, 10.24.

5-Chloro-2-(5-fluoro-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)-1H-benzo[d] imidazole (8b)

Pale yellow; Yield 67%; mp 202–204 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3348–3360 (indole NH, benzimidazole NH), 3008–3063 (CH aromatic), 2854–2928 (CH aliphatic), 1659 (benzimidazole C=N), 1300, 1148 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 3.29 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.13–7.22 (m, 2H, indole H-6, benzimidazole H-6), 7.46 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, benzimidazole H-7), 7.55 (s, 1H, indole H-4), 7.66–7.72 (m, 2H, benzimidazole H-4, indole H-7), 7.91 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 8.02 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 12.25 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable), 12.37 (s, 1H, benzimidazole NH, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 43.9 (SO2CH3), 105.4, 106.3, 112.1, 113.6, 117.3, 118.3, 122.0, 123.8, 125.2, 127.7, 129.7, 133.5, 136.6, 138.1, 140.4, 140.9, 141.9, 146.3, 149.0. Anal. Calced for C22H15ClFN3O2S: C, 60.07; H, 3.44; N, 9.55. Found: C, 60.31; H, 3.20; N, 9.79.

5-Chloro-2-(5-methyl-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (8c)

Yellow solid; Yield 70%; mp 217–219 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3272–3322 (indole NH, benzimidazole NH), 3192, 3072 (CH aromatic), 2927, 2857 (CH aliphatic), 1620 (benzimidazole C=N), 1301, 1149 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 2.43 (s, 3H, CH3),3.27 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.12 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, indole H-6), 7.2 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, benzimidazole H-6), 7.43–7.47 (m, 2H, indole H-7, benzimidazole H-7), 7.68–7.71 (m, 2H, indole H-4, benzimidazole H-4), 7.88 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 7.98 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 12.04 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable), 12.45 (s, 1H, benzimidazole NH, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 21.7 (CH3), 43.8 (SO2CH3), 104.7, 112.1, 113.2, 118.4, 118.6, 120.1, 122.7, 125.5, 126.2, 127.6, 128.3, 129.4, 130.0, 134.3, 135.2, 136.1, 137.0, 140.4, 145.7. Anal. Calced for C23H18ClN3O2S: C, 63.37; H, 4.16; N, 9.64. Found: C, 63.24; H, 4.25; N, 9.88.

General procedure for synthesis of 5-un/substituted-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde oxime 9a–c

A mixture of an ethanolic solution of respective indole-3-carbaldehyde derivative (6a–c) (1 mmol) and hydroxylamine HCl (0.08 g, 1 mmol) was heated under reflux for 4–6 h in the presence of a few drops of pyridine. After cooling, the reaction mixture was poured into ice-cold water and the separated solid was filtered, dried and recrystallized from ethanol (yield: 55–70%).

2-(4-(Methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde oxime (9a)

Yellow solid; Yield 62%; mp 199–201 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3282–3385 (indole NH, OH), 3010–3028 (CH aromatic), 2928–2951 (CH aliphatic), 1596 (C=N), 1302, 1146 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 3.31 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.16–7.26 (m, 2H, indole H-5, H-6), 7.48 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-7), 7.89 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 8.10–8.12 (m, 3H, phenyl H-3, H-5, indole H-4), 8.32 (s, 1H, CH), 10.89 (s, 1H, OH, D2O exchangeable), 11.96 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 44.2 (SO2CH3), 106.4, 112.7, 122.4, 125.7, 126.2, 127.9, 129.0, 129.9, 135.6, 136.7, 137.7, 140.7, 143.3 (CH=N). Anal. Calced for C16H14N2O3S: C, 61.13; H, 4.49; N, 8.91. Found: C, 61.48; H, 4.61; N, 8.62.

5-Fluoro-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde oxime (9b)

Yellow solid; Yield 55%; mp 226–228 ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3366–3463 (indole NH, OH), 3013–3029 (CH aromatic), 2918–2997 (CH aliphatic), 1598 (C=N), 1298, 1143 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 3.3 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.12 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-6), 7.48 (s, 1H, indole H-4), 7.8 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-7), 7.89 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6), 8.11 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 8.31 (s, 1H, CH), 10.89 (s, 1H, OH, D2O exchangeable), 12.04 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 43.9 (SO2CH3), 107.2, 112.2, 113.3, 126.2, 128.0, 129.5, 133.8, 136.3, 139.3, 140.5, 144.0 (CH=N), 157.1, 159.4. Anal. Calced for C16H13FN2O3S: C, 57.82; H, 3.94; N, 8.43. Found: C, 57.58; H, 4.06; N, 8.75.

