Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impacts of Inflow Variations on the Long Term Operation of a Multi-Hydropower-Reservoir System and a Strategy for Determining the Adaptable Operation Rule

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Obvious inflow variations resulting from changing environments bring big challenges to the operations of hydropower reservoirs. This study reveals the impacts of average annual inflow volume (AAIV) variations on the long term operation of a multi-hydropower-reservoir (MHR) system, and presents a strategy for determining the adaptable operation rule. The strategy includes two parts. One part is making different inflow scenarios based on the change points of AAIVs. Another part is applying the principle of cross validation to select the adaptable rule from the formulated operation rules in various inflow scenarios. Specifically, the change points of AAIVs are identified by three statistical methods. An optimization operation model of an MHR system is built, and three evolutionary and meta-heuristic algorithms are applied to resolve the model in different inflow scenarios. Based on the optimal operation results, two machine learning algorithms are employed to formulate operation rules in each inflow scenario. The MHR system at the upstream of Yellow River basin is taken as a case study. The results show that (1) the long term operation of an MHR system is sensitive to the AAIV variations; and (2) the presented strategy is feasible in determining the adaptable operation rule for an MHR system under the AAIV variations. The findings of the study are helpful for the long term operation of an MHR system under the AAIV variations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboutalebi M, Haddad OB, Loáiciga HA (2015) Optimal monthly reservoir operation rules for hydropower generation derived with SVR-NSGAII. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141(11):04015029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acheampong AO, Boateng EB (2019) Modelling carbon emission intensity: application of artificial neural network. J Clean Prod 225:833–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi M, Haddad OB, Loáiciga HA (2015) Adaptive reservoir operation rules under climatic change. Water Resour Manag 29(4):1247–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battiti R (1992) First- and second-order methods for learning: between steepest descent and Newton’s method. Neural Comput 4(2):141–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Zhong PA (2019) A multi-time-scale power prediction model of hydropower station considering multiple uncertainties. Sci Total Environ 677:612–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Li J, Lu H, Xia J (2019) The dynamic benefit compensation in a multi-reservoir system based on importance analysis. J Clean Prod, in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desta Y, Goitom H, Aregay G (2019) Investigation of runoff response to land use/land cover change on the case of Aynalem catchment, north of Ethiopia. J Afr Earth Sci 153:130–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson B, Wagener T, Pianosi F (2019) An argument-driven classification and comparison of reservoir operation optimization methods. Adv Water Resour 128:71–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eum HI, Simonovic SP (2010) Integrated reservoir management system for adaptation to climate change: the Nakdong River basin in Korea. Water Resour Manag 24(13):3397–3417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng M, Liu P, Guo S, Gui Z, Zhang X et al (2017) Identifying changing patterns of reservoir operating rules under various inflow alteration scenarios. Adv Water Resour 104:23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler M, Vellasco MMBR, Tanscheit R (2019) PSO+: a new particle swarm optimization algorithm for constrained problems. Appl Soft Comput J, in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoyiannis D, Economou A (2003) Evaluation of the parameterization-simulation-optimization approach for the control of reservoir systems. Water Resour Res 39(6):1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krol MS, De Vries MJ, Van Oel PR, De Araújo JC (2011) Sustainability of small reservoirs and large scale water availability under current conditions and climate change. Water Resour Manag 25(12):3017–3026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labadie JW (2004) Optimal operation of multi reservoir systems: state-of-the-art review. J Water Resour Plan Manag 130(2):93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XZ, Chen ZJ, Fan XC, Cheng ZJ (2018) Hydropower development situation and prospects in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 82:232–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu LL, Du JJ (2017) Documented changes in annual runoff and attribution since the 1950s within selected rivers in China. Adv Clim Chang Res 8:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Li L, Chen G, Rheinheimer D (2014) Parameter uncertainty analysis of reservoir operating rules based on implicit stochastic optimization. J Hydrol 514:102–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Huang S, Huang Q, Xie Y, Leng G et al (2017) Identification of the non-stationarity