Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental impact assessment of galvanized sheet production: a case study in Shandong Province, China

  • LCA FOR MANUFACTURING AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Galvanized sheet is the most widely used coated steel plate globally in the industry of construction, automobile, electronics manufacturing, etc. Large amounts of resources and energy are used in galvanized sheet production, which likewise generates vast amounts of pollutant emissions. In the face of the rapid growth of the production and demand of galvanized sheet in China, it is very important to find out the key factors of the environment impact in the production of galvanized sheet. An evaluation of the environmental impact of galvanized sheet production in China was conducted by using the framework of life cycle assessment to improve resource saving and environmental protection in the galvanized sheet industry, and update the life cycle inventory database of galvanized sheet production.

Methods

The environmental impact assessment was carried out based on the life cycle assessment framework by the use of ReCiPe 2016 method which was applicable on a global scale to evaluate the environmental impact of galvanized sheet production. Methods of uncertainty analysis and sensitivity analysis were adopted to provide credible support.

Results and discussion

The midpoint categories of global warming and fossil resource scarcity, as well as the endpoint categories of human health contributed most to environmental burden, which were mainly caused by carbon dioxide emissions and coal consumption. Environmental impact was dominated by the key process of continuous casting billet production, followed by electrolytic zinc production and electricity generation.

Conclusions

Additional CO2-reducing measures should be implemented in galvanized sheet production to slow the effect of global warming. Moreover, biomass char reducing agents, rather than coal-based reducing agents, should be utilized in steelmaking to reduce fossil resource consumption. Furthermore, renewable energy, rather than coal-based electricity, should be used in galvanized sheet production to reduce carbon emissions and fossil resource consumption. Increasing the recycling rate of scrap steel and zinc waste can save resources and reduce environmental burden. The results of this study can provide guidance in the reduction of resource consumption and environmental burden of galvanized sheet production to the maximum extent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul Quader M, Shamsuddin A, Dawal SZ, Nukman Y (2016) Present needs, recent progress and future trends of energy-efficient ultra-low carbon dioxide (CO2) steelmaking (ULCOS) program. Renew Sust Energ Rev 55:537–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arasto A, Tsupari E, Kärki J, Pisilä E, Sorsamäki L (2013) Post-combustion capture of CO2 at an integrated steel mill–part I: technical concept analysis. Int J Greenh Gas Control 16:271–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolin CA, Smith ST (2011) Life cycle assessment of borate-treated lumber with comparison to galvanized steel framing. J Clean Prod 19:630–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brito M, Martins F (2017) Life cycle assessment of butanol production. Fuel 208:476–482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burchart-Korol D (2013) Life cycle assessment of steel production in Poland: a case study. J Clean Prod 54:235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini F, Strømman AH (2011) Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresour Technol 102:437–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chisalita DA, Petrescu L, Cobden P, van Dijk HAJ, Cormos AM, Cormos CC (2019) Assessing the environmental impact of an integrated steel mill with post-combustion CO2 capture and storage using the LCA methodology. J Clean Prod 211:1015–1025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CISSY (2017) China iron and steel statistical yearbook. China Iron and Steel Industry Association. Available from< http://www.chinaisa.org.cn/ >. Accessed 21 Feb 2020

  • CNMIY (2017) China nonferrous metals industry yearbook. China statistics press. Available from< http://www.chinania.org.cn/>. Accessed 21 Feb 2020

  • CPLCID (2018) Chinese process-based life cycle inventory database. Available from< http://www.huanke.sdu.edu.cn/info/1024/3275.htm>. Accessed 21 Feb 2020

  • Feliciano-Bruzual C (2014) Charcoal injection in blast furnaces (bio-PCI): CO2 reduction potential and economic prospects. J Mater Res Technol 3:233–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, Van Zelm R, (2009) A Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method Which Comprises Harmonised Category Indicators at the Midpoint and the Endpoint Level, first ed. In: Report I: Characterization. Available from< http://www.lciarecipe.net>. Accessed 21 Feb

  • GRID (2018) State garid Shandong electric power company. Available from<http://www.sd.sgcc.com.cn/>. Accessed 21 Feb 2020

  • Hernández-Betancur JD, Hernández HF, Ocampo-Carmona LM (2019) A holistic framework for assessing hot-dip galvanizing process sustainability. J Clean Prod 206:755–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z, Ding X, Sun H, Liu S (2010) Identification of main influencing factors of life cycle CO2 emissions from the integrated steelworks using sensitivity analysis. J Clean Prod 18:1052–1058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts MAJ, Steinmann ZJN, Elshout PMF, Stam G, Verones F, Vieira M, Zijp M, Hollander A, van Zelm R (2017) ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14040 (2006) International Standard. Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework. Available from<http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=37456>. Accessed 21 Feb 2020

  • King JH, Buckton G, Poole S (2015) Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: review and results harmonization. Renew Sust Energ Rev 42:1113–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong G, White R (2010) Toward cleaner production of hot dip galvanizing industry in China. J Clean Prod 18:1092–1099

