Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Differing views regarding diet and physical activity: adolescents versus parents’ perspectives

BMC Pediatrics volume 20, Article number: 137 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Today, approximately one in five United States adolescents age 12 to 19 years is obese and just over a third are either overweight or obese. This study examines how parents and peers influence diet and physical activity behaviors of older adolescents (14–18 years) with overweight or obesity to inform weight management interventions.

Methods

Adolescent participants included 14 to 18-year-olds with a Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than the 85th percentile for their age and sex who were receiving care in a large healthcare system in Northern California. Adolescents and their parents participated in separate focus groups and interviews (if not able to attend focus groups) that were held at the same time in the same location. We used qualitative thematic analysis to identify common themes discussed in the adolescent and parent focus groups as well as paired analysis of adolescent-parent dyads.

Results

Participants included 26 adolescents and 27 parents. Adolescent participants were 14 to 18 years old. Half were female and the participants were almost evenly distributed across year in school. The majority self-identified as White (56%) and Asian (36%).Three themes were identified which included 1) parents overestimated how supportive they were compared to adolescents’ perception 2) parents and adolescents had different views regarding parental influence on adolescent diet and physical activity behaviors 3) parents and adolescents held similar views on peers’ influential role on lifestyle behaviors.

Conclusion

Parents’ and adolescents’ differing views suggest that alignment of parent and adolescent expectations and behaviors for supporting effective weight management could be incorporated into interventions.

Peer Review reports

Background

The prevalence of obesity among adolescents age 12 to 19 years in the United States (US) has doubled over the past two decades. Today, approximately one in five US adolescents age 12 to 19 years is obese and just over a third are either overweight or obese [1]. Obesity in adolescence is associated with numerous immediate and long-term adverse health [2,3,4,5,6] and psychosocial consequences [3, 5,6,7]. For example, the prevalence of prediabetes/diabetes is estimated to be 23% among US adolescents [8]. Additionally compared to normal weight peers, obese adolescents are more likely to suffer from depression [9], shame [10], bullying [11], and anxiety [12] – factors that may contribute to weight gain and hinder engagement in interventions. Furthermore, obesity during adolescence is associated with an increased risk of obesity in adulthood [13]. According to national data, 90% of obese adolescents remained obese over a decade later, suggesting a high likelihood that obesity in adolescence persists into adulthood [14]. Obesity in adulthood is associated with costly and debilitating conditions including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and some cancers [15]. Thus, supporting adolescents to achieve a healthy weight will improve their immediate health and well-being as well as decrease their risk of obesity and its related comorbidities in adulthood.

Despite the urgent public health need for treating obesity in adolescence, there is a paucity of evidence-based interventions, especially for older adolescents age 14–18. Adolescence is a distinct development period in which children transition to adulthood and increasingly gain autonomy [16], including in lifestyle behaviors such as diet and physical activity [17,18,19,20,21], providing a crucial window of opportunity for establishing sustainable, lifelong healthy habits [18]. This developmental period is also marked by increasing dependence on peer relationships with a continued importance of parents and the family unit as a central influence on adolescents’ lifestyle. These factors underscore the need for tailored approaches to address this unique developmental period.

In younger children direct involvement of parents is a key factor for success [22,23,24]. While obesity tends to run in families [25,26,27] and parents remain an important influence for adolescents [28], the importance of peers and increasing autonomy make it difficult to know how best to engage parents in adolescent weight management programs. To date, research findings have been mixed regarding the extent to which involving parents is beneficial for adolescent weight loss [29].Al-Khudairy et al. found that behavioral interventions for adolescents that involved parents, compared to those with no parental involvement, did not seem to differ in effectiveness for weight-related outcomes [30]. Limited research offers differing views on the impact of parental involvement in adolescents. Engagement with adolescents and their parents to explore their views is important for informing successful weight management interventions for this age group.

