Immobilized enzyme reactors based on nucleoside phosphorylases and 2′-deoxyribosyltransferase for the in-flow synthesis of pharmaceutically relevant nucleoside analogues

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123258Get rights and content

Highlights

  • An in-flow enzymatic system based on immobilized NPs and NDT was developed.

  • LrNDT and CpUP/AhPNP were immobilized on monolithic silica columns.

  • The two immobilized enzyme reactors (IMERs) catalyzed continuous reactions in flow.

  • Pure nucleoside analogues were synthesized in suitable amounts for drug discovery.

  • Both bioreactors are promising alternatives to nucleoside chemical synthesis.

Abstract

In this work, a mono- and a bi-enzymatic analytical immobilized enzyme reactors (IMERs) were developed as prototypes for biosynthetic purposes and their performances in the in-flow synthesis of nucleoside analogues of pharmaceutical interest were evaluated. Two biocatalytic routes based on nucleoside 2′-deoxyribosyltransferase from Lactobacillus reuteri (LrNDT) and uridine phosphorylase from Clostridium perfrigens (CpUP)/purine nucleoside phosphorylase from Aeromonas hydrophila (AhPNP) were investigated in the synthesis of 2′-deoxy, 2′,3′-dideoxy and arabinonucleoside derivatives. LrNDT-IMER catalyzed the synthesis of 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine and 5-iodo-2′-deoxyuridine in 65–59% conversion yield, while CpUP/AhPNP-IMER provided the best results for the preparation of arabinosyladenine (60% conversion yield).

Both IMERs proved to be promising alternatives to chemical routes for the synthesis of nucleoside analogues. The developed in-flow system represents a powerful tool for the fast production on analytical scale of nucleosides for preliminary biological tests.

Introduction

The use of enzymes for the synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) represents an interesting alternative to classical chemical routes. In particular, the intrinsic selectivity of enzymes allows the reduction of synthetic steps and their natural ability to work under mild conditions makes the production bioprocess eco-friendly (Busacca et al., 2011, Pollard and Woodley, 2007, Truppo, 2017, Woodley, 2008).

In addition, the immobilization of the enzyme to a solid support allows its stabilization and, consequently, the exploitation of more severe conditions (pH, temperature, solvents), as well as the reuse of the biocatalyst for multiple cycles (Bernal et al., 2018, Sheldon and Woodley, 2018).

Immobilized enzymes can be used in batch or in a system operating under continuous flow conditions (in-flow). In-flow reactions offer advantages compared to those performed in batch, resulting in an increase in productivity. Moreover, flow reactors can be prepared on different scales (from analytical to production scale). For the development of bioreactors on analytical scale, enzyme immobilization is generally performed directly in the column, thus creating an immobilized enzyme reactor (IMER) (Fang et al., 2012). IMERs can be used for rapid preparation of small quantities (microscale) of new products as required for drug discovery (Britton et al., 2018, Fang et al., 2012, Girelli and Mattei, 2005, Tamborini et al., 2018).

The choice of the immobilization carrier is an important issue to preserve enzymatic activity. In this context, monoliths emerged as interesting carriers for the preparation of IMERs due to their attractive features: high permeability and low back-pressure; accessibility of the immobilized macromolecule thanks to the high porosity; possibility to use different immobilization methods and chemistries; stability (Calleri et al., 2012, Vlakh and Tennikova, 2013a, Vlakh and Tennikova, 2013b). For these reasons, monolithic supports represent an advancement compared to more common beads and particle columns.

