Abstract
Purpose The present study analyses the kinematics of patients with neck problems and healthy controls by estimation of Finite Helical Axis behaviour. A cross sectional study design was used to investigate whether FHA behaviour differs due to neck problems.
Methods
584 subjects were recruited from private and ambulatory institutional physiotherapy practices. Among these 171 patients with neck related problems were selected based on referral diagnosis by primary care general practitioners. Cervical kinematics were compared based on minimal convex hull, path length and mean angle of the Finite Helical Axis distribution as well as on the helical angle. Three active planar motions were registered: flexion–extension, axial rotation and lateral bending.
Results
Patients demonstrated a significantly reduced and less variable behaviour of the Finite Helical Axis during active flexion–extension and axial rotation motions as compared to healthy individuals and lateral bending.
Conclusion
Patients with neck related problems demonstrate a more restricted motion behaviour with less variability in Finite Helical Axis distribution and orientation during active planar motions. At present it is not clear whether these kinematic differences are the result or the cause of dysfunction.
Graphic abstract
These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baeyens JP, Cattrysse E, Van Roy P, Clarys JP (2005) Measurement of three-dimensional intra-articular kinematics: methodological and interpretation problems. Ergonomics 48:1638–1644
Hoy D, March L, Woolf A, Blyth F, Brooks P, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J, Blore J, Murray C, Burstein R, Buchbinder R (2014) The global burden of neck pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 73:1309–1315. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204431
Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J (2006) The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J 15:834–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0864-4
Ohberg F (2008) The effect of anisotropic systematic errors in estimating helical angles. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 11:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255840701722498
Kettler A, Marin F, Sattelmayer G, Mohr M, Mannel H, Durselen L, Claes L, Wilke HJ (2004) Finite helical axes of motion are a useful tool to describe the three-dimensional in vitro kinematics of the intact, injured and stabilised spine. Eur Spine J 13:553–559
Grip H, Sundelin G, Gerdle B, Karlsson JS (2008) Cervical helical axis characteristics and its center of rotation during active head and upper arm movements-comparisons of whiplash-associated disorders, non-specific neck pain and asymptomatic individuals. J Biomech 41:2799–2805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.005
Salem W, Lenders C, Mathieu J, Hermanus N, Klein P (2013) In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical spine during maximal axial rotation. Man Ther 18:339–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.12.002
Ellingson AM, Yelisetti V, Schulz CA, Bronfort G, Downing J, Keefe DF, Nuckley DJ (2013) Instantaneous helical axis methodology to identify aberrant neck motion. Clin Biomech 28:731–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.07.006
Schmidt H, Heuer F, Wilke HJ (2008) Interaction between finite helical axes and facet joint forces under combined loading. Spine 33:2741–2748. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c4319
Wachowski MM, Wagner M, Weiland J, Dorner J, Raab BW, Dathe H, Gezzi R, Kubein-Meesenburg D, Nagerl H (2013) Does total disc arthroplasty in C3/C4-segments change the kinematic features of axial rotation? J Biomech 46:1739–1745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.03.027
Barbero M, Falla D, Clijsen R, Ghirlanda F, Schneebeli A, Ernst MJ, Cescon C (2017) Can parameters of the helical axis be measured reliably during active cervical movements? Musculoskelet Sci Pract 27:150–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2016.10.008
Woltring HJ, Long K, Osterbauer PJ, Fuhr AW (1994) Instantaneous helical axis estimation from 3-D video data in neck kinematics for whiplash diagnostics. J Biomech 27:1415–1432
Winters JM, Peles JD, Osterbauer PJ, Derickson K, Deboer KF, Fuhr AW (1993) Three-dimensional head axis of rotation during tracking movements. A tool for assessing neck neuromechanical function. Spine 18:1178–1185
Osterbauer PJ, Derickson KL, Peles JD, Deboer KF, Fuhr AW, Winters JM (1992) 3-Dimensional head kinematics and clinical outcome of patients with neck injury treated with spinal manipulative therapy—a pilot-study. J Manip Physiol Ther 15:501–511
Cescon C, Cattrysse E, Barbero M (2014) Methodological analysis of finite helical axis behavior in cervical kinematics. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 24:628–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.05.004
Koerhuis CL, Winters JC, van der Helm F, Hof AL (2003) Neck mobility measurement by means of the ‘Flock of birds’ electromagnetic tracking system. Clin Biomech 18:14–18
Mc Quade KJ, Finley MA, Harris-Love M, McCombe-Waller S (2002) Dynamic error analysis of ascension’s Flock of birds electromagnetic tracking device using a pendulum model. J Appl Biomech 18:171–179
LaScalza S, Arico J, Hughes R (2003) Effect of metal and sampling rate on accuracy of flock of birds electromagnetic tracking system. J Biomech 36:141–144
Assink N, Bergman GJD, Knoester B, Winters JC, Dijkstra PU, Postema K (2005) Interobserver reliability of neck-mobility measurement by means of the flock-of-birds electromagnetic tracking system. J Manip Physiol Ther 28:408–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.06.009
Amiri M, Jull G, Bullock-Saxton J (2003) Measuring range of active cervical rotation in a position of full head flexion using the 3D Fastrak measurement system: an intra-tester reliability study. Man Ther 8:176–179
Cescon C, Ernst M, Schelldorfr S, Cattrysse E, Clijsen R, Barbero M (2014) Investigation of cervical movements in neck pain patients with the finite helical axis approach. In: XX congress of the international society of electrophysiology and kinesiology. Rome, Italy
Alsultan F, Cescon C, De Nunzio AM, Barbero M, Heneghan NR, Rushton A, Falla D (2019) Variability of the helical axis during active cervical movements in people with chronic neck pain. Clin Biomech 62:50–57
Mannel H, Marin F, Claes L, Durselen L (2004) Anterior cruciate ligament rupture translates the axes of motion within the knee. Clin Biomech 19:130–135
Halder AM, Itoi E, An KN (2000) Anatomy and biomechanics of the shoulder. Orthop Clin North Am 31:159. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70138-3
Gallo LM, Brasi M, Ernst B, Palla S (2006) Relevance of mandibular helical axis analysis in functional and dysfunctional TMJs. J Biomech 39:1716–1725
Stenneberg MS, Busstra H, Eskes M, van Trijffel E, Cattrysse E, Scholten-Peeters GGM, de Bie RA (2018) Concurrent validity and interrater reliability of a new smartphone application to assess 3D active cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 34:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2017.12.006
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest; no financial grants were received for this study; no copyrighted materials were used in this paper.
Ethical approval
Approval for the study was gained from the ethical commission of the University Hospital Brussels (UZ-Brussel- B.U.N. 143201214958).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The MATLAB routine used in this study was developed by Cescon et al. in a joined collaboration between the Experimental Anatomy Research Group of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB – Belgium) and the Department of Health Sciences of the University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI - Manno, Switzerland).
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cattrysse, E., Burioli, A., Buzzatti, L. et al. Cervical kinematics estimated by finite helical axis behaviour differs in patients with neck related problems as compared to healthy controls. Eur Spine J 29, 2778–2785 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06380-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06380-0