To fill a critical gap in our understanding regarding successful weight management strategies for this age group, we engaged adolescents and their parents using separate focus groups to examine how parents and peers influence diet and physical activity behaviors of older adolescents (14–18 years) with overweight and obesity. The ultimate goal of this study was to directly inform the development of a primary care-based weight management intervention for adolescents age 14 to 18 with a BMI > the 85th percentile for age and sex.

Methods

Sample and recruitment

Participants included 14 to 18-year-old adolescents with a Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than the 85th percentile for their age and sex who were receiving care within a large multispecialty healthcare system in Northern California. The Sutter Health Institutional Review Board approved all study procedures (PAMF# 14–03-302EXP). Electronic Health Records (EHR) were used to identify potentially eligible current patients based on age and BMI percentile. We identified individuals with an encounter or clinic visit including a measurement of weight and height in the past 6 months and used this to calculate BMI for eligibility criteria. Exclusion criteria included serious physical or mental health conditions listed in the EHR and per physician discretion. Physicians involved in the study were consulted regarding participant eligibility and were asked to review the list of potential participants from their patient panel and indicated any patients they viewed as inappropriate for the study (based on serious physical or mental health impairment) as well as referred additional patients to be recruited. There were no specific inclusion or exclusion criteria applied to parent participants. Once approval was obtained, 377 invitation letters were mailed to parents/guardians [referred to as “parents” in the remaining text] from their adolescent’s pediatrician or family medicine doctor explaining the study and inviting their adolescent to participate with an option to opt out of the study. Parents who did not opt out through phone or reply card received a call from study staff to assess interest in participation and screen for eligibility. After parents consented for their adolescent to participate, they were invited to participate in a separate parent focus group. All participating parents provided written informed consent and adolescents provided written assent.

Data collection

Study staff trained in qualitative methods facilitated three focus groups with adolescents and three with their parents in summer 2015. For participants who were not able to attend the focus groups, trained study staff conducted individual in-depth interviews with adolescents (n = 5) and with their parents (n = 4). Adolescents and their parents participated in separate focus groups and interviews that were held at the same time in the same building. The focus group/interview guides for both adolescents and parents covered five main topic areas: 1) causes and consequences of overweight, 2) experiences or attempts with diet and weight loss, 3) diet, 4) physical activity, and 5) family and peer influences. Questions were open-ended and attempted to foster discussion. Probing questions were asked when necessary to deepen the discussion. All focus groups and interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim.

Participant demographics were assessed using a self-administered survey prior to the focus group discussion. In addition, participants completed a survey that included questions about lifestyle activities and decision-making. The parent version assessed parents’ opinions for themselves and their adolescent for each topic. Adolescents received $20 for participating in a 2-h focus group or a 1-h interview; the participating parents did not receive any monetary incentive or compensation.

Data analysis

We summarized findings from the survey using descriptive statistics. For the focus groups transcripts, we used an inductive approach including two phases for the qualitative analysis given the broad topics covered in the focus groups and interviews. In the first phase, two co-authors (KG and LL) came to consensus on an initial set of codes and their definitions based on reviewing the first 2 focus group and 2 interview transcripts. Through discussion among all study team members, the codebook was refined and finalized. KG and LL conducted the coding of all the focus group and interview transcripts according to the codebook using Dedoose (Version 7.0.23), a web-based software for qualitative and mixed-methods analysis. All respondents were assigned a study identifier with a linking identifier for adolescent-parent dyads, which was applied as a code to corresponding excerpts throughout all transcripts. This method allowed adolescents’ data that were coded with a linking identifier to match responses from their parent in order to facilitate comparisons between adolescent and parent responses within the same family.

The data were then reviewed by code to identify common themes both within and across the focus groups/interviews, with data summarized for adolescents and parents separately for comparison to identify overarching themes for each group. In addition, paired parent-adolescent responses were examined by code to identify similarities and discrepancies in accounts of adolescents’ diet and physical activity routines and their attempts to improve their diet or increase physical activity. KG and LL summarized coding reports and created an overall summary of key themes for parents and for teens separately, and of key areas of inconsistency between parent and teen reporting. Not all teen-parent dyads had a quote for every theme. Adolescent and parents’ demographic and lifestyle surveys were quantitatively summarized using means and proportions using SPSS (Version 14.0).