In recent years, in-flow IMERs have been applied to the synthesis of different classes of APIs or pharmaceutical intermediates (Britton et al., 2018, Naldi et al., 2018, Tamborini et al., 2018). Among APIs, nucleoside analogues represent intriguing targets since their biocatalyzed synthesis can overcome different drawbacks of the classical chemical process used for their production (Ding et al., 2010, Fresco-Taboada et al., 2013, Mikhailopulo, 2007). Nucleoside phosphorylases (NPs) have proven their potential for the synthesis of modified nucleosides, which find applications as antiviral and antitumor agents. NPs can act on ribo- or 2′-deoxyribosylnucleosides by a reversible phosphorolytic reaction, resulting in the formation of the corresponding nucleobase and glycosyl moiety. The NP-catalyzed transfer of the sugar residue to a second nucleobase leads to the production of a new nucleoside (transglycosylation reaction) (Cattaneo et al., 2017, Fresco-Taboada et al., 2013). NPs are classified into families that possess different substrate specificity (for purine or pyrimidine nucleosides). Pyrimidine nucleoside phosphorylases have been successfully employed in the pyrimidine-pyrimidine transglycosylation reaction (Serra et al., 2013a, Serra et al., 2011), while the coupling of two NPs is often necessary to obtain the desired nucleoside when the transglycosylation occurs between a purine and a pyrimidine base. Recently, using in-flow bioreactors, the purine-purine transglycosylation catalyzed by a purine nucleoside phosphorylase from Aeromonas hydrophila (AhPNP) has been investigated (Calleri et al., 2015). Moreover, the in-flow bi-enzymatic tranglycosylation has also been described by connecting in series two bioreactors containing a uridine phosphorylase from Clostridium perfrigens (CpUP) and AhPNP (Cattaneo et al., 2017).

A different class of enzymes, 2′-deoxyribosyltransferases (NDTs), has also been used in batch for the synthesis of modified nucleosides (Fernández-Lucas et al., 2013, Fernández-Lucas et al., 2012, Fernández-Lucas et al., 2011, Fernández-Lucas et al., 2010). Reactions catalyzed by NDTs consist in the exchange between a nucleobase of a 2′-deoxyribonucleoside and a free nucleobase in one step, with regio- and stereoselectivity (Fernández-Lucas et al., 2010, Fresco-Taboada et al., 2013, Huang et al., 1983). Two classes of NDTs can be distinguished: NDT type I (PDT), which catalyzes the deoxyribose group transfer exclusively between purines, and NDT type II (NDT), which catalyzes the transfer between purines and/or pyrimidines (Becker and Brendel, 1996, Holguin and Cardinaud, 1975, Kaminski, 2002).

The mechanism of NDTs shows to be similar to retaining glycoside hydrolases. Glycosyltransfer reaction occurs via double-displacement mechanism involving the formation of a covalently bound glycosyl-enzyme intermediate. In addition, NDTs perform acid/base catalysis similarly to glycosidases (Danzin and Cardinaud, 1974, Del Arco et al., 2019, Fresco-Taboada et al., 2018, Fresco-Taboada et al., 2013, Huang et al., 1983, Porter et al., 1995, Short et al., 1996).

Among the described NDTs, nucleoside 2′-deoxyribosyltransferase from Lactobacillus reuteri (LrNDT) has been revealed as suitable biocatalyst for the synthesis of nucleoside analogues with therapeutic activity, showing the highest specific activity as well as catalytic efficiency (Fernández-Lucas et al., 2011, Fernández-Lucas et al., 2010). NDTs proceed through a ping-pong bi-bi mechanism. In the first step, the catalytic Glu residue attacks the anomeric C1′ releasing the nucleobase, which leads to the glycosylated intermediate. In a second step, the second nucleobase attacks the glycosylated intermediate (transglycosylation) to generate the corresponding nucleoside. Interestingly, a hydrolase function was also described in absence of nucleobase acceptors (Smar et al., 1991) or at long reaction times (Huang et al., 1983).

In this work, the preparation of an LrNDT-IMER on a monolithic epoxy silica column is described for the first time. The obtained bioreactor has been applied to the synthesis of selected nucleosides of pharmaceutical interest. In addition, the co-immobilization of CpUP and AhPNP has also been investigated using a monolithic aminopropyl silica carrier. The two different bioreactors were included in a chromatographic system for in-flow reactions and tested in the preparation of different nucleosides on analytical scale in order to find the most adequate system for the synthesis of analogues modified at the base and/or at the sugar moiety.