of extreme precipitation events and correlations with large-scale ocean-atmospheric circulation patterns: a case study in the Wei River basin, China. J Hydrol 548:184–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng XJ, Chang JX, Wang XB, Wang YM (2019) Multi-objective hydropower station operation using an improved cuckoo search algorithm. Energy 168:425–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ming B, Chang JX, Huang Q, Wang YM, Huang SZ (2015) Optimal operation of multi-reservoir system based on cuckoo search algorithm. Water Resour Manag 29:5671–5687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ming B, Liu P, Guo S, Zhang X, Feng M et al (2017) Optimizing utility-scale photovoltaic power generation for integration into a hydropower reservoir by incorporating long- and short-term operational decisions. Appl Energy 204:432–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu WJ, Feng ZK, Feng BF, Min YW, Cheng CT et al (2019) Comparison of multiple linear regression, artificial neural network, extreme learning machine, and support vector machine in deriving operation rule of hydropower reservoir. Water 11:88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perolat J, Couso I, Loquin K, Strauss O (2015) Generalizing the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for interval data. Int J Approx Reason 56:108–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rani D, Moreira MM (2010) Simulation-optimization modeling: a survey and potential application in reservoir systems operation. Water Resour Manag 24:1107–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy MJ, Kumar DN (2006) Optimal reservoir operation using multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. Water Resour Manag 20(6):861–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryberg KR, Hodgkins GA, Dudley RW (2019) Change points in annual peak streamflows: method comparisons and historical change points in the United States. J Hydrol, in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankarasubramanian A, Lall U, Espinueva S (2008) Role of retrospective forecasts of GCMs forced with persisted SST anomalies in operational streamflow forecasts development. J Hydrometeorol 9(2):212–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Sobey A (2019) A comparative review between genetic algorithm use in composite optimization and the state-of-the-art in evolutionary computation. Compos Struct, in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Huang W, Ma G, Ma G, Wang Y (2016) Determining the optimal year-end water level of a multi-year regulating storage reservoir: a case study. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 16(2):284–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong T (2015) Performance evaluation of classification algorithms by k-fold and leave-one-out cross validation. Pattern Recogn 48:2839–2846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie MF, Zhou JZ, Li CL, Zhu S (2015) Long-term generation scheduling of Xiluodu and Xiangjiaba cascade hydro plants considering monthly streamflow forecasting error. Energy Convers Manag 105:368–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong Z, Cui Y, Liu Z, Zhao Y, Hu M, Hu J (2020) Evaluating explorative prediction power of machine learning algorithms for materials discovery using k-fold forward cross-validation. Comput Mater Sci 171:109203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Liu P, Cheng L, Wang H, Ming B et al (2018) Deriving operating rules for a large-scale hydro-photovoltaic power system using implicit stochastic optimization. J Clean Prod 195:562–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Zhang S, Geng S, Jiang Y, Hui L, Zhang D (2015) Application of decision trees to the determination of the year-end level of a carryover storage reservoir based on the iterative dichotomizer 3. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 64:375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Yu X, Qin H (2016) Optimal operation of multi-reservoir hydropower systems using enhanced comprehensive learning particle swarm optimization. J Hydro Environ Res 10:50–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Lin J, Peng Q, Wang D, Yang T et al (2018) Modeling and simulating of reservoir operation using the artificial neural network, support vector regression, deep learning algorithm. J Hydrol 565:720–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao T, Zhao J (2014) Joint and respective effects of long- and short-term forecast uncertainties on reservoir operations. J Hydrol 517:83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology (2018KFKT-5), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018 M642338), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41601488) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK2016046).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yangyang Xie.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, S., Xie, Y., Fang, H. et al. Impacts of Inflow Variations on the Long Term Operation of a Multi-Hydropower-Reservoir System and a Strategy for Determining the Adaptable Operation Rule. Water Resour Manage 34, 1649–1671 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02515-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02515-6

Keywords

Navigation