Results

Participant characteristics

A total of 26 adolescents and 27 parents participated in the focus groups and interviews. Adolescent participants ranged in age from 14 to 18 years old (Table 1). Half of the group was female and the participants were almost evenly distributed across year in school. Of the adolescent participants, the majority self-identified as White (56%) and Asian (36%). Parent participants were mostly female (81%), married (85%), had completed either college or graduate school (72%) and more than half reported annual household income greater than $150,000 (64%) (Table 1). Slightly more than a third (37%) were born outside of the US. This sample is similar to the population served by the health care system. The underlying catchment area from which the study participants were recruited spans five counties, has a higher average household income of $106,489 [31] and a relatively large Asian population (29%) [32]. Given this, the representativeness of this sample to the broader U.S. population is limited.

Table 1 Adolescent and parent sociodemographic survey results
Full size table

Emergent themes and findings

Three themes emerged from the focus groups and interviews with adolescents and parents. Survey findings are included throughout to support qualitative findings.

Theme 1: Parents and adolescents differ in their perception of parental support for weight management

In general, the focus groups/interviews and survey indicated that parents and adolescents differed in their perceptions of adolescents’ weight management needs, although there were a few examples of agreement. Paired analysis of adolescents and parents from their respective focus group transcripts revealed that one-third (n = 9) of parents reported aiding their adolescent in their change attempts for healthy diet; but only 15% (n = 4) of adolescents reported receiving aid from their parent(s) in their change attempts. There were also substantial discrepancies between adolescents’ accounts of their parents’ assistance and parents’ own accounts of their assistance. Among one parent-adolescent pair, the parent reported helping her adolescent with portion control and planning meals (Table 4, quote 1.1) while the adolescent complained that her mother offered little support in providing healthier food (Table 4, quote 1.2) and expressed a general lack of positive support from her mother (Table 4, quote 1.3). Among another parent-adolescent pair, the parent reported that despite her efforts to introduce whole grains, increase vegetables and salads, and replace unhealthy snacks (e.g. cookies) with healthier ones (e.g. fruit), the adolescent was reluctant to eat healthier foods. In contrast, the adolescent reported having tried to eat less “chips and sweets” but said it was very difficult due to lack of healthy food options at home.

From the survey data it was apparent that parents and adolescents differed in their report of prior weight loss attempts (Table 2). Almost 70% of adolescents reported having tried to lose weight while only about half of the parents (48%) reported that their adolescent had done so. More than half of the adolescents indicated that they had tried to increase their physical activity (62%) and decease their sugar intake from candy and sweets (62%), less than one-third of parents shared this view (23 and 31% respectively). In contrast, the majority of parents (69%) indicated that their child had attempted to lose weight by reducing “junk food or fast food” intake, while less than half (47%) of adolescents agreed. Further, 78% of the adolescents reported eating more fruits, vegetables and salads as a weight loss method, only 46% of the parents indicated that their adolescent had been doing so.

Table 2 Adolescents’ weight loss attempts
Full size table

There were some examples of both the adolescent and parent agreeing that the parents had provided assistance to help adolescents eat healthier. For instance, one adolescent reported that he had started eating healthier foods and his parents had been helping him in the process (Table 4, quote 1.4). The parent also shared more details about how he had helped the adolescent eat healthier by helping with portion control (especially with pasta), providing a lot of healthy options at home and taking the adolescent to grocery store with him (Table 4, quote 1.5). In addition, this adolescent and parent pair both reported doing a 7-min workout as a family every Saturday for almost a year.

