Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Summary Review
  • Published:

Tooth loss in Periodontitis: how valuable are the predictors?

Abstract

Data sources Three electronic databases including Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central were searched for finding the relevant literature. Cross-referencing, reviews and editorials were also used to identify original studies. Unpublished studies/ Grey literature were excluded.

Study selection Both observational and interventional studies were included for the review and only the studies with a minimum of 3 year follow-up period and which have reported the association between the predictor and tooth loss via odds/risk ratio or their derivatives were selected.

Data extraction and synthesis Data like study characteristics, assessed predictors (risk factors or indicators), tooth loss per year as well as the association estimated (as OR, RR or any derivative) were extracted from the included studies. Meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis was carried to find the impact of predictors on the tooth loss.

Results After screening, 20 studies were finally included in the study with a total of 15,422 participants. The mean age of the patient was 44.5 (range: 31-54 years) while the mean follow-up period was 12 years (range: 4-20 years). Predictors were pooled as patient level and tooth level predictors. Strong association was found for most of the patient level (age, compliance, diabetes, IL-1 polymorphism, diabetes and smoking) as well as tooth level predictors (Bone loss, pocket depth, tooth type, furcation involvement and mobility) except for sex (patient level predictor) and endodontic involvement (tooth level predictor).

Conclusions The meta-analysis depicted in the review exhibited strong association for most of the predictors which can be used by the dentists for treatment planning. Overall tooth level factors have stronger associations than patient level factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frencken J E, Sharma P, Stenhouse L, Green D, Laverty D, Dietrich T. Global epidemiology of dental caries and severe periodontitis - a comprehensive review. J Clin Periodontol 2017; 44 Suppl 18: S94-S105.

  2. Ramseier C A, Anerud A, Dulac M et al. Natural history of periodontitis:Disease progression and tooth loss over 40 years. J Clin Periodontol 2017; 44: 1182-1191.

  3. G Caton J, Armitage G, Berglundh T et al. A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions - Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification. J Clin Periodontol 2018; 45 Suppl 20: S1-S8.

  4. Martinez-Canut P. Predictors of tooth loss due to periodontal disease in patients following long-term periodontal maintenance. J Clin Periodontol 2015; 42: 1115-1125.

  5. Hassel A J, Safaltin V, Grill S et al. Risk factors for tooth loss in middle and older age after up to 10 years: An observational cohort study. Arch Oral Biol 2018; 86: 7-12.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gugnani, S., Gugnani, N. Tooth loss in Periodontitis: how valuable are the predictors?. Evid Based Dent 21, 12–13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-020-0081-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-020-0081-y

Search

Quick links