5-Methyl-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde oxime (9c)

Yellow solid; Yield 70%; mp 212–214 ℃  ℃; IR (KBr, cm−1) 3362 (indole NH, OH), 3025–3060 (CH aromatic), 2857–2928 (CH aliphatic), 1597 (C=N), 1300, 1145 (SO2); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 2.42 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.29 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 7.09 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-7), 7.36 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, indole H-6), 7.86 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-2, H-6),7.94 (s, 1H, indole H-4), 8.09 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz, phenyl H-3, H-5), 8.31 (s, 1H, CH), 10.8 (s, 1H, OH, D2O exchangeable), 11.79 (s, 1H, indole NH, D2O exchangeable); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 21.7 (CH3), 44.0 (SO2CH3), 107.4, 111.8, 122.2, 125.4, 126.2, 127.7, 129.0, 129.9, 135.5, 136.7, 137.7, 140.5, 144.3 (CH=N). Anal. Calced for C17H16N2O3S: C, 62.18; H, 4.91; N, 8.53. Found: C, 62.42; H, 4.83; N, 8.79.

Biological evaluation

Antimicrobial and antifungal activities

The antimicrobial and antifungal screening was performed according to CO-ADD (The Community for Antimicrobial Drug Discovery) procedures [27].

COX-1/COX-2 inhibition colorimetric assay

Measurement of the ability of the synthesized compounds to inhibit COX isozymes by using colorimetric COX (ovine) inhibitor screening assay kit (Kit catalog number 760111, Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions and as mentioned before [28].

Carrageenan-induced rat edema assay

Pretreatment of rats with compounds 7a–k, 8a–c, and 9a–c before injection with carrageenan in rat paw which induces inflammation and then the percentage of paw edema reduction was measured after certain hours according to previously reported procedures [29].

In vitro nitric oxide release assay

Different solutions of the tested compounds 9a–c in DMF were diluted using phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) till a final concentration of 100 µM (test solutions). To 100 µl of different test solutions, 100 µl of N-acetyl cysteine solution was added and the obtained solution was kept in an incubator at 37 °C (treated solutions). The solutions were treated similarly as for a nitrite standard solution with Griess reagent components, 100 µl of sulphanilamide solution was added to each tube of the treated solution, the mixture was left at 25 °C for 5–10 min, protected from light. To this mixture 100 µl of the NED solution was added, the mixture was again left for 5–10 min at 25 °C, protected from light.

The absorbance of the formed purple color, if any, was measured within 30 min at λ 546 nm, a blank experiment was performed under the same conditions, the procedure was repeated three times for each tested compound and the average absorbance values were calculated. The corresponding concentration of nitrite was determined by comparison to the nitrite standard calibration curve and the amount of NO released (revealed by the corresponding nitrite concentration) was calculated as a percentage of moles of NO released from 1 mol of the tested compounds.

Molecular modeling and docking

Molecular modeling studies were performed by using Molecular Operating Environment MOE version 2018.0101. Structures of 7b, 7h, and 7i were built in MOE. The X-ray crystal structure of celecoxib bound to the COX-2 (PDB: ID 3LN1) active site was obtained from the protein data bank at research collaboration for Structural Bioinformatics (RSCB) protein database [PDB].

Preparation of the enzyme for docking by removing the Co-crystallized ligand and water molecules then the enzyme was 3D protonated, in which hydrogen atoms were added to their standard geometry. The conformers generated were docked into the COX-2 receptor with MOE-dock using the triangle matcher placement method and the GBVI/WSA dG scoring function.

A molecular mechanics force field refinement was carried out on the top 30 poses generated. Celecoxib was redocked into the active site of 3LN1 to validate the docking protocol. Amino acid interactions and the hydrogen bond lengths were summarized in (Table 6).

