Abstract
Purpose
To compare the performance of using Hounsfield units (HU) value derived from computed tomography and T-score of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to predict pedicle screw loosening.
Methods
We reviewed 253 patients aged ≥ 50 years undergoing pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD). The evaluation of screw loosening: radiolucent zones of ≥ 1 mm thick in X-ray. The criterion for osteoporosis: the lowest T-score ≤ − 2.5. The average HU value of L1–L4 was used to represent lumbar bone mineral density (BMD). The area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of predicting screw loosening.
Results
One patient underwent reoperation for screw loosening at 9 months follow-up. At 12 months follow-up, the loosening rate was 30.6% (77/252) in the remaining 252 patients. Osteoporotic patients had higher loosening rate than non-osteoporotic patients (39.3% vs. 25.8%, P = 0.026). The T-score showed no significant difference between loosening group and non-loosening group (− 2.1 ± 1.5 vs. − 1.7 ± 1.6, P = 0.074), and so is the lowest lumbar BMD of DXA (0.83 ± 0.16 g/cm2 vs. 0.88 ± 0.19 g/cm2, P = 0.054). The HU value was lower in the loosening group (106.8 ± 34.4 vs. 129.8 ± 45.7, P < 0.001). The HU value (OR, 0.980; 95%CI 0.968–0.993; P = 0.002) was the independent influencing factor of screw loosening. The AUC of predicting screw loosening was 0.666 (P < 0.001) for HU value and 0.574 (P = 0.062) for T-score.
Conclusions
HU value is a better predictor of pedicle screw loosening than T-score of DXA in patients aged ≥ 50 years with LDD. We should not only focus on the DXA measurements when making surgical plans concerning lumbar fixation.
Graphic abstract
These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boos N, Webb JK (1997) Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders: a European view. Eur Spine J 6:2–18
Chin DK, Park JY, Yoon YS, Kuh SU, Jin BH, Kim KS, Cho YE (2007) Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients requiring spine surgery: incidence and significance of osteoporosis in spine disease. Osteoporos Int 18:1219–1224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-007-0370-8
Hoppe S, Keel MJB (2017) Pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic spine: indications, limitations and technical aspects. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 43:3–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0750-x
Galbusera F, Volkheimer D, Reitmaier S, Berger-Roscher N, Kienle A, Wilke H-J (2015) Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication? Eur Spine J 24:1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3768-6
Alanay A, Vyas R, Shamie AN, Sciocia T, Randolph G, Wang JC (2007) Safety and efficacy of implant removal for patients with recurrent back pain after a failed degenerative lumbar spine surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:271–277. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000211283.14143.ad
Berjano P, Bassani R, Casero G, Sinigaglia A, Cecchinato R, Lamartina C (2013) Failures and revisions in surgery for sagittal imbalance: analysis of factors influencing failure. Eur Spine J 22:853–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3024-x
Bredow J, Boese CK, Werner CML, Siewe J, Löhrer L, Zarghooni K, Eysel P, Scheyerer MJ (2016) Predictive validity of preoperative CT scans and the risk of pedicle screw loosening in spinal surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2487-8
Röllinghoff M, Schlüter-Brust K, Groos D, Sobottke R, Michael JW-P, Eysel P, Delank KS (2010) Mid-range outcomes in 64 consecutive cases of multilevel fusion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Orthop Rev 2:3–4. https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2010.e3
Okuyama K, Sato K, Abe E, Inaba H, Shimada Y, Murai H (1993) Stability of transpedicle screwing for the osteoporotic spine. An in vitro study of the mechanical stability. Spine 18:2240–2245
Shepherd JA, Schousboe JT, Broy SB, Engelke K, Leslie WD (2015) Executive summary of the 2015 ISCD position development conference on advanced measures from DXA and QCT: fracture prediction beyond BMD. J Clin Densitom 18:274–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2015.06.013
Hamdy RC, Petak SM, Lenchik L (2002) Which central dual X-ray absorptiometry skeletal sites and regions of interest should be used to determine the diagnosis of osteoporosis? J Clin Densitome 5(Suppl):S11–S18
Xie Y, Fu Q, Chen ZQ, Shi ZC, Zhu XD, Wang CF, Li M (2011) Comparison between two pedicle screw augmentation instrumentations in adult degenerative scoliosis with osteoporosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:286. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-286
Pinera AR, Duran C, Lopez B, Saez I, Correia E, Alvarez L (2011) Instrumented lumbar arthrodesis in elderly patients: prospective study using cannulated cemented pedicle screw instrumentation. Eur Spine J 20:408–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1907-2
Dai F, Liu Y, Zhang F, Sun D, Luo F, Zhang Z, Xu J (2015) Surgical treatment of the osteoporotic spine with bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw fixation: technical description and preliminary application in 43 patients. Clinics 70:114–119. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2015(02)08
Muraki S, Yamamoto S, Ishibashi H, Horiuchi T, Hosoi T, Orimo H, Nakamura K (2004) Impact of degenerative spinal diseases on bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in elderly women. Osteoporos Int 15:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1600-y