Theme 2: Parents and adolescents had different views regarding parental influence on adolescent diet and physical activity behaviors

The focus groups/interviews revealed that adolescents desired support from their parents while parents reported that adolescents sought out peer support for eating healthy. For example, adolescents liked the fact that parents helped them to eat healthy meals (Table 4, quote 2.1). Adolescents also reported that their parents served as role models for healthy eating. One adolescent noted that her mother’s weight loss efforts made it easier for her to change her own diet (Table 4, quote 2.2). Another adolescent shared a similar experience, even though she sometimes found the emphasis on healthy food “annoying” (Table 4, quote 2.3). In response to one mother’s recounting of her efforts to encourage her adolescent to be more physically active, another parent expressed his opinion that parent influence becomes less important and their peer group becomes more important at this age. (Table 4, quote 2.4).

The differing views of parental influence on diet were also apparent when both groups were asked about perceived control over what the adolescents eat on the survey (Table 3). Among the adolescents, about half (54%) expressed a feeling of complete control and an additional 35% expressed some control over what they eat at home, while parents responded that the control was shared, with 67% saying their child had “some control” over what is eaten. At school, 53% of adolescents felt they had complete control over their diet while only 41% of the parents felt this was true of their teens. In focus groups/interviews, parents acknowledged their role in supporting healthy eating by discussing their efforts to provide healthy meals for dinner but almost all concurred that they have little to no control over adolescents’ lunch. Some parents expressed that adolescents exerted their own will in planning lunch and two parents reported that their adolescents once mentioned that bringing lunch to school is "not cool".

Table 3 Adolescents’ and Parents’ Perception of Teen Control Over Diet
Full size table

In regard to physical activity, focus groups and interviews revealed that some adolescents wanted support for physical activity from parents and some did not while parents unanimously thought that their support was not influential. Some adolescents reported that they enjoy working out with their parents and found them great motivators (Table 4, quote 2.5). On the other hand, some adolescents complained that they disliked working out with their parents for various reasons. For example, one adolescent was not happy with her mom not sticking to exercising together and complaining too much (Table 4, quote 2.6). Another adolescent described his experience with working out with parents as embarrassing, at least initially (Table 4, quote 2.7). Meanwhile, parents felt strongly that adolescents need support from their peers more than support from parents to become more physically active. For example, a parent noted that support from peers rather than nagging from parents is better because peers go through the same issues together (Table 4, quote 2.8). Another parent reported great frustration over "nagging" her adolescent in vain and that she had already given up on trying (Table 4, quote 2.9).

Table 4 Quotes organized by theme and order of appearance
Full size table

Theme 3: Parents and adolescents held similar views regarding peer influences on lifestyle behaviors (e.g. diet and physical activity)

Adolescents and parents generally agreed that peers negatively influenced diet. Adolescents generally described the influence of their peers on diet as negative because they tended to consume low-cost or junk food and sugar-sweetened beverages when they were spending time with their peers. For some adolescents, observations of their peers’ behavior, as opposed to any direct peer pressure to eat unhealthy foods, was a source of frustration and cause for discouragement. For example, one adolescent noted that one of her friends always boasts about not gaining weight from eating junk food frequently, which frustrated her (Table 4, quote 3.1). Parents agreed with adolescents and tended to describe peer influence on diet as negative and resulting in unhealthy food choices. For example, a parent described how she was not able to control what her adolescent ate when he was with his friends (Table 4, quote 3.2).

With regard to physical activity, adolescents and parents reported that the effect of peers varied. Adolescents described that peers can have both a negative and positive influence on physical activity. Some adolescents described feeling motivated to engage in planned physical activities with friends such as a hike or other types of group exercise (Table 4, quote 3.3). However, others reported negative influence by friends such as feeling uncomfortable working out with friends who are in better shape. Other adolescents commented that their peers rarely do any exercise, implying a social norm among that peer group. Another adolescent described how different friends influenced his physical activity (Table 4, quote 3.4), contrasting a group of friends who encouraged him to hike with them with another friend who preferred to be sedentary. Parents agreed with adolescents that peers negatively and positively influenced adolescents’ physical activity. Peers negatively influenced physical activity if they were not interested in physical activity (e.g., engage in screen time when they spend time together). Peers positively influenced physical activity if they were interested in being active when they spend time together. For example, one parent thought that her adolescent would be more willing to do exercise with friends versus with family (Table 4, quote 3.5).

