Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

MRI findings in Pott’s spine and correlating clinical progress with radiological findings

  • Spinal Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To document magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes in Pott’s spine and to correlate these with clinical findings and outcome.

Methods

Patients with Pott’s spine having more than one set of MRI were included in the study. Patients were grouped according to timing of their second MRI. The MRI findings included changes in bone, disc, spinal cord, and soft tissue. The MRI changes were categorized into improvement, no change, or worsening. “Paradoxical worsening” was defined as radiological worsening in setting of clinical improvement, as described by improvement of Nurick’s grade. Outcome was defined by mRS scale at three, six, and 12 months. The MRI findings and outcome were correlated.

Results

The results are based on 36 patients. The MRI changes included vertebral changes in form of spondylodiscitis in 33 (92%), epidural abscess in 29 (81%), spinal cord changes including edema and granuloma in 17 (47%), paravertebral abscess in 29 (81%), and vertebral body collapse in 12 (33.3%) patients. At three months, clinical improvement occurred in eight out of 12 patients, deterioration in two, and no change in two. Spinal MRI revealed improvement in one patient only; whereas eight had deterioration and three had no change. At six months, all nine patients improved clinically, but MRI showed improvement in only four, while another four showed deterioration and one had no change. In the nine and 12 months group, while all patients clinically improved, MRI showed minimal worsening.

Conclusion

In Pott’s spine, the clinical improvement precedes the radiological improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garg RK, Somvanshi DS (2011) Spinal tuberculosis: a review. J Spinal Cord Med 34(5):440–454

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ansari S, Amanullah MF, Ahmad K, Rauniyar RK (2013) Pott’s spine: diagnostic imaging modalities and technology advancements. N Am J Med Sci 5(7):404–411. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.115775

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Moorthy S, Prabhu NK (2002) Spectrum of MR imaging findings in spinal tuberculosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:979–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jain AK (2010) Tuberculosis of the spine: a fresh look at an old disease. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 92:905–913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jung NY, Jee WH, Ha KY, Park CK, Byun JY (2004) Discrimination of tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182(6):1405–1410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chemotherapy and management of tuberculosis in the United Kingdom: recommendations 1998 (1998) Joint Tuberculosis Committee of the British Thoracic Society. Thorax 53(7): 536–548

  7. Blumberg HM, Burman WJ, Chaisson RE, Daley CL, Etkind SC, Friedman LN, Fujiwara P, Grzemska M, Hopewell PC, Iseman MD, Jasmer RM, Koppaka V, Menzies RI, O'Brien RJ, Reves RR, Reichman LB, Simone PM, Starke JR, Vernon AA (2003) American Thoracic Society, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Infectious Diseases Society. American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America: treatment of tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167(4):603–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Five-year assessment of controlled trials of short-course chemotherapy regimens of 6, 9 or 18 months’ duration for spinal tuberculosis in patients ambulatory from the start or undergoing radical surgery (1999) Fourteenth report of the Medical Research Council Working Party on Tuberculosis of the Spine. Int Orthop 23(2): 73–81

  9. Nick G Lasanianos, Nikolaos K Kanakaris, Peter V (2015) Giannoudis., (eds). Trauma and orthopaedic classifications: a comprehensive overview. London, Springer

  10. Banks JL, Marotta CA (2007) Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke 38(3):1091–1096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Antonio, Rivas-Garcia (2013) Imaging findings of Pott’s disease: Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 4): S567–S5782

  12. Jain AK, Aggarwal A, Mehrotra G (1999) Correlation of canal encroachment with neurological deficit in tuberculosis of the spine. Int Orthop 23:85–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharif HS, Clark DC, Aabed MY, Haddad MC, al Deeb SM, Yaqub B, al Moutaery KR (1990) Granulomatous spinal infections: MR imaging. Radiology 177(1):101–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tins BJ, Cassar-Pullicino VN (2004) MR imaging of spinal infection. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 8(3):215–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Forrester DM (2004) Infectious spondylitis. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 25:461–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cormican L, Hammal R, Messenger J, Milburn HJ (2006) Current difficulties in the diagnosis and management of spinal tuberculosis. Postgrad Med J 82(963):46–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nussbaum ES, Rockswold GL, Bergman TA, Erickson DL, Seljeskog EL (1995) Spinal tuberculosis: a diagnostic and management challenge. J Neurosurg 83(2):243–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Choremis CB, Padiatellis C, Zou Mbou Lakis D, Yannakos D (1955) Transitory exacerbation of fever and roentgenographic findings during treatment of tuberculosis in children. Am Rev Tuberc 72(4):527–536

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith H (1987) Paradoxical responses during the chemotherapy of tuberculosis. J Inf Secur 15:1–3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ranjan P, Kalita J, Misra UK (2003) Serial study of clinical and CT changes in tuberculous meningitis. Neuroradiology 45:277–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Narita M, Ashkin D, Hollender ES, Pitchenik AE (1998) Paradoxical worsening of tuberculosis following antiretroviral therapy in patients with AIDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 158(1):157–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Teoh R, Humphries MJ, O'Mahony G (1987) Symptomatic intracranial tuberculoma developing during treatment of tuberculosis: a report of 10 patients and review of the literature. Q J Med 63(241):449–460

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalita J, Prasad S, Misra UK (2014) Predictors of paradoxical tuberculoma in tuberculous meningitis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 18(4):486–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roberts CW, Walker W, Alexander J (2001) Sex-associated hormones and immunity to protozoan parasites. Clin Microbial Rev 14(3):476–488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Shakti Kumar for secretarial help.

Funding

The study was not supported by any funding agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Usha Kant Misra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standard of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its amendments or comparable ethical standards.

This study was ethically approved by the ethics committee of Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli Road, Lucknow, India (IEC Code: 2018-38-DM-EXP).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• In Pott’s spine, vertebral changes occur in 33 (92%), soft tissue changes in 29 (81%), and spinal cord changes in 17 (44%).

• By three months, 66.6% showed clinical improvement which was supported by MRI in 8.3% only.

• Clinical improvement precedes that in MRI.

• To monitor drug response MRI to be repeated if there is lack of clinical improvement.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Misra, U.K., Warrier, S., Kalita, J. et al. MRI findings in Pott’s spine and correlating clinical progress with radiological findings. Neuroradiology 62, 825–832 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02402-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02402-2

Keywords

Navigation