Section snippets

Chemicals and reagents

Inosine (Ino), 2′,3′-dideoxyuridine (ddUrd), 5-iodouracil (IUra), 5-iodo-2′-deoxyuridine (IdUrd), 2-(N-Morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES), methanol, glutaraldehyde, sodium cyanoborohydride, glycine, Bradford reagent and formic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy). Hypoxanthine (Hpx), adenine (Ade), 2′-deoxyadenosine (dAdo), uracil (Ura), 2′,3′-dideoxyinosine (ddIno), 5-fluorouracil (FUra) and 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine (FdUrd) were from Alfa Aesar (Novachimica, Cinisello

Preparation and characterization of the IMERs

Enzyme activity was tested prior to the immobilization by performing in-solution assays. The phosphorolysis of 2′-deoxyuridine (dUrd) by CpUP and inosine (Ino) by AhPNP was monitored to calculate the specific activity of the two NPs (Cattaneo et al., 2017), which resulted 16 IU/mg for CpUP and 34 IU/mg for AhPNP. LrNDT activity was evaluated in the transglycosylation conversion of dUrd and adenine (Ade) to 2′-deoxyadenosine (dAdo) and uracil (Ura) (Fernández-Lucas et al., 2010) and was found to

Conclusions

The enzymatic microscale synthesis of different nucleoside analogues was performed using a bi-enzymatic (obtained by co-immobilizing two NPs) and a mono-enzymatic (immobilization of one NDT) bioreactors. The combination of CpUP and AhPNP provided the best results for the synthesis of araA, according to previous data obtained using two mono-enzymatic IMERs.

Instead, LrNDT-IMER gave promising results for 2′-deoxyribonucleosides, which were synthesized with 50–88% conversion yields using dUrd as

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Francesca Rinaldi: Investigation, Writing - original draft. Jesús Fernández-Lucas: Investigation, Conceptualization. Diego de la Fuente: Investigation. Changping Zheng: Investigation. Teodora Bavaro: Investigation. Benjamin Peters: Resources. Gabriella Massolini: Conceptualization. Francesca Annunziata: Investigation. Paola Conti: Funding acquisition. Isabel de la Mata: Resources, Conceptualization. Marco Terreni: Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Enrica Calleri: Supervision,

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Cariplo Foundation (Italy) [grant number 2016-0731].

References (41)

  • M. Naldi et al.

    Immobilized enzyme-based analytical tools in the -omics era: recent advances

    J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.

    (2018)
  • D.J. Pollard et al.

    Biocatalysis for pharmaceutical intermediates: the future is now

    Trends Biotechnol.

    (2007)
  • D.J.T. Porter et al.

    Identification of the active site nucleophile in nucleoside 2-deoxyribosyltransferase as glutamic acid 98

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1995)
  • I. Serra et al.

    A comparison between immobilized pyrimidine nucleoside phosphorylase from Bacillus subtilis and thymidine phosphorylase from Escherichia coli in the synthesis of 5-substituted pyrimidine 2’-deoxyribonucleosides

    J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym.

    (2013)
  • I. Serra et al.

    Stabilization of thymidine phosphorylase from Escherichia coli by immobilization and post immobilization techniques

    Enzyme Microb. Technol.

    (2011)
  • S.A. Short et al.

    Active site amino acids that participate in the catalytic mechanism of nucleoside 2’-deoxyribosyltransferase

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1996)
  • L. Tamborini et al.

    Flow bioreactors as complementary tools for biocatalytic process intensification

    Trends Biotechnol.

    (2018)
  • C. Temporini et al.

    Optimization of a trypsin-bioreactor coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry for quality control of biotechnological drugs

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2006)
  • S. Tengattini et al.

    Enterokinase monolithic bioreactor as an efficient tool for biopharmaceuticals preparation: on-line cleavage of fusion proteins and analytical characterization of released products

    J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.