Discussion

In this study we found that adolescents and parents held different views on the role that parents can play in weight management and in the perceived influence of parents versus peer influence on health behaviors like diet and physical activity. In general, adolescents viewed their parents as having an important influence on weight management, healthy eating, and physical activity. Parents felt that their role was less important than that of peers for influencing their adolescents’ diet and physical activity behaviors. We also found that adolescents and parents agreed that peers negatively influence diet and have mixed effects on physical activity, based on the activity level of the peers. The information on adolescent and parent perceptions can be used to inform weight management interventions that are developmentally appropriate for this age group.

The results of this study argue for the inclusion of parents in interventions for older adolescents, contrasting some prior studies that argue for the lack of significant impact [33] or disadvantage to parental involvement [34]. There is a large amount of evidence that supports the positive impact of parental involvement in weight management interventions for younger pediatric populations [22, 23, 35, 36], but less is known about how to optimize parental involvement for older adolescents. These approaches will need to balance this age group’s increasing autonomy and reliance on peers with their continued need for parental support. Possible approaches include increasing parents’ ability to serve as a role model for weight management at home [35], and providing parents with skills for effective communication strategies for weight management with adolescents [37]. Additionally, the focus groups and interviews inform suggestions for how parents might support the specific health behaviors of healthy eating and physical activity.

For diet, adolescents highlighted the important role that parents play in creating a healthy food environment in the home. It is estimated that adolescents consume 63–65% of their daily calories at home [38]. The paired analysis revealed that increased communication around what the home food environment should include is needed. Availability of healthy foods like vegetables, fruits and balanced meals was as important as an absence of junk foods and sugar-sweetened beverages. These strategies could target the parents directly as well as indirectly through supporting adolescents to have conversations with their parents about the home food environment. Goal setting with parents and adolescents around the home food environment may be an effective strategy. For physical activity, some adolescents were open to physical activity with their parents while the parents unanimously reported that peers as opposed to parents were the most important. Additionally, while some adolescents reported that their parents were positive role models for physical activity, the fact that their parents were not physically active did not seem to deter adolescents from engaging in physical activity. Observational research has shown that parents who encourage and value physical activity consequently influence children’s behaviors, resulting in higher levels of physical activity among them [39,40,41]. A relatively recent meta-analysis [35] found that support from parents and their modelling behaviors were related to adolescent physical activity. Strategies that help adolescents to identify successful social support mechanisms may reveal individualized approaches to physical activity promotion. Strategies for parents may be to not assume that their adolescent children do not want to participate in physical activity with them, but rather to have conversations about the role they may play.

Adolescents and parents generally agreed that peers have a negative influence on diet, primarily due to the foods that they eat when they spend time with their friends. This is in line with other studies that have found that adolescents tend to consume unhealthy foods when they spend time together and that peers may encourage the consumption of unhealthy foods within social groups [20, 42, 43]. However, there is limited empirical evidence to elucidate how peer factors may be related to adolescents’ unhealthy food intake and some studies support the importance of bolstering self-regulation [44]. Strategies informed by this finding on peer influence may include equipping adolescents with skills to maintain healthy eating when they spend time with friends. For example, adolescents may benefit from problem solving skills that would help them to successfully navigate situations when they want to eat healthy and they are with peers. Additionally, skills that support adolescents in effectively communicating why they are making healthy choices may help them to maintain a healthy diet. Finally, fostering positive peer social support through bringing together adolescents who are seeking to make dietary changes may be effective. Problem solving, effective communication skills, and social support are all hallmark strategies in evidence-based weight management programs such as the Diabetes Prevention Program that are designed for adults [45]. These programs may be able to be adapted for older adolescents.