Availability of data and materials

The data sets and samples of the compounds used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

A. baumannii :

Acinetobacter baumannii

C. albicans :

Candida albicans

C. neoformans :

Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii

E. coli :

Escherichia coli

GI50 :

Growth Inhibition of 50%

K. pneumonia :

Klebsilla pneumonia

MIC:

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration

MOE:

Molecular Operating Environment software

MRSA :

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

P. aeruginosa :

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

SI:

Selectivity index

References

  1. Akbas E, Berber I (2005) Antibacterial and antifungal activities of new pyrazolo [3, 4-d] pyridazin derivatives. Eur J Med Chem 40:401–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alagarsamy V, Meena S, Ramseshu K, Solomon V, Thirumurugan K, Dhanabal K, Murugan M (2006) Synthesis, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, ulcerogenic index and antibacterial activities of novel 2-methylthio-3-substituted-5, 6, 7, 8-tetrahydrobenzo (b) thieno [2, 3-d] pyrimidin-4 (3H)-ones. Eur J Med Chem 41:1293–1300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bekhit AA, Farghaly AM, Shafik RM, Elsemary MM, Bekhit AE, Guemei AA, El-Shoukrofy MS, Ibrahim TM (2018) Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modeling of novel thienopyrimidinone and triazolothienopyrimidinone derivatives as dual anti-inflammatory antimicrobial agents. Bioorg Chem 77:38–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Abdelall EK, Lamie PF, Ali WA (2016) Cyclooxygenase-2 and 15-lipoxygenase inhibition, synthesis, anti-inflammatory activity and ulcer liability of new celecoxib analogues: determination of region-specific pyrazole ring formation by NOESY. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 26:2893–2899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zarghi A, Najafnia L, Daraee B, Dadrass OG, Hedayati M (2007) Synthesis of 2, 3-diaryl-1, 3-thiazolidine-4-one derivatives as selective cyclooxygenase (COX-2) inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 17:5634–5637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zebardast T, Zarghi A, Daraie B, Hedayati M, Dadrass OG (2009) Design and synthesis of 3-alkyl-2-aryl-1, 3-thiazinan-4-one derivatives as selective cyclooxygenase (COX-2) inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 19:3162–3165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdellatif KR, Abdelall EK, Fadaly WA, Kamel GM (2016) Synthesis, cyclooxygenase inhibition, anti-inflammatory evaluation and ulcerogenic liability of new 1, 3, 5-triarylpyrazoline and 1, 5-diarylpyrazole derivatives as selective COX-2 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 26:406–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grosser T, Ricciotti E, FitzGerald GA (2017) The cardiovascular pharmacology of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Trends Pharmacol Sci 38:733–748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Elshemy HA, Abdelall EK, Azouz AA, Moawad A, Ali WA, Safwat NM (2017) Synthesis, anti-inflammatory, cyclooxygenases inhibitions assays and histopathological study of poly-substituted 1, 3, 5-triazines: confirmation of regiospecific pyrazole cyclization by HMBC. Eur J Med Chem 127:10–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Patrono C, Baigent C (2017) Coxibs, traditional NSAIDs, and cardiovascular safety post-precision: what we thought we knew then and what we think we know now. Clin Pharmacol Ther 102:238–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Smyth EM (2010) Thromboxane and the thromboxane receptor in cardiovascular disease. Clinical Lipidology 5:209–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu S, Wang G, Lin Y, Zhang Y, Pei L, Yao H, Hu M, Qiu Y, Huang Z, Zhang Y (2016) Novel anticancer oridonin derivatives possessing a diazen-1-ium-1, 2-diolate nitric oxide donor moiety: design, synthesis, biological evaluation and nitric oxide release studies. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 26:2795–2800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shaker AM, Abdelall EK, Abdellatif KR, Abdel-Rahman HM (2018) Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 2-(4-(methylsulfonyl) phenyl) indole derivatives with promising COX-2 inhibitory activity. J Appl Pharm Sci 8:001–008

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Abdellatif KR, Abdelall EK, Bakr RB (2017) Nitric oxide-NASIDS donor prodrugs as hybrid safe anti-inflammatory agents. Curr Top Med Chem 17:941–955

