Correction to: J Fusion Energ (2016) 35:123–133 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-015-0034-1
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mathematical error in page 2 and in Ref. [39].
The sentence, “It was named C/2013 A1 (at 56 km/s, 0.7 km in diameter, weighing 3 × 108 metric Tons, it had 4 billion megatons of kinetic energy).” should read as “It was named C/2013 A1 (at 56 km/s, 0.7 km in diameter, weighing 3 × 108 metric Tons, it had 140,000 megatons of kinetic energy).”
Reference
REN21—Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century Renewables 2012—Global Status Report (2012), https://selectra.co.uk/sites/selectra.co.uk/files/pdf/GSR2012.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wurden, G.A., Weber, T.E., Turchi, P.J. et al. Correction to: A New Vision for Fusion Energy Research: Fusion Rocket Engines for Planetary Defense. J Fusion Energ 38, 557 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-019-00224-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-019-00224-6