Elsevier

Composite Structures

Volume 244, 15 July 2020, 112232
Composite Structures

Thickness-variable composite beams for vibration energy harvesting

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112232Get rights and content

Abstract

Researchers have recently focused on improving the efficiency of piezoelectric energy harvesters by redesigning their substrate beams. Two approaches have been explored, including changing the shape of the cross-section area, i.e., width variation, and changing the thickness of cantilever beams. The width changing approach suffers from the deduction of output power from the piezoelectric elements of the trimmed-off regions, while performance deterioration does not occur in the thickness-variable approach. The benefit of thickness-variable beams on energy harvesting has been analyzed theoretically, but its detailed experimental study is still absent. In this study, we for the first time fabricate a thickness-variable harvester based on the Garolite FR-4 epoxy laminate, and validate the superiority of the variable thickness beam on the harvester performance enhancement. A theoretical model is developed based on the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory and numerically solved via the Rayleigh-Ritz method. We compare the thickness-variable composite beam configuration with a conventional uniform-thickness counterpart and unveil the beneficial effect of evenly-distributed strain on performance enhancement. Experiments indicate that the thickness-variable method increases on the energy harvester efficiency by 78%.

Introduction

Advances in low power electronic devices open up the possibility of developing self-powered systems by scavenging ambient energy from the environment. Piezoelectric energy harvesters have been used in a wide range of scenarios, such as structural health monitoring systems, smart wireless devices [1], [2], [3]. To enhance the power output of generators, the research communities have resorted to various approaches including nonlinear bandwidth broadening techniques [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], multilayer piezoelectric stacks [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] and force amplification mechanism [17], [18]. Despite the distinctive advantages of these structures, the cantilever-based harvesters are still extensively used and receive the most attention due to the ease of fabrication, small size, light in weight, low working loading conditions and ease application [19], [20].

To further improve the performance of cantilever-typed energy harvesters, efforts have been dedicated to redesigning the cross-section area or the thickness. For example, Shebeeb and Salleh [21], via the finite element method (FEM), analyzed the cantilever beam with triangular, rectangular and trapezoidal cross-section and calculated the output power for each beam. In their work, only the substrate layer was considered. Other works focused on analytical modeling and experiments. Goldschmidtboeing and Woias [22] used the Rayleigh-Ritz method to study different beam shapes, and the analytical results were validated by experiments. Ben Ayed et al. [23] exploited a one-mode Galerkin approach to derive the reduced-order model. Salmani and Rahimi [24] formulated the behavior of nonlinear piezoelectric energy harvester with exponentially tapering width. It showed that the structure improved voltage per mass at a high exciting acceleration amplitude. Baker et al. [25] experimentally investigated output power by comparing the cantilever beam designs with rectangular and trapezoidal shapes. Similar works can be found in the literature [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. Table 1 summarizes the main features of some variable cross-section area energy harvesters. The power amplification ratio is obtained by comparing the variable cross-section energy harvesters with the uniform counterparts. It can be found that both analytical models and experiments were utilized in optimizing the cross-section.

But one should note that piezoelectric materials, especially piezoelectric ceramics, are extremely brittle. The cutting processes would significantly increase the costs [25]. In addition, the piezoelectric materials would lose the output power in the trimmed-off regions. Thus, some researchers have explored the effect of variable thickness of the substrate layer on the conversion efficiency. Paquin and St-Amant [31] investigated the optimum slope angle of a tapered cantilever beam for the best performance by semi-analytical mechanical model. It reported that the tapered energy harvester could generate 3.6 times higher power output than the uniform thickness beam. The result was compared with a FEM simulation. Later, Xie et al. [32] established a finite differential theoretical model to study the effect of taper ratios in width and thickness of the energy harvester. They concluded that 70 times higher power output could be achieved. Keshmiri et al. [33] studied functionally graded material piezoelectric energy harvester with a nonlinearly tapered thickness using a theoretical model. They found that the design is capable of generating 19.76 times as much voltage as its uniform counterpart. A similar study was implemented by Raju et al. [34], in which they used the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory to develop an analytical model and proved that the voltage was increased by up to 126.6%. Recently, Keshmiri and Wu [35] designed wideband piezoelectric energy harvesters by combining an array of non-uniform thickness cantilever bimorphs. Based on the theoretical optimization, they pointed out the design can obtain around five times larger peak voltage output compared with the uniform thickness one. Other forms of change in thickness included elliptical [36], parabolic, hyperbolic [37] and tapered profiles. Table 2 lists the main features of previously reported thickness-variable harvesters.

However, as can be seen in Table 2, the main research methods in the literature on optimizing the thickness are numerical simulation and analytical modeling. Few have conducted an experimental study and the predicted power amplification ratio has a large difference. In addition, these studies predicted the electrical responses of the harvesters but were lack of the further explanation of the power reinforcement mechanisms. In this study, we will fill the gap between theoretical analysis and experiments. The prototypes with a variable thickness are fabricated for quantitatively characterizing its performance enhancement effect, which is further explained by theoretical models.

In this paper, the authors numerically and experimentally investigate a unimorph cantilever beam with a variable thickness. PZT-5H and Garolite FR-4 are used as piezoelectric and substrate layer, respectively. Section 2 is dedicated to developing the theoretical model with a varying thickness and validating it by the FEM simulation. Section 3 presents the experimental platform. Section 4 details the results derived from theoretical analysis and the experiments and unveil beneficial effect of evenly-distributed strain on performance enhancement. Finally, the conclusion is given in Section 5.