In contrast to the finding on diet where peers were largely a negative influence, adolescents and parents agreed that peers can have both a positive and negative influence on physical activity. They acknowledged that adolescents want to engage in activities with their peers. Thus, if the peers are engaged in physical activity, this will have a positive effect and if they are engaged in sedentary activities this will have a negative effect [46,47,48,49]. The implications of the effect of peers on physical activity has several important implications for weight management strategies. Encouraging adolescents to identify and plan for activities that they can engage in with their friends has potential for increasing physical activity. Recognizing that peer support for physical activity is important, interventions could also create opportunities for adolescents to be physically active together.

Limitations

This study analyzed the views and experiences of 26 adolescents and 27 parents from Northern California and participants were recruited from one healthcare system. Given the scope of this study, we were not able to analyze adolescents who were overweight separately from those who were obese. Future work should aim to elucidate potential differences and commonalities in the experiences, lifestyle behaviors and perspectives for these distinct therapeutic groups. While we included adolescent participants with a BMI that is over the 85th percentile for age, we did not capture the weight of parent participants. There is a possibility that parent support for or assistance with weight management maybe related to their own weight. Due to this limitation, it is unclear whether pattern of parent behavior in support/nonsupport of healthy food choices and/or physical activity may be related to parent weight status. This would be an interesting and important consideration for future research. Additionally, given the recognized importance of home environment and family influence on lifestyle behaviors it would be important for future studies to explore the influence of family size (i.e., siblings) on adolescent behaviors. Finally, patients of this healthcare system may be different from the general population. Future research, with a larger, representable sample of adolescents and parents would be helpful to verify the study’s results, including the comparison between views of adolescents and those of parents. Given that the prevalence of overweight/obesity are higher among individuals/families of low income/social advantage, compared with high income/social [50, 51] advantage. Repeating the study among adolescents/families who are socially disadvantaged would be an important priority for future work as well.

Conlcusion

This study provides perspectives of both parents and their older adolescents on a pressing public health issue. The findings of this study affirm the need for interventions that aim at initiating and supporting effective communication between parents and older adolescents in order to promote effective weight management efforts for adolescents at risk for adulthood obesity. More work is needed to explore barriers and facilitators to effective communication as well as methods to overcome barriers and improve communication specifically regarding older adolescent weight management.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during this study are not publicly available due to institutional policies.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body Mass Index

US:

United States

EHR:

