Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical investigation on conventional and PCM heat sinks under constant and variable heat flux conditions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a numerical model is developed to study the behaviour of conventional heat sink and phase change material (PCM) heat sink for electronics cooling applications. Two different PCMs, RT35HC (ΔTm = 34–36 °C and ΔH = 240 kJ/kg) and RT44HC (ΔTm = 41–44 °C and ΔH = 250 kJ/kg), are selected for the analysis. A comparison has been made between conventional heat sink and PCM-based heat sink under constant and variable heat flux conditions. Further, four different hybrid heat sink design configurations are studied during the cooling period (solidification) and compared with PCM-based heat sink. During the heating period, the conventional heat sink is subjected to different convective cooling environments (h = 10–50 W/m2-K). The results showed that the PCM heat sink achieved base temperature equivalent to the conventional heat sink with the heat transfer coefficient between 30 and 40 W/m2-K under the constant heat flux condition. Under the variable heat flux condition, the base temperature of the PCM heat sink is very much less than the conventional heat sink subjected to 50 W/m2-K. During the cooling period, hybrid heat sinks reduced the heat transfer coefficient by ten times less than that of the PCM heat sink.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(A\) :

Mushy zone constant (kg/m3-s)

\(C_{\text{p}}\) :

Specific heat (J/kg-K)

\(f_{\text{l}}\) :

Liquid volume fraction/average melt fraction

\(\overrightarrow {{F_{\text{b}} }}\) :

Body force term (N/m3)

g :

Acceleration due to gravity (m/s2)

h :

Heat transfer coefficient (W/m2-K)

\(\Delta H\) :

Latent heat of fusion (kJ/kg)

k :

Thermal conductivity (W/m-K)

\(p\) :

Pressure (Pa)

\(\overrightarrow {S}\) :

Darcy’s momentum source term (N/m3)

t :

Time (s)

\(T\) :

Temperature (K)

\(\overrightarrow {V}\) :

Velocity vector in x and y directions

\(x,y\) :

Coordinate axes

\(\beta\) :

Coefficient of thermal expansion (1/K)

\(\rho\) :

Density (kg/m3)

λ :

Constant

\(\mu\) :

Dynamic viscosity (Pa s)

eff:

Effective

l:

Liquidus

m:

Melting

mush:

Mushy zone

s:

Solidus

HHS:

Hybrid heat sink

PCM:

Phase change material

SPT:

Set point temperature

VHF:

Variable heat flux

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support from Mr. Saurabh Dongare, B. Tech student, Department of Chemical Engineering, IIT Guwahati, in preparing the literature review, is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muthukumar P..

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with any researchers related to the work reported in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sunku Prasad, J., Anandalakshmi, R. & Muthukumar, P. Numerical investigation on conventional and PCM heat sinks under constant and variable heat flux conditions. Clean Techn Environ Policy 23, 1105–1120 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01829-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01829-8

Keywords

Navigation