Volume 24, Issue 2 p. 356-368
RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

Incorporating the impacts of climate change into infrastructure life cycle assessments: A case study of pavement service life performance

Geoffrey Guest

Corresponding Author

Geoffrey Guest

National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada

Correspondence

Geoffrey Guest, NRC Construction, National Research Council of Canada (NRC), Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada.

Email: Geoffrey.Guest@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca

Search for more papers by this author
Jieying Zhang

Jieying Zhang

National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Omran Maadani

Omran Maadani

National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Hamidreza Shirkhani

Hamidreza Shirkhani

National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 April 2019
Citations: 22

Funding information:

This project was funded by Infrastructure Canada under the Climate Resilient Buildings and Core Public Infrastructure Project managed by the National Research Council of Canada.

Editor Managing Review: Mikhail Chester

Abstract

Climate change is expected to impact both the operational and structural performance of infrastructures such as roads, bridges, and buildings. However, most past life cycle assessment (LCA) studies do not consider how the operational/structural performance of infrastructure will be affected by a changing climate. The goal of this research was to develop a framework for integrating climate change impacts into LCA of infrastructure systems. To illustrate this framework, a flexible pavement case study was considered where life-cycle environmental impacts were compared across a climate change scenario and several time horizons. The Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) was utilized to capture the structural performance of each pavement performance scenario and performance distresses were used as inputs into a pavement LCA model that considered construction and maintenance/rehabilitation materials and activities, change in relative surface albedo, and impacts due to traffic. The results from the case study suggest that climate change will likely call for adaptive design requirements in the latter half of this century but in the near-to-mid term, the international roughness index (IRI) and total rutting degradation profile was very close to the historical climate run. While the inclusion of mechanistic performance models with climate change data as input introduces new uncertainties to infrastructure-based LCA, sensitivity analyses runs were performed to better understand a comprehensive range of result outcomes. Through further infrastructure cases the framework could be streamlined to better suit specific infrastructures where only the infrastructure components with the greatest sensitivity to climate change are explicitly modeled using mechanistic-empirical modeling routines.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.