Electronic Health Records

References

  1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA. 2014;311(8):806–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Whitlock EP, O'Connor EA, Williams SB, Beil TL, Lutz KW. Effectiveness of weight management interventions in children: a targeted systematic review for the USPSTF. Pediatrics. 2010;125(2):e396–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reilly JJ, Methven E, McDowell ZC, et al. Health consequences of obesity. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88(9):748–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Weiss R, Dziura J, Burgert TS, et al. Obesity and the metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(23):2362–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pulgaron ER. Childhood obesity: a review of increased risk for physical and psychological comorbidities. Clin Ther. 2013;35(1):A18–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Must A, Strauss RS. Risks and consequences of childhood and adolescent obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23(Suppl 2):S2–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Erermis S, Cetin N, Tamar M, Bukusoglu N, Akdeniz F, Goksen D. Is obesity a risk factor for psychopathology among adolescents? Pediatr Int. 2004;46(3):296–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. May AL, Kuklina EV, Yoon PW. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors among US adolescents, 1999-2008. Pediatrics. 2012;129(6):1035–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. BeLue R, Francis LA, Colaco B. Mental health problems and overweight in a nationally representative sample of adolescents: effects of race and ethnicity. Pediatrics. 2009;123(2):697–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sjoberg RL, Nilsson KW, Leppert J. Obesity, shame, and depression in school-aged children: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2005;116(3):e389–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van Geel M, Vedder P, Tanilon J. Are overweight and obese youths more often bullied by their peers? A meta-analysis on the correlation between weight status and bullying. Int J Obes. 2014;38(10):1263–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Field AE, Cook NR, Gillman MW. Weight status in childhood as a predictor of becoming overweight or hypertensive in early adulthood. Obes Res. 2005;13(1):163–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rooney BL, Mathiason MA, Schauberger CW. Predictors of obesity in childhood, adolescence, and adulthood in a birth cohort. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(8):1166–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gordon-Larsen P, The NS, Adair LS. Longitudinal trends in obesity in the United States from adolescence to the third decade of life. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18(9):1801–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hruby A, Hu FB. The epidemiology of obesity: a big picture. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(7):673–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Erikson EH. Identity: youth and crisis. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Butryn ML, Wadden TA, Rukstalis MR, et al. Maintenance of weight loss in adolescents: current status and future directions. J Obes. 2010;2010:789280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Steinberg L, Morris AS. Adolescent development. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:83–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hui EK, Tsang SK. Self-determination as a psychological and positive youth development construct. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:759358.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Story M, Neumark-Sztainer D, French S. Individual and environmental influences on adolescent eating behaviors. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102(3 Suppl):S40–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wray-Lake L, Crouter AC, McHale SM. Developmental patterns in decision-making autonomy across middle childhood and adolescence: European American parents' perspectives. Child Dev. 2010;81(2):636–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Golley RK, Hendrie GA, Slater A, Corsini N. Interventions that involve parents to improve children's weight-related nutrition intake and activity patterns - what nutrition and activity targets and behaviour change techniques are associated with intervention effectiveness? Obes Rev. 2011;12(2):114–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Niemeier BS, Hektner JM, Enger KB. Parent participation in weight-related health interventions for children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2012;55(1):3–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehdizadeh A, Nematy M, Vatanparast H, Khadem-Rezaiyan M, Emadzadeh M. Impact of parent engagement in childhood obesity prevention interventions on anthropometric indices among preschool children: a systematic review. Child Obes. 2020;16(1):3–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lazzeri G, Pammolli A, Pilato V, Giacchi MV. Relationship between 8/9-yr-old school children BMI, parents' BMI and educational level: a cross sectional survey. Nutr J. 2011;10:76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Mech P, Hooley M, Skouteris H, Williams J. Parent-related mechanisms underlying the social gradient of childhood overweight and obesity: a systematic review. Child Care Health Dev. 2016;42(5):603–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Savona-Ventura C, Savona-Ventura S. The inheritance of obesity. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;29(3):300–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pakpour AH, Gellert P, Dombrowski SU, Fridlund B. Motivational interviewing with parents for obesity: an RCT. Pediatrics. 2015;135(3):e644–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jelalian E, Rancourt D, Sato AF. Innovative interventions in pediatric obesity: commentary and future directions. J Pediatr Psychol. 2013;38(9):1030–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Al-Khudairy L, Loveman E, Colquitt JL, et al. Diet, physical activity and behavioural interventions for the treatment of overweight or obese adolescents aged 12 to 17 years. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD012691.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bureau UC. Race/Ethnicity of Individual. 2016 American Community Survey 1-year estimates Web site. Published 2016. Accessed2019.

  32. Bureau UC. Income/Earnings (Households) 2016 American Community Survey 1-year estimates. Published 2016. Accessed2019.