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Popiołek Ł (2017) Hydrazide–hydrazones as potential antimicrobial agents: overview of the literature since 2010. Med Chem Res 26:287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Özkay Y, Tunalı Y, Karaca H, Işıkdağ İ (2011) Antimicrobial activity of a new series of benzimidazole derivatives. Arch Pharm Res 34:1427–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh N, Pandurangan A, Rana K, Anand P, Ahamad A, Tiwari AK (2012) Benzimidazole: a short review of their antimicrobial activities. Int Curr Pharm J 1:119–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Verma G, Marella A, Shaquiquzzaman M, Akhtar M, Ali MR, Alam MM (2014) A review exploring biological activities of hydrazones. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 6:69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saini D, Gupta M (2018) Hydrazones as potential anticancer agents: an update. Asian J Pharm Pharmacol 4:116–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaur J, Bhardwaj A, Huang Z, Knaus EE (2012) N-1 and C-3 substituted indole Schiff bases as selective COX-2 inhibitors: synthesis and biological evaluation. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 22:2154–2159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bandgar BP, Sarangdhar RJ, Viswakarma S, Ahamed FA (2011) Synthesis and biological evaluation of orally active prodrugs of indomethacin. J Med Chem 54:1191–1201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Unsal-Tan O, Ozadali K, Piskin K, Balkan A (2012) Molecular modeling, synthesis and screening of some new 4-thiazolidinone derivatives with promising selective COX-2 inhibitory activity. Eur J Med Chem 57:59–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. El-Sherief HA, Abuo-Rahma GE-DA, Shoman ME, Beshr EA, Abdel-baky RM (2017) Design and synthesis of new coumarin–chalcone/NO hybrids of potential biological activity. Med Chem Res 26:3077–3090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Abuo-Rahma GE-DA, Abdel-Aziz M, Beshr EA, Ali TF (2014) 1, 2, 4-Triazole/oxime hybrids as new strategy for nitric oxide donors: synthesis, anti-inflammatory, ulceroginicity and antiproliferative activities. Eur J Med Chem 71:185–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Habeeb AG, Praveen Rao P, Knaus EE (2001) Design and synthesis of celecoxib and rofecoxib analogues as selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors: replacement of sulfonamide and methylsulfonyl pharmacophores by an azido bioisostere. J Med Chem 44:3039–3042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang JL, Limburg D, Graneto MJ, Springer J, Hamper JR, Liao S, Pawlitz JL, Kurumbail RG, Maziasz T, Talley JJ (2010) The novel benzopyran class of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Part 2: the second clinical candidate having a shorter and favorable human half-life. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 20:7159–7163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Berger M, Roller A, Maulide N (2017) Synthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of novel analogues of dehydroabietic acid prepared by CH-Activation. Eur J Med Chem 126:937–943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Abdelazeem AH, Abdelatef SA, El-Saadi MT, Omar HA, Khan SI, McCurdy CR, El-Moghazy SM (2014) Novel pyrazolopyrimidine derivatives targeting COXs and iNOS enzymes; design, synthesis and biological evaluation as potential anti-inflammatory agents. Eur J Pharm Sci 62:197–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. El-Nezhawy AO, Biuomy AR, Hassan FS, Ismaiel AK, Omar HA (2013) Design, synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of omeprazole-like agents with anti-inflammatory activity. Bioorg Med Chem 21:1661–1670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Community for Antimicrobial Drug Discovery (CO-ADD) funded by the Wellcome Trust (UK) and The University of Queensland (Australia) for the antimicrobial screening.

Funding

Not applicable. (No specific funding or grant).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nahda University, Beni-Suef, 62517, Egypt

    Ahmed M. M. Shaker & Hamdy M. Abdel-Rahman

  2. Department of Pharmaceutical Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, 62514, Egypt

    Eman K. A. Abdelall & Khaled R. A. Abdellatif

  3. Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, IbnSina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah, 21418, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Khaled R. A. Abdellatif

  4. Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Assiut University, Assiut, 71526, Egypt

    Hamdy M. Abdel-Rahman

Authors
  1. Ahmed M. M. Shaker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eman K. A. Abdelall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Khaled R. A. Abdellatif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hamdy M. Abdel-Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HMA-R and KRAA designed the idea, and the protocol of the whole study; AMMS synthesized the compounds and wrote the experimental parts. AMMS, HMA-R, EKA interpreted the spectral data and modeling study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed M. M. Shaker.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaker, A.M.M., Abdelall, E.K.A., Abdellatif, K.R.A. et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of 2-(4-methylsulfonyl phenyl) indole derivatives: multi-target compounds with dual antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities. BMC Chemistry 14, 23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-020-00675-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-020-00675-5

Keywords

BMC Chemistry

ISSN: 2661-801X

Contact us