Skip to main content
Log in

Initial experience with scalp sparing radiation with concurrent temozolomide and tumor treatment fields (SPARE) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Standard of care for glioblastoma includes concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance temozolomide with tumor treatment fields (TTFields). Preclinical studies suggest TTFields and radiation treatment have synergistic effects. We report our initial experience evaluating toxicity and tolerability of scalp-sparing radiation with concurrent TTFields.

Methods

This is a single arm pilot study (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03477110). Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with KPS ≥ 60 with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were eligible. All patients received concurrent scalp-sparing radiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions), standard concurrent temozolomide (75 mg/m2 daily), and TTFields. Maintenance therapy included standard temozolomide and continuation of TTFields. Radiation treatment was delivered through TTFields arrays. The primary endpoint was safety and toxicity for concurrent TTFields with chemoradiation in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Results

We report the first ten patients on the trial. Eight were male, and two were female, with median age 61 years (range 49 to 73 years). Median KPS was 90 (range 70–90). Median follow-up was 7.9 months (2.8 to 17.9 months). Nine (90%) patients with unmethylated MGMT promotor, and one with methylated. Median time from surgery to radiation was 33 days (28 to 49 days). All patients completed concurrent chemoradiation plus TTFields without radiation or TTFields treatment interruption or discontinuation. Scalp dose constraints were achieved for all patients, with mean dose having a median value of 7.7 Gy (range 4.9 to 13.2 Gy), D20cc median 22.6 Gy (17.7 to 36.8 Gy), and D30cc median 19.8 Gy (14.8 to 33.4 Gy). Average daily use during concurrent phase had median value of 83.5% and 77% for maintenance. There was no related ≥ Grade 3 toxicity. Skin toxicity (erythema, dermatitis, pruritus) was noted in 80% of patients, however, these were limited to Grade 1 or 2 events which resolved spontaneously or responded to topical medications. Eight patients (80%) had progression, with median PFS of 6.9 months (range 2.8 to 9.6 months).

Conclusions

Concurrent TTFields with scalp-sparing chemoradiation is a safe and feasible treatment option with limited toxicity. Future randomized prospective trial is warranted to define therapeutic advantages of concurrent TTFields with chemoradiation.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT03477110

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stupp R, Mason WP, Van Den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner AA et al (2015) Maintenance therapy with tumor-treating fields plus temozolomide vs temozolomide alone for glioblastoma a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:2535–2543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A et al (2017) Effect of tumor-treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:2306–2316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kirson ED, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R et al (2004) Disruption of cancer cell replication by alternating electric fields. Cancer Res 64:3288–3295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirson ED, Dbalý V, Tovaryš F et al (2007) Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:10152–10157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Giladi M, Munster M, Schneiderman RS et al (2017) Tumor treating fields (TTFields) delay DNA damage repair following radiation treatment of glioma cells. Radiat Oncol 12:206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim EH, Kim YJ, Song HS et al (2016) Biological effect of an alternating electric field on cell proliferation and synergistic antimitotic effect in combination with ionizing radiation. Oncotarget 7:62267–62279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grossman R, Bokstein F, Ben Harosh C et al (2019) Tumor-treating fields combined with radiotherapy and temzolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma: final results from a pilot study. Int J Radiat Oncol 105:E99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li T, Shukla G, Peng C et al (2018) Dosimetric impact of a tumor treating fields device for glioblastoma patients undergoing simultaneous radiation therapy. Front Oncol 8:51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lacouture ME, Davis ME, Elzinga G et al (2014) Characterization and management of dermatologic adverse events with the NovoTTF-100A System, a novel anti-mitotic electric field device for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Semin Oncol 41(Suppl 4):S1–S14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Basch E, Reeve BB, Mitchell SA et al (2014) Development of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). J Natl Cancer Inst. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju244

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Glas M, Scheffler B, Lazaridis L et al (2018) P01.060 PriCoTTF: a phase I/II trial of tumor treating fields prior and concomitant to radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 20:243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Onken J, Staub-Bartelt F, Vajkoczy P et al (2018) Acceptance and compliance of TTFields treatment among high grade glioma patients. J Neurooncol 139:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stupp R, Wong ET, Kanner AA et al (2012) NovoTTF-100A versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. Eur J Cancer 48:2192–2202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bender E, Kozak K, Howard S et al (2017) The effect of OptuneTM tumor treating fields transducer arrays on skin radiation dose during radiotherapy. J Clin Neurosci 42:172–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Witek M, Vahknenko Y, Siglin J et al (2014) Dose Reduction to the Scalp with Hippocampal Sparing Is Achievable with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy. Int J Med Physics, Clin Eng Radiat Oncol 03:176–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. De Puysseleyr A, Van De Velde J, Speleers B et al (2014) Hair-sparing whole brain radiotherapy with volumetric arc therapy in patients treated for brain metastases: Dosimetric and clinical results of a phase II trial. Radiat Oncol 9:170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gilbert MR, Dignam JJ, Armstrong TS et al (2014) A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 370:699–708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chinot OL, De La Motte RT, Moore N et al (2011) AVAglio: phase 3 trial of bevacizumab plus temozolomide and radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Adv Ther 28:334–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao YH, Wang ZF, Cao CJ et al (2018) The clinical significance of O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status in adult patients with glioblastoma: a meta-analysis. Front Neurol 9:127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T et al (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:997–1003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dorothy McAfee, Suzanne O’Hara, and Daniel Vernau for their clinical trial support. The authors would like to thank Ms. Peggy Groove for philanthropic support for this study.

Funding

Novocure with (Grant No. 19-0065) provides funding for the trial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenyin Shi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

WS: consulting for brainlab, varian, novocure. Research funding for clinical trial: Novocure, Regeneron.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 48 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, A., Bar-Ad, V., Martinez, N. et al. Initial experience with scalp sparing radiation with concurrent temozolomide and tumor treatment fields (SPARE) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 147, 653–661 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03466-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03466-z

Keywords

Navigation