  33. Coates T, Killen JD, Slinkard LA. Parent participation in a treatment program for overweight adolescents. Eat Disord. 1982;1(3):37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Brownell KD, Kelman JH, Stunkard AJ. Treatment of obese children with and without their mothers: changes in weight and blood pressure. Pediatrics. 1983;71(4):515–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yao CA, Rhodes RE. Parental correlates in child and adolescent physical activity: a meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Reicks M, Banna J, Cluskey M, et al. Influence of parenting practices on eating behaviors of early adolescents during independent eating occasions: implications for obesity prevention. Nutrients. 2015;7(10):8783–801.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hadley W, McCullough MB, Rancourt D, Barker D, Jelalian E. Shaking up the system: the role of change in maternal-adolescent communication quality and adolescent weight loss. J Pediatr Psychol. 2015;40(1):121–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Poti JM, Popkin BM. Trends in energy intake among US children by eating location and food source, 1977-2006. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(8):1156–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Trost SG, McDonald S, Cohen A. Measurement of general and specific approaches to physical activity parenting: a systematic review. Child Obes. 2013;9(Suppl):S40–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Trost SG, Sallis JF, Pate RR, Freedson PS, Taylor WC, Dowda M. Evaluating a model of parental influence on youth physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25(4):277–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Brustad RJ. Attraction to physical activity in urban schoolchildren: parental socialization and gender influences. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996;67(3):316–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Croll JK, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M. Healthy eating: what does it mean to adolescents? J Nutr Educ. 2001;33(4):193–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Salvy SJ, Elmo A, Nitecki LA, Kluczynski MA, Roemmich JN. Influence of parents and friends on children's and adolescents' food intake and food selection. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(1):87–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kalavana TV, Maes S, De Gucht V. Interpersonal and self-regulation determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behavior in adolescents. J Health Psychol. 2010;15(1):44–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Diabetes Prevention Program Research G. The diabetes prevention program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(12):2165–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Salvy SJ, Roemmich JN, Bowker JC, Romero ND, Stadler PJ, Epstein LH. Effect of peers and friends on youth physical activity and motivation to be physically active. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009;34(2):217–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Voorhees CC, Murray D, Welk G, et al. The role of peer social network factors and physical activity in adolescent girls. Am J Health Behav. 2005;29(2):183–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Beets MW, Vogel R, Forlaw L, Pitetti KH, Cardinal BJ. Social support and youth physical activity: the role of provider and type. Am J Health Behav. 2006;30(3):278–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Duncan SC, Duncan TE, Strycker LA. Sources and types of social support in youth physical activity. Health Psychol. 2005;24(1):3–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kant AK, Graubard BI. Family income and education were related with 30-year time trends in dietary and meal behaviors of American children and adolescents. J Nutr. 2013;143(5):690–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Frederick CB, Snellman K, Putnam RD. Increasing socioeconomic disparities in adolescent obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(4):1338–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This was an investigator-initiated study by Sutter Health Research. No sponsor or funding source had a role in the design or conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis or interpretation of the data; or preparation, review or approval of the manuscript. The findings reported have not been previously published and that the manuscript is not being simultaneously submitted elsewhere.

Funding

This study was funded by Sutter Health. The funding institution was not directly involved in the design of the study, data collection, analysis or interpretation of the study of the findings.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sutter Health Center for Health Systems Research, 795 El Camino Real, Ames Building, Palo Alto, CA, 94301, USA

    Kristen M. J. Azar, Katie Gillespie & Lily Liang

  2. Stanford University, Stanford, USA

    Meghan Halley & Lisa Goldman Rosas

  3. University of Illinois, Chicago, USA

    Nan Lv

  4. UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, USA

    Sharon Wulfovich

Authors
  1. Kristen M. J. Azar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meghan Halley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nan Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sharon Wulfovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Katie Gillespie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lily Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lisa Goldman Rosas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KMJA and LGR conceived the study, designed the study. KMJA obtained research funding. KMJA and LGR supervised the conduct of the study. KG, LL and MH analyzed the data. SW assisted with literature review. KMJA drafted the manuscript, and all authors (KMJA, MH, NL, SW, KG, LL and LGR) contributed substantially to its revision. KMJA takes responsibility for the paper. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristen M. J. Azar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Sutter Health IRB and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. For minors under the age of 16 years old, we obtained written consent from a parent or guardian and written assent from the minor. Both the consent form and assent form were reviewed and approved by the Sutter Health IRB.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azar, K.M.J., Halley, M., Lv, N. et al. Differing views regarding diet and physical activity: adolescents versus parents’ perspectives. BMC Pediatr 20, 137 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02038-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02038-4

Keywords

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us