Zou D, Li W, Deng C, Du G, Xu N (2019) The use of CT Hounsfield unit values to identify the undiagnosed spinal osteoporosis in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J 28:1758–1766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5776-9
Pompe E, de Jong PA, de Jong WU, Takx RAP, Eikendal ALM, Willemink MJ, Oudkerk M, Budde RPJ, Lammers J-WJ, Hoesein FAAM (2016) Inter-observer and inter-examination variability of manual vertebral bone attenuation measurements on computed tomography. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4145-x
Pickhardt PJ, Pooler BD, Lauder T, del Rio AM, Bruce RJ, Binkley N (2013) Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications. Ann Intern Med 158:588–522. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00003
Zaidi Q, Danisa OA, Cheng W (2019) Measurement techniques and utility of Hounsfield unit values for assessment of bone quality prior to spinal instrumentation: a review of current literature. Spine 44:E239–E244. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002813
Anderson PA, Polly DW, Binkley NC, Pickhardt PJ (2018) clinical use of opportunistic computed tomography screening for osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:2073–2081. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01376
Schwaiger BJ, Gersing AS, Baum T, Noel PB, Zimmer C, Bauer JS (2014) Bone mineral density values derived from routine lumbar spine multidetector row CT predict osteoporotic vertebral fractures and screw loosening. Am J Neuroradiol 35:1628–1633. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3893
Spirig JM, Sutter R, Götschi T, Farshad-Amacker NA, Farshad M (2018) Value of standard radiographs, CT and MRI of the lumbar spine in detection of intraoperatively confirmed pedicle screw loosening—a prospective clinical trial. Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.06.345
Sanden B, Olerud C, Petren-Mallmin M, Johansson C, Larsson S (2004) The significance of radiolucent zones surrounding pedicle screws. Definition of screw loosening in spinal instrumentation. J Bone Jt Surg Ser B 86:461–457
Larsen JM, Rimoldi RL, Capen DA, Nelson RW, Nagelberg S, Thomas JC Jr (1996) Assessment of pseudarthrosis in pedicle screw fusion: a prospective study comparing plain radiographs, flexion/extension radiographs, CT scanning, and bone scintigraphy with operative findings. J Spinal Disord 9:117–120
Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Oda H, Uei H (2008) Clinical course and significance of the clear zone around the pedicle screws in the lumbar degenerative disease. Spine 33:903–908
Ohtori S, Inoue G, Orita S, Yamauchi K, Eguchi Y, Ochiai N, Kishida S, Kuniyoshi K, Aoki Y, Nakamura J, Ishikawa T, Miyagi M, Kamoda H, Suzuki M, Kubota G, Sakuma Y, Oikawa Y, Inage K, Sainoh T, Takaso M, Toyone T, Takahashi K (2013) Comparison of teriparatide and bisphosphonate treatment to reduce pedicle screw loosening after lumbar spinal fusion surgery in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis from a bone quality perspective. Spine 38:E487–E492. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828826dd
Kim JW, Park S-W, Kim Y-B, Ko MJ (2018) The effect of postoperative use of teriparatide reducing screw loosening in osteoporotic patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 61:494–502. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0216
Kim HJ, Kim SG, Lee HM, Kim HS, Moon ES, Park JO, Seol NH, Moon SH (2008) Risk factors associated with the halo phenomenon after lumbar fusion surgery and its clinical significance. Asian Spine J 2:22–26. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2008.2.1.22
Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, Tamura Y, Chiba M, Sato K (2001) Influence of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation: a study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. Spine J 1:402–407
Orita S, Ohtori S, Eguchi Y, Kamoda H, Arai G, Ishikawa T, Miyagi M, Inoue G, Ochiai N, Kishida S, Takaso M, Aoki Y, Takahashi K (2010) Radiographic evaluation of monocortical versus tricortical purchase approaches in lumbosacral fixation with sacral pedicle screws: a prospective study of ninety consecutive patients. Spine 35:E1230–E1237
Kim J-B, Park S-W, Lee Y-S, Nam T-K, Park Y-S, Kim Y-B (2015) The effects of spinopelvic parameters and paraspinal muscle degeneration on S1 screw loosening. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 58:356–357. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.58.4.357
Bokov A, Bulkin A, Aleynik A, Kutlaeva M, Mlyavykh S (2018) Pedicle screws loosening in patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: potential risk factors and relative contribution. Global Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218772302
Funding
This study was funded by the Clinical Cohort Construction Program of Peking University Third Hospital (BYSYDL2019006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All data collection and analysis conducted in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zou, D., Sun, Z., Zhou, S. et al. Hounsfield units value is a better predictor of pedicle screw loosening than the T-score of DXA in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J 29, 1105–1111 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06386-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06386-8