Section snippets

Model development

Fig. 1 shows the thickness-variable energy harvester which is attached to an excitation. It consists of a cantilever beam with varying thickness, a piezoelectric element and a tip mass. With the consideration of the fabrication issue, the tapered thickness of the substrate beam is selected as a linear profile. Besides, a part of the thickness of the beam is designed to be uniform to fix the inertial mass vertically. h0 and h1 are the thickness of the harvester at the fixed and free end,

Experiment

Following the geometric and material parameters listed in Table 3, Table 4, we made two energy harvesters, one with a uniform thickness, the other with a varying thickness. Two identical steel mass blocks, 19 g, are machined and attached to the tip ends of the prototypes. Fig. 3 shows these two prototypes and the platform in the experiment. The beams were fixed on a vibrator (Modal Shop Inc. 2075E), which provided 0.1 g (g = 9.80 m/s2) of acceleration in the experiments. To measure the input

Results and discussion

By doing the frequency-sweep testing, it was found that the fundamental frequency of the uniform and non-uniform thickness beam is 141 Hz and 142 Hz, respectively. It can be found that the first-order eigenfrequency obtained in experimental and theoretical analysis shows an agreement. Then, to determine the relation between the resistance and voltage, the authors swept the frequency of the vibrator for each case.

Fig. 4 compares the obtained results in the experiment and the theoretical model

Summary

In this paper, we theoretically and experimentally studied the thickness-variable composite beam energy harvester. The prototypes with uniform and non-uniform thickness were fabricated using the selected Garolite FR-4 materials. To unveil the beneficial effect of the evenly-distributed strain on the power response of thickness-varying harvester, we built a theoretical model using the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, which is applicable in the energy harvesters with linear or nonlinear tapered

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

This work is financially supported by the grants from the City University of Hong Kong (Project Nos. 7200559, 9610390), the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (Project No. CityU 21210619) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 11902282).

References (57)

  • J.W.Ã. Jaworski et al.

    Free vibration of a cantilevered beam with multiple steps : Comparison of several theoretical methods with experiment

    J Sound Vib

    (2008)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Nonlinear random responses and fatigue prediction of elastically restrained laminated composite panels in thermo-acoustic environments

    Compos Struct

    (2019)
  • D. Mallick et al.

    Bidirectional electrical tuning of FR4 based electromagnetic energy harvesters

    Sensors Actuators, A Phys

    (2015)
  • S. Woodward et al.

    Production of low-volume aviation components using disposable electromagnetic actuators

    J Mater Process Technol

    (2011)
  • Z. Yang et al.

    High-performance piezoelectric energy harvesters and their applications

    Joule

    (2018)
  • Z. Yang et al.

    Comparison of PZN-PT, PMN-PT single crystals and PZT ceramic for vibration energy harvesting

    Energy Convers Manag

    (2016)
  • Z. Yang et al.

    On the efficiency of piezoelectric energy harvesters

    Extrem Mech Lett

    (2017)
  • S.M. Taware et al.

    A Review of Energy Harvesting From Piezoelectric Materials

    J Mech Civ Eng

    (2013)
  • H. Li et al.

    Energy harvesting from low frequency applications using piezoelectric materials

    Appl Phys Rev

    (2014)
  • H.A. Sodano et al.

    Estimation of Electric Charge Output for Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting

    Strain

    (2004)
  • Q. Lu et al.

    An E-shape broadband piezoelectric energy harvester induced by magnets

    J Intell Mater Syst Struct

    (2018)
  • W. Tai et al.

    On improvement of the frequency bandwidth of nonlinear vibration energy harvesters using a mechanical motion rectifier

    J Vib Acoust Trans ASME

    (2018)
  • H. Wu et al.

    Development of a broadband nonlinear two-degree-of-freedom piezoelectric energy harvester Development of a broadband nonlinear two-degree-of- freedom piezoelectric energy harvester

    J Intell Mater Syst Struct

    (2014)
  • D. Upadrashta et al.

    Material strength consideration in the design optimization of nonlinear energy harvester

    J Intell Mater Syst Struct

    (2015)
  • N.G. Elvin et al.

    Effects of axial forces on cantilever piezoelectric resonators for structural energy harvesting

    Strain

    (2011)
  • T. Xu et al.

    Energy harvesting using a PZT ceramic multilayer stack

    Smart Mater Struct

    (2013)
  • Wen S, Xu Q. Design of a novel piezoelectric energy harvester for scavenging energy from human walking. IEEE/ASME Int...
  • Evans M, Tang L, Bowen C, Hu AP, Tao K, Aw K. Electromechanical modelling of a piezoelectric stack energy harvester....
  • Cited by (38)

    • Improving the gravity-rotation-excited vibration energy harvesting in offset configurations

      2023, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      To achieve the aforementioned goals, gravity-rotation-excited vibration energy harvesting (GRE-VEH) that is a process to harness mechanical energy in rotational [13–17] or swing [18–22] environments and convert it into electrical energy was proposed to integrate with wireless sensors to construct a monitoring system architecture for online directly detecting the status of rotor components in long-term [11]. This kind of method utilizes the periodically changed component of the gravitational force to excite the energy harvester (EH) installed on the rotor and achieves power generation from the harvester's oscillations via electromechanical coupling processes of piezoelectric [23–27], triboelectric [28–30], and electromagnetic effects [20,31], etc. In recent years, GRE-VEH has been increasingly developed for different application contexts and its derived self-powered wireless electronics have shown high feasibility.

    • Soybean-inspired nanomaterial-based broadband piezoelectric energy harvester with local bistability

      2022, Nano Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, the vehicle-bridge coupling vibration energy can be used to directly power the wireless sensor networks embedded in bridges for structural health monitoring [10]. Among various working mechanisms [11], the piezoelectric energy harvesting technique is a promising approach, with which the energy harvesting devices have the advantages of easy fabrication, low weight, small size, and high energy density [12–16]. Piezoelectric energy harvesters can be categorized into linear and nonlinear devices.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text