    (2018)
  • J.M. Woodley

    New opportunities for biocatalysis: making pharmaceutical processes greener

    Trends Biotechnol.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Chemo-enzymatic synthesis of 5-substituted ribavirin analogs: Unexpected cooperative effect in the interaction of 5-alkyloxymethyl 1,2,4-triazol-3-carboxamides with E. coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase active site

      2022, Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Structural analogs of nucleosides have a rich history of research and application in medicinal chemistry and drug design (De Clercq 2012; Seley-Radtke and Yates 2018; Zeidler et al., 2015). Synthesis of such compounds is possible either by methods of classical organic synthesis (Davoll and Lowy 1951; Robins and Robins 1965) or with biocatalysis (Barai et al., 2002; Benítez-Mateos and Paradisi 2022; Fateev et al., 2014; Rabuffetti et al., 2019; Rinaldi et al., 2020; Vichier-Guerre et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2015). Enzymatic glycosylation pathways are very important in nucleoside synthesis.

    • Taylor-made production of pyrimidine nucleoside-5′-monophosphate analogues by highly stabilized mutant uracil phosphoribosyltransferase from Toxoplasma gondii

      2021, Bioresource Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Chemical production of nucleoside-5′-monophosphates (NMPs) often implies numerous protection-deprotection reactions, and also, the use of chemical reagents (Yoshikawa et al., 1969), harsh reaction conditions, and the presence of organic solvents (Fernández-Lucas, 2019). Because of this, recent trends for improving industrial processes have allowed that biocatalysis emerges as an important asset in the industrial production of nucleosides and nucleotides (Del Arco et al., 2021a; Del Arco et al., 2021b; Rinaldi et al., 2020; Slagman and Fessner, 2021; Wu et al., 2021). In this context, many different enzymes including kinases (NKs) (Serra et al., 2014; Zou et al., 2013), acid phosphotransferases (AP/PTases) (Liu et al., 2012), phospholipases (Gudiño et al., 2018), 5′-phosphodiesterases (Zou et al., 2008), or phosphoribosyltransferases (PRTs) (Acosta et al., 2018, Del Arco et al., 2017, Del Arco et al., 2018a) have been employed as catalysts for the synthesis of NMPs (Fernández-Lucas, 2015; Del Arco et al., 2018a).

    • New trends in the biocatalytic production of nucleosidic active pharmaceutical ingredients using 2′-deoxyribosyltransferases

      2021, Biotechnology Advances
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, authors compared the use of a LrNDT-IMER with an IMER based on the co-immobilization of UP from Clostridium perfringens (CpUP) and PNP from Aeromonas hydrophila (AhPNP). In the light of the results, LrNDT-IMER was chosen as the optimal biocatalyst for the enzymatic synthesis of idoxuridine (1) and floxuridine (10, 59-65% conversion), whereas CpUP/AhPNP-IMER provided the best results for the vidarabine (5) synthesis (60% conversion yield) (Rinaldi et al., 2020). Since NDTs are key enzymes in purine salvage in Trypanosomatids (T. brucei, T. cruzi or Leishmania mexicana, among others), as an essential metabolic route for parasite survival, IMERs based on trypanosomatid 2′-deoxyribosyltransferases could be a valuable screening tool for novel therapeutic candidates against trypanosomatid diseases (sleeping sickness disease, Chagas disease or leishmaniasis) (Fang et al., 2012).

    • Recent advances in artificial enzyme cascades for the production of value-added chemicals

      2021, Bioresource Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recently, the production of GSK2879552, a lysine-specific demethylase-1 inhibitor, was demonstrated by GlaxoSmithKline using a two-enzyme cascade comprising ketoreductase and engineered imine reductase with 99.5% ee (Schober et al., 2019). New enzyme cascades consisting of different enzymatic reactions, such as oxidation, reduction, hydrolysis, amination, isomerization, and condensation, were developed for the synthesis of high-value chemicals such as chiral alcohols (Wu et al., 2014), amines (Rinaldi et al., 2020), aldehydes (Ni et al., 2018), ketones (Hohagen et al., 2017), hydroxy acids (Hou et al., 2019), amino acids (Liu et al., 2018a; Xu et al., 2020), dicarboxylic acids (Wang et al., 2020), lactones and esters, etc (Wu and Li, 2018). Majority of the reported cascades consists of two or three enzymes (Table 1).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Institute for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems.

    View full text