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Tan XC, Guo JX, Zhu KW, Huang C (2019) Study on an implementation scheme of synergistic emission reduction of CO2 and air pollutants in China’s steel industry. Sustainability 11:22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobato NCC, Villegas EA, Mansur MB (2015) Management of solid wastes from steelmaking and galvanizing processes: a brief review. Resour Conserv Recycl 102:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma H, Oxley L, Gibson J, Li W (2010) A survey of China’s renewable energy economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:438–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Yang D, Shen X, Zhai Y, Zhang R, Hong J (2018) How much water is required for coal power generation: an analysis of gray and blue water footprints. Sci Total Environ 636:547–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manhabosco SM, Manhabosco TM, Geoffroy N, Vignal V, Dick LFP (2018) Corrosion behaviour of galvanized steel studied by electrochemical microprobes applied on low-angle cross sections. Corros Sci 140:379–387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen BV, Lund H, Karlsson K (2011) 100% renewable energy systems, climate mitigation and economic growth. Appl Energy 88:488–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midrex-Technologies (2010) Environmental. A clean environment. Available from<http://www.midrex.com>. Accessed 21 Feb 2020

  • Ng KW, Giroux L, Todoschuk T (2018) Value-in-use of biocarbon fuel for direct injection in blast furnace ironmaking. Ironmak Steelmak 45:406–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olmez GM, Dilek FB, Karanfil T, Yetis U (2016) The environmental impacts of iron and steel industry: a life cycle assessment study. J Clean Prod 130:195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohlmann JG, Borrego AG, Osório E, Diez MA, Vilela ACF (2016) Combustion of eucalyptus charcoals and coals of similar volatile yields aiming at blast furnace injection in a CO2 mitigation environment. J Clean Prod 129:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pritzel dos Santos A, Manhabosco SM, Rodrigues JS, Dick LFP (2015) Comparative study of the corrosion behavior of galvanized, galvannealed and Zn55Al coated interstitial free steels. Surf Coat Technol 279:150–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qi C, Ye L, Ma X, Yang D, Hong J (2017) Life cycle assessment of the hydrometallurgical zinc production chain in China. J Clean Prod 156:451–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raja VS, Panday CK, Saji VS, Vagge ST, Narasimhan K (2006) An electrochemical study on deformed galvanneal steel sheets. Surf Coat Technol 201:2296–2302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranzani da Costa A, Wagner D, Patisson F (2013) Modelling a new, low CO2 emissions, hydrogen steelmaking process. J Clean Prod 46:27–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi B, Marquart S, Rossi G (2017) Comparative life cycle cost assessment of painted and hot-dip galvanized bridges. J Environ Manag 197:41–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seré PR, Deyá C, Elsner CI, Di Sarli AR (2015) Corrosion of painted galvanneal steel. Procedia Mater Sci 8:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleeswijk AW, van Oers LF, Guinee JB, Struijs J, Huijbregts MA (2008) Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: an LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000. Sci Total Environ 390:227–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suopajärvi H, Umeki K, Mousa E, Hedayati A, Romar H, Kemppainen A, Wang C, Phounglamcheik A, Tuomikoski S, Norberg N, Andefors A, Öhman M, Lassi U, Fabritius T (2018) Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking–status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO2 steel production technologies. Appl Energy 213:384–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tongpool R, Jirajariyavech A, Yuvaniyama C, Mungcharoen T (2010) Analysis of steel production in Thailand: environmental impacts and solutions. Energy 35:4192–4200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Larsson M, Lövgren J, Nilsson L, Mellin P, Yang W, Salman H, Hultgren A (2014) Injection of solid biomass products into the blast furnace and its potential effects on an integrated steel plant. Energy Procedia 61:2184–2187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wen L, Lund H, Mathiesen BV, Zhang X (2011) Potential of renewable energy systems in China. Appl Energy 88:518–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Hong J, Ren Y, Wang Q, Yuan X (2015) Approaches for controlling air pollutants and their environmental impacts generated from coal-based electricity generation in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:12384–12395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yellishetty M, Mudd GM, Ranjith PG, Tharumarajah A (2011) Environmental life-cycle comparisons of steel production and recycling: sustainability issues, problems and prospects. Environ Sci Pol 14:650–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao G, Pedersen AS (2018) Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production and consumption in an isolated territory. Procedia CIRP 69:529–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Major Basic Research Projects of the Shandong Natural Science Foundation, China (ZR2018ZC2362), National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFF0206702; 2017YFF0211605), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71671105; 71974113), and The Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University, China (2018JC049).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, China

    Changxing Ji, Xiaotian Ma, Yijie Zhai, Ruirui Zhang, Xiaoxu Shen, Tianzuo Zhang & Jinglan Hong

Authors
  1. Changxing Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaotian Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yijie Zhai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ruirui Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaoxu Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tianzuo Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jinglan Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinglan Hong.

Additional information

Communicated by Omer Tatari

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 31 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, C., Ma, X., Zhai, Y. et al. Environmental impact assessment of galvanized sheet production: a case study in Shandong Province, China. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25, 760–770 